The North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative Unified Stream Crossing Assessment Protocols.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS4 Process.
Advertisements

Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012.
Capacity Building Global Support Program Enhance the institutional capacity necessary to support professionals in implementing tiger conservation over.
Robert Weber PA Fish and Boat Commission Fisheries Biologist Fish Management Division.
Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Culvert Inventory and Assessment Protocol 2015 Field Season.
2015 Point In Time Count: Broward County CoC Plan to End Homelessness
Implementation of the Texas Virtual School Network
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Houston, Texas January 2014 Ken Garrahan Chief of Visitor Services Southwest Region
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
22000 Food Safety Management Systems
Amy Sheldon Watershed Coordinator February 3, 2004.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Nina Muscillo and Andrew Hargreaves November 2014 Supporting Medication Reconciliation.
NAACC Stream Crossing Survey. Field Form Page 1 Crossing Data & Structure 1 Data ~ 80% of surveys.
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
Great Lakes Regional Research Information Network Lake Michigan Coordination Team Brian K. Miller – Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Anders Andren – Wisconsin.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
MNR’s Role in Public Safety Around Dams –An Overview
A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC-PRIVATE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP Jens C. Hilke Integrating natural resource and transportation agencies into the Staying Connected.
Overview of DOE’s National Weatherization Training and Technical Assistance Plan Holly Ravesloot U.S. Department of Energy February
PTCS Service Provider Review 0 Background RTF assumed responsibility for maintaining PTCS specifications in March 2003  Developed PTCS Service Provider.
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 Session 5 Future Requirements for Observations and Information Global Monitoring Plan for POPs Tracking pollutants HE-02 Katarina.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
EDMS structure ODOT GIS Steering Committee EDMS Steering Committee EDMS RES/RAZ mapping Workgroup EDMS Data & Tools Workgroups EDMS proposes projects to.
An Introduction to the NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer (NHDE) Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner NC Natural Heritage Program North Carolina.
Natural Resource Information Systems Aquatic Organism Passage Managing your Data in INFRA and NRIS Water Brian Sanborn USFS – NRIS Water/Air Region 9 –
What is a Watershed? Goals for this module Discuss the goals and objectives of the project Discuss the goals and objectives of the project Learn who.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Inspection Policies and Procedures INSPECTION POLICIES.
All about the American Library Association-Allied Professional Association (ALA-APA) Proactive Approaches to Improving the Salaries and Status of Our Profession.
Assuring Safety for Clinical Techniques and Procedures MODULE 5 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum 2008.
T PBIS Overview for Administrators 1 Copyright 2011 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.
Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP): Importance of ecological connectivity at road/stream crossings. Mark Hudy Transportation Ecologist USDA Forest Service.
May Maloba, CCSP Coordinator August 10,  FACES CCSP overview  Program emphasis  Screening protocols  M & E  Achievements  Challenges.
T HE S TAYING C ONNECTED I NITIATIVE - An International Collaboration to Conserve, Restore and Enhance Landscape Connectivity Across Vermont and the Northern.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Tools to Inform Protection, Restoration, and Resilience in the Hudson River Estuary The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
By: Said Kamal Mohmmed statistician Sector economic statistics, C.A.P.M.A.S Study on mobile phone use in the collection of survey.
MICS Data Processing Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Processing Workshop Overview of the MICS Process.
Update on the NADP Atmospheric Mercury Initiative Developing a new coordinated and collaborative approach to atmospheric mercury monitoring A Briefing.
ISEMP Data Management System. Support entire workflow Based on required functions Based on understanding of the data ISEMP Data Management System.
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
A Presentation to the USDOE January 13, 2010 Mary Ann Snider Chief of Educator Excellence and Instructional Effectiveness Race to the Top- Assessment Programs.
Training on Safe Hospitals in Disasters Module 3: Action Planning for “Safe Hospitals”
Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.
Science Translation, Conservation Adoption and Delivery: Revised process for needs and projects related to science translation and adoption Steve Fuller.
Building A Successful Worksite Wellness Program from Scratch William McPeck, MSW, CWWPC, WLCP Consultive Coach St. Albans, Maine Nationally Certified Worksite.
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
EECS David C. Chan1 Computer Security Management Session 1 How IT Affects Risks and Assurance.
Office of Greenways & Trails
Stephanie Oppenheimer, MS SUCCESS Center Erica Ellington, CRA, CHRC
Critical Linkages: Identifying Culvert Replacement Priorities to Maintain Connectivity of Cold Water Streams in the Face of Climate Change Scott Jackson,
The North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative Changes for 2016
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Staying Connected in the Northern Appalachians
11 i. Create a national coordinating mechanism for aDSM
INAC Water and Wastewater: Discussion on Current Policies and Processes Presented at: Circuit Rider Trainer Professional Association’s Annual General Meeting.
Maintenance of Certification
The North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative Changes for 2016
Presentation transcript:

The North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative Unified Stream Crossing Assessment Protocols

Overview of Training Session 1.Importance of Aquatic Connectivity 2.Project Overview 3.Project Organization Planning & Coordination 4.Survey Protocols (Indoors) 5.Survey Protocols (Out-door) 6.Electronic data collection 7.Data Entry & Validation 8.Prioritization (assessment & mitigation) 9.Data Management, QA/QC and Training

Barry Wicklow © 1999 Joyce Gross Robert Jenkins & Noel Burkhead Micrographia Alan Richmond

Dams

Sub-standard Culverts Sub-standard Culverts

Excessive Velocities

Flow Contraction Kozmo Bates

Inlet Drop

Scour Hole

Outlet Drop (Perching) Outlet Drop (Perching)

Tail Water Armoring

Insufficient Water Depth Insufficient Water Depth

© 2003 John White Kenneth Catania Scott Jackson Mink Dusky salamander Spring Salamander Wood turtle Snapping turtle Star-nosed mole Otter Beaver Muskrat

Openness

Glimpse of Existing Situation A survey of 6,030 single and multiple culverts in five New England states: NumberPercent Severe barrier931.5 Significant barrier Moderate barrier2, Minor barrier2, Insignificant barrier Full passage % are moderate to severe barriers None provided full aquatic organism passage

Source: MA Riverways Program 721 sq.mi.

Source: MA Riverways Program

Culvert Failure

Culverts and Climate Change: Changes in the climate make culverts a critical issue for natural resource conservation and protection of infrastructure and public safety

North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative (NAACC)

North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative (NAACC): Objectives Reconnect streams & rivers to support healthier populations of fish & wildlife Proactively identify and prioritize sites for stream crossing upgrades/replacements Facilitate communication and information sharing among partners

Depth (detail) Expert detailed assessment Expert rapid assessment Lay person rapid assessment Breadth (objective) Aquatic Continuity ConditionGeomorphology Modular approach to crossing assessment

Evaluating & Restoring Connectivity Evaluate river and stream crossings Evaluate habitat and landscape Establish priorities for upgrades Take action – Careful design and construction

Evaluate Connectivity Universal coding system Rapid assessment field protocols Online database Scoring systems

Online Crossings Database

Data Input Paper forms Electronic data collection Bulk uploads

Data Validation Database rules that can’t be violated Programmed in Examples – Required fields – Acceptable range of measurements – GPS units must be within bounding box Electronic data collection: applied at time of collection in the field Paper data collection: applied when data are entered to the database

Data Reports Excel files Shapefiles Mapping interface

Project Organization R & D Funding Core group Work group Implementation Broad buy-in Steering committee Advisory committee Work groups Network of collaborators

Project Infrastructure Crossing codes Protocols & field data forms Electronic data collection Online Database  Data storage & retrieval  Scoring  Mapping interface Prioritizing crossings for assessment Prioritizing crossings for mitigation  TNC Northeast Connectivity Project  UMass Critical Linkages Project

Distributed Coordination North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative Project Area L1: Local Coordinators L2: Regional Coordinators L3: Central Coordinators Trainers Lead Observers (data collectors) Technicians Volunteers

Survey Roles & Responsibilities Survey Coordinator Create maps and make crossing assignments Determine when conditions are appropriate for data collection Establishes standards and expectations for safety Ensure adherence to protocols and QA/QC procedures Reviews and approve data entered into database Lead Observer Receives Extensive Training Leads team of 1-2 other volunteers (coordinates survey materials, sets meeting locations and times) Ensures assessment are done safely Participates in surveys on regular basis Responsible for field data collection (paper or electronic) Enters data into the online database

Responsibilities of L2 Coordinators Oversee surveys in their geographic areas Recruit and supervise L1 coordinators Coordinate training Ensure QA/QC procedures are implemented Coordinate with L3 coordinators L2 Responsibilities can be shared among multiple individuals or organizations

Data Collection & Entry Lead Observers Collect data Match survey locations to xycodes Enter data into database L1 Coordinators Review & approve records Field audit 10% of an lead observer’s first 50 records Field audits not required for lead observers that have assessed >50 crossings

Training Requirements Lead Observers Classroom training either online or in-person (4 hours) In-person field training (1 day) Shadow a certified lead observer (20 crossings) Coordinators Certification as a lead observer Online coordinator training unit

Certification Certification required for lead observers and coordinators Lead Observers Completion of training requirements Pass an online quiz Coordinators Certification as a lead observer Coordinator training unit and pass quiz Certification for lead observers will expire after 2 years of inactivity Periodic recertification for active lead observers and coordinators will be encouraged but not required

Grandfathering Classroom training (in-person or online) required regardless of experience Field training can be waived for those observers/coordinators: that have participated in comparable field training prior to adoption of NAACC protocols and have conducted 10 or more field assessments Shadowing can be waived for observers/coordinators that have conducted 20 or more field assessments using protocols comparable with the NAACC protocols (USFS, VT, NH, ME or UMass)

Prioritizing Assessments

Mapping Support

North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative Project Area Contacts Scott Jackson Jessica Levine