Time to Draw: Developing a Logic Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Highlighting Parent Involvement in Education
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Developing a Positive Identity
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Career Development Interventions in the Elementary Schools
Self Study Orientation Community Living Burlington.
5 by 5: Growing Healthy Learners An early childhood system of care designed to prepare vulnerable children for success in school and in life. Sylvia Echols.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
The Power of Assets 40 Developmental Assets. 40 Developmental Assets Represent everyday wisdom about positive experiences and characteristics for young.
Developing a Logic Model
Dennis McBride, Ph.D. The Washington Institute (253) Goal Driven Logic Models.
1 Community Assessment Chapter 13 28/4/2007 Ahmad Adeeb.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
Goal 3, Volunteer Development and Systems to Support Youth: Logic Model and Communications Plan Situation Statement During 2005, over 11,218 adult volunteers.
Baldwin County Public School System Counseling and Guidance Program.
Queen Rania Family & Child Center/ Child Safety Program/ Jordan River Foundation.
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
Society for the Advancement of Community, Health, Education and Training SACHET-Pakistan registered under social welfare agencies act
TRANSITION PROJECT LEARNING NETWORK WORKSHOP 3 AISLING PROJECT: TRANSITION PROJECT.
POPULATIONS AS THE FOCUS OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING.
Asset building: Is it worth the risk??
Activities Outcomes – Impact Short Term Medium Term Long Term Problem statement: New York City teen pregnancy rates are higher than the national average,
DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT, FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Leadership I and II February, 2011 Providing Services to Students, Families and Community through.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
MOVING UPSTREAM By BUILDING PROTECTIVE FACTORS
Ramey & Ramey (1998) Early Intervention: activities designed to enhance a young child’s development Initial evaluation of child’s abilities and needs (in.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
The Evaluation Plan.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Objectives 1. Children will be supported in an integrated way through the establishment of a Start Right Community Wrap- Around Programme in the target.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
Literature Review. –Protective Factors Self-awareness Family cohesion Perception of risk Age of first use –Intervention Programs Substance abuse Prevention.
Millie Cortes Capstone Project Master of Public Administration University of Alaska Anchorage April 16, 2011.
Frances Blue. “Today’s young people are living in an exciting time, with an increasingly diverse society, new technologies and expanding opportunities.
Healthy Families America Overview. Healthy Families America Developed in 1992 by Prevent Child Abuse America Evidence-based home visiting model 400 Affiliated.
20th IUHPE World Conference on Health Promotion, July 2010, Geneva, Switzerland Dr Heather Gifford Whakauae Research for Maori Health and Development.
Planning an improved prevention response in middle childhood Ms. Melva Ramirez UNODC Regional Office for Central America and the Caribbean.
An Evaluation of the Fathers’ Development Work Programme.
Family Advocates Home Visiting Program. Mission Strengthen families and communities so they can be safe, healthy and thriving. We do this by providing.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Chapter 11: Building Community Capacity to Take Action Operation: Military Kids Ready, Set, Go! Training.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Ready to Raise PowerPoint Resource The Work of Early Years Community Developers Please feel free to adapt these PowerPoint slides to your needs. Credit.
: The National Center at EDC
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Fostering Local and National Collaboration to Support Continuous Quality Improvement Angela Sheehan, ORC Macro Beth Dague, Project Director, Project Tapestry.
Collaboration and Coalition Building Presented by Prevention Services of ETP Inc. and DMHAS’ Prevention Unit.
Only 3 work weeks left! Welcome to Unit 7!!. Preview of Upcoming Weeks Unit 7- Our last standard work week Unit 8-2 Final essays due Unit 9- Final paper.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators To learn how to explain the Communities That Care process and the research.
Working together to build assets.  What is the Search Institute?  What are Developmental Assets?  Why are assets important?
Getting to Outcomes: How to do strategic planning with your CRP Theresa Costello National Resource Center for Child Protective Services May 25, 2007.
Positive Youth Development Origins, Research and Concepts.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Promoting Science-based Approaches to Preventing Teen Pregnancy, STDs and HIV Policy, Partnerships, and Creativity Brigid Riley, MPH American Public Health.
CHAPTER 7 DELIVERY OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM
Bruce Grey Child and Family Services
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
SUCCESSFUL MEASURING JAMES HARDIN, DIRECTOR, HEALTH IMPACT
”Supporting Parents Right from the Start”
Mental Health Liaison Nurses in Halton Schools
BOOTCAMP SOCIAL INNOVATION ACCELERATOR TO CREATE LASTING CHANGE
Presentation transcript:

Time to Draw: Developing a Logic Model Rachele C Espiritu, Ph.D. Data Counts! Using Evaluation and Information Systems to Build Systems of Care Systems of Care Symposium September 10 & 11, 2003 Washington, DC

Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD Logic Model WHAT IS IT? “A graphic representation of the sequences of plausible intentions about the purposes of a program from assumptions to activities, through outcomes and impacts.” WHY DO IT? - Neatly summarizes program (1 page) - Assures program plausibility - Avoid miscommunications between evaluator and program - Define program needs - Assists with Evaluation design Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

LOGIC MODEL TEMPLATE Mission Target Audience Priority Areas/ Objectives Strategies/ Activities . Outcomes Values & Principles Context/Problem Resource Partners Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Especially For Girls Context Strategies Goals CHALLENGES STRATEGIES Mission Statement: Especially for Girls seeks to strengthen protective factors in girls by developing problem solving skills, caring relationships, strengthening their sense of identity in order to equip them to confidently and competently move through adolescence, and aims to supplement girls existing developmental strengths by engaging them and their families in activities which promote healthy lifestyles leading to self-sufficiency. CHALLENGES STRATEGIES GOALS Lack of empowerment and personal responsibility in girls Negative and unsupportive environment Need for safe place to explore issues Lack of programs that are flexible and responsive to the gender specific needs of girls Need for programs during vulnerable times (3-6pm) Lack of age specific and developmentally appropriate programs Lack of comprehensive services Lack of neighborhood based services Need for geographically specific services Lack of family-centered and inclusive services Need for advocacy and awareness of issues of girls Working with Neighborhoods & Community Healthier relationships of girls Improve self-esteem and social skills Improve self-discipline and problem-solving skills Improve family communication and wellness Stronger family bonds Increase community responsibility of girls Increase number of self-sufficient families with healthy lifestyles Reduce teen pregnancy in targeted neighborhoods Reduce teen pregnancy in Hillsborough County Increase community awareness of needs of girls Values and Principles: Neighborhood based Geographically specific Family centered and inclusive Positive and supportive environment Safe place to explore issues Designed around empowerment and personal responsibility Flexible and responsive to needs of girls Creating awareness of issues and needs of girls Participation in committees, groups and councils Public speaking Target Specific Neighborhoods Implementing collaborative agreements Service outreach and access Service delivery based on mutually identified needs/strengths of clients and expected outcomes Implement collaborative agreements with other agencies as evidenced by reporting of goal(s), collaborative partners and number of clients benefiting Working with Families Educational experiences Parenting workshops (36 hrs. provided) Role modeling of positive parent/child interaction Supportive services Daily communication and interaction with families Individual and family counseling (72 hrs. for 12 girls & their families Crisis intervention Informal and on-going support Information and referral Group membership & decision-making activities (20 family activities) Family fun nights Celebration and recognition of accomplishments Planning and taking field trips Planning and doing community service projects Planning and doing mother/daughter activities Door prizes/food/refreshments ASSETS Working with Girls Focus on primary prevention of teenage pregnancy Existing collaborative efforts Now keep in mind that the development of a program logic model is also a developmental process. It can grow with you and your program. This may look quite complicated, so let’s break the program logic model into its main components… Educational experiences Psycho-educational groups twice weekly (648 hours) Didactic discussions Guest speakers and demonstrations Social skill building and role modeling opportunities Planned curricula (includes health/sex education) Provide family planning information to 80% of girls Supportive services Crisis intervention Individual counseling (up to 12 girls) Sexual abuse services available Role modeling and relationship building/mentoring Encourage personal growth based on strengths of girls Informal, on-going support Group membership & decision-making activities Role playing activities Planning and doing community service and volunteerism Celebrations and recognition of accomplishments OUTCOMES Decrease juvenile justice delinquency referrals for 90% of participants Improve school achievement in 50% of participants as evidenced by grade promotion or graduation Increase skills for stable functioning in 80% of participants POPULATION PARAMETERS At least 60 girls and their families Girls 10-14 Services are delivered at three sites in the East Bay and King Clusters Monitoring and Data Collection Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD Context Strategies Goals

Simplified Logic Model Mission Target population Objectives/ Theory Activities Outcomes Context Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD Mission Statement Dig it out, dust it off Provides the framework Keeps activities on target Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Target Audience/Context Characteristics of children and families Demographics Diversity History of problem Characteristics of the environment Need for services Stakeholders Resources What is the community context in terms of values, culture, and politics? What external constraints (standards, regulations, etc.) must the program demonstrate compliance with? What resources (time,money,expertise) are available for the evaluation? Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD Values/Principles Culturally Competent Family- & Child-Centered Collaborative Comprehensive Community Commitment Individualized Inclusive Strengths-Based Early Intervention Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD Objectives What do you want to happen? Examples: Improve access to quality care Create a seamless service array for children and families Promote collaboration & linkages among child-serving agencies Provide culturally competence care Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

State objectives in measureable terms You define “how many, when, for how long, what type, and how much” All subsequent decisions – evaluation design, data collection, data analyses, and reports will be based on this step The program model serves as a basis for identifying your program's implementation and participant outcome objectives. Initially, you should focus your evaluation on assessing whether implementation objectives and immediate participant outcome objectives were attained. This task will allow you to assess whether it is worthwhile to commit additional resources to evaluating attainment of intermediate and final or long-term outcome objectives. Often program managers believe that stating objectives in measurable terms means that they have to establish performance standards or some kind of arbitrary "measure" that the program must attain. This is not correct. Stating objectives in measurable terms simply means that you describe what you plan to do in your program and how you expect the participants to change in a way will allow you to measure these objectives. From this perspective, measurement can involve anything from counting the number of services (or determining the duration of services) to using a standardized test that will result in a quantifiable score. Some examples of stating objectives in measurable terms are provided below. Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD Activities How will you get it done? What strategies, services, interventions are being provided? Types of services Characteristic of service: intensity, frequency, duration, sequence Examples Implementing collaborative agreements Supportive services (parenting workshops: 1 hr/week for 10 weeks) Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD Outcomes Short term and long term outcomes What do you expect to happen as a direct result of the activities? Individual Staff Agency Community Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Measuring the Outcomes Use logic model to identify short and long term outcomes Select indicators: the specific observable, measurable characteristic or change that will represent achievement of the outcome The specific statistic (i.e., #,%) the program will calculate to summarize its level of achievement Outcome evaluation is another important feature of any comprehensive evaluation plan. It focuses on the “effectiveness” questions- the short- and long-term goals of the project. Each program is unique and will achieve a range of different outcomes. Use your program logic model to identify short and long term outcomes. You may also have different levels of outcomes, such as individual or client focused outcomes like changing a child’s attitude or behavior. There are also program level or system-level outcomes, such as improved access to case management or strengthening interagency partnerships. These outcomes should also connect to your individual client outcomes. After you determine the outcomes you are trying to achieve, your will need ways to measure changes the program is supposed to effect. Indicators are the specific… Then you will have to decide how you will use the results. Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD

Determine what “success” will look like System Program Evaluation Children and Families Rachele C. Espiritu, Ph.D. Georgetown University CCHD