GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
Advertisements

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, ANick Virmani 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Tracker Subsystem Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST LAT ProjectNovember 04, 2005 Phase 0 TRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test -Electrical Test- Phase 0 TRR Key Requirements Documents.
GLAST Large Area Telescope: Manufacturing Preparation Design Engineering Meeting Jerry Clinton 1 April 2003 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford,
GLAST LAT Project4.1.7 G. Haller V21 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Electronics, Data Acquisition & Flight Software W.B.S Face-to-Face Nov 04 Mike Huffer/Gunther.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review – December 2, 2004 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren Marsh SLAC Performance & Safety.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 15 Manufacturing & Processes 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Manufacturing.
GLAST LAT ProjectF2F, June 15, 2005 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Joseph Cullinan SLAC Performance & Safety Assurance Manager.
GLAST LAT ProjectSubsystem Managers Meeting May 12, GLAST Large Area Telescope: Lowell A. Klaisner Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Project Manager.
GLAST LAT ProjectTEM &TEM-PS Manufacturing Readiness Review – September 16, 2004 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Pat Lujan TEM.
GLAST Calorimeter SLAC LAT Meeting 17Jul 2003 Naval Research Lab Washington DC wnjohnson 1 SLAC Meeting Calorimeter Subsystem 17 July 2003 W. N. Johnson.
GLAST LAT ProjectPDU/GASU MRR, February 3, DAQ & FSWV1 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: B. Estey, G. Haller SLAC xxxx LAT Quality Engineer
GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Tracker Subsystem Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
9 March 2004 GIFTS Blackbody Subsystem Critical Design Review Project Plan Status Fred Best & Evan Richards 9 March 2004.
From Research Prototype to Production
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
THEMIS Mission CDR JacksonUCB, June 14-18, 2004 Critical Design Review THEMIS Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA DAQ Peer Critical Design Review, March 19-20, 2003 Nick Virmani 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Data Acquisition Subsystem Gamma-ray.
GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 N. Virmani Naval Research Lab Washington DC GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
GLAST LAT ProjectDelta PDR/Baseline Review July 29-August 1, 2002 Section 7.3 AntiCoincidnce Detector Technical Status 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: AntiCoincidence.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section XX 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering WBS Dick Horn.
GLAST LAT ProjectApril 27, 2006: LAT Pre-Ship Review Presentation 12 of 12 Quality Assurance 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT Pre-Ship Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 15 Manufacturing Process 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Manufacturing Process.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: Schedule Summary; Critical.
GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 N. Virmani Naval Research Lab Washington DC GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
Process Control during Wafer Design and Production.
GLAST LAT ProjectSeptember 15, 2006: Pre-Shipment Review 1 Integration and Test Presentation 11 of 12 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT Pre-Shipment Review.
Tracker SSD Ladder Preproduction Review Actions and Changes Since Last Week September 16, 2002 Alessandro Brez Robert Johnson.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review – June 30, 2005 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Joseph Cullinan SLAC Performance & Safety.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 Acuña1 MAGNETOMETER (MAG) M. H. Acuña NASA/GSFC Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Muons at NRL 28 Feb 2006 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC LAT Muon Data Taking During Environmental Test at NRL J. Eric.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 3-4 Sept EFW INST+SOC PDR97 RBSP Electric Field and Waves Instrument (EFW) Product.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, C Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS C: Electronics Module Testing.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP-EFW SMA I-CDR RBSP EFW SMA Safety and Mission Assurance Instrument -
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 100 EFW DFB Systems Assurance Trent Taylor LASP.
GLAST LAT Project4.1.7 G. Haller V2 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Electronics, Data Acquisition & Flight Software W.B.S April Status Gunther.
GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 W. N. Johnson Naval Research Lab Washington DC GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review – Nov 3, 2005 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Joseph Cullinan SLAC Performance & Safety.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, E Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS E: MCM Assembly Gamma-ray.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: Electronic Parts & Materials.
GLAST LAT Project CAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 W. N. Johnson Naval Research Lab Washington DC GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: Silicon Strip Detector.
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 LAT QA has hired a full-time on-site representative (Donald Knaepple)
LAT Design Integration and Analysis1 GLAST LAT Project24 May 2005 LAT Monthly Status Review 24 May 2005 Design Integration and Analysis LAT Monthly Status.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face, 14 April 2004 LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EGSE and Interface Verification Pat Hascall SLAC System.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 1 STEREO Product Assurance Ron Jackson
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 100 EFW DFB Systems Assurance Trent Taylor LASP.
GLAST LAT ProjectTEM/TPS MRR, September 16, DAQ & FSWV1 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: B. Estey, Production SLAC (650)
Bill Raynor Naval Research Lab
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
EFW DFB Systems Assurance
EFW DFB Systems Assurance
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
THEMIS Mission Assurance
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Integration and Test Organization Chart
Introduction and Overview
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Presentation transcript:

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical (EEE) Parts Nick Virmani Naval Research Lab, Washington DC

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 2 EEE Parts Selection Criteria Parts screening and qualification per GSFC-311-INST-001 level 2, superceded by EEE-INST-002, and LAT EEE Parts Program Control Plan LAT-MD Manufacturer’s process control and construction, policies on qualification, reliability process monitor, requalification, screening. Certification of manufacturing and assembly (Surface Mount and MCM Assembly) processes to be compatible with parts. Thermal profile of reflow equipment and process control. Parts Control Board (PCB) approval of all parts, procedures, specifications along with procurement controls and documentation Electrical testing of parts and board assemblies for extended temperature range. Derating of all parts as per PPL-21. Parts stress analysis for each board assembly prior to flight assembly. GIDEP search and review of parts from selection until launch.

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 3 EEE Parts Challenges New technology parts never used in space application such as the 3.3 volt ADC, DAC, Polyswitch Fuses, ASICs, MCMs Nanoconnectors, etc. ASICs (system on chip) with million channels. Plastic Encapsulated Microcircuits (PEMs) Wide range of parts. The risk is a key issue in the decision making process. All subsystem managers, engineers, GSFC, and parts control board (PCB) have to agree for radiation, testing, screening, and qualification issues. Tight budget.

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 4 EEE Parts Status ACD Front End Electronics Board – all parts approved except ASICs and MAX494 OpAmps ASICs testing procedure and plan to be prepared and to be approved by PCB. High Voltage Bias Supply (HVBS) Board – all parts approved except high voltage capacitor, inductors, etc. Plans are in process for approval of all parts. Resistor Tap Network Board – no issues CAL Front End Electronics Board – all parts approved except MAX145 & MAX5121. Test flows approved by GSFC PCB, LAT-SS Test set-up is in process to be reviewed and approved by PCB. ASICs – Flight design to be finalized. Test flows, LAT-SS approved by GSFC. Other specifications and procedures are in process. Photodiode Assembly – All parts approved. Qualification will start by the first week of June 2003.

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 5 EEE Parts Status DAQ General part list for the selection of parts submitted. 90% of the parts have been approved. Allocation of the parts to each board design (PDU, SIU, AEM, GASU, EPU) is in process and to be reviewed by PCB. ASICs – flight design to be finalized. Test flows LAT-SS approved by GSFC PCB. Other specifications and procedures are in process are to be reviewed and approved by PCB. RAD750 – part list approval based on other GSFC program. TKR MCM - ASIC wafer testing in process. Procedure for MCM chip-on-board assembly, testing, wire bonding, MCM mounting, integration and in- process controls to be submitted to PCB for approval. Polyfuse – GSFC approved screening & qualification specification and preliminary testing results show no concern. Waiting for flight material. Flex Cable – flex cable design under revision. Specification will be revised. No manufacturing and qualification issues. Cristek connector qualification report being requested from Vendor.

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 6 Radiation Testing Status ACD – MAX494 under testing at GSFC. ASICs will be tested when parts available no other issues. CAL – Voltage reference, MAX145, and MAX5121 will be tested at Brookhaven Lab in June Tests coordinated with GSFC Radiation Branch Code 561. ASICs will be tested when parts available. DAQ – General parts lists are under review by GSFC radiation branch code 561. ASIC radiation test plan under review by GSFC. ASICs will be tested when available. TKR – SEE testing of ASICs will be done at Legnaro (IT). In addition, two Tracker ASIC MCMs will be SEE tested at TAMU for comparison of data. All LAT ASIC designs have a common gate library and architecture. If the results at TAMU and Legnaro are comparable, the remaining ASIC type will not be tested at TAMU. CAL – Photodiode testing and crystal testing is in process.

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 7 EEE Part Derating and Part Stress Analysis Status ACD Derating and part stress analysis is in process CAL Derating and part stress analysis is complete TKR Derating and part stress analysis is complete DAQ Derating and part stress analysis will be performed after selection of parts for SIU, PDU, GASU, EPU, RAD750 and power supply. Our goal is to complete derating and part stress analysis prior to flight board fabrication

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 8 Process Flow Chart for ASICs Wafer/Die Packaging WAFERS RECEIVE FROM MOSIS USING AGILENT PROCESS INSPECTION WAFER MOUNT PROCEDURE WAFER SAW PROCEDURE WAFFLE PACK DIES AND SHIP TO ASAT RECEIVING INSPECTION AT ASAT DIE ATTACH ADHESION CONTROL MONITORS LEAD FRAME SELECTION DIE ATTACH CURE WIREBONDWIREBOND MONITOR OPTICAL INSPECTION DIE ATTACH MONITOR MOLDING Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Inspection per MIL-STD-883 LAT Released Procurement Document To be performed at GSFC

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 9 Process Flow Chart for Packaging of ASICs Molding Compound Selection Molding Molding Monitor Post Mold Cure Trim Monitor Mark Monitor Mark CurePlating Plating Monitor Strip Visual Trays / Tubes Form Monitor Final Inspection QA Buy-off Lead Scan Dry Bake Final Visual Examination InspectionPack Packing Material Ship to testing facility for testing CSAM 20 pcs. from lot Decision for acceptance

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 10 ASICs Screening Flow in Parallel to PreQual/Qual and Radiation Testing Prepare test fixtures for dynamic burn-in, prepare test programs and verify the functionality of burn-in boards for screening of parts and submit burn-in diagram for approval to PCB 100% Thermal cycle -40  C to 125  C (20 cycles) unpowered 85 parts if more than 500 total, 52 parts if less than 500 for Pre- Qualification/Qualification Select 10% minimum or 200 pieces, whichever is greater, from the total lot for screening and qualification. DPA 5 samples of each type. Receiving Inspection for ID and damage Dynamic Burn-in for 168 hours at 85  C but do not exceed junction temp of 125  C. Burn-in procedures to be approved by the PCB Perform 100% electrical, functional, and parametric measurement at three temperatures i.e., room temp. +25  C, high +85  C, and low temp. -30  C B The balance qty of ASIC parts are to be stored in N2 purged bags and containers. 4A CSAM decision to be made after review of Qual data from page 8 10% parts or min. 200 pcs. whichever is greater 4B 10 pcs. of each type for SEE RAD Testing 6C Packaged ASIC parts External Visual Inspection as per MIL-STD- 883, 100% 3 Decision by PCB, if electrical tests to be performed on balance quantity. 6A Perform electrical testing at room temp. on 10% of parts or 200 pcs. minimum, whichever is greater. 6 Serialization Balance quantity to be used for screening 6D 100% electrical, functional, and parametric measurements at room temp. +25  C 2 4C4D

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 11 ASICs Screening Flow in Parallel to PreQual/Qual and Radiation Testing Verify integrity of bare PWB as per GSFC S-312-P-003, prepare reflow profile, run test boards after assembly as per NASA-STD , prepare detailed procedures, certify selected vendor, verify functionality of sample assembled board, submit all procedures to PCB for approval, and conduct flight mount review. Software and procedure to be configuration controlled and all anomalies as recorded Assemble flight boards using proven, approved, and configuration controlled documents as defined in block 13. Mandatory inspection points during assembly to be defined by PCB 100% Visual Inspection of assembled boards as per NASA-STD for surface mount assemblies 100% electrical verification of flight board at room temp. using configuration controlled and approved test program as per procedure approved by PCB Bake parts from block 4A only if any of the bags have been opened Parts Control Board (PCB) to make decision to use the balance parts (block 4A & 4B) after reviewing test data. 11 Review TID results and if parts are acceptable, bake parts from block 9 and ship the screened parts to ACD and DAQ and store balance quantity in nitrogen purge bags to be used for rework, see block CSAM (optional) Decision will be made after review of Pre- Qual/Qual Data. See block 4A and 4C for quantity. 10 Select 10 samples of each type for total dose testing under bias. 11A

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 12 ASICs Screening Flow in Parallel to PreQual/Qual and Radiation Testing Conformal coat assembled and tested boards Perform 100% electrical testing using the configuration controlled test program Store flight boards in nitrogen purge storage Obtain approval of PCB Flight boards ready for integration Present all data to Parts Control Board (PCB) Perform 100% electrical testing using configuration controlled test program after rework at room temperature 25  C, high temp.+85  C and low temp. -30  C 23 – Reworked and Spare Boards Review results, calculate deviations in the electrical parameters from the previous tests 100% Visual Inspection as per NASA-STD Rework and replace boards, if any, using the screened parts from block 12. All rework and replacement of parts to be recorded. Number of rework and replacement parts to be decided by PCB (Rework If Required) 100% Electrical test at -30  C with continuous monitoring using configuration control test program % Dynamic burn-in (flight assembled boards) at 85  C for 168 hours with continuous monitoring using configuration controlled test program. Procedures to be approved by PCB 18

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 13 ASIC Pre-Qual/Qual Flow Radiography 100% Divide into 3 sub-lots SMT Simulation 100% CSAM 100% 100% Electrical Testing at room temp. 25C, high +85  C, & low - 30  C HAST 100 hours at 130  C 20 pcs. from lot of 85 or 15 pcs. from lot of 52 CSAM 100% Unpowered Temperature Cycling 200 cycles (-55  C to 125  C), 1 cycle / hour, 20 pcs. from lot of 85 or 15 pcs. from lot of 52 Life test at 125  C 45 pcs. from lot of 85 or 22 pcs. from lot of 52 CSAM 100% 100% Electrical functional and parametric measurement at room temp 25  C, high +85  C & low -30  C Examination of Data CSAM 100% Examination of Data Interim Electrical Measurement after 160 hrs at room temp. 25  C. Examination of Data 85 parts if lot is more than 500 pcs. or 52 parts if less than 500. Block 6B after electrical test. Report 100% Electrical functional and parametric measurement at room temp 25  C, high +85  C & low -30  C Report Q1 Q2 Q3Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20 Q21 Q22 PCB Review Q23

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 14 Summary & Risk Mitigation  LAT engineers team involvement on PCB with GSFC parts and radiation branch personnel.  Manage risk by adding process controls, manufacturing assurance, screening, and qualification.  Select standard pre-qualified parts where possible.  Store, handle, and assemble parts using well qualified procedures.  Check board assembly manufacturing process for all parts for compatibility.  Use previous mission lessons learned database  Use of well qualified personnel  All above plans are in process and risks are being managed continuously.  Parts plan is in good shape.