Www.rimkus.com Underground Infrastructure Mapping Charles W. McCrackin, M.S., P.G.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONSTRUCTION DRILLING INC.
Advertisements

SITE INVESTIGATION.
Soil Exploration T.E. Civil G.E.- I.
Basic Ground Penetrating Radar Theory
ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION EMI In Illinois Soils. Small electrical charge caused by collapse of a magnetic field is introduced into soil Small electrical.
Soil & Site Investigation
Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)
1. EnTech is a 35+ year old, Professional Engineering firm that pioneered the industry of Non-Destructive Testing in 1980 and now has a worldwide reputation.
Environmental & Engineering Geophysics “Looking through a dark glass dimly.” Insights into groundwater, runoff and the impact of humankind on the environment.
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Mechanical Wave Measurements Electromagnetic Wave Techniques
AKS Geoscience. Located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, AKS Geoscience Inc. is a progressive independent firm comprised of professional.
Raw Data Saturated Ground Less Saturated Ground Transect 3 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BURD-RUN BURIED STREAM CHANNEL IN COLLUVIAL FILL OF THE CUMBERLAND.
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) GPR technology can be used to determine depth to bedrock and or water table, locate buried ordinance at gunnery ranges,
electromagnetic method
Characterization of Glacial Materials Using Seismic Refraction and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves Glenn Larsen Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
Applied Geophysics An Introduction
Petrotech 2007 AOA Geophysics Inc Integrity Oil Services Specialists in Applied Geophysics.
UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby. UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby Very Low Frequency EM Surveys for the Purpose of Augmenting for the Purpose of Augmenting Near-Surface.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
 Soil grains come from weathering of bedrock ◦ Physical weathering – granular soils ◦ Chemical weather – creates clay  Soil is either residual or transport.
Applied Geophysics Geology 319 / 829
GG 450 Lecture 19 February 26, 2006 Ground Penetrating Radar.
GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES Presented By: Hans van de Vrugt, CEG, RGp Patrick F. Lehrmann, PG, RGp SOUTHWEST GEOPHYSICS.
Finding a Site Survey and Excavation September 9, 2014 Anth 130.
Application of Near-Surface Geophysics to Agricultural Drainage Pipe Detection.
Remote Sensing and geophysical Methods for Evaluation of Subsurface Conditions Matt Houston.
Eagle Mountain – Woodfibre Gas Pipeline Project Geotechnical and geophysical tests James Lota, FortisBC September 25, 2014.
1 Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigations for Water Resources Presented at: India Water Week- April 8-12, 2013 Presented.
Conclusions Geophysical Methods for Road Construction and Maintenance Hedi Rasul 1&2, Caroline Karlsson 1, Imran A. Jamali 1, Robert Earon 1, Bo Olofsson.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
Direct-Heat Geothermal Systems: steps to improve understanding about the source of heat Rick Allis Utah Geological Survey March Workshop.
PRINCIPLES OF GEOPHYSICS. Introduction Geophysics is an interdisciplinary physical science concerned with the nature of the earth and its environment.
Ground Penetrating Radar for Utilities mapping and Detection ์
An Easy Method of Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Soils using Pore Pressure Response of Piezocone Penetration Test Chung R Song, Ph.D., University.
The ORFEUS Project: a step change in Ground Penetrating Radar technology to locate buried utilities Guido Manacorda Engineering Manager IDS Ingegneria.
Marine Resistivity: a Tool for Characterizing Sediment Zones.
Physical Properties of Permafrost: The Impact of Ice in the Ground to Geophysical Surveys Brian Moorman Department of Geology and Geophysics and.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Ground Improvement Dr. Talat Bader
ECE 497 Capstone Design.
Midterm results Average mark 73.7% (29.5 / 40) Median mark 30 / 40.
Evaluation of the Geophysical Investigations for Rapid Mapping the Maha Sarakham Rock Salt Formation in the Northeast, Thailand.
Mineral Exploration Tel: (07) Fax: (07)
Parameterising road construction in route-based road weather models: Can GPR provide the answer? Dr Lee Chapman & David Hammond School of Geography, Earth.
GAVESHANA GEOSCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company)
GEOPHYSICAL APPLICATIONS FOR GENERAL EXPLORATION
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
GROUND PENETRATING RADAR
SITE INVESTIGATION ARUN MUCHHALA ENGINEERING COLLEGE-DHARI
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
1 Introduction to Applied Geophysics & Geophysical Exploration Prof Jeannot Trampert (coordinator) Dr Fred Beekman
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
1 Dam Geophysics- An Indispensable Tool for Dam Health Check & Dam Monitoring Presented by: Dr. Sanjay Rana, Director, PARSAN.
A SEMINAR TOPIC ON LANDMINE DETECTION USING IMPULSE GROUND PENETRATING RADAR A SEMINAR TOPIC ON LANDMINE DETECTION USING IMPULSE GROUND PENETRATING RADAR.
Andrzej Kotyrba Central Mining Institute Katowice, Poland
Ground-Penetrating Radar
SUB SURFACE INVESTIGATION
Technologies to model Ground water
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
GPR Keren Engoltz and Semion Polinov Prof. Ammatzia Peled
Mohd Nawawi and Amin E. Khalil PPSF, Universiti Sains Malaysia
Creating a Conference Poster
The VIY-2 Ground Penetrating Radar
PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER: A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
The Crossley Heath School, Halifax
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Presentation transcript:

Underground Infrastructure Mapping Charles W. McCrackin, M.S., P.G.

What’s in the Subsurface ? Underground Utilities - telecommunication lines, underground power, gas lines, water lines, sanitary sewer, storm water pipes, fiber optics, duct banks, groundwater wells, etc. Underground Storage Tanks – petroleum tanks, septic tanks, waste water tanks, catch basins, etc. Septic Systems – drain-fields, sanitary sewer systems, etc. Buried Foundations – building foundations, vertical piles, drilled shafts, sheet piles, sea walls, tie backs, etc. Fill Material - landfill, buried debris, slag pits, heterogeneous materials, infill material, organic laden soils from poor site development, clays, till, etc.

What to consider when mapping the subsurface? Target Type Target Depth Soil Conditions Water Table Above Ground Structures

What type of geophysical methods are used to map buried infrastructure ? Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Electromagnetics (EM) Electrical Resistivity (ER) Magnetics (Mag) Seismics

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Transmits and receives electromagnetic pulses (high frequency microwave energy) into the ground and detects differences in the dielectric properties (ability of materials to hold a charge) of the subsurface materials. Pros Highly effective in resistive sandy soils Very high resolution geophysical method Cons Limited depth of penetration Depth of penetration affected by conductive soils (clays, organics, leachate) Applications Underground Utilities Buried Debris Landfill Delineation Underground Storage Tanks Fill Depth/Thickness Void Detection Plume Mapping Structural Elements in Concrete (Rebar) Courtesy of USDA website

Electrical Resistivity (ER) Measures potential differences of the subsurface materials by passing electrical current into the ground and measuring the potential difference between two points. Pros Most effective in conductive clayey soils Capable of profiling deeper depth of penetration (in excess of 100 feet under certain soil conditions and line length) Has a lateral zone of influence Highly effective for hydrological studies Cons Lower resolution geophysical method Susceptible to noise and interference Applications Buried Debris Landfill Delineation Underground Storage Tanks Fill Depth/Thickness Void Detection Plume Mapping

Electromagnetics (EM) A primary EM field is created and is quickly shut-off creating a secondary field. The secondary EM field that has been created is then recorded. (Non-ferrous metal such as: brass, aluminum, and tin are not detected) Pros Capable of mapping large survey areas over a relatively short amount of time Not influenced by smaller discrete buried metal Cons Non-ferrous objects are not detected. Maximum depth of detection is approximately 15 feet May be influenced by interference from above ground metal structures Applications Landfill Delineation Utility Mapping Underground Storage Tank (UST) Locating Unexploded Ordinance Mapping Buried Infrastructure Mapping Courtesy of Geonics, LTD

Magnetics (MAG) Pros Capable of mapping large survey areas over a relatively short amount of time Not influenced by smaller discrete buried metal Cons Non-ferrous objects are not detected. Depth of detection is dependent on size of the buried ferrous object. May be influenced by interference from above ground metal structures and overhead power lines Susceptible to diurnal changes in the Earth’s magnetic field (corrections must be made) Applications Landfill Delineation Utility Mapping Underground Storage Tank (UST) Locating Buried Infrastructure Mapping Geologic Mapping and Mining Courtesy of EPA website Courtesy of ASM website Measurements are made to record the spatial variations in the earth’s total magnetic field

Seismics Seismic waves are transmitted through the subsurface to access the P (Longitudinal/Compressional) and S (Transverse/Shear) waves behavior so that the elastic (stress and strain) properties of the material can be used to determined (E-Young’s modulus, µ-Poisson’s ratio, K-bulk modulus, and G- rigidity modulus) which give us wave velocities or p-density of the subsurface materials. Applications Mapping Top of Rock Crosshole Geophysics Assessing Strength of Subsurface Materials for Building Foundations/Critical Infrastructure (e.g., Dam and Bridge Construction) Geologic and Engineering Studies Pros Numerous Seismic Methods for shallow and deep mapping Refraction and MASW surveys highly effective in the upper 100 ft. Provides information directly related to material density and easily correlated to relative “N” values Cons Can be field extensive and requires considerable data processing Depending on the Seismic method deployed may have various limitations with noise/interference to consider at each site

Complimentary Methods Conventional Utility Locator Pile Integrity Test Thermal Imaging Camera Video Inspection

Multi-Level Approach Courtesy of Geoview Why use more than one method? Each geophysical method detects various soil properties Allows for data comparison and correlation Provides more information about the subsurface for improved subsurface site characterization

2D vs 3D Subsurface Mapping 2D-Primary Geophysical Profiling Method 3D-Hot Topic for Current Geophysical Research 2D Applications Still the most widely used and most cost effective survey technique for all geophysical methods Highly effective when correlated with 1D ground truth data such as SPT and CPT data Provides cross-sectional data in between confirmation borings to confirm the general subsurface profile Can be converged with parallel or orthogonal 2D transects to provide pseudo-3D information about the subsurface 3D Applications Generally relegated to only 2 or 3 geophysical methods (i.e., Ground Penetrating Radar, Electrical Resistivity and some research in 3D MASW seismic surveying) Generally constrained to smaller survey areas which require very high resolution (i.e., Imaging of Concrete Structures-rebar mapping, void detection, utility mapping, roadway mapping and applications in archaeology)

2D vs 3D Data Transect 2 (2D Inversion) Transect 2 (3D Inversion) McCrackin, Kruse, and Van Beynen, 2012

2D vs 3D GPR Data Examples

2D vs 3D ERT Data Examples

2D vs 3D MASW Seismic Data Examples Park and Taylor, 2009

What to expect when mapping the subsurface ? Expect the Unexpected ! Buried Foundations Underground Utilities Organics Clays Till Near-surface water table Underground Storage Tanks Sheet Piles Tie Backs Buried Debris Heterogeneous Fill Material Surface Obstructions

Potential Issues to Consider Accessibility and site access (Dense vegetation or debris at the surface) Heavily reinforced concrete at the site with metal or wire mesh Highly conjested near-surface infrastructure masking deeper buried structures Conductive soils or surface material Shallow water table Electrical or Seismic noise present

Expectations and Realistic Goals Geophysics - is a non-destructive, non-invasive tool that requires ground truth data to fully understand and provide accurate, meaningful geophysical results Garbage in > Garbage out Meaningful subsurface data will be correlated with subsurface testing (e.g., SPT, Hand Auger or Test Pit data) Be cautious of over reaching geophysical results with no supporting ground truth information Geophysical surveys rarely have conclusive results by themselves Geophysical surveys are an effective tool to identify “Areas of Interest” or “Features” to further investigate and confirm Geophysical surveys narrow the investigation and help provide information about the subsurface properties and material characteristics that must be identified with exploratory destructive testing

Ground Truth, Ground Truth, Ground Truth… Physical Exploratory Testing is often destructive, can be costly, and may require multiple locations Geophysics provides a 2D and sometimes 3D mapping approach to limit the amount of destructive testing Be very selective with subsurface testing locations (testing inside and outside areas of interest can sometimes offer great insight) Understand that Physical 1D testing methods such as SPT and CPT data may not be a good representation of the entire site (i.e., such methods only provide a 2”-3” diameter sampling tube or resistance tip) Consider other options such as video line inspections of underground utilities, vacuum extraction or hand trenching in highly congested/sensitive areas. DON’T FORGET THE LOCAL ONE CALL SYSTEM!

Advanced Subsurface Mapping and Data Management GIS Mapping Geospatial Data Analysis Infrastructure and Data Management

Questions ?