Colony-Wide Analysis of Mouse Auditory Brainstem Responses (II): Maturational, Gender and Aging Effects in C57Bl/6J and CBA/CaJ Mice Paul Allen 1, John.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SITE OF LESION TESTING:
Advertisements

Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements Christopher A. Shera, John J. Guinan, Jr., and Andrew J. Oxenham.
AUDITORY BRAINSTEM EVOKED RESPONSE (ABR)
Hearing relative phases for two harmonic components D. Timothy Ives 1, H. Martin Reimann 2, Ralph van Dinther 1 and Roy D. Patterson 1 1. Introduction.
Early auditory novelty processing in humans: auditory brainstem and middle-latency responses Slabu L, Grimm S, Costa-Faidella J, Escera C.
CS 551/651: Structure of Spoken Language Lecture 11: Overview of Sound Perception, Part II John-Paul Hosom Fall 2010.
Limitation of Click-Evoked ABR: Lack of Frequency-Specificity
Minimum Audible Angle Measured in Young and Old CBA Mice Using Prepulse Inhibition of Startle Paul D. Allen, Jordan Bell, Navin Dargani, Catherine A. Moore,
1 Auditory Sensitivity, Masking and Binaural Hearing.
Development of Improved Noise Metrics and Auditory Risk Assessment Procedure June 22, 2009 Won Joon Song and Jay Kim Mechanical Engineering Department.
The Precedence Effect in mice, demonstrated in the inhibitory effect of reversing the order of clicks within pairs from two speakers on the startle reflex.
Antagonists of neural nitric oxide synthase affect auditory behaviours in mice: A study of the acoustic startle reflex (ASR) and its inhibition by gaps.
Age-Related Decrements in the Integrative Action of the Auditory Nervous System* seen in the Acoustic Startle Reflex of the CBA Mouse James R. Ison, Paul.
PATTERNS OF NORMAL AND ABNORMAL AUDITORY BEHAVIOR IN POTASSIUM CHANNEL KNOCK OUT MICE. J.R. Ison* 1, P.D. Allen 1, M. Zettel 1, R.H. Joho 2 1. Brain &
NORMAL THRESHOLD AND SUPRATHRESHOLD ABR AND ASR RESPONSES TO ACOUSTIC ONSETS IN KCNA1 KNOCKOUT MICE, BUT A REDUCED RESPONSE TO OFFSETS J. R. Ison 1, P.
Structure and function
Temporal processing 2 Mechanisms responsible for developmental changes in temporal processing.
Effect in CBA Mice of varying Signal Intensity and Age on the Inhibition of the Acoustic Startle Reflex produced by a Change in Sound Location along the.
Possible Interaction between KCNA1 Genotype and Aging on Auditory Spatial Discrimination in the Mouse Paul D. Allen, Peter J. Rivoli, James R. Ison Department.
Cross-Spectral Channel Gap Detection in the Aging CBA Mouse Jason T. Moore, Paul D. Allen, James R. Ison Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University.
Exaggerated Startle Reflex to Low Frequency Tone Bursts in C57BL/6J Mice with Progressive Hearing Loss: A Longitudinal Aging Study Jim Ison, Peter Rivoli,
Magnitude and Phase Measurements
Sensitivity System sensitivity is defined as the available input signal level Si for a given (SNR)O Si is called the minimum detectable signal An expression.
Acoustics/Psychoacoustics Huber Ch. 2 Sound and Hearing.
IT-101 Section 001 This is an addition to lecture 8 Lecture #14 Introduction to Information Technology.
Dynamic Range and Dynamic Range Processors
METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LITERATURE Low frequency information via a hearing aid has been shown to increase speech intelligibility in noise.
Clinical Applications
Composition of Population Making Population Pyramids.
PHYSIOLOGY: Standard extracellular techniques were used to record 44 on and on-sustained units from the contralateral IC of 1-4 month-old CBA mice. Stimulus.
Chapter 5: Normal Hearing. Objectives (1) Define threshold and minimum auditory sensitivity The normal hearing range for humans Define minimum audible.
Hearing & Aging Or age brings wisdom and other bad news.
Need for cortical evoked potentials Assessment and determination of amplification benefit in actual hearing aid users is an issue that continues to be.
1 THE ROLE OF COVARIATES IN CLINICAL TRIALS ANALYSES Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr., PhD Boston University FDA ODAC March 13, 2006.
Auditory Brainstem Response
DECREASED FLICKER SENSITIVITY WITH A SCANNED LASER DISPLAY. J.P. Kelly 1, H.L. Pryor, E.S. Viirre, T. Furness III. 1 Children's Hospital & Medical Center;
SOUND PRESSURE, POWER AND LOUDNESS MUSICAL ACOUSTICS Science of Sound Chapter 6.
Communication and Cortex The computational neuroethology of mouse vocalizations Robert Liu Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology University.
AEPs Ahmed Khater, MD, PhD Ass. Prof. of audio-vestibular medicine
BASIC INSTRUMENTS - oscilloscopes
Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.
A direct comparison of Geodesic Sensor Net (128-channel) and conventional (30-channel) ERPs in tonal and phonetic oddball tasks Jürgen Kayser, Craig E.
Scan of piezo drive trigger delay For this timing scan, we picked an amplitude of 7.5V (a little more than required to give minimum rms vibration as identified.
SOUND PRESSURE, POWER AND LOUDNESS
HEARING- 3. LEARNING OBJECTIVES LEARNING OBJECTIVES Discuss the principles used in performing tests of hearing Discuss the principles used in performing.
김 진 욱 Chap 14. O VERVIEW OF A UDITORY E VOKED P OTENTIALS (3/3)
Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. 컴퓨터 구조 및 네트워크 연구실 Auditory Brainstem Response : Differential Diagnosis(3/3) 윤준철.
J. Mossong1, N. Majéry2, C. Mardaga3 , M. Muller4, F. Schneider1
4aPPa32. How Susceptibility To Noise Varies Across Speech Frequencies
Echolocation.
ABR measures Absolute latency Inter-peak latency Wave amplitudes
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Sharen E. McKay, Wayne Yan, Jessica Nouws, Maximilian J
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Ana Alves-Pinto, Joseph Sollini, Toby Wells, and Christian J. Sumner
Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Noise-Exposed Human Ears Tracy Mbuoben, BA, Hannah Tubbs, BS, Ariana Randall, BA, Cassie Hiebert,
Echolocation.
CHAPTER 10 Auditory Sensitivity.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Equipment for measuring OAE
Ben Scholl, Xiang Gao, Michael Wehr  Neuron 
Roman F. Loonis, Scott L. Brincat, Evan G. Antzoulatos, Earl K. Miller 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Kensaku Nomoto, Susana Q. Lima  Current Biology 
Machine Learning for Visual Scene Classification with EEG Data
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Two Directions of Plasticity in the Sensory-Deprived Adult Cortex
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Colony-Wide Analysis of Mouse Auditory Brainstem Responses (II): Maturational, Gender and Aging Effects in C57Bl/6J and CBA/CaJ Mice Paul Allen 1, John Housel 2, Jason Moore 1, William O'Neill 1,2, Peter Rivoli 1, James Ison 1 1 Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester; 2 Dept of Neurobiology & Anatomy, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry; Rochester, NY ARO Introduction CBA/CaJ: (710 recordings, 388 from Males, 322 from Females) C57Bl/6: (484 recordings, 244 from Males, 240 from Females) Auditory brainstem response (ABR) Routinely measured in conjunction with behavioral, electrophysiological or histological experiments For methods see presentation 437 Multiple ABRs were accepted for an animal only if there was a minimum of 60 days between recordings Animals undergoing drug treatment etc. are excluded Superthreshold ABR is assessed via signal to noise S/N ratio calculated from the RMS of 2kHz high-pass filtered waveforms RMS windows: Pre-response = ms, Evoked Response = ms S/N calculated for a subset of mice (using TDT System II apparatus) CBA/CaJ (N=259, 145 Males and 114 Females) C57Bl/6 (N=99, 39 Males and 60 Females) Supported by NIA Grant #AG09524 and The Schmitt Program on Integrative Brain Research Subjects and Methods CBA/CaJ C57Bl/6J Changes in ABR Waveforms with Age Changes in ABR Waveforms with Hearing-loss 22 M - 17 F41 M - 22 F9 M - 9 F27 M - 21 F11 M - 10 F35 M - 35 F Level (dB SPL) 2 mo5-7 mo8-14 mo15-22 mo23-27 mo28-34 mo 16 M - 20 F19 M -17 F1 M - 8 F3 M - 7 F0 M - 8 F Level (dB SPL) 2 mo3 mo5 mo7 mo8 mo ABR Thresholds from 1 to 30 Months of Age ABR Thresholds: 1 to 12 Months of Age ABR Ratio Plots Difference in Ratio Male - Female ABR Ratio Plots Difference in Ratio Male - Female Changes in Superthreshold ABR with Hearing-lossAging-related Changes in Superthreshold ABR ABR Ratio vs Age 90dB SPL Difference in Ratio Male - Female ABR Ratio vs Age 90dB SPL Difference in Ratio Male - Female CBA/CaJ and C57BL/6J mice provide useful models for contrasting rapid degenerative vs. slow age-related hearing loss. The descriptions of ABR hearing measures in these mice are mostly obtained in small groups (save for Li and Borg, 1991), and concerned with thresholds (save for Hunter and Willott, 1987). Our colony at the University of Rochester provides these mice to investigators focused on age-related changes in complex auditory processing. Both threshold and superthreshold ABR measures are taken on many mice at ages that meet the special needs of particular protocols. Here we describe ABR measures collected over 6 years, in a total of 570 CBA mice (267F, 303M) and 353 C57 (161F, 192M), most born in the vivarium from Jackson Lab breeding stock. The youngest mice for which records are available were 27 days of age while the oldest mice were 1046 days of age for the CBA (n = 2) and 787 days of age for the C57 (n=2). The data we present are grouped in age bins providing sufficiently large samples of males and females to minimize potential cohort and procedural differences across time. Reduction in P1 amplitudes (as seen for 12kHz, 90dB SPL) Lengthening of Inter-peak intervals (Note that wave forms are aligned on P1) Subtle changes in ABR waveform with age Change in appearance of P1a/N1 complex No sex effect on ABR waveforms No threshold loss (and possible maturational gain?) up to 14 mo of age Progressive loss, equal across frequency, beyond 14 mo of age No systematic sex differences Superthreshold S/N ratio plots show substantial decline with age in first year of life, despite negligible threshold changes Central neural aging? Artifact of changes in head size, or dielectric properties of cranium? Possible weak female advantage seen in S/N color plots up to 22 months S/N ratios for 90 dB highlight the progressive decline into old age and lack of systematic sex differences with age and frequency Left: “Classic” frequency across age Right: Age effect across frequency 1) Initial slow loss for all frequencies, then delayed abrupt loss, higher first 2) Old females are slightly more sensitive to low frequencies Reduction in P1 amplitude (shown for 12kHz, 90 dB) (Note that waveforms have been aligned on P1) ABR waveforms change with hearing-loss Inter-peak intervals remain stable (except P2, P4) Females have slightly larger ABR peaks (Head size?) Superthreshold S/N ratios show progressive high frequency hearing loss in parallel with the elevated ABR thresholds. The 90 dB S/N data show a progressive decline with age for all frequencies Possible female advantage is seen in S/N ratios above threshold, and is consistent with threshold data The initial age-related gradual hearing loss across frequencies is consistent with, e.g., Hequembourg & Liberman, (2001), but the data favoring female over male inconsistent with Willott & Bross (2004) or Henry (2002).