Triple-A tyres – benefits for environment, noise, safety and economy Results of ‘Potential benefits of Triple-A tyres in the Netherlands’, a study performed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Hearing Reducing C02 from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles ETRMA response: Tyre performances integrated proposal F. Cinaralp, July 11.
Advertisements

Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Holistic approach for rolling noise mitigation GRB 56 th Sep 3 – 5,
M+P | MBBM group Shifts in tyre sound levels between 2007 and 2013 Erik de Graaff (presented by Gijsjan van Blokland) Client: Netherlands.
EU Tire Label. April 2011 Tire Performance Label: A Global TrendTrend 2 EU World wide introduction of a tire label EU-Label for the performance in Rolling.
European approaches to transport data collection and analysis for strategic policy and impact evaluation TRB 92 nd Annual Meeting Session 824: Transport.
CEDR Project Group Noise Value for Money in Noise Abatement Ingunn Milford Environmental Section Norwegian Public Roads Administration CEDR = Conference.
Road Safety Policy in the Netherlands Road safety policy in the Netherlands
Road Transport ImpEE Improving Engineering Education PROJECT THE.
Application of Low Noise Road surfaces in the Netherlands: Excellent results but not enough to meet the legal targets Prepared by the Netherlands.
Workshop on “Integrated development and climate policies: How to realize benefits at national and international level?” Suzana Kahn Ribeiro PROFESSOR Engineering.
Tyre Labelling (EC/1222/2009) June Tyre Labelling Tyres will be graded according to wet grip, fuel efficiency and external noise. The presentation.
Getting It From Here to There: Urban Truck Ports and the Coming Freight Crisis Stephen Viscelli NSF Postdoctoral Fellow Center on Wisconsin Strategy.
Cake B. Smart Grid Description –Communication between grid and appliances –Peak load shaving and elimination of vampire loads CO 2 savings from distribution.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Policy Instruments for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transport Chris Nash.
Additional Items for Consideration Bill VandeWater Consumer Products Manager Sales Engineering Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire.
UNECE Joint Task Force on Environmental Indicators Item 3 (f) Average Age of Road Motor Vehicle Fleet.
Car sharing in European CIVITAS cities lessons learned and evaluation May 21th, 2015 Utrecht, The Netherlands Janiek de Kruijff, CIVITAS & TNO.
Quantifying Impacts of Transport- Related CO 2 Abatement Policies Roundtable on Transport - Related Climate Change Problems OECD Environment Directorate.
Mark Evers Transport for London Reducing CO 2 from Transport Action Today to Protect Tomorrow London’s Climate Change Action Plan.
“Bicing” in Barcelona, Spain: A description and estimated health impacts David Rojas Rueda Audrey de Nazelle Marko Tainio Mark Nieuwenhuijsen.
Joint Intersectoral Task Force on Environmental Indicators Geneva 5 – 7 November 2013 Transport and environment: newly proposed indicators Vladislav Bizek.
Opportunities and Constraints on Possible Options for Transport Sector CDM Projects – Brazilian Case Studies Suzana Kahn Ribeiro Importance of Transport.
Making Way for Public Rapid Transit in South Asia and its Impact on Energy and Environment Bangalore, Dhaka and Colombo Ranjan Kumar Bose & Sharad Gokhale.
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility Contribution to the European Bus and Coach Forum 2011 Huib van Essen, 20 October 2011.
Chapter 5 Controlling your vehicle
Climate Change Mitigation in the Transport Sector May 2006 Axel Friedrich Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Germany Review of experience in Europe.
HDM-4 Road User Costs Model Version 2.00 Rodrigo Archondo-Callao February 18, 2010
Dutch Campaign ‘Choose the Best Tyre’ Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1 (62nd GRB, 1-3 September 2015, agenda.
Pricing policies for reducing CO 2 emissions from transport Huib van Essen Manager Transport CE Delft.
COP 10, Buenos Aires, 06 December 2004 UNFCCC Mads Bergendorff UIC Environmental Advisor Building on the Railways’ environmental strengths Rail today is.
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
Accident Scene Safety Module 1 – Vehicle Safety Section 1 - Driving Safety.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values ~Rationality of Thresholds for N2 and M3~ JASIC 1 Informal document GRB (57 th GRB, 5-7 February 2013, agenda.
Regulatory Impact Assessment of New Vehicle Noise Test Colin Treleven Senior Consultant Environmental Assessment Group TRL Limited 6 th September 2005.
Amendment to Regulation No.117, Concerning Manufacturer’s Information about Tyre Rolling Resistance Coefficients. RF experts - 15/02/2009 Informal document.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values JASIC 1 Informal document GRB Rev.1 (55th GRB, 7-9 February 2012, agenda item 3(b))
Quiet road surfaces Eurocities - working group noise Chair: Henk Wolfert Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1.
GRB, 57-th session 5-8 February, 2013 RF Experts LONG WAY TO THE RR NORMS GRRF ( ) GRB Informal document GRB (57th GRB, 5-7 February 2013,
Geneva, 09 December Commission Proposal on the General Safety of Motor Vehicles Automotive Unit- F1 Geneva, 09 December Informal document No.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
ETRTO comments on NL GRB NL proposal for amending tyre noise limits in UN Reg European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation - ETRTO References:
ICT 1 Scenario calculations on the effect of different source reduction on road vehicles using the TraNECam/Rotranomo calculation model, developed by H.Steven,
Potential of electrical trailer cooling during rest periods Analysis of emission and costs.
Strategic Growth Programme (SGP) Centre for Environment and Development for the Arab Region & Europe (CEDARE)
By: Christina Nahar Conservation Transport.  An effective strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must include: -Improved fuel economy -Reduce carbon.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY © OECD/IEA Consideration on Environmentally Friendly Vehicles Kazunori Kojima International Energy Agency 5 th Informal.
Jordy van Meerkerk, Gusta Renes & Geert Ridder (University of Southern California) 1 Greening the Dutch car fleet The role of the differentiated sales.
Proposal Netherlands Tyre Noise Limits Original GRB Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1 (62nd GRB, 1-3.
Glen Whitehead Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency October 2012 Transport 1.
Page 1 The Role of Innovation for Efficient and SustainableTransport Ivan Hodac Secretary General IRU 1 December 2010, Brussels.
M+P | MBBM group People with solutions Triple AAA-tyres - cost/benefit analysis - NL “best tyre” campaign Erik de Graaff Prepared for: LEO.
Fuel savings potential from low rolling- resistance tires Axel Friedrich Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Germany.
> ETC Barcelona > Christoph Schimeczek • Effectiveness of [
Fuel cost and road damage: evidence from weigh-in-motion data
Strengthening Tyre Limits Regulation 661/2009 and 1222/2009
Johan Sliggers Ministry of Environment The Netherlands
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility
Strengthening Tyre Limits Informal doc GRB Rev.1
Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal Document No
Declaration on Best Tyres
Declaration on Best Tyres
CO2 and the Road Transport Sector in India
ASSESSMENT OF THE LATEST PROPOSAL BY THE NETHERLANDS AS PRESENTED
Analysis of WLTP European utility factor For OVC-HEVs.
vkm in transport modelling
CEDR = Conference of European Directors of Roads
EU Tyres labelling scheme
Strengthening Tyre limits ! New developments (2)
Amendment to regulation UN 117 Introduction of worn tyre performances
Shifts in tyre sound levels between 2007 and 2013
Presentation transcript:

Triple-A tyres – benefits for environment, noise, safety and economy Results of ‘Potential benefits of Triple-A tyres in the Netherlands’, a study performed by order of the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment Stephan van Zyl (TNO) Sven Jansen (TNO) Foort de Roo (TNO) Michael Dittrich (TNO) Erik de Graaff (M+P) source: 66 dB Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB (60th GRB, 1-3 September 2014, agenda item 9)

D What are tyre labels good for? …hidden savings for the end-user! A: quiet B: average C: loud 0 € +30 € +120 € +160 € +170 € n/a 33 m 37 m 41 m n/a 1 27 m 30 m € n/a *3dB is equivalent to a doubling of the noise level, i.e. doubling of the traffic intensity 3 Noise A: reference B: +1-3dB* C: +4-6dB* 2 Braking distance from 80 to 0 km/h on wet road surface 1 Fuel cost savings mileage: km/j fuel price: 1,75 €/l economy: 7,5 l/100km tyre lifetime: 4 years

Content Core question‘What is the potential benefit of AAA-tyres in NL?’ Approach‘How to calculate this benefit?’ Results ‘What is the current distribution of tyres in NL?’ ‘What are societal benefits of AAA-tyres in NL?’ ‘What are end-user benefits of AAA-tyres in NL?’ ‘What are potential benefits of AAA-tyres in EU?’ Conclusion‘What can we learn from these results?’ ‘Are the results in line with your expectations?’

What is the potential benefit of AAA-tyres in NL? Status quo (‘average tyre’) D AAA (‘best tyre’) source: VACO, dossier bandenlabel dB

How to calculate this benefit? 1.Current tyre distribution in NL determined based on sales numbers in 2013 [source: VACO database] 2.Benefits of AAA-tyres determined in terms of: energy (fuel cost savings and reduced amount of CO 2 ) safety (reduced amount of accidents and slight, serious and fatal injuries) noise (reduced amount of annoyed and sleep disturbed people) savings potential A (energy) savings potential A (safety) savings potential A (noise) savings potential AAA = + +

What is the current tyre distribution in NL? On average, NL drives on DCB tyres (D=energy, C=safety, B=noise). Tyre typeEnergySafetyNoiseNoise (dB) C14.4 (‘D-label’)2.6 (‘C-label’)1.9 (‘B-label’)69.9 C24.3 (‘D-label’)2.7 (‘C-label’)2.0 (‘B-label’)71.6 C33.7 (‘D-label’)2.5 (‘C-label’)1.8 (‘B-label’)72.2 * Labelling: A = 1, B = 2, C = 3, D = 4, etc…

What are the potential societal benefits in NL? …of A-rated tyre for energy Vehicle classFuel type Fuel savings [in Ml] Fuel cost savings [in M€] Passenger cars Petrol Passenger cars Diesel 9572 Service/delivery Diesel 6146 Distribution Diesel 11 Heavy duty Diesel 9270 Bus Diesel 76 TOTAL Vehicle classFuel type CO 2 -reduction [in MtCO 2 ] TOTALMix1.3 On a societal level, annual savings of nearly 506Ml of fuel, 365M€ of fuel costs and a reduction of 1.3Mton in CO2 emissions can be achieved.

What are the potential societal benefits in NL? …of A-rated tyre for safety A shift toward A-rated tyres for safety yearly yields 43 less fatalities, 260 less serious injuries and 364 less slight injuries in traffic accidents. In total, this saves the society 183 M€ each year. C1C2C3TOTAL Reduced number of fatalities Reduced number of serious injuries Reduced number of slight injuries Monetary benefits [in M€]

What are the potential societal benefits in NL? …of A-rated tyre for noise TOTAL Reduced number of highly annoyed people Reduced number of annoyed people Reduced number of highly sleep disturbed people Reduced number of sleep disturbed people Monetary benefits [in M€]389 A shift towards A-rated tyres for noise results in reduction of several hundreds of thousands of (highly) annoyed and (highly) sleep- disturbed people. This corresponds to annual societal savings of 389M€.

What are the potential societal benefits in NL? …of AAA-rated tyre for energy, safety AND noise EnergySafetyNoiseTOTAL Annual fuel savings [in Ml] Annual CO2 reduction [in MtCO2] Reduced number of fatalities -43- Reduced number of serious injuries Reduced number of slight injuries Reduced number of highly annoyed people Reduced number of annoyed people Reduced number of highly sleep disturbed people Reduced number of sleep disturbed people Annual cost savings [in M€] The societal benefits of AAA-rated tyres are calculated as the sum of the independent benefits of energy, safety and noise. It can be stated, that a shift to AAA-rated tyres yield benefits for the end-user as well as the Dutch society.

De fuel cost savings for the end-user vary between 117 € per year for an average passenger car on petrol up to € per year for an average long haul truck. Vehicle classFuel type Fuel savings [in l] Fuel cost savings [in €] Passenger cars (family) Petrol Passenger cars (lease) Diesel Service/delivery Diesel Urban delivery/collection Diesel Municipal utility Diesel Regional delivery/collection Diesel Long haul Diesel Construction Diesel Bus Diesel Coach Diesel What are the potential end-user benefits? …of AAA-rated tyres: Fuel cost savings!

What are the potential societal benefits in EU*? …of AAA-rated tyre for energy, safety AND noise Same assumptions as in NL NL tyre distribution NL driving patterns NL share of vehicle technologies NL fuel consumption NL accident causation NL road surface characteristics NL driving speeds Adopted assumptions to EU EU vehicle fleet / vehicle-kilometres EU road network EU weather conditions Calculation for car occupants only (EU) EU number of annoyed and sleep- disturbed people Energy Noise Safety * Potential benefits of Triple-A tyres in Europe, Zyl, Roo, Dittrich and Jansen, 2014

What are the potential societal benefits in EU*? …of AAA-rated tyre for energy, safety AND noise EnergySafetyNoiseTOTAL Annual fuel savings [in Gl] 17-- Annual CO2 reduction [in MtCO2] 42-- Reduced number of fatalities Reduced number of serious injuries Reduced number of slight injuries Reduced number of highly annoyed people [in millions] Reduced number of annoyed people [in millions] Reduced number of highly sleep disturbed people [in millions] Reduced number of sleep disturbed people [in millions] Annual cost savings [in G€] Based on differences between EU and NL in terms of VKMs (vehicle kilometres), road length, accident statistics, etc., the societal benefits of AAA-rated tyres in the EU are more than 30 times higher than in NL. The annual societal cost savings amount to about 34 billion Euros. * Potential benefits of Triple-A tyres in Europe, Zyl, Roo, Dittrich and Jansen, 2014

Stakeholder discussion and questions Successful stakeholder meeting in NL, June 2014: Demand for increased consumer awareness Further questions: How can potential savings be monetized in practise? How can end-users be stimulated to purchase the ‘best tyre’? Are Triple-A tyres really the ‘best tyre’? What about other parameters like tyre-road interference? Proof-of-Mechanism: monitoring programme with different tyres

APPENDIX Assumptions for EU – energy

APPENDIX Assumptions for EU – safety

APPENDIX Assumptions for EU Noise