Tres Volcanus “Team V” Conceptual Design Review Community College of Aurora Adam Kim Ian Jones Dani Strohmier 06/10/10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
Advertisements

Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Space Debris Conceptual Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathan Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Launch Readiness Review Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin.
DemoSat-B: Team V Community College Of Aurora Ian Jones Adam Kim Dani Strohmier Ian Jones Adam Kim Dani Strohmier July 26, 2010.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium DemoSat-B Colorado State University Matthew Jui, Ian Patterson, Mark Spowart, Todd Wallis June Colorado Space Grant.
TEAM kkkkk Conceptual Design Review Saad Alqahtani, Charles MacCraiger, Alexa Warly, Connor Jacobson, Kyle Skjerven, Matt Busby 09/19/11 Fall 2011 Rev.
Team 7, Final Presentation December 1, Mission Overview Send up petri dishes containing bacteria Analyze the effects of temperature, pressure, and.
The Wright Stuff Conceptual Design Review Colton Hall, Brendan Lee, David Thomas, Zak Collins, Eli Nelson, Devin Bazata September 20th 2011 Fall 2011 Rev.
Team BIOHAZARD Presents: Project CRUENTO. CRUENTO: Latin – to make bloody; stain with blood.
BalloonSat “Optimism Prime” Team “Thumbs Up” Conceptual Design Review Nick Lenk, Greg Nelson, Eddie Cyrus, Jake Varey, Chase Pritchett, Brian Inglis 9/23/08.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Daniel Sayle, Patrick Byrne, Sarah Kemp, Anna McLeland, Katie Thompson 11/2/10 TEAM MUNCHIES LAUNCH READINESS REVIEW.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Team Name Critical Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Critical Design Review Cameron Comeau, Katie Brissenden, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Aram Podolski, Hannah Williams 06OCT2009.
Tres Volcanus Conceptual Design Review Community College of Aurora Adam Kim Ian Jones Dani Strohmier 06/10/10.
Panoramic Rays Conceptual Design Review Brian Gonzales, Kaia Jerde, Harrison McLean, Anirudh Sarsam, Brett Traub, Matt Capron September 20, 2007.
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Conceptual Design Review Travis Dowdy, Jocelyn Mulkey, Hunter Hoopes, Taylor Smith, Kaitlyn Zimmitti, Jess Davidoff September.
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Colton Hall, Brendan Lee, David Thomas, Zak Collins, Eli Nelson, Devin Bazata October 6, 2011 The Wright Stuff Conceptual Design Review.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Echo  Conceptual Design Review Andrew Berg, Shawn Carroll, Cody Humbargar, Jade Nelson, Jared Russell, Austin Williamson
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Conceptual Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani September 21, 2006.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
CDR Presentation. - Team T.E.N.’s objectives are to fly Ralph with all the systems functioning properly. This includes the boom arm, radiation badge,
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Conceptual Design Overview
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
SPIRIT of the Koala Project VOLT Critical Design Review Anthony Anglin, Colin Harkins, Dylan Cooper, Thomas Jefferies, Starteya Pais, Joao Mansur, Andrew.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Speed of Sound Team BalloonWorks. Table of Contents Mission Goal and Objectives Science and Technical Backgrounds Mission Requirements Payload Design.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Miscellaneous Notes: This is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here. Basically this.
Cosmic v12/1/09Cosmic Pre-PDR 1 Cosmic Ray Experiment Team Cosmic Jace Boudreaux Allen Bordelon.
Team Name Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here)
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Understanding Earth’s History – Ice Cores Why is ice key to our understanding of earth’s history?
Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin Wong 05 October 2010.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review College of Menominee Nation Conceptual Design Review College of Menominee Nation Marilyn Madosh, Larry.
Spring REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: 2500-SP03 FOR DESIGN CONCEPT OF THE Balloon Satellite (BalloonSat) PROPOSALS ARE.
Balloon Payload Launch
Mission Statement... The Space Wolverines will;
Brandi Casey Lee Wilson
RoverSat Critical Design Review UCCS Space Grant Team
S^3 Launch Readiness Review
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Conceptual Design Review
Launch Readiness Review
Team Mate Conceptual Design Review
Team Munchies Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
[Solomon Westerman] [PM]
The Atmosphere Chapter 3 Section 2 Ms. Cuthrell Ecology 1st Period.
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Tres Volcanus “Team V” Conceptual Design Review Community College of Aurora Adam Kim Ian Jones Dani Strohmier 06/10/10

Mission Overview –Tres Volcanus is interested in analyzing samples collected from the stratosphere of sulfur dioxide particles. –Our group hopes to learn more about any effects, with relation to human life, due to volcanic eruptions. We hope to learn how far reaching ash particulates from volcanoes can be and how long particles from the ash can stay in the air.

–Our plan to collect stratospheric particulates is to use air filters exposed to the air. Inspiration came from the filters used in smoke stacks to filter out sulfur dioxide to meet basic clean air standards. The theory is the downward airflow due to the balloon’s lift will bombard the filters with particulate matter. Some filters will contain a spray on adhesive to trap more particulates. We will analyze the filters under a microscope to get an approximation of particle volume, or use a reactant to measure particulate matter.

–Our group became interested in this experiment because of the Icelandic volcano eruption that lasted a week and halted the majority of air travel over Europe in April. In researching other experiments, we came across a group that also launched a balloon in Larimer, Wyoming after the Mt. Pinatubo eruption in 1991 to study aerosol layers. Though the volcano erupted half a world away, the group did find an increase in sulfur dioxide. The only issue here was that they had no way to prove that the increases were from volcanic eruptions or from normal, man-made emissions.

There is also an Italian team using a balloon with a payload to analyze dust in the upper atmosphere. Their experiment is known as the DUSTER experiment, DUSTER standing for Dust in the Upper Stratosphere Tracking Experiment and Return. The DUSTER experiment is using carbon films and other machinery to collect samples in flight. There are no results for this experiment yet as it is ongoing.

Basic Mission Requirements

Concept of Operations Our payload will be a low rectangular box (we’ve yet to test dimensions, but do not expect them to exceed 10x6x6 in). The payload will be made of foam core and we will use a black foam material for insulating. The payload will have two square tubes passing through it with two filters glued in each. The second of the two filters will have a spray on adhesive to ensure particle matter will stay on the filter after the payload lands. We were concerned about air passing through the filters if both had the adhesive.

We are going to program a basic stamp to open and close two sliding hatches on each tube, one on the top and one on the bottom. The stamp will open them simultaneously after a certain amount of time (when the balloon is expected to reach the stratosphere, based on previous flights) and close them simultaneously after a certain amount of time (before the balloon is expected to burst, based on previous flights). The integral hardware (and therefore most of the mass) will be centrally located and designed to sit around the flight string. We will have the basic stamp, a heating system, 9v batteries for power, and one or two servos to operate the opening and closing of the hatches. When we recover the payload, we will take out the tubes with the filters to analyze at a later date.

Block Diagram

Subsystems Overview –We plan to interface the servos with the basic stamp. –The basic stamp will be operated on 9V batteries. –The heating system will be operated on 9V batteries. –The batteries will be kept insulated and near the heating system. –The stamp will be kept separate from the heating system.

Our essential design driver will be the samples collected from the filters. Our experiment relies on the theory that the downward flow of air will be enough to collect a sample on a filter that can be microscopically analyzed after the flight. We came up with this design for it’s simplicity. We need minimal hardware and we will not need to store any data. The only hardware that will be active are the stamps and the servos. The stamp will remain on the whole flight, and the servos are only active to open and close the hatches.

Parts List Team V will need: A basic stamp A heating system One or two servos 9V batteries Basic air filters Foam Core board Insulating materials

Team V already has a basic stamp supplied to us through CCA. We have 8 9V batteries donated to us, though we are researching how many we will need through the course of the experiment for testing and for the flight. We are researching servos and are not sure of how many we will need. We expect one or two shall suffice based on previous experiments where a servo was used. We are also researching heating systems, and air filters to use. We know the general cost for all materials needed. We are expecting to come in well under the $600 budget.

Management

DemoSat-B 2010 Summer Schedule Kick-Off Telecon6/8/2010 PDR Slides Due6/11/2010 Design Document Rev. A/B Due6/11/2010 PDR Teleconference 6/14/2010, 1:00pm MDT CDR Slides Due6/24/2010 CDR Teleconference 6/25/2010, 1:00 pm MDT Design Document Rev. C Due6/30/2010 Test Readiness Review 7/8/2010 First Full Mission Test Results Due 7/16/2010 LRR Slides Due7/26/2010 LRR (Boulder ??)7/30/2010 Launch7/31/2010 Design Document Rev. D (Final Reports) Due8/5/2010 On-Site VisitsTBA Official Schedule

Conclusions The major issue we can currently foresee is analyzing particulate matter once our payload returns from the air. We’ve yet to speak to our chemistry affiliate to determine how we can measure sulfur dioxide particles. Right now, we are focused on design and purchasing materials. Our school is on a buying freeze until July 1 st, but this will give us time to research all options. We anticipate more problems as we go along, but the idea of air filters to collect samples hasn’t been widely tested, so the issues we could be facing aren’t widely known.