1 CIS607, Fall 2004 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Xiaofang Zhang Week 7 (Nov. 10)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Model-based Development approach for Model Transformations Shekoufeh Kolahdouz Rahimi, Kevin Lano
Advertisements

Translation-Based Compositional Reasoning for Software Systems Fei Xie and James C. Browne Robert P. Kurshan Cadence Design Systems.
MAPPING DATA FLOW DIAGRAMS INTO STRUCTURE CHARTS
Reducing the Cost of Validating Mapping Compositions by Exploiting Semantic Relationships Eduard C. Dragut Ramon Lawrence Eduard C. Dragut Ramon Lawrence.
An Extensible System for Merging Two Models Rachel Pottinger University of Washington Supervisors: Phil Bernstein and Alon Halevy.
Wrap up  Matching  Geometry  Semantics  Multiscale modelling / incremental update / generalization  Geometric algorithms  Web Services.
Using Schema Matching to Simplify Heterogeneous Data Translation Tova Milo, Sagit Zohar Tel Aviv University.
1 CIS607, Fall 2004 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Xiangkui Yao Week 6 (Nov. 3)
1 CIS607, Fall 2004 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Julian Catchen Week 3 (Oct. 13)
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Dong Hwi Kwak Week 5 (Oct. 26)
Merging Models Based on Given Correspondences Rachel A. Pottinger Philip A. Bernstein.
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Dayi Zhou Week 4 (Oct. 19)
Paper Title Your Name CMSC 838 Presentation. CMSC 838T – Presentation Motivation u Problem paper is trying to solve  Characteristics of problem  … u.
1 Ivan Lanese Computer Science Department University of Bologna Roberto Bruni Computer Science Department University of Pisa A mobile calculus with parametric.
A Review of Ontology Mapping, Merging, and Integration Presenter: Yihong Ding.
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Paea LePendu Week 8 (Nov. 16)
PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment Natalya Fridman Noy and Mark A. Musen.
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Enrico Viglino Week 3 (Oct. 12)
1 CIS607, Fall 2004 Semantic Information Integration Attendees: Vikash Agarwal, Julian M Catchen Kevin A Huck, Kushal M Koolwal, Paea J Le Pendu Xiangkui.
Annotating Documents for the Semantic Web Using Data-Extraction Ontologies Dissertation Proposal Yihong Ding.
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Jiawei Rong Week 10 (Nov. 30)
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Shiwoong Kim Week 9 (Nov. 23)
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Zebin Chen Week 7 (Nov. 9)
PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment Natalya F. Noy and Mark A. Musen.
11/8/20051 Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web D. Dou, D. McDermott, P. Qi Computer Science, Yale University Presented by Z. Chen CIS 607 SII, Week.
Lesson 6. Refinement of the Operator Model This page describes formally how we refine Figure 2.5 into a more detailed model so that we can connect it.
CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Article Name: Clio Grows Up: From Research Prototype to Industrial Tool Name: DH(Dong Hwi) kwak Date:
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Amanda Hosler Week 6 (Nov. 2)
The information integration wizard (Iwiz) project Report on work in progress Joachim Hammer Presented by Muhammed Al-Muhammed.
1 Adapting BPEL4WS for the Semantic Web The Bottom-Up Approach to Web Service Interoperation Daniel J. Mandell and Sheila McIlraith Presented by Axel Polleres.
EECS 395/495 Algorithmic Techniques for Bioinformatics General Introduction 9/27/2012 Ming-Yang Kao 19/27/2012.
FRANCISCO J. GALAN AND AHMED RIVERAS UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE SEMANTIC WEB SERVICES IN A TRANSACTIONAL CONTEXT PROLE 2013 (MADRID)
CSE 590DB: Database Seminar Autumn 2002: Meta Data Management Phil Bernstein Microsoft Research.
C OMPUTER P ROGRAMMING 1 Introduction to Programming.
Semantic Matching Pavel Shvaiko Stanford University, October 31, 2003 Paper with Fausto Giunchiglia Research group (alphabetically ordered): Fausto Giunchiglia,
XML-to-Relational Schema Mapping Algorithm ODTDMap Speaker: Artem Chebotko* Wayne State University Joint work with Mustafa Atay,
44220: Database Design & Implementation Logical Data Modelling Ian Perry Room: C48 Tel Ext.: 7287
1 Yolanda Gil Information Sciences InstituteJanuary 10, 2010 Requirements for caBIG Infrastructure to Support Semantic Workflows Yolanda.
Algebra I & Concepts Ch. 1 Test Review. Directions 1)Get out a sheet of paper, title it “Ch. 1 Test Review”, and put your name on the paper! 2)Complete.
Fixed Parameter Complexity Algorithms and Networks.
Ragib Hasan Johns Hopkins University en Spring 2010 Lecture 6 03/22/2010 Security and Privacy in Cloud Computing.
Lecture 1: Introduction and Overview CSCI 700 – Algorithms 1.
1 Dept of Information and Communication Technology Creating Objects in Flexible Authorization Framework ¹ Dep. of Information and Communication Technology,
Verification and Validation in the Context of Domain-Specific Modelling Janne Merilinna.
P15 Lai Xiaoni (U077151L) Qiao Li (U077194E) Saw Woei Yuh (U077146X) Wang Yong (U077138Y)
Major objective of this course is: Design and analysis of modern algorithms Different variants Accuracy Efficiency Comparing efficiencies Motivation thinking.
Interoperability & Knowledge Sharing Advisor: Dr. Sudha Ram Dr. Jinsoo Park Kangsuk Kim (former MS Student) Yousub Hwang (Ph.D. Student)
West Virginia University Slide 1 Copyright © K.Goseva 2010 CS 736 Software Performance Engineering Comments on Homework #1  Please revise the solution.
Semantics In Text: Chapter 3.
Program Design. The design process How do you go about writing a program? –It’s like many other things in life Understand the problem to be solved Develop.
Presented by: Daniel Hess, Yun Zhang. Motivation Problem statement Major contributions Key concepts Validation methodology Assumptions Recommended changes.
Problems with XML & XML Schemas XML falls apart on the Scalability design goal. 1.The order in which elements appear in an XML document is significant.
Metadata By N.Gopinath AP/CSE Metadata and it’s role in the lifecycle. The collection, maintenance, and deployment of metadata Metadata and tool integration.
 Fall Chart 2  Translators and Compilers  Textbook o Programming Language Processors in Java, Authors: David A. Watts & Deryck F. Brown, 2000,
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad 1 Automatic Semantic Web Service Composition based on owl-s Research Proposal presented by : Toktam ghafarian.
Advanced Software Development Karl Lieberherr CSG 260 Fall Semester
Concepts and Realization of a Diagram Editor Generator Based on Hypergraph Transformation Author: Mark Minas Presenter: Song Gu.
CS223: Software Engineering
CMPSC 16 Problem Solving with Computers I Spring 2014 Instructor: Tevfik Bultan Lecture 4: Introduction to C: Control Flow.
FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMING AT WORK - HASKELL AND DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGES Dr. John Peterson Western State Colorado University.
Functions Algebra of Functions. Functions What are functions?
CPMGT 300 Week 3 Learning Team Planning Process Groups and Developing the Scope Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
Objective of This Course
Knowledge Inference for Optimizing Secure Multi-party Computation
Metadata The metadata contains
V-Con TS - Test Cases “The Mini Cases”
Program correctness Model-checking CTL
ONTOMERGE Ontology translations by merging ontologies Paper: Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web by Dejing Dou, Drew McDermott and Peishen Qi 2003.
Future Development Plans
Miles to Kilometers problem
Presentation transcript:

1 CIS607, Fall 2004 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Xiaofang Zhang Week 7 (Nov. 10)

2 Questions from Homework 5 What’s the difference between this approach and other approaches? – The paper is doing a nice job proving the properties of ontology mapping and matching problem. But it seems what they propose – middleware data model – is exactly what some others are doing. I.e. other approaches are also mapping data in different ontologies into an intermediate one and then go from there. – Along the same line of question one, when the authors talk about representing correspondence/relations between difference data in their data model, they said they assume having “ a SINGLE data forest (that can be viewed as the union of data forests) ”. And also they distinguish data from different sources by putting source (e.g. F1, F2) into the labels. This looks very similar with the idea of having a merged onotology with namespace distinguish sources in paper by Dou etal. What is the relationship between these two approaches? -- Xiangkui – How is the strategy of translation in this paper different then the one from Dou et al? How is it similar? -- Paea

3 Questions from Homework 5 (cont ’ d) Is there a standard (better) way to do translation? – With all these research efforts being made to translate data from disparate sources, each using their own preferred format, wouldn't it be worthwhile to spend efforts on coming up with some standards (similar to IETF protocols) and getting away with all the translation problem? – Each paper on translation/merging/alignment presents a new approach to solve the concerned problem. Is there some common underlying mechanism that these approaches use or are they just ad-hoc solutions? -- Vikash

4 Questions from Homework 5 (cont ’ d) About the algorithm. – I don’t see how labeling input and output vertices in the merged trees is considered a restriction – it seems like necessary bookkeeping to me. Is it because additional metadata is added to the forest which is irrelevant to the source and target data? -- Kevin – Can the validity of rules be checked as they are being composed, i.e. are the rulesets provably correct in what actions they will take since they are defined formally? -- Julian

5 Questions from Homework 5 (cont ’ d) Other questions about this paper: – Data sources must be in a tree-like (forest-like) format, correct? An example of data that is not in such a format would be? – Paea – This seems like a good solution for creating data warehouses and database translation. Is this method implemented in other software? Has the W3TRANS software been successful? -- Kevin - How do the execution times of W3TRANS compare to other systems? -- Julian