Robert Sowislo AAHCM Public Policy Committee ©AAHCM Academy Public Policy Academy Public Policy Year in Review and Issues for Your Practice and the Field.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Positioning Providers for a Managed Care Environment
Advertisements

MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Medicaid Managed Care Key Concerns J Input of Stakeholders J Enrollment and Marketing J Services and Benefits J Access to Experienced Providers J Reimbursement.
Donald Mack, M.D. Ohio State University Medical Center Gregg Warshaw, M.D. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.
1 Addressing Patients’ Social Needs An Emerging Business Case for Provider Investment September 30, 2014 Deborah Bachrach Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP.
Physician Payment Issues Implications for Obstetric Care James Scroggs Director Health Economics Department The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Will Groneman Executive Vice President System Development TriHealth
1 Wisconsin Partnership Program Steven J. Landkamer Program Manager Wisconsin Dept. of Health & Family Services July 14, 2004.
The Source for Housing Solutions Creating a Medicaid Supportive Housing Services Benefit Washington State Conference on Ending Homelessness. May 22, 2014.
Implications for the Future ©AAHCM Linda DeCherrie, MD Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors Program.
House Calls Medicine for High-Risk Pioneer Beneficiaries
SoonerCare and National Health Care Reform Oklahoma Health Care Authority Board Retreat August 26, 2010 Chad Shearer Senior Program Officer Center for.
Linda V. DeCherrie, MD Director, Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors Program ©AAHCM.
Gary Swartz, JD, MPA Associate Executive Director American Academy of Home Care Medicine ©AAHCM Value Based Purchasing.
Tracey Moorhead President and CEO May 15, 2015 No Disclosures ©AAHCM.
May 14, 2015 ©AAHCM. Thomas Edes, MD (1 Year Term) E.D. Geriatrics & Extended Care; Office of Clinical Ops; US Dept of Veteran Affairs Mindy Fain, MD.
Physician Leader Perspective of ACO Transition Scott D. Hayworth, MD, FACOG President and CEO Mount Kisco Medical Group, PC.
State Innovation Models Initiative: Medicaid Delivery System Innovation & Payment Redesign Jim Roberts, Policy Analyst NW Portland Area Indian Health Board.
Nancy B. O’Connor Regional Administrator, CMS June 2, 2011
Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 Preliminary Summary of Beneficiary and Plan Provisions July 14 th,
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
Foundations for a Successful Patient-Centered ACO: Federal Law Background Jim Dearing, D.O., FACOFP, FAAFP Chief Medical Officer, Physician Network John.
Barbara McAneny MD. 2 3 » Legal entity through which the Affordable Care Act’s Shared Savings Program will be implemented » Comprised of groups of eligible.
The Ever Shifting Sands: Health Policy Influencing Readmissions Eric A. Coleman, MD, MPH, AGSF, FACP Professor of Medicine, Head, Division of Health Care.
Efforts to Sustain Asthma Home Visiting Interventions in Massachusetts Jean Zotter, JD Director, Office of Integrated Policy, Planning and Management and.
Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Introduction to the Medical Home Part 2 How does a Practice adopt.
Legal Issues in Hospital- Hospice (and Other) Partnerships Brooke Bumpers, Esq. Hogan & Hartson, LLP Washington, D.C. October 12, 2002.
DSDS Quality Assurance Unit State of Alaska, Dept. of Health and Social Services Division of Senior and Disabilities Services (DSDS) Quality Assurance.
An Integrated Healthcare System’s Approach to ACOs Chuck Baumgart, M.D., Chief Medical Officer Presbyterian Health Plan David Arredondo, M.D., Executive.
The Challenges of the Medicaid Modernization Mandate – Part 1 Joel L. Olah, Ph.D., LNHA Executive Director Aging Resources of Central Iowa Iowa Assisted.
Overview of Steps Needed to Develop Partnerships
1 South Carolina Medicaid Coordinated Care and Enrollment Counselors Programs.
Rural Input for Health Care Payment Learning and Action Network March 25, 2015.
Specialty Practice Pathologist Patient cap.org v. # Advocacy Workshop for Engaged Pathologists Mike Giuliani, Senior Director, Legislation and Political.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
J. James Rohack, MD, FACC President, AMA Director, Scott & White Center for Healthcare Policy Professor of Medicine and Humanities, TAMHSC Information.
The Accountable Care Organization Idea Francis J. Crosson, M.D. The Permanente Medical Group The Forum November 13, 2011.
MACRA Overview and RFI HIT Joint Committee October 6, 2015
©AAHCM Rodney Hornbake MD, FACP Essex CT
Copyright 2011 Medical Group Management Association. All rights reserved. If you’ve seen one ACO…., you’ve seen more than the rest of us William F. Jessee,
Quality Improvement and Care Transitions in a Medical Home Maryland Learning Collaborative May 21, 2014 Stephanie Garrity, M.S., Cecil County Health Officer.
Alliance for Health Reform Briefing: What’s in There? An Ask-the-Experts Overview of the Health Reform Law April 16, 2010 Dean A. Rosen, Partner
Montefiore’s Population Health Management Services
Bringing Medicare and MassHealth Together Senior Care Options.
NACDD Hill Day: Legislative Visits What to Expect Mari T. Brick, MA Program Consultant, NACDD
INDEPENDENCE AT HOME A 20 YEAR OVERNIGHT SUCCESS Eric DeJonge, MD Director of Geriatrics, MedStar Washington Hospital Center.
Transforming Care in Patient Centered Medical Home and Accountable Care Organization Hae Mi Choe, PharmD Director, Pharmacy Innovations & Partnerships.
General Assistance – Unemployable Experience in WA state July 2010.
Copyright Medical Group Management Association ® (MGMA ® ). All rights reserved. MACRA: Next steps toward value-based payment in Medicare.
Payment Reform Update: Value Over Volume Amy Mullins, MD, CPE, FAAFP.
Payment and Delivery System Reform in Medicare Alliance for Health Reform April 11, 2016 Cristina Boccuti, MA, MPP Associate Director, Program on Medicare.
Building the basis for a population health driven model for primary care: An analysis of Maryland primary care Laura Mandel Preceptors: Chad Perman & Russ.
Putting people first, with the goal of helping all Michiganders lead healthier and more productive lives, no matter their stage in life. 1.
Merit-Based Incentives Advocacy Leadership to Shape Change.
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) is a bipartisan legislation signed into law on April 16,  Repeals the flawed Sustainable.
All-Payer Model Update
Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 MACRA
Lori Smetanka, JD Director, National LTC Ombudsman Resource Center
Alternative Payment Models in the Quality Payment Program
Health Care Homes: Better Health, Better Care, Lower Cost
Rhode Island Quality Institute
Child health advocacy update
Missouri Behavioral Health Independent Practice Association (IPA)
The Path to Provider Status
Sco Senior Care Options Bringing Medicare and MassHealth Together.
Strategies for Staying Independent in Primary Care Practice
All-Payer Model Update
Optum’s Role in Mycare Ohio
System Improvement Provisions of the Affordable Care Act
Value-Based Healthcare: The Evolving Model
Presentation transcript:

Robert Sowislo AAHCM Public Policy Committee ©AAHCM Academy Public Policy Academy Public Policy Year in Review and Issues for Your Practice and the Field in Years Ahead

No Disclosures ©AAHCM

Linda DeCherrie, MD Bruce Kinosian, MD Karl Eric DeJonge, MD Michael Benfield, MD William Mills, MD Rodney Hornbake, MD Thomas Edes, MD Norman Vinn, DO Robert Sowislo, MBA George Taler, MD Steve Landers, MD James Pyles, Esq. Connie Row, Executive Director AAHCM Gary Swartz, Esq.

 What does public policy mean for Academy Members – for a house call practice?  How does Academy public policy and advocacy work occur?  Public policy issues and demands now track transition from FFS to Value Based payment/population health management  Current and future issues important to the field ©AAHCM

Refers to the laws, the actions of government, the agency funding priorities, and the regulations Impacts your ◦ Practice organization and operation ◦ Practice revenue and success ©AAHCM

Service provided by volunteer public policy committee and Academy staff Relationships with alliances, coalitions and multi-specialty groups Augmented through Professional Services relationships ($) ◦ Law/lobbying, data analytics Augmented through organizational relationships ◦ Corporate and professional alliances (AGS, AAHPM, etc.) Supported through practice level and individual voluntary action ◦ Letters/ , calls, visits, political support and letters to editor/journals ©AAHCM

Policy area/issueAcademy effort and results Traditional Fee Schedule SGR – supported permanent repeal and signed onto letters, (offered IAH) CCM - advocated for chronic care management code and successful in changes to make it more usable for housecalls (incident to relaxed and business cost increasing requirements generally dropped) ACP – advocating for coverage and payment for advanced care planning effective 2016 – Dr. DeCherrie representing Academy These two services (CCM and ACP) may produce value for Academy members that is greater as a ratio to practice service and revenue than for MDs/NPs and PAs in other practice settings. Professional Fee Schedule Home Health - payment rule and conditions of participation, face to face requirements, templates Medicare Advantage/Advance Call Letter, and other letters regarding managed care Shared Savings Programs (ACOs), CMMI Request for Information Re Advanced Primary Care Models Impact Act Value Base Payment Modifier/risk adjustment for high risk patients Standards Development Telemedicine Academy Comment Letters, and face to face meetings with CMS officials and Congressional staff Restrictive requirements eliminated (PCMH for CCM) The Academy commented on an increased number and range of rule making and requests for comments and information as the impact of home care medicine is recognized and Academy capacity grows. Academy comments have been incorporated into final rules and policy. (Dr. Lauders leading) Waiver recommendations included in ACO development Home continues as location of service for Medicare Advantage assessments, diagnostic code acceptance. Patient attribution rules to include NP / PA, etc. Public Policy Committee response Meeting with MEDPAC. (Dr. Kinosian leading) AAHCM Standards Committee Formed AAHCM developed position paper on telemedicine for HBPC Services and Outcomes

©AAHCM Policy area/issueAcademy effort and results Independence at HomeAcademy “JEN analysis” of risk adjustment for IAH like population has been accepted within CMS and will inform HCC risk adjustment for Independence at Home. Academy will advocate that results be incorporated across all payment models, measures and the value based payment modifier program. Advocacy toward continuation/expansion. Advocate for accurate evaluation and payment Managed Care and Dual Eligibles The Academy is increasing the depth and breadth of managed care industry relationships. This includes relationships with executives and medical leadership of health plans as well as the representatives/trade associations and regulators of health plans. Regulation, Audits, and Practice Burden The Academy continues to have influence in reducing practice burden and in protecting and expanding opportunities for housecalls. Continued audit intervention. Publications, Media Requests, and Letters to the Editor, etc. Academy members have produced increased number of peer review articles, Academy board and staff have responded to increase level of requests for interviews regarding home care medicine and generated an increased number of letters to the editor

Public policy issue of importance to your practice Fee for service volume/code based issues Value based payment and alternative payment models (APMs) issues Patient volume – how is patient relationship established? “Attribution” No requirements, other than medical necessity and PCP relationship (unless preventive/screening) Patient eligibility criteria/ attribution, so; Need to influence the rules for patient assignment to your practice – otherwise threat to patient panel Standards – what standards required to render service as primary care provider? None, other than basic state licensure, and Medicare program enrollment Present in MACRA for APMS and “medical home,” so; Need to influence what will be the standards and who certifies the practices.Measures and outcomesMultiplicity of measures, not population based No outcomes requirements und Present in MACRA for professional fee schedule, APMS and “medical home,” so; Need to influence what will be population appropriate measures and outcomes ©AAHCM

Public policy issue of importance to your practice Fee for service volume/code based issues Value based payment and alternative payment models (APMs) issues Services recognized and covered for payment Coverage, payment and RVUs “fought” for on code by code basis, e.g., RVUs for house call E and M codes TCM CCM ACP AWV in home setting Need to participate to negotiate definition of deal, and what is the right bundle/risk/shared savings? and How to keep the budget/deal from shrinking in the future. Payment and measure assessment risk adjusted based on patient condition? No.Yes. Need to influence in order to assure accurate risk adjustment for house call patient population regardless of payment model Accountability – protection against over and underutilization The micromanagement, burden and “hassle factor” Fraud and abuse concerns and Audits and medical record review Will be embedded in evolving models based on outcomes and patient satisfaction. So, need to influence; Who establishes/administers waivers? Who controls patient movement across settings? Who evaluates outcomes and patient satisfaction? “Stark Exceptions” ©AAHCM

Patient Enrollment /payment sourceExamples of Academy public policy efforts and influence requirement Where will public policy efforts be required? Medicare fee for serviceNew services considered and covered – e.g., Advance care planning Congress, CMS Medicare AdvantageHome continues as setting and focus for care coordination and care management Eliminate barriers to house call contracting and NP credentialing Risk adjustment Congress, CMS Medicare ACOs/shared savings and bundled payments Beneficiary characteristics Beneficiary attribution Risk adjustment Risk/shared savings, bundled payment “deal” Congress, CMS Dual eligibles and Medicaid Managed CareRole of house calls in population networks Beneficiary enrollment Opt in or out? Payment terms and levels Congress, CMS, and States; Legislative Medicaid/Health Departments Insurance departments Commercial health plansBeneficiary enrollment “Attribution and Engagement” Eliminate barriers to house call contracting Eliminate barriers to NP credentialing Address plans requirement for PCMH Congress, CMS, and States; Legislative Medicaid/Health Departments Insurance departments NAIC, NGA MedicaidBeneficiary enrollment in ACOs, IAH like models adopted by MCOs Straight Medicaid levels of payment need to move to Shared Savings Congress, CMS, and States; Legislative Medicaid/Health Departments ©AAHCM