Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental 11-09-05 Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Advertisements

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Chapter 10: Frequency Response Techniques 1 ©2000, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Nise/Control Systems Engineering, 3/e Chapter 10 Frequency Response Techniques.
Nyquist Plot – First Order Lag
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Transforming C(s) into c(t): Negative Feedback Control with Proportional Only Controller Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond.
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Modern Control Theory (Digital Control)
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions.
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Process Control Instrumentation II
Lecture 9: Compensator Design in Frequency Domain.
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Lecture 23 Second order system step response Governing equation Mathematical expression for step response Estimating step response directly from differential.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Chapter 8 Performance of P-only, PI and PID Controllers.
Viscously Damped Free Vibration. Viscous damping force is expressed by the equation where c is a constant of proportionality. Symbolically. it is designated.
Lynbrook Robotics Team, FIRST 846 Control System Miniseries - Summary of Lecture /03/2012.
Lecture 22 Second order system natural response Review Mathematical form of solutions Qualitative interpretation Second order system step response Related.
Experimental determination of motor model parameters ETEC6419.
1 Chapter 2 We need to write differential equations representing the system or subsystem. Then write the Laplace transform of the system. Then we will.
Automatic Control System
Lynbrook Robotics Team, FIRST 846 Control System Miniseries - Lecture 2 05/22/2012.
Unit 5: Feedback and control theory An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Feedback and control theory Learning summary By the end of this.
2-1 (a),(b) (pp.50) Problem: Prove that the systems shown in Fig. (a) and Fig. (b) are similar.(that is, the format of differential equation is similar).
By Irfan Azhar Time Response. Transient Response After the engineer obtains a mathematical representation of a subsystem, the subsystem is analyzed for.
Chapter 13 1 Frequency Response Analysis Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process For a first-order transfer function with gain K and time constant,
ME 335 Boğaziçi University A Study on Motor Speed Control.
1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse (see
Chapter 14 Frequency Response Force dynamic process with A sin  t, Chapter
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
1 Lecture D32 : Damped Free Vibration Spring-Dashpot-Mass System Spring Force k > 0 Dashpot c > 0 Newton’s Second Law (Define) Natural Frequency and Period.
LCR circuit R V0 L I(t)=0 for t<0 V(t) C + trial solution
Chapter 4 Dynamic Systems: Higher Order Processes Prof. Shi-Shang Jang National Tsing-Hua University Chemical Engineering Dept. Hsin Chu, Taiwan April,
Chapter 6 Analysis of Feedback Control Systems Prof. Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan June,
Root Locus Method. Root Locus Method Root Locus Method.
Lecture 13: Second-Order Systems Time Response Lecture 12: First-order systems Lecture 13: Second-order systems Lecture 14: Non-canonical systems ME 431,
Lecture 3: Common Dynamic Systems 1. Identify common dynamic elements:  First order  Integrating (Non self-regulatory)  Second order  Dead time Predict.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
Lecture 7/8 Analysis in the time domain (II) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
CBE / MET Feb 12.
CBE 491 / Sep 12.
Lecture 23 Second order system step response
Response of Higher Order Systems
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
CBE / MET Feb 12.
Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond
Exercise 1 For the unit step response shown in the following figure, find the transfer function of the system. Also find rise time and settling time. Solution.
By: Nafees Ahamad, AP, EECE, Dept. DIT University, Dehradun
Presentation transcript:

Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson

Outline  Description of Speed System  Previous work Step Response Frequency Response Root Locus  Proportional only controller response curves  Model  Experimental  Results  Conclusions

Speed System Diagram SRC 1 ST 1 Motor / Generator SCZ 1

SSOC Input-Output Relationship Speed System M(t) Input (%) C(t) Output (RPM)

Step Response Input-Output Relationship Ke -t 0 M(t) Input (%) C(t) Output (RPM) τ – Time Constant (s) = 0.2 t 0 – Dead Time (s) = 0.1 K – Gain (RPM/%) = 17

Frequency Response Input-Output Relationship Ke -t 0 M(t) Input (%) C(t) Output (RPM) τ – Time Constant (s) t 0 – Dead Time (s) K – Gain (RPM/%)

tau - t 0 - tau -0.2 s t 0 – 0.1 s

Step and Frequency Response Experiments Conclusions  FOPDT Parameters  = 0.2 s t o = 0.1 s K = 17 RPM/%  order about 1st  f u = 3.5 Hz  K cu = 0.3%/RPM

Feedback Controller

Characteristic Equation (CE) Padés Approximation

Control Gain Locations K C-CD =0.02 %/RPM K CU =0.3 %/RPM K QD =0.19 %/RPM Over-damped Under-dampedUnstable f u = 24/2 Π = 3.82 Hz

Root Locus Conclusions  Ultimate K cu = 0.3  Quarter Decay K c = 0.19  Critically Damping K CD = 0.02  Underdamped 0.02<K c <0.3  Overdamped 0<K c <0.02 *all units are % / RPM

Determination of f u  Bode plots f u = 3.5 Hz  Characteristic Equation (CE) f u = 4 Hz  Root Locus f u = 3.8 Hz

P-only Controller Analysis Model FOPDT Parameters  = 0.2 s t o = 0.1 s K = 17 RPM/%  Values found for Ultimate (Marginal Stability) Quarter Decay Critical Damping Overdamped

Decay Ratio – 1 Oscillatory Settling Time – Never Offset - CBD Set Point Output

Decay Ratio – 0.25 Oscillatory Settling Time – 1.25 s Offset – 71 RPM Set Point Output

Decay Ratio – 0 Monotonic Settling Time – 0.5 s Offset – 219 RPM Set Point Output

Decay Ratio – 0 Monotonic Settling Time – 0.5 s Offset – 230 RPM Set Point Output

Controller Operating Curve for Model m bar = 63% r(t) = 1100 RPM delta r = 300 RPM

P-only Controller Analysis Experimental FOPDT Parameters  = 0.2 s t o = 0.1 s K = 17 RPM/%  Values found for Ultimate (Marginal Stability) Quarter Decay Critical Damping Overdamped

Set Point Output SIW

RPM Set Point Output SIW

RPM Set Point Output SIW

Set Point Output SIW

could not be determined

Model vs. Experimental  Decay Ratio  Settling  Offset

FVT = delta R*(1-K C K/(1+K C K))

Conclusions  Low K c values Model and experimental responses are analogous  Higher K c values Experimental responses never settle  Recommended K c = 0.19 (%/RPM) High offset (75 RPM)

Proportional-Integral Feedback Controller