Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Muon Isolation Update Ken Johns University of Arizona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
Advertisements

First look of ME study on ttH(  bb) channel Univ. of Tokyo Y.Kataoka
Visible and Invisible Higgs at 350 GeV Mark Thomson University of Cambridge =+
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
Some D0 Meeting November 2003 Muon Isolation Studies Ken Johns University of Arizona.
Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
1 previously, when I calculated event selection efficiencies, I defined efficiencies as the following: efficiency in electron channel = (total number of.
The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan.
Status and Plans for the Measurement of the Top Quark Production Cross Section in the Leptons plus Jets Channel Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei.
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 04 December 2007.
Update on Pileup Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)
Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Muon Isolation Update Ken Johns University of Arizona.
Update from UAZ Xiaowen Lei, Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)
Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
10 TeV Updates on Efficiencies and Event Shapes Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona) Single lepton + jets channel.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final LHC Kittikul Kovitanggoon * & Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University Michael Weinberger.
1 2vtx tagged diBjets mass cross section measurement Univeristy of Notre Dame Hong Luo Mar 3 th 2005.
26th June 2007RAL1 Signal and Background Separation in ttH Resham Sarkar Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Search for the decay B c  B s  Masato Aoki September 13, B s  J/  channel 1.Pion reconstruction efficiency 2.Cut variables and optimization.
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
5/9/111 Update on TMVA J. Bouchet. 5/9/112 What changed background and signal have increased statistic to recall, signal are (Kpi) pairs taken from single.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
1 Pythia versus Alpgen for W+jets (High Mass Dibosons work) Sarah Allwood 07/12/06.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
Status Update: Search for Low Mass Strings at CMS Andy Yen.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Update on searches for ZZ signal in the 3 electron channel Azeddine Kasmi Bob Kehoe Many Thanks to: David, Pavel, Julia LO NLO.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
The Univ. of Tokyo Dept. of Physics 1 New MT method to remove SUSY contaminations CSC Note 1&2 : 27 Aug 2007 Ginga Akimoto, Y. Kataoka, S. Asai The University.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Cut flow for A/H  tau tau  lh. Overview We present an overview of the cuts used for the neutral MSSM A/H  tau tau  lh analysis for 1 fb -1 The statistical.
Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Measuring the t-tbar Cross-Section in the Dilepton Channel at CDF* J. Incandela for C. Mills Jan. 17, 2008 DOE Site Visit UC Santa Barbara * PhD Thesis.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
b-ID: p17 certification: Version 1.1 seems solid so far
Top quark search update
Stop->4 bodies signal samples with 2 leptons in final state
Where's the Higgs? EW variables sensitive to mH via radiative corrections mH114.4 GeV.
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Philippe Doublet, LAL Roman Pöschl & François Richard, LAL
Bose-Einstein correlations in 8 TeV DATA with jets
Generation of samples for VBF H0-->ZZ*-->bbll
Thesis topics converted photon and pi0 discrimination
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Muon Isolation Update Ken Johns University of Arizona

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Conclusions  p13 vs p14 (not42) u ~2x events in p14 u Halo11 efficiency improves (70% vs 55%) u Little effect on Trkpt and Rat efficiency  p14 (t42) vs p14 (not42) u 25% less events u Halo11 and Rat efficiency unchanged (70%) u Trkpt efficiency improves?? (75% vs 55%)  Background efficiency u For comparison, set background efficiency to 10%  Halo11 efficiency for signal = 55%  Trkpt efficiency for signal = 38%  Rat efficiency for signal = 92%  dR efficiency for signal = 50%

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Conclusions  Rat = Halo11 / Ptmu u Let Ptmu = 6, 10, 12, 15 GeV/c u Find Rat cut where background efficiency = 10%  6 GeV/c = 0.32  10 GeV/c = 0.30  12 GeV/c = 0.28  15 GeV/c = 0.25 u => Slowly varying with Ptcut u => But other variables change with Ptmu cut as well (statistics?)  Signal efficiency for 10% background efficiency u Use 12 GeV/c cut sample for all background variables u For comparison, set background efficiency to 10%  Halo11 efficiency for signal = 75%  Trkpt efficiency for signal = 50%  Rat efficiency for signal = 92%  dR efficiency for signal = 75%

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Z, Zj, Zjj Data  Sample u Emily Z skim u Cuts  Good vertex  2 muons with P T > 15 GeV/c  1 isolated muon  Same vertex  Muon phi (highest P T ) – metphi < 165 degrees  Corrected MET < 15 GeV  75 < dimu mass < 105 GeV/c 2  0, 1, >1 jets with E T > 20 GeV u Look at distributions of the “other” muon

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Halo 11 (p13 vs p14-not42)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Trkpt (p13 vs p14-not42)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Rat (p13 vs p14-not42)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Halo11 p14 (not42 vs t42)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Trkpt p14 (not42 vs t42)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Rat p14 (not42 vs t42)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 bb p13 Data  Sample u Dimu p13 skim u Cuts  Good vertex  2 muons with P T > 6 GeV/c  // ΔR > 0.5 between the two muons  1 muon with an associated jet  Same vertex  Muon phi (highest P T ) – metphi < 165 degrees  Corrected MET < 15 GeV  0 < dimu mass < 70 GeV/c 2  >1 jets with E T > 20 GeV u Look at distributions of the “other” muon

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Halo11 (Zjj vs bb)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Trkpt (Zjj vs bb)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Rat (Zjj vs bb)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 dr (Zjj vs bb)

Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Next Steps  With signal and background efficiencies we can proceed to the using the matrix method u tt to mumu cuts with no H T cut and MET > 20 GeV cut u Like sign and unlike sign  Develop muon isolation likelihood  Cross-check bb distributions using single muon sample