Parameterised turbine performance Power Curve Working Group – Glasgow, 16 December 2014 Stuart Baylis, Matthew Colls, Przemek Marek, Alex Head.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Introduction, Agenda and Review of Actions.
Advertisements

Inflow angle and Energy Production Jørgen Højstrup Wind Solutions / Højstrup Wind Energy Power Curve Working Group, Louisville 6 October 2014.
Lecture 30 November 4, 2013 ECEN 2060 Lecture 30 Fall 2013.
Investigating the Use of a Variable-Pitch Wind Turbine to Optimize Power Output Under Varying Wind Conditions. Galen Maly Yorktown High School.
Controller design for a wind farm, considering both power and load aspects Maryam Soleimanzadeh Controller design for a wind farm, considering both power.
Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment
A Methodology for a Decision Support Tool for a Tidal Stream Device
Wind Power and Wind Turbines BJ Furman K Youssefi 13FEB2008.
Announcements Read Chapter 7 Quiz on HW 3 Today
PCWG 9 th Meeting December Glasgow PCWG 2015 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
The generics of wind turbine nacelle anemometry
Importance of advanced simulations of electrical system in wind turbines April 2010.
Next: Wind Turbine Rotors Goal ?. Question 1  Divergent thinking consists of A) Selection of unique answer B) Brainstorming many ideas.
Rotor Track and Balance
Wind Turbine Project Recap Wind Power & Blade Aerodynamics
March 2006 Development and Test of a 5 kW Wind Turbine for Modular Autonomous Supply Systems Berthold Hahn Paul Kühn Institut für Solare Energieversorgungstechnik.
Design Process Supporting LWST 1.Deeper understanding of technical terms and issues 2.Linkage to enabling research projects and 3.Impact on design optimization.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources
1 11 A review of wind energy technologies part two. Adviser : Dr. Yuan-Kang Wu Student : Po-Kai Lin Date :
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
3D Power Deviation Matrix PCWG Meeting – New Orleans, LA. September 14, 2015 Alex Head.
Dynamically Variable Blade Geometry for Wind Energy
Power Curve Working Group Update New Orleans 15 th September 2015.
The Answer is Blowing in the Wind… The Power of Wind.
Introduction people business vision and goals Product design aims features and benefits competitive comparison current status What we are looking for manufacturing.
Wind Engineering Module 4.1 Blade Element Theory
ECE 7800: Renewable Energy Systems
EWEC2007 Milano, 8 May 2007 Extrapolation of extreme loads acc. to IEC Ed.3 in comparison with the physics of real turbine response Dirk Steudel,
Wind Turbine Aerodynamics Section 1 – Basic Principles E-Learning UNESCO ENEA Casaccia - February Fabrizio Sardella.
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines EWEC2007 Milan, Italy 7-10 May 2007 B. Skaare 1, T. D. Hanson 1, F.G. Nielsen 1, R. Yttervik.
Power Management of Wind Turbines presented by: Barry Rawn MASc Candidate University of Toronto Wind Power Generation Symposium- February 20th, 2004 SF1105.
Power Curve Working Group Update Roskilde 26 th June 2015.
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
 Design of a Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine MUN VAWT DESIGN Group 11 Jonathan Clarke Luke Hancox Daniel MacKenzie Matthew Whelan.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources Fall 2012 Instructor: Xiaodong Chu : Office Tel.:
Wind Turbine Design Methods
A New Theoretical Basis for Describing Low Turbulence Wind Turbine Performance Peter Stuart PCWG Meeting – 26 June 2015.
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Systems: Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms J. Y. Grandidier, Valorem, 180 Rue du Marechal Leclerc, F B ´ Begles,
Experience of Modelling Forested Complex Terrain Peter Stuart, Ian Hunter & Nicola Atkinson 30 th October 2009.
Supervisor: Dr David Wood Co-Supervisor: Dr Curran Crawford
Aerodynamic forces on the blade, COP, Optimum blade profiles
Upflow correction method EWEA Power Curve Working Group London, 2015 December.
Evan Gaertner University of Massachusetts, Amherst IGERT Seminar Series October 1st, 2015 Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Aerodynamics.
An evaluation of power performance for a small wind turbine in turbulent wind regimes Nicholas J. Ward Ph.D. Student, Energy Engineering Advisor: Dr. Susan.
© 2009 Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Pilot’s Manual – Ground School Aerodynamics Chapter 1 Forces Acting on an Airplane.
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Noise
Turbine blade basics. Calculation of Wind Power Where P = power, measured in watts (W) or joules per second (J/s)  = density of fluid, measured in.
IEC FDIS 2016 Consensus Analysis Project
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update 13 December 2016
Upflow correction method
TERRAINS Terrain, or land relief, is the vertical and horizontal dimension of land surface. Terrain is used as a general term in physical geography, referring.
Turbulence and Heterogeneous Wind
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Wind Turbine Control System
Wind Power and Wind Turbines
With Andrew Magstadt and Dr. David Thayer
Wind Turbine
DYNAMIC STALL OCCURRENCE ON A HORIZONTAL AXIS WIND TURBINE BLADE
Betz Theory for A Blade Element
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
High Resolution Turbine-Specific Matrix
Fluid Dynamic Principles to Generate Axial Induction
CONCENTRATION AND AUGMENTATION
Identification of Fundamental Design Parameter for A Wind Turbine
The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.
Theory and its application
DESIGN, SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Micrositing for Wind Turbines
Presentation transcript:

Parameterised turbine performance Power Curve Working Group – Glasgow, 16 December 2014 Stuart Baylis, Matthew Colls, Przemek Marek, Alex Head

Site specific performance A calculated power curve is calculated in a particular set of conditions (shear, turbulence etc.). We can ask two questions: 1.In matching conditions, do measurements agree? 2.How does performance change outside these conditions? Today we will focus on answering the second question.

Aim To aggregate turbine performance data into a parameterised model: –A single model applicable globally –Spanning variations in geometry of turbines –Across all site conditions Parameters must capture physical drivers of performance variation –Rotor aerodynamics –Controller influence To be used to predict turbine performance with pre-construction mast data.

Current practice Various methods in use Theoretical or data-derived Often parameterised –Fixed adjustment –Shear –Turbulence –Wind speed –Geometry –Turbine type –Geography –Density 2D binning misses significant performance variation % 120%112%108%106%102% 99% 116%109%106%104% 102%101%100%96%97% 16% 111%105%101% 102%101%100%99% 96% 98%99%101% 100% 8% 82%88%89%92%95%98%100%101%102%101% 75%82%83%87%88%93%97%99%101%100% 0% 62%70%76%78%81%84%88%94%100%101% Wind speed/turbulence % 92%100%117%112%109%102% 89%98%110%106%110%97%96%95% 16% 94%95%103%101%102%101%99%89% 83%101%99%96%99% 91%89%84% 8% 80%95%93%95%91%90%91% 85% 90%88%86%90% 87%80%82% 0% 75%69%74% 75%73% Shear/turbulence at 6 m/s (data for illustrative purposes)

Aerodynamic performance variation Blade “lift to drag ratio”(LDR) is a good measure of aerodynamic efficiency For any blade, LDR is sensitive to: –Turbulence –Relative wind speed –Angle of attack variation To capture rotor performance, the solution is to aggregate on: –Turbulence intensity –Wind speed –Rotor Wind Speed Ratio (RWSR) This captures turbulence, shear and rotor geometry influences on rotor aerodynamic performance U top U bottom RWSR = U top /U bottom

Controller effects Distinct cubic and rated power curve phases Wind speed alone doesn’t allow comparison Normalise by zero turbulence rated wind speed (from IEC proposed standard)

Resulting parameter set Turbulence –A factor in blade Lift to Drag performance Rotor wind speed ratio –Correlates with angle of attack variation across rotor –Captures impact of diameter, hub height and shear Normalised wind speed –Wind speed affects blade Lift to Drag performance –Normalised by the zero TI rated speed to align controller modes across turbine types.

Inner and outer range Outer range (all conditions) Turbulence Intensity Rotor wind speed ratio Inner Range Defined to match calculation conditions For any normalised wind speed: Night Day Low Roughness High Roughness Relative performance

Data set 47 turbines 8 turbine types 4 Manufacturers Data from USA, Europe, Asia Applicable to a broad range of site conditions. Normalised wind speed Rotor wind speed ratio Turbulence Resulting 3D performance matrix

Rotor wind speed ratio Turbulence intensity U norm = 0.5 2%4%6%8%10%12%14%16%18%20%22%24% 1.772%73%75%79% 80%82%71% 1.671%75%78%79%81%83%82%85%78% 1.572%76%78%82%85% 84%85%86%83%95% 1.472%75%81%85% 84% 89%90%92%94%95% 1.375%76%80%84%86%85%90%92% 98% 108% 1.273%77%84%87%89%92%95%100%105% 108%114% 1.173%78%86%90%95%99%106%109%110%112%114%117% 1.073%80%87%91%101% 105%108%110%117%118%124% %85%89%91%92%91%97%101%100%107% %87%82%89%91%97% %84%82%84%87% Inner Range Night Day

Rotor wind speed ratio Turbulence intensity U norm = 0.7 2%4%6%8%10%12%14%16%18%20%22%24% 1.779%78%83%80%88% 1.679%82%85%87%90%89%90% 1.579%84%87%91% 90%91%93%92%93% 1.480%86%88%91%94%96% 95%99% 1.381%85%89%91%95%98% 97%100% 102%95% 1.281%88%90%92%96%98%100% 102%104%103%106% 1.177%87%91%94%97%99%102%103%105%107% 109% %93%96%98%100%101%104%105% 111%103% %95% 96%102% %93%92%95%97% %89%92%90%94% Inner Range Lower hubs, larger rotors or higher shear Performance varies with both rotor wind speed ratio and turbulence intensity

Rotor wind speed ratio Turbulence intensity U norm = 0.9 2%4%6%8%10%12%14%16%18%20%22%24% 1.785%88%87%92% 1.684%92%99%92%97% 1.585%93%96%95%94%102%98% 1.486%94%96%97%99%100% 101%105% 1.387%94%95%98%99%101% 102% %96%98%99%101%102% 103%102%101% 1.198%95%93%98%100% 102% 103% %101% 102% 103%105% %100% 97%92%93% %96%94%96%89% %90%86% Inner Range

Rotor wind speed ratio Turbulence intensity U norm = 1.1 2%4%6%8%10%12%14%16%18%20%22%24% 1.791%90% 1.691%102% 1.595%100%103% 1.499%100%102%100% 101% 98% %99%102% 101%99%100% %102% 101% 99%98% % 101% 100% 101% %99%100%103% %98% Inner Range Less performance variation at higher wind speeds

Outcome Data shows that Turbulence Intensity, Rotor Wind Speed Ratio and Normalised Wind Speed can be used to define a single universal turbine performance model. The results show good consistency, across turbine types, geometries and geographies – model captures physical drivers of turbine performance variations. It can be easily applied to normal pre-construction data to predict expected turbine performance levels for any given site. It allows higher confidence predictions for new diameters, hub heights and climates.

Next steps Several refinements are in progress: Expansion of the source data and conditions ranges. Further investigation of variation within bins: –Turbine type (blade geometry, pitch strategy etc) –Constrained operation –Off-axis flow –Directional veer –Non-constant shear (‘shear relaxation’ etc.) Link to Computational Fluid Dynamics modelling

Thanks to data contributors Send us your PPT data! –Operators, we’ll send you free results in exchange for your data. –Manufacturers, we’d welcome engagement. Thank you

Lift to drag ratio Blade “lift to drag ratio”(LDR) Measure of aerodynamic efficiency LDR is sensitive to: –Blade geometry, pitch and RPM –Turbulence –Relative wind speed –Angle of attack (AOA) Optimal Performance Stall AOA LDR rotation and wind components

What affects Lift-to-Drag ratio? At any instant: –RPM and pitch are constant –Local wind speed varies, causing AOA and LDR oscillation –This affects rotor performance High AOA Low AOA Wind speed Height AOA LDR