A Business Case for Peering in 2010 William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering.net 30-31 August 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 15 YEAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R I P E N e t w o r k C o o r d i n a t i o n C e n t r e. h t t p : / / w w w. r i p e. n e t. n c r i p e. n e t 1 The Internet Registry System IPv4.
Advertisements

Selecting an IXP Where to peer?. THE TOP 10 IXP SELECTION CRITERIA How do network operators choose an Internet Exchange Point? 2.
Evolution 0.9: The Evolution of the U.S. Peering Ecosystem Gigabit Peering Forum VII Herndon, VA September 9, 2003 William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief.
The IX Playbook Observations from an IX Operative.
Port of Hamburg Marketing Range of services Bengt van Beuningen
Advanced Topics of WAN Compiled from Previous ISQS 6341 Project November 2003.
The Folly of Peering Ratios? William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. From Debate…
Part II: Inter-domain Routing Policies. March 8, What is routing policy? ISP1 ISP4ISP3 Cust1Cust2 ISP2 traffic Connectivity DOES NOT imply reachability!
Peering vs Transit Economics : The Peering Simulation Game August :00-13:00 Nairobi, Kenya Sarova Panafric Hotel Nairobi
IXP & Neutral Colocation Symbiosis SAFNOG Data Centre definition In its simplest form, a data centre is a facility that houses IT equipment – Servers,
Internet Video: The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
The Next Wave of Massive Disruptions to the Peering Ecosystem Asia Pacific Peering Forum Sydney, Nov. 8, 2006 William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical.
IP Address Management The RIR System & IP policy
Peering policies and BGP configuration
The Next Wave of Massive Disruptions to the Peering Ecosystem Tokyo Peering Forum II June 22, 2006 William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison.
Mirjam Kühne 1 ETO, Oct The Internet Registry System presented by Mirjam Kühne.
The Art of Peering: The Peering Playbook William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. NaMeX Member Meeting October 7, 2005 Rome,
© XchangePoint 2001 Economic Differences Between Transit and Peering Exchanges Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer NANOG 25 10th June 2002.
Internet Policy Day 1 - Workshop Session No. 2 Market structure Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
 2003 DSL Forum, unauthorized use prohibited 1 Tom Starr President & Chairperson.
Supporting Internet Growth and Evolution: The Transition to IPv6 Bali IPv6 Summit, Bali 9 June Sanjaya Services Director, APNIC.
Internet Video: The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
Internet Exchange Points Keith Mitchell CTO, XchangePoint ICANN GAC Regional Forum Cape Town 29 th Nov 2004.
The Peering Simulation Game William B. Norton August 2010 Nairobi, Kenya Sarova Panafric Hotel Nairobi African Peering and Interconnection Forum:
Peering vs Transit Economics : The Peering Simulation Game August :00-13:00 Nairobi, Kenya Sarova Panafric Hotel Nairobi
IP Peering Adviser: KuangChiu Huang Ph.D. Student: 陳佳盈 修宇亮 鄭有志.
Peering Policies - When to Peer, When not to Peer Quilt Peering Workshop October 2006 St Louis, Missouri.
Internet Addressing and the RIR system (part 2) 12 February 2004 Phnom Penh, Cambodia Paul Wilson, APNIC.
24/02/20050 Euro-IX update APNIC 19 - IX SIG Kyoto Japan by Serge Radovcic of Euro-IX
APNIC Depletion of the IPv4 free address pool – IPv6 deployment The day after!! 8 August 2008 Queenstown, New Zealand In conjunction with APAN Cecil Goldstein,
Peering Personals William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering.net August 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 15 YEAR ANNIVERSARY PARTY.
An Overview of Peering; Benefits of Peering Andrew Ogilvie Managing Director, Xtraordinary Networks Ltd
GRID COMPUTING AND THE GROWTH OF THE INTERNET ROBERT B. COHEN, PH.D. COHEN COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
Policies for Peering and Internet Exchanges AFIX Technical Workshop Session 8.
CS551: ISP Peering Norton01 Christos Papadopoulos (
Mirjam Kühne 1 EC, Oct Policy Development in RIPE & the RIPE NCC Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.
25/07/2003BGP Table Manners 1 Interdomain Routing Politics for the Masses Dave Aaldering.
Peering Concepts and Definitions Terminology and Related Jargon.
Can ISPs be Profitable Without Violating Network Neutrality? Amogh Dhamdhere Constantine Dovrolis Georgia Tech.
RONOG2 - INTRODUCTION INTERLAN & THE OPERATORS’ COMMUNITY.
The 3 Stages of Peering. Interviews with 200 ISP Peering Coordinators revealed… 3 General Phases of Peering: 1) Identification of Potential Peer – the.
The Great (Public vs. Private) Peering Debate Peering at 10G William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. RIPE 50 – Stockholm EIX-WG.
Scotland Internet Exchange The LINX UK-wide Peering Initiative John Souter CEO, LINX Scotland (Edinburgh) Peering Event March 2013.
Why SingTel Won’t Peer William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. Asia Pacific Peering Forum Singapore, Oct. 5, 2006 Slide Set.
A Business Case for Peering in 2004 (v0.7) William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. (V0.7), XChangePoint Europe October 28,
Peering BOF III William B. Norton Co-Founder, Chief Technical Liaison Equinix Inc. NANOG 19 Washington, DC.
1 The Internet Registry System Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC EC-POP Brussels 5 July 1999.
Peering Economics for Content Providers / GPF2.0 / Dani Roisman Peering Economics for Content Providers March 29, 2007 Dani Roisman
Peering and Interconnection Economics Introduction to Internet Transit and Peering.
DE-CIX Management GmbH, GPF IX UPDATE, slide # 1 DE-CIX Internet Exchange Update 22 March 2007.
APOPS Asia Pacific OPerationS forum AP* Retreat Busan, August 2003.
Euro-IX update IX SIG APNIC17 Kuala Lumpur Feb 25 th Euro-IX update APNIC 17 - IX SIG 25 th February Kuala Lumpur Serge Radovcic Euro-IX.
Keith Mitchellhttp:// RIPE ncc IP Address Space Governance Keith Mitchell Executive Board Chairman, RIPE NCC (Chief Executive, LINX) European.
Mirjam Kühne. AfNOG Conference, 11 May Operational Co-ordination in the RIPE Region presented by: Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.
Remote Peering William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering International Chief Strategy Officer, International Internet Exchange (IIX)
A Business Case for Peering
Peering Information: Some Data Points
NANOG Panel Discussion: Are “Transit Exchanges” and “Peering Exchanges” Self-Differentiating? Toronto June, 2002.
Montenegro Internet eXchange Point (MIXP) – a success story
The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem
Internet Interconnection
Peering Information: Some Data Points
Peering 101 Introduction to Internet Peering
The Art of Peering: The Peering Playbook
William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
A Business Case for Peering in 2004 (v0.7)
Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison
IXP paradigm shift .
Presentation transcript:

A Business Case for Peering in 2010 William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering.net August 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 15 YEAR ANNIVERSARY PARTY 1st DE-CIX CUSTOMER SUMMIT This work was sponsored in part by DE-CIX and DrPeering.net 7/2/2015 4:02:49 AM

The Importance of Context

Background 1987 – building Internet Ops community 1998 – building Peering Intelligence 2008 – consulting, education

DrPeering.net Peering Resources Internet Service Providers and Peering A Business Case for Peering About the White Paper Process The Art of Peering - The Peering Playbook The Art of Peering - The IX Playbook Chief Technical Liaison Ecosystems: 95th Percentile Measurement for Internet Transit Asia Pacific Peering Guidebook Evolution of the U.S. Peering Emerging Video Internet Ecosystems European vs US Internet Exchange Points Internet DataCenter Build vs Buy Decision Internet Service Providers and Peering Internet Transit Pricing Historical and Projections Modeling the value of an Internet Exchange Point NANOG History Peering: Motivations to Peer A Study of 28 Peering Policies Peering Simulation Game Peering: Top 10 Ways to Contact Peering Coordinators Peering: Top 10 Reasons NOT to peer Public vs Private Peering - the Great Debate The Folly of Peering Ratios Top 9 IX Selection Criteria Video Internet - The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem All freely available

INTERNET TRANSIT This is how I level set

Definition of Transit Definition: Internet Transit is the business relationship whereby one ISP provides (usually sells) access to all destinations in its routing table 95 th % Simple Well defined No netops req’d Traffic flows opposite direction of routing announcements

95 th Percentile PP

Internet Transit Declines trend Noone makes $ Can’t go down

Market Prices for Transit Source:

Good news – Traffic always grows P  60%V80% 

Group: What happens at $0/Mbps? BrainStorm – shout out – Tell me how a content distribution business can make money when – The transit price is $0/Mbps

PRICE OF TRANSIT $2-3/Mbps $1 $2 $400 $2-3/Mbps

DOES PEERING MAKE SENSE ANYMORE? AFTER INTERNET TRANSIT

Analysis of Traffic Flow Vs.direct

Analysis of Traffic Flow Def.P

Definition of Peering Definition: Internet Peering is the business relationship whereby companies reciprocally provide access to each others’ customers. Peering is not a perfect substitute for transit, & is not transitive. Back to traffic flow…

Analysis of Traffic Flow Top50

Peering Top 50 Histogram Cost

Cost of Peering Peering is NOT FREE 1)Transport Fees 2)Colocation Fees 3)Peering (Port,membership,etc) Fees 4)Routing equipment #s

Cost of Peering Plug some #’s in 1)10G Transport Fees: $6K/mo 2)Colocation Fees: $1K/mo 3)Peering (10GPort,membership,etc) Fees: $2K/mo 4)Routing equipment: $8K/mo Total Cost of Peering: $17K/mo Can peer ~ 7Gbps (for free) = $17K/7000=$2.43/Mbps best case scenario Alternative to Peering: Transit at $5/Mbps How do we compare peering and transit? $6000/mo $8000/mo $2000/mo Colo $1000/mo 1M,2M,3M

Cost of 10G Transport Local – in Amsterdam to AMSIX $2000/mo Near – in nearby countries $4000/mo Far – still in Europe $6000/mo Source for sample data: Bjorn Bjerkeskaug Edwin Punt

Peering Cost $17K/month Peering Metrics

Effective Peering Bandwidth / Minimum Cost of Traffic Exchange Effective Peering Bandwidth=7000Mbps Minimum Cost of Traffic Exchange=$2.34/Mbps

Peering Break Even Point $2.34/Mbps Peering Break Even Point Range…

Effective Peering Range $2.34/Mbps Peering Break Even Point Effective Peering Bandwidth Generalized

Peering Break Even Point Peering Metrics Effective Peering Range Effective Peering Bandwidth Minimum Cost of Traffic Exchange

The Business Case for Peering in 2010 Frankfurt Madrid Budapest

Value Of an Internet Exchange If the DECIX were to disappear tomorrow, the peering population would be $2M per month worse off. Assume that the next best alternative to peering at DECIX is transit At $2/Mbps. The DE-CIX is very valuable to the peering population there.

TOP TEN LISTS

Top 10 Lists Why Peer? Why not Peer? Top 10 ways seasoned Peering Coordinators Contact Target ISPs Top n Lists

Top 4 Motivations to Peer ①Lower Transit Costs ②Lower Latency ③Usage-based traffic billing ④Marketing Benefits

Top 10 Reasons NOT to Peer ①Traffic Asymmetry ②Transit Sales Preferred ③Ports are for Revenue ④Keep Transit Prices from sliding ⑤Prefer SLAs ⑥Traffic Ratio denial ⑦Transit is Cheaper ⑧Personality Conflicts ⑨We aren’t true Peers ⑩We don’t have the cycles

Top 10 ways to contact Peers ①face-to-face at informal meeting in an Internet Operations forum like NANOG, IETF, RIPE, GPF, APNIC, AFNOG, etc., ②face-to-face at Commercial Peering Forums like Global Peering Forum (you must be a customer of one of the sponsoring IXes) ③face-to-face at IX Member Meetings like DECIX, LINX, or AMS-IX member meetings. ④introductions through an IX Chief Technical Liaison or a peer that knows the right contacts ⑤via electronic mail, using the pseudo standard or a personal contact, ⑥from contacts listed on an exchange point participant list, or peeringdb registrations, ⑦with tech-c or admin-c from DNS or ASN registries, ⑧Google for peering contact AS peering, ⑨from the target ISP sales force, at trade show or as part of sales process, ⑩from the target ISP NOC.

Top 9 IX Selection Criteria ①Telecommunications Issues ②Deployment Issues ③ISP Current Presences ④Operations Issues ⑤Business Issues ⑥Cost Issues ⑦Credibility Issues ⑧Exchange Population Issues ⑨Existing Exchange vs. New Exchange?

Q&A Will this in a document form help you make the internal case for peering? What would appeal to your team?