AA_Vis_1. Using the software “MultiSpec,” students follow protocols to prepare a “clustered” image of their GLOBE Study Site.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Step 1: Create a folder with your name on your computers desktop to save downloaded materials in. Step 2: Download Multispec software
Advertisements

Mapping Burn Severity. Burned Area Reflectance Classification (BARC)
GLOBE Land Cover Measurements Manual Mapping Land Cover Sample Sites Accuracy Assessment MultiSpec Computer assisted land cover mapping Accuracy Assessment.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Sabie Environmental Consulting TITLE: Remote sensed land cover classifcation REQUIRED BY: Biological Science DepartmentPRODUCT # 34.
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
AA_Vis_1. Students examine both the “true color” And “false-color Infrared” images provided by GLOBE AA_Vis_2.
Urbanization and Land Cover Change in Dakota County, Minnesota Kylee Berger and Julia Vang FR 3262 Remote Sensing Section 001/002.
Accuracy Assessment Error Matrix Program Kamini Yadav and Russ Congalton.
VALIDATION OF REMOTE SENSING CLASSIFICATIONS: a case of Balans classification Markus Törmä.
Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors Uncertainty January 23, 2006.
John Lowry RS/GIS Laboratory College of Natural Resources Utah State University Resource Management Tools & Geospatial Conference, Phoenix, AZ April 18-22,
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 18 February 2010 Reading: Ch – 7.19 Last lecture: Spectral Mixture Analysis.
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 19 February Reading: “Estimating Sub-pixel Surface Roughness Using Remotely Sensed Stereoscopic Data” pdf preprint.
February 15, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors
Global Land Cover: Approaches to Validation Alan Strahler GLC2000 Meeting JRC Ispra 3/02.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Chapter 9 Accuracy assessment in remotely sensed categorical information 遥感类别信息精度评估 Jingxiong ZHANG 张景雄 Chapter 9 Accuracy assessment in remotely sensed.
Methods of Validating Maps of Deforestation and Selective Logging Carlos Souza Jr. Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia—Imazon.
Ten State Mid-Atlantic Cropland Data Layer Project Rick Mueller Program Manager USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service Remote Sensing Across the.
Mapping of mountain pine beetle red-attack forest damage: discrepancies by data sources at the forest stand scale Huapeng Chen and Adrian Walton.
Chenghai Yang 1 John Goolsby 1 James Everitt 1 Qian Du 2 1 USDA-ARS, Weslaco, Texas 2 Mississippi State University Applying Spectral Unmixing and Support.
The Land Around Us An Introduction to Maps By: Mrs. Miles.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
1 Evaluating Model Performance Lantz Ch 10 Wk 5, Part 2 Right – Graphing is often used to evaluate results from different variations of an algorithm. Depending.
Classification & Vegetation Indices
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
Forest Cover at Pisgah State Park. Size Class 1 Seedlings Under 1 inch DBH.
Change Detection in the Metro Area Michelle Cummings Laura Cossette.
Accuracy Assessment Having produced a map with classification is only 50% of the work, we need to quantify how good the map is. This step is called the.
Height Growth [m/3yr] An example: Stand biomass estimation by LiDAR.
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Future Discussion Introduction MethodologyResultsAbstract There are three types of data used in the project. They are IKONOS, ASTER, and Landsat TM, representing.
Accuracy of Land Cover Products Why is it important and what does it all mean Note: The figures and tables in this presentation were derived from work.
Honeysuckle in the Taconics
Environmental Modeling Advanced Weighting of GIS Layers.
Chuvieco and Huete (2009): Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing, Taylor and Francis Emilio Chuvieco and Alfredo Huete Fundamentals of Satellite Remote.
Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Comparing Three Great Lakes Research Projects By Mary Bresee.
Background: The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) together with the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) and the.
Data Models, Pixels, and Satellite Bands. Understand the differences between raster and vector data. What are digital numbers (DNs) and what do they.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
Environmental Modeling Validating GIS Models. 1. A Habitat Model Issues: ► Mapping Florida Scrub Jay habitat in the Kennedy Space Center in the Kennedy.
Housekeeping –5 sets of aerial photo stereo pairs on reserve at SLC under FOR 420/520 –June 1993 photography.
CHANGE DETECTION ANALYSIS USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES Change in Urban area from 1992 to 2001 in COIMBATORE, INDIA. FNRM 5262 FINAL PROJECT PRESENTATION.
Landsat Satellite Data. 1 LSOS (1-ha) 9 Intensive Study Areas (1km x 1km) 3 Meso-cell Study Areas (25km x 25km) 1 Small Regional Study Area (1.5 o x 2.5.
Accuracy Assessment Accuracy Assessment Error Matrix Sampling Method
Why Study Land Cover?. Our GPS readings are accurate to about ± 16 meters. Satellite ground tracks do not exactly cover any one 30 m x 30 m site If.
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps THEMATIC ACCURACY.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
National Forest Inventory for Great Britain
Housekeeping 5 sets of aerial photo stereo pairs on reserve at SLC under FOR 420/520 June 1993 photography.
REMOTE SENSING ANALYSIS OF URBAN SPRAWL IN BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA:
Assessment of data quality
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Planning a Remote Sensing Project
Land Cover Investigation
Overall Classification Accuracy = 87.86%
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
GLOBE is a hands-on environmental science and education program involving students in primary and secondary schools throughout the world.
Calculating land use change in west linn from
Christina Konnaris (Jake Brenner)
Presentation transcript:

AA_Vis_1

Using the software “MultiSpec,” students follow protocols to prepare a “clustered” image of their GLOBE Study Site

Students examine the “true color” And “false-color Infrared” images provided by GLOBE to identify land cover types. AA_Vis_2

Students use the “MUC System” to identify land cover types in their classified image.

Using either a local map,

Or their Landsat image,

Students gather data from 90 x 90 m Qualitative Land Cover Samples to check the accuracy of their map

. Site 1 MUC 0222 Site 2 MUC 4522 Site 3 MUC 93 Site 4 MUC 4522 Site 5 MUC 52 Site 6 MUC 72 Site 7 MUC 4522 Site 8 MUC 92 At each of these sites, the MUC value is determined, a GPS reading is taken at the center, and photographs are taken in each cardinal direction. These are Validation Data

The Accuracy Assessment Data Work Sheet is filled out for all sites. Landing Woods √ Rachel Carson_ √ Burnham Plaza √ Rachel Carson_ √ Dunes Development √ Wells Beach √ Rachel Carson_ √ Wells Corner √

Total The “Difference/Error Matrix” is constructed Validation Data (What we actually found) Map Data (What we expected to find) Total

Total Map and Validation data are entered on the Matrix Validation Data (What we actually found) Map Data (What we expected to find) Total | ||| || | |

Total Totals are calculated for rows and columns Validation Data (What we actually found) Map Data (What we expected to find) Total | ||| || | |

Overall Accuracy is calculated Overall Accuracy = x 100 Overall Accuracy = x 100 = 63% Sum of Major Diagonal Tallies Total Number of Samples 5 8 Map Data

More Qualitative sites are visited, and the Matrix is developed for all classes on the map Total Total Map Data Validation Data

Overall Accuracy is Calculated Overall Accuracy = x 100 = 72% Map Data Validation Data

Producer Accuracy is Calculated Producer Accuracy tells us how well we did in identifying Land cover types in our map. Producer Accuracy = x 100 = = 62% # Correctly Identified Column Total 8 13

Validation Data User Accuracy is Calculated User Accuracy = x 100 = = 57% # Correctly Identified Row Total 8 14 User Accuracy tells us how accurate someone else would be using our data in the field

REMOTELY SENSED FOREST VEGETATION MAPS: RASTER MAPS CREATED FROM LANDSAT TM IMAGERY July 1996 Landsat TM Image Pawtuckaway Study Area, NH, USA Forest Cover Type Map from Classification of July 1996 Landsat TM Image Pawtuckaway Study Area, NH, USA Legend Class Names White Pine White Pine-Hemlock Other Conifer Hemlock Oak Red Maple Mixed Forest Nonforest Beech Other Scale Kilometers AA_Vis_13

ERROR MATRICES AND ESTIMATES OF ACCURACY AA_Vis_15