Virtual Reality Surgical Training at the University of Washington Presented By: Timothy Kowalewski Robert Sweet MD, Urology Suzanne Weghorst, Human Interface.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing the reliability and validity of a Virtual Reality Upper Gastrointestinal simulator using a novel video-endoscopic assessment technique. Moorthy.
Advertisements

No. 091 Bipolar Diathermy for Transurethral Resection of Prostate: 6 year Australian Single Regional Centre Experience Devang Desai (Urology Registrar),
Split Questionnaire Designs for Consumer Expenditure Survey Trivellore Raghunathan (Raghu) University of Michigan BLS Workshop December 8-9, 2010.
Whole Slide Digital Images in Residency Education: Sliced Bread or Iced Dread? Lewis A. Hassell, MD University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Pathology.
How Accurate is the ACGME Resident Survey? Comparison Between ACGME and In-House GME Survey Bridget N. Fahy 1, S. Rob Todd 1, Judy L. Paukert 2, Melanie.
5/5/14 Evaluation of Tube Thoracostomy Teaching Models: An Argument for Developing Low-Fidelity Simulators Azmath Mohammed, MD; Christina Jenkins, MD;
Challenges in Surgical Simulators Muhammad Muddassir Malik Muhammad Adil Usman SEECS, NUST, Islamabad School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science,
Advanced Initiatives in Medical Simulation Washington, DC May 10, 2004 Challenges Facing Simulation H ow a National Agenda Would Solve the Problem Richard.
Human interface technology lab Medical Applications of VR Suzanne Weghorst Human Interface Technology Lab University of Washington.
Introduction Visual feedback mounted on surgical tool K. Carter, T. Vaughan, G. Gauvin, P. Pezeshki, A. Lasso, T. Ungi, E. Morin, J. Rudan, C. J. Engel,
Mechatronics Lab Workshop i Visualisering Presentation Haptic and Visual Simulation of a Material Cutting Process Using Patient Specific High Resolution.
Virtual Reality Simulators for Minimal Invasive Surgery Training
Design Activities in Usability Engineering laura leventhal and julie barnes.
ATACC 17August, 2003 ATACCC St. Petersburg, FL August 17, 2003 Richard M. Satava, MD FACS Professor of Surgery University of Washington School of Medicine.
SienceSpace Virtual Realities for Learning Complex and Abstract Scientific Concepts.
The Xitact Platform for Laparoscopic Surgery Training Ivan Večerina, M.D. – Xitact S.A. MMVR11, 2003 LS 500 Trainer Platform.
Minimally Invasive Surgery Task Decomposition - Etymology of Endoscopic Suturing Jacob Rosen* Ph.D., Lily Chang** MD, Jeff Brown ***, Andy Isch** MD Blake.
Visual Spatial Ability – Are Surgeons Born or Made? Zackary Boom-Saad, Pamela Andreatta, EdD, Miranda L. Hillard, Anthony G. Gallagher, PhD †, Scott Langenecker,
Simulation for Training January 25 th, 2003 MMVR Simbionix Corp Cedar Ave. Cleveland OH
Validation of the UW Virtual Reality TURP Simulator Version 1.0 Presented By: Timothy Kowalewski Robert Sweet, MD Peter Oppenheimer Suzanne Weghorst Jeff.
Robotic surgery - pushing the frontiers in minimally invasive surgery
Perception between Regular and Sped teachers in Handling Children with Intellectual Disability: Basis for a Specialized Training Program for Teachers by.
Improved Patient Safety By Comprehensive Simulation-Based Training in Cardiac Surgery AHRQ 2012 Annual Conference September 10, 2012 Richard H. Feins,
Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Port Site Simulator University of Washington Department of Surgery & Human Interface Technology Lab.
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Unclassified – Unlimited Distribution Considerations for adaptive tutoring within serious games:
Blood effects for Flinders Sinus Surgery Simulator
Assessment of Communication Skills in Medical Education
The Otorhinolaryngology Hand-Off: Pursuing Excellence in Patient Care and Safety Mark A. Zacharek, MD, FACS, FAAOA Associate Professor Associate Residency.
SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY Lect. Sapna Gambhir Neha MNW-888-2k11 CN.
Evaluating Surgical Skills And Operating Room Performance: Education/Remediation? Certification/Credentialling? John J. Ferrara MD Kanav Kahol PhD Phoenix.
CAP -State Pathology Society Leadership Conference June 29, 2007.
Matthew Roberts, Vanessa Bacal, Mohammed Mahdi, Ethan D. Grober Mount Sinai & Women’s College Hospital, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University.
Sandeep Bagla, MD Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology Inova Alexandria Hospital.
1 Haptic Systems Mohsen Mahvash Lecture 1 9/1/06.
Simulation and Medical Performance Peter G. Schulam, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Urology Eric Savitsky, M.D. Associate Professor Department.
Module 2: Quality and Quality Measures The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes.
Advanced Distributed Learning & Medical Skills Proficiency Carla Pugh, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Surgery and Associate Director of the Center for.
© University of Strathclyde Martin Fitchie University of Strathclyde Research Presentation Day 2004 Integrating Tolerance Analysis and.
Creating an Online Tutorial on TUSK Workshop 6 th Annual Health Sciences Mini-Symposium for Teaching and Learning Innovative Teaching with Technology at.
Chapter 8 Validity and Reliability. Validity How well can you defend the measure? –Face V –Content V –Criterion-related V –Construct V.
In order to improve the Family Medicine obstetrics (OB) rotation orientation and to encourage resident- resident teaching, we developed an orientation.
Randomized double-blinded trial investigating the impact of a curriculum focused on error recognition on laparoscopic suturing training J Bingener, T Boyd,
Feasibility and Value of a Procedural Workshop for Surgery Residents Based on Phase-II of the APDS/ ACS National Skills Curriculum Dimitrios Stefanidis.
Implementation of Full Patient Simulation Training in Surgical Residency Gladys L. Fernandez, MD Baystate Medical Center Tufts University School of Medicine.
Does the Rate of Achieving Competency on simulated Laparoscopy Training Programs Predict Actual Skill in Performing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? Warren.
Simulators for Objective Differentiation of Force-Based Laparoscopic Skills: Towards a Salient Haptic Skills Trainer Dane E. Smith, Joseph Singapogu, Timothy.
Measurement and Scaling
Proficiency-Based Training for Phacoemulsification Princeton Lee Research Fellow RCSI & ICO Alcon Education Night 27/02/2009.
R. Sweet 1,2, T. Kowalewski 2, P. Oppenheimer 2, J. Berkley 2, J. Porter 1, R. Satava 3, S. Weghorst 2 1 Department of Urology, University of Washington,
MEASUREMENT: PART 1. Overview  Background  Scales of Measurement  Reliability  Validity (next time)
Great Debate: Simulation A Resident’s Perspective Ernest (Ted) Gomez, MD, MTR PGY-3 Resident Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery.
Simulated Patients Improve Medical Student Comfort Level with Breaking Bad News and End of Life Issues Skotti Church, MD Carl J Fichtenbaum, MD, FACP University.
Neal E. Seymour, MD Baystate Medical Center Tufts University School of Medicine Baystate Simulation Center—Goldberg Surgical Skills Lab 2010 APDS Annual.
Comparing Performance on the Virtual Laparoscopic and Robotic Simulators Among Medical Students Pursuing Surgical versus Non-surgical Residencies Amanda.
LEARN. CARE. COMMUNITY. PNWU.edu Figure 1: Concept Map for IPE Fidelity 1.Determine the rubric score that represents high, medium, and low fidelity. 2.Identify.
Introduction Motivation Ultrasound-guided (USG) needle interventions, such as central venous catheterization (CVC), require simultaneous sonography and.
종양혈액내과 R4 김태영 /prof. 백선경. SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM Oncologists - evaluate and diagnosis complex problems - devise and administer individualized treatment.
Can Computers Teach Empathy? A Randomized Controlled Study Using Virtual Patients to Enhance Medical Students’ Empathic Communication Adriana Foster, MD.
PAPER SEMINAR PRESENTATION: SINUS SURGERY STUDY USING THE REMS GROUP 12 BARBARA KIM, BRIAN GU, KURT LEE MENTORS: KEVIN OLDS, DR. RUSSELL TAYLOR.
HAPTIC TECHNOLOGY ASHWINI P 1PE06CS017.
Design and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Simulation Module for Training Advanced Temporal Bone Surgery Sudanthi Wijewickrema Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology)
Medical Simulation J. Peter Kincaid, Ph.D.
Introducing virtual REALITY
International Consensus on Defining and Measuring Quality in Surgical Training Pritam Singh, Rajesh Aggarwal, Boris Zevin, Teodor Grantcharov, Ara Darzi.
Assessing learners’ needs
Training and Development
CLICK TO GO BACK TO KIOSK MENU
Department of Emergency Medicine
Figure 2 Recommended simulation training pathway
– Graphics and Visualization
Presentation transcript:

Virtual Reality Surgical Training at the University of Washington Presented By: Timothy Kowalewski Robert Sweet MD, Urology Suzanne Weghorst, Human Interface Technology Lab Prof. Blake Hannaford, Electrical Engineering

O.R. vs V.R. “It’s no longer blood and guts, it’s bits and bytes” “It’s no longer blood and guts, it’s bits and bytes” (Col. Richard Satava, MD) Prof. Of Surgery, UW; DARPA Skin Suturing Sinus Surgery TURP/Urology

What is TURP? Transuretheral Resection of the Prostate Transuretheral Resection of the Prostate Gold-standard for treating obstructive urinary symptoms Gold-standard for treating obstructive urinary symptoms Challenging to teach and learn Challenging to teach and learn

What is TURP? Transuretheral Resection of the Prostate Transuretheral Resection of the Prostate Gold-standard for treating obstructive urinary symptoms Gold-standard for treating obstructive urinary symptoms Challenging to teach and learn Challenging to teach and learn

TURP: a good model for Simulation Objective assessment Objective assessment High risk to patients High risk to patients Apparent training gap Apparent training gap Common problem Common problem National Average Number of TURPS performed by residents Source: ACGME Sweet, et al. Journal of Endourology. October, 2002.

Mainstay operation Mainstay operation Apparent demand Apparent demand Amenable to current technology Amenable to current technology 99%: Validated Simulator Useful in Training 75%: Validated Simulator Useful after Residency …YES 98%: TURP is the Gold Standard of care TURP: a good model for Simulation

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction  Virtual anatomy and visual elements  Virtual anatomy and visual elements  Real-time force / tactile feedback  Real-time force / tactile feedback  O.R. instrumentation  O.R. instrumentation  External physical model  External physical model  Auditory cues  Auditory cues

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video  Definition of task and errors  Definition of task and errors  Statement of goal:  Statement of goal: “Efficiently resect as much tissue as possible while avoiding errors “Efficiently resect as much tissue as possible while avoiding errors and minimizing blood loss, amount of irrigant used, coagulation and minimizing blood loss, amount of irrigant used, coagulation current and number of cuts…” current and number of cuts…” Special Thanks to Anthony Gallager, Ph.D

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Task Questionnaire  Demographics, gender, professional experience, education, ‘video  Demographics, gender, professional experience, education, ‘video game’ experience, TURP-related questions, etc… game’ experience, TURP-related questions, etc…  Stratification of database  Stratification of database

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task  Three trained, non-medical technicians  Three trained, non-medical technicians  Consistent, pre-determined responses  Consistent, pre-determined responses  Privacy and Anonymity  Privacy and Anonymity

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Post-Task Questionnaire Post-Task Questionnaire  Critique of simulator according to its elements  Critique of simulator according to its elements  Open feedback  Open feedback

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Post-Task Questionnaire Post-Task Questionnaire AUA Annual Conference AUA Annual Conference  72 Experts  72 Experts  19 Trainees  19 Trainees  19 Novices  19 Novices

Metrics Grams of tissue resected Grams of tissue resected Amount of irrigant used Amount of irrigant used Quantity of ambient blood Quantity of ambient blood Number and severity of bleeding vessels Number and severity of bleeding vessels Instrument position and interaction Instrument position and interaction Number of cuts at tissue Number of cuts at tissue ~ 12 Hz resolution ~ 12 Hz resolution Combinations thereof … Combinations thereof …

Results: Face Validity  Do you feel the UW TURP Simulator would be useful as a training tool?

Results: Face Validity  Would you like to see it implemented into the curriculum of residency programs?

Results: Face Validity  Do you feel it would be useful as a tool for accreditation?

Results: Content Validity Categorical Standardized Likert scale of global acceptability Acceptability threshold Slightly acceptable Moderately acceptable Totally acceptable Slightly unacceptable Moderately unacceptable Totally unacceptable

Results: Novices vs. Experts ( p < ) Result of Levene-conditioned two-tailed T-test quantifies resolving potential of selected metrics to determine differences between novices and experts.

Results: Construct Validity Performance of Errors

Construct/Concurrent Validity (Cross-sectional) Metrics correlations mimicked the operating room. Experts and trainees were more efficient at cutting than novices. (P<.01) Experts were more efficient at coagulating bleeders than trainees who were more efficient than novices. (P<.05, P<.01) Performance among experts did not exhibit “decay” Video game experience influenced performance in novices and experts only.

Conclusions Established Face and Content Validity Established Face and Content Validity Established Construct Validity (X-sectional) Established Construct Validity (X-sectional) Addressed Concurrent Validity (incomplete) Addressed Concurrent Validity (incomplete) NO assessment predictive validity or longitudinal studies NO assessment predictive validity or longitudinal studies For Version For Version

Version 2.0 Predictive and Construct Validation Study Anatomy ID Module Coagulation Module Cutting Module Advanced Resection Module