Device Clinical Bridge (DCB) Phase 1 IHE Proposal Draft Graphics October 23, 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patient Care Devices IHE North America 2009 Showcase Participant Workshop Todd Cooper, Breakthrough Solutions Co-Chair, IHE PCD Technical Committee Manny.
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Pathfinding Session: Device Integration IHE North America Webinar Series 2008 Todd Cooper Patient Care Device Domain Breakthrough Solutions Foundry, Inc.
Patient Care Device Domain Overview. The Patient Care Device Domain PCD History Established in 2005 when the charter was awarded to the ACCE Jointly sponsored.
San Antonio – Todd Cooper Chair, ISO/IEEE 11073; Co-Chair HL7 DEV WG HL7 DEV WG ISO TC215 WG7 IEEE EMBS Health Informatics – Devices Update.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) eDoC Administrative Documents Templates for HL7 Orders October 25, 2013.
JANUARY 20, 2014 Medical Device Patient Record Integration (MDPRI) Project 1.
Medical Device Standards
ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
S&I Framework Testing HL7 V2 Lab Results Interface and RI Pilot Robert Snelick National Institute of Standards and Technology June 23 rd, 2011 Contact:
Device and EMR interoperability (IDCO). Implantable Cardiac Device Information is Collected At Implant … During In Clinic Follow-ups … And in the Home.
QIDAM Issues and proposals for a logical model For discussion during HL7 WG Meeting in Jan 2014 Thursday Q3.
FHIR Without the smoke. FHIR Experience In the last 4 weeks, we have been busy. We … Prototyped a Device Data Aggregator/Reporter using FHIR resources.
Catherine Hoang Ioana Singureanu Greg Staudenmaier Detailed Clinical Models for Medical Device Domain Analysis Model 1.
IHE PCD Rosetta Update Paul Schluter, PhD, GE Healthcare IHE PCD F2F at ECRI, Plymouth Meeting, PA October 20, 2010.
1 IHE PCD F2F IHE PCD Quick Updates IHE PCD Face-to-Face, Cleveland, Ohio Tuesday Q1 and Q2, April 1, 2014 Paul Schluter, GE Healthcare Q1:
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
1 HL7 DEV SIG and IEEE GC IEEE P a Update HL7 DEV SIG and IEEE GC Meetings, Chicago, IL Thursday Q4, September 18, 2014.
Device Observation Semantic Bridge (DSB/DOSB) Phase 1 IHE Proposal Draft Graphics September 04, 2014 Amended Based on NLM/IHTSDO Meeting – September 09,
2013 PCD Domain Update Monroe Pattillo Practical Health Interoperability, LLC IHE PCD Planning Committee Co-Chair.
Device and EMR interoperability (IDCO). Implantable Cardiac Device Information is Collected At Implant … During In Clinic Follow-ups … And in the Home.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
IHE-PCD , HL7 HC Dev WG, ISO/IEEE 11073, and NIST Medical Device Communication and IHE-PCD Cycle 4 Test Strategy IHE-PCD, HL7, ISO/IEEE Joint WG Meetings.
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
Benefits of IHE PCD Standards-Based Interoperability June 1, 2014 | 8:30 AM Jeff McGeath – Iatric Systems, Inc. John Garguilo – NIST Monroe Pattillo –
Body Mass Index (BMI) Content Profile Brief Profile Proposal for 2012/13 presented to the Quality, Research & Public Health (QRPH) Planning Committee Jennifer.
1 Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group The Vision Toward Testing Ontology Tools in High Priority Health IT Applications October 5, 2005.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1 Patient Care Devices Domain Test Effort Integrating.
OSEHRA Medical Device Integration Adapter (MDIA) Project Briefing.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.
Patient Care Devices HIMSS IHE Showcase ’09 Review & ‘10 Planning.
Sharing Value Sets (SVS Profile) Ana Estelrich GIP-DMP.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
February 8, 2005IHE Europe Educational Event 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Basic Security Robert Horn Agfa Healthcare.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1 Patient Care Devices Domain Test Effort Integrating.
MATT REID JULY 28, 2014 CCDA Usability and Interoperability.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
1 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Care Delivery - IS01 Electronic Health Record (EHR) Laboratory Results Reporting July 6, 2007.
Patient Care Devices HIMSS10 Webinar Series; October
Query Health Concept-to-Codes (C2C) SWG Meeting #11 February 28,
PCD - WCM Waveform Communication Management [WCM].
IHE PCD MEM-DMC CMMS & RTLS User Perspective Monroe Pattillo Practical Health Interoperability, LLC 6/21/2013.
IHE Workshop – June 2007What IHE Delivers 1 Nicholas Steblay Boston Scientific Implantable Device Cardiac Observations (IDCO) Profile.
ACCE Clinical Engineering Symposium Overview of IHE PCD Exhibit at AAMI Y2010.
PCD User Handbook 2010 Purpose The Handbook is designed to help healthcare professionals implement IHE on a new clinical system purchase or upgrade an.
IHE Workshop – June 2006What IHE Delivers 1 Nicholas Steblay Boston Scientific Implantable Device Cardiac Observations (IDCO) Profile.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
LRI Validation Suite Meeting Prototype Tool Demonstration December 20th, 2011.
Software and Systems Division “RTMMS IHE-PCD F2F WG meeting Kansas City, MO (Cerner) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) John.
Device and EMR interoperability (IDCO). Implantable Cardiac Device Information is Collected At Implant … During In Clinic Follow-ups … And in the Home.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge -There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.
Helping the Cause of Medical Device Interoperability Through Standards- based Test Tools DoC/NIST John J. Garguilo January 25,
Patient Care Devices Daegu HIMSS Asia Mini-Showcase PCD Dallas F2F
Case Study: HL7 Conformance in VA Imaging Mike Henderson Principal Consultant Eastern Informatics, Inc.
1 IEEE GC Montreal IEEE Nomenclature IEEE GC at HL7, Montreal, Quebec Tuesday Q2 – May 10, 2016 Paul Schluter, GE Healthcare.
Labs Early Adoption Program Template Insert the Name of Your Implementation / Organization Here MM/DD/YYYY.
Structured Data Capture (SDC) FHIR SDC Pilots Template
Todd Cooper Co-Chair, IHE Patient Care Devices Manny Furst IHE PCD Technical Program Manager IHE–Korea 2010 Connectathon eWorkshop IHE–Korea 2010 Connectathon.
Labs Early Adoption Program Template Insert the Name of Your Implementation / Organization Here MM/DD/YYYY.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
IHE PCD F2F Agenda Virtual / projectathon / certification testing program requirements MDPRI progress and next steps Certification plans Potential innovation.
ICE Update to IEEE committee
IHE PCD Nomenclature and WCM
Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group
IHE DEC and Continua WAN Interface Proposals for Remote Monitoring
The Center for Medical Interoperability
Spencer Crosswy Paul Schluter The Center for Medical Interoperability
_ Update Seth Blumenthal, MBA Director, Data & Innovation PCPI
Presentation transcript:

Device Clinical Bridge (DCB) Phase 1 IHE Proposal Draft Graphics October 23,

Team - Recent VHA (also IHE for some) – Ioana Singureanu – Greg Staudenmaier – Holly Miller – Dan Morford – Catherine Hoang IHE – Manny Furst – Paul Sherman – Technical Project Manager – IHE Patient Care Device Domain(retired VHA) – John Garguilo (NIST) – Paul Schluter (GE) – Alex Lippitt (HIMSS, IHE) 2

The Problem – the DCB Challenge (1 of 2) The general rule today is that while a clinician or provider can view patient data generated by patient care devices in an inpatient setting or outpatient encounter room, but when that same person accesses his or her EHR application that data is not available. Getting semantically correct clinical data from patient care devices into clinical applications is generally not achieved today for a number of reasons: The applicable nomenclature from medical devices, IEEE , is not one of the Meaningful Use (MU) approved nomenclatures, reducing the incentive to use IEEE data in clinical applications. The update under review, IEEE a, is also not one of the MU approved nomenclatures. There are no commonly accepted mappings of IEEE to Meaningful Use approved nomenclatures (LOINC and SNOMED primarily) for clinical measures although there are vendors who have done so as proprietary interfaces, but there is no reliable way to combine this data given the lack of generally accepted mappings. 3

The Problem – the DCB Challenge (2 of 2) Note: There are still many circumstances where the specific numeric measures are not codified in a generally accepted standard, for example the on-Going work with ventilators. The result is that much of this numeric data generated from medical applications is either not reentered into clinical systems or reentered at significant risk of error. 4

The Patient Data is Here.... 5

But Not Here

Initial Use Case (1 of 2) There are a number of key use case examples, both inpatient and outpatient, all in the clinical environment. One use case was selected based on its relative simplicity in regards to semantic interoperability and also its high volume. That use case involves the monitoring of vital signs in an inpatient setting (ICU, Step Down, Observation, General / Surgical). The patient is transported to a room and is attached to a monitor or monitors to collect the key vital signs as defined by Meaningful Use as a minimum: Body Temperature BP Diastolic BP Systolic Head Circumference (manual entry) Heart Rate Height (manual entry) Height (Lying) O2 % BldC Oximetry Respiratory Rate Weight Measured 7

Initial Use Case (2 of 2) Additional vital signs may be monitored depending on the setting and procedure. The devices or middleware then collect this data in IEEE nomenclature for inclusion in PCD-01 Communicate Device Data messages. The PCD Device Observation Filter would filter these messages into an EHR consumable stream of output. A new transaction/profile would convert these data streams into HL7 CDAs accessing a utility that would convert applicable IEEE nomenclature into LOINC observations and SNOMED post-coordinated applicable nomenclature and constraints. These CDAs would then be transmitted to the EHR or other clinical system to populate the patient’s clinical record for care management, accountable care, public health, and CQI research purposes. 8

BENEFITS of Patient Care Device Clinical and Operations Data Acquisition Improved workflow Improved data collection Improved safety Improved patient care

Benefits Improved workflow: Medical device data desired for clinical, operations, clinical quality improvement, population and research purposes could be requested retrospectively or subscribed in advance for publishing to a repository or to a specific clinical application for a specific patient and intervention. Improved data collection: Data would no longer need to be reentered from the device to the clinical application, effectively eliminating risks of neglecting to implement the data or making transcription errors. Improved safety: Additional medical device observation data would be available to clinicians. Improved patient care: Increased observation data would be included in the patient’s chart as well as in near real time for the clinical application for clinical decision support. In the short term, the benefits would apply to a high volume of work including any inpatient scenario involving devices providing vital sign observations. This would only increase over time as outpatient and patient settings are added and observations are added beyond vital signs. Please note that vital signs benefits of course do not apply to those vital signs that are observed manually such as height. 10

Proposed Constraints (1 of 2) Principles Avoid semantic transformation where possible; work with both nomenclatures to align terminology and value sets with each other (include whole chunks of nomenclature where possible) – needs to merge into clinical realm - a lot of work done Use post-coordinated SNOMED concepts where possible to reduce the number of concepts that need to be created and managed; where necessary based on the IEEE input – Map pre-coordinated concepts and deal with multiple axes – Deal with multiple axes for complex concepts IEEE overlaps SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm, and UCUM terminology. Initially only the observation identifiers in LOINC (and perhaps SNOMED for constraints) would be addressed but in the future we will address the other areas of overlap. The principle of post-coordinated concept priority is a useful one – Establish an on-going process to ensure device / clinical harmonization over time involving IEEE, IHE, and hopefully NLM (with whom we are currently in discussion, planning for future VA/NLM inter-agency agreements 11

Proposed Constraints (2 of 2) Scope Deferred – Use cases beyond inpatient vital signs – Usage with consumer devices – Usage with portable lab devices 12

Proposed Division of Labor - The Three Components 13 Device Data Stream and Filtering IHE PCD Device Semantic Bridge (“Chapter 17”) IHE PCC IEEE to Concept / Clinical Mapping VHA NLM C4MI Pilots – VHA, ??

PCD Technical Solution and DCB 14 Numerics Waveforms Annotations Events Alerts Configuration Commands ISO/IEEE mapping to SNOMED, RxNORM, and/or LOINC for vital sign and other numerics such as medications from ventilators IHE PCD DEC* IHE PCD DEC WCM*, ACM*, … Device Observation Reporters (DOR) Network Gateways Device Integration Engines Individual Devices Device Observation Consumers (DOC) Enterprise EMR, EHR, … 1.(HL7 V2.6 messaging and ISO/IEEE nomenclatures) Device Observation Filter (DOF) * DEC = Device Enterprise Communication WCM = Waveform Content Module ACM = Alert Communication Management Subscribe

PCD Technical Solution 1.Enterprise gateways, device integration engines (e.g. Capsule, iSiron, Nuvon) and possibly individual devices send near real-time medical device data using the IHE PCD DEC Profiles (HL7 V2.6 messaging and ISO/IEEE nomenclatures. 2.For numeric vital signs observations, a normative mapping from ISO/IEEE to SNOMED and/or LOINC are developed (by organizations representing SNOMED and/or LOINC) and are made available on the NIST RTMMS and other nomenclature repositories. Enterprise “Device Observation Consumers” would use the normative mapping table to translate the ISO/IEEE nomenclature to SNOMED and/or LOINC. 3.Device-centric data (waveforms, events, alerts, configuration and commands) would use the ISO/IEEE nomenclature. 4.The IHE PCD DEC (Device Enterprise Communication) Technical Framework and ISO/IEEE nomenclature are recognized as “Meaningful Use” profiles and standards for medical device data transfer to and from enterprise entities. 15

PCD IHE Actors Diagram (Current State) 16 Device Observation Consumer (DOC) Device Observation Filter (DOF) Device Observation Reporter (DOR) PCD-02: Subscribe to PCD Data PCD-01: Communicate Device Data “no filter option”

Use Case Steps Key steps* include: 1.DOC Subscription for a Data Stream to a DOF – Patient, patient location, device class, device parameters – Begin time, intervals, end time 2.Device sends data to DOR 3.DOR sends observation stream to DOF 4.DOF sends filtered stream to DOC If no filtering needed, the steps are 2. and then a revised 4. – DOR sends stream to DOC 17

IHE Actors Diagram (Straw man Future Incremental State) 18 Device Clinical Consumer (DCC) Device Observation Filter (DOF) Device Observation Reporter (DOR) PCD-02: Subscribe to PCD Data PCD-01: Communicate Device Data Device Observation Bridge ( DOB ) HL7 v2.6 PCD DEC PCC DCB “CDA” Data Transform Utility Applications Care Management Clinical Decision Support Accountable Care Public Health Clinical Quality Improvement Device Observation Consumer (DOC) HL7 v2.6 PCD-01 TBD “no filter option” HL7 CTS2

Use Case Steps Key steps include: 1.DOC Subscription for a Data Stream to a DOF – Patient, patient location, device class, device parameters – Begin time, intervals, end time 2.Device sends data to DOR 3.DOR sends observation stream to DOF 4.DOF filters stream to retain what is useful for clinical work and sends filtered stream to DOC 5.DOC sends stream to DOB which maps clinical observations from filtered HL7 v2.6 messages, invoking a data transformation utility to perform data transformations required for LOINC and SNOMED nomenclatures 6.DOB sends filtered and transformed stream to DCC 19

Standards & Systems (1 of 2) Nomenclatures / Terminologies Used: Device (IHE PCD Technical Framework Volume 3 – Semantic Content) – IEEE Nomenclature – MDC terms Clinical (CDA) * – LOINC (observations) – SNOMED (constraints primarily) – RxNorm (anesthesia drugs) – UCUM (units of measure) Device Information Model (DIM) – how a device maps to a hierarchical, containment tree model – GMDN. MDNS assumed in use but being phased out * FHIR impact anticipated as Consolidated CDA specifications will migrate to FHIR resource definitions 20

Standards & Systems (2 of 2) Messaging – HL7 V2.6 constrained by IHE DEC PCD-01 and RTM – Device – CDA - Clinical Message Transport – Minimum Lower Layer Protocol (MLLP) over TCP/IP – Device Operations – Web Services(REST/SOAP) - Clinical Observations Systems Impacted – EHRs primarily currently – Over time: Clinical Decision Support, Population Management, Clinical Research 21

Content Type and Direction 22 Type of InteractionNomenclature – Device SideNomenclature – Clinical Side Device Numerics ExportIEEE LOINC (observations) SNOMED (coordination) Device Waveforms ExportIEEE Device Annotations ExportIEEE Device Events ExportIEEE Device Alerts ExportIEEE

The initial value set LOINC Concept CodeConcept NamePreferred Concept Name Body TemperatureBody temperature:Temp:Pt:^Patient:Qn: BP DiastolicIntravascular diastolic:Pres:Pt:Arterial system:Qn: BP SystolicIntravascular systolic:Pres:Pt:Arterial system:Qn: Head CircumferenceCircumference.occipital-frontal:Len:Pt:Head:Qn:Tape measure Heart RateHeart beat:NRat:Pt:XXX:Qn: HeightBody height:Len:Pt:^Patient:Qn: Height (Lying)Body height^lying:Len:Pt:^Patient:Qn: O2 % BldC OximetryOxygen saturation:SFr:Pt:BldC:Qn:Oximetry Respiratory RateBreaths:NRat:Pt:Respiratory system:Qn: Weight MeasuredBody weight:Mass:Pt:^Patient:Qn:Measured 23 Specified in the HTSP C80 Vital Signs Results value set specification ( ) :

Vital Sign Observation Vocabulary Qualifiers / Constraints 24 Constraints (MU2 C-CDA)Device Side (MDC Term Codes – IHE PCD Tech Framework Volume 3 Semantic Content) Clinical Side Requirements (assume 1 instance unless otherwise noted) Clinical Side Term Codes classCode SHALLOBS moodCode SHALLEVN templateID SHALL Id SHALL / 1 to Many Code (vital sign result type) SHALL Text (including link potential)SHOULD statusCode (completed)SHALL(ActStatus) = completed effectiveTimeSHALL valueSHALL InterpretationCode (qualifier)MAY methodCode (qualifier)MAY targetSiteCode (qualifier)MAY authorMAY Encoded values come from SNOMED UCUM used for Units of Measureyes