Team Oprah John Koch Amanda Olvey Matt Robertson Cole Ulen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Engineering?.
Advertisements

INPUTS OF WORKING GROUP 1. We have a very good balance between attack and defence at the moment, nothing should be changed it is important to have a.
A method for addressing any large problem. Carefully consider the problem. Define the problem. Ask yourself the following questions: What is it that I.
Teaming Up. Teams A group of people working together to accomplish a task.
Beyond Essentials of Management: Proposal for Advanced Management Program at the University of Pennsylvania January 21, 2010.
MicroMouse Proposal Presentation Team: Amaze Me. Introduction Members and roles Brandon Gibu Brandon Gibu Updating webpage Ah Ram Kim Ah Ram Kim Contacting.
Updates & News Reflections on Article Summaries & Assignment #1 Today’s focus: Group effectiveness & learning.
Technical Writing II Acknowledgement: –This lecture notes are based on many on-line documents. –I would like to thank these authors who make the documents.
Team A.C.M.E. ECE 361 Final Project. Team Members A my Sibilia C hris Waters M att Fike E ric Benz.
The Yellow Dart Project Summary Robotic Triathlon Heiko Maiwand Megan Bardolph Fred Pabon Bryan “ The Destroyer ” Shaw.
Justin Harger | Adi Kapoor | John Kolodick | Captain Morgan Rebels.
TΣAM M1NDSTӨЯMΣЯZ Aaron Doades, Bryce Brown, Corey Richmond, John Witting.
In-Class Group Work Training1 Introduction  Student-based group work or team work has become an important part of learning.
Team SMAC’s Design Experience Design Process, Successes, and Failures.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Project Summary for Chitty Chitty Bang Bang February 26, 2004.
From Legos to Legend: The Team Voltron Final Presentation.
Team Soda Evan Hanusa Doug Nelson Argha Raychowdhury Kris Renfro.
ROBOCOM SISD LEGO Robot Maze Eastlake HS
Team Blue Sweater, ECE Final Design Review “Deep Blue”
Brainstorming & Project Management
Inception/Elaboration Lecture Oo15 Gymnastics System Example.
6.191 Introduction Master of Engineering Thesis Project Program Prototyping Research Results Charles G. Sodini, Howard E. Shrobe, Arthur C.M. Chen.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Robotics Team Roles Robotics and Automation Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All Rights Reserved 1.
LEADERSHIP AND FOLLOWERSHIP. DISCUSSION CONTENTS  Leadership and Followership as a subject, and a relationship  Definitions and awareness  Basic Types.
Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition P. 1 Spring Quarter Work Day Check Robot Against Budget Work on Oral Report Work.
Junk Box Objective: Create a marble maze using the materials in a box of junk!
Marketing and Sales Production Process. Summary 3 Phases Conceptual Production Execution Roles Sponsor, Producer, Analyst, Senior Executive, Executive,
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
THE POSTMORTEM Chapter 10 Introduction to Team Software Process.
TEAMING UP. TEAM A group of people working together to accomplish a task.
Gra 6820 Strategic Choice Syllabus Fall Objective To provide a comprehensive perspective –the theory and art of strategic decision-making Perspective.
Slide 1 Project 1 Lab 8 T&N3311 PJ1 Information & Communications Technology HD in Telecommunications and Networking Content of this lesson  Final tutorial.
Marine Corps Civilian Leadership Development Leadership Development Seminar Session Six Final Reflections 1.
Your Hospital’s Name Location Process Improvement: Name of your Improvement.
ASIL, Inc. Proprietary Information1 Business Relationship Management Powered by ASIL, Inc. “Business Performance Management ”
Generic competencesDescription of the Competence Learning Competence The student  possesses the capability to evaluate and develop one’s own competences.
REFLECTIONS ON PACT AFTER YEAR TWO: STE STE Faculty Meeting Presentation Tuesday, August 24, 2010 Cathy Zozakiewicz, COE PACT Coordinator Nina Potter,
Wilmer Arellano  Getting started  Syllabus  Objectives and Evaluation  Teams and Mentors  Topics Covered  Learning Outcomes  Exams Regulations.
Robotic Locomotion XXXXXX Robot Group Name: Robot Name: Group Members:
Research on self-adaptive decision-making mechanism for competition strategies in robot soccer Frontiers of Computer Science, 2015, 9(3):485–494 Haobin.
Engineering Design Building the Team. Elements of Cohesive Teams Trust Willingness to engage in conflict Commitment Accountability Attention to results.
Brainstorming & Project Management ENGR Brainstorming  Proposing new ideas  Free flowing exchange of ideas  No judgment  No decisions  Build.
BUS 611 Week 4 Assignment Integrated Project Management To purchase this material link
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
MITiBot (Mighty-Bot not Mitty-Bot)
TSPE Leadership Conference
CPMGT 300 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CJA 375 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
CUR 505Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
MGT 598Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
BSHS 425 STUDY Lessons in Excellence--bshs425study.com.
MGT 598 STUDY Lessons in Excellence- - mgt598study.com.
CPMGT 300 STUDY Lessons in Excellence--cpmgt300study.com.
CPMGT 300 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com.
CPMGT 300 STUDY Education for Service--cpmgt300study.com.
HCS 525 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com
CPMGT 300 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com.
Chapter 19 Speaking in and as a Group
Overview Course description: Course goal Course structure
ILM Assignment Criteria
Discovering a natural tension in your own leadership style
Where We Are OVERVIEW Lesson 1: Course Overview
Introduction to Engineering Design
Brainstorming & Project Management
Overview Review of Course Details Course goal Course lessons.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Unit: Education Reform
Presentation transcript:

Team Oprah John Koch Amanda Olvey Matt Robertson Cole Ulen

Design Overview Design a Lego robot to complete tasks: –Timed Race –Free Throw Competition –Heavy Pushing Event

Roles & Responsibilities Implemented leadership rotation schedule Each member responsible to the team and the project’s success Uphold code of ethics Remain professional in competitive environment

Course Influences Kept meetings productive and focused Allowed creativity Collaborative decision making Design review –Outside perspectives –Envision needed changes Set standards for testing

Testing Results Speed –Required: <25 Seconds –Tested: 21 Seconds (Passed) Pushing –Required: 100 Cm –Tested: 100 Cm (Passed) Throwing –Required: 2 out of 3 –Tested: Average 2 out of 3 (Passed)

Competition Results Position: 4 th Place (Score of 304) Speed –21 Seconds Pushing –100 Cm Throwing –2 out of 3 Winner of the Stormy Award

Lessons Learned Useful decisions –Assigning team roles and responsibilities –Comparing alternative ideas –Creating test plans Changes –Increase testing standards –Meet more outside of class –More open to midcourse revisions –More guidance needed on final report content

Summary & Conclusions Class was different from any other class at Rose due to the team environment Difference between a group and a team We are further prepared for our futures as engineers

PDS Proposal Battle Bots Maze with Obstacles

Questions?