Introduction to the IPEC small claims track

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Nicholas Kissen Thomas Frith Islington Leaseholders Association 12 th June 2013.
Advertisements

Civil Procedure Appeals Enforcement.
APARTMENT OWNERS NETWORK NOVEMBER o Outline the new District Court Procedure o o Service of Proceedings – Problems o Statute of Limitations – 6.
Acuity Legal Limited 3 Assembly Square Britannia Quay Cardiff Bay Cardiff CF10 4PL t: +44 (0) f: +44 (0) e:
Civil Proceedings Criminal Proceedings.
Chapter 8.  A civil action relates to an act or omission that infringes the rights of a person, group or government instrumentality and seeks to return.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
The Appeals Process by Gina chandler
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Cost Effective Dispute Resolution Alana Dowley Legal Services Director Contract Intelligence Pty Ltd.
COSTS AGREEMENTS AND DISCLOSURES BAR ASSOCIATION CPD SEMINAR 2 AUGUST 2007 By Roger Traves SC.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INTERIM INJUNCTIONS: A PRACTICAL GUIDE Kevin Glover, Shortland Chambers
Law 12 MUNDY Civil Trials – Introduction Civil lawsuit involves disputes between two individuals, groups or corporations/organizations called =
Ch. 5-3 Civil Procedure.
1 Resolution of Intellectual Property Disputes VenueNovotel Bauhinia Shenzhen Hotel, China Date15 October 2008 Presented by Charmaine KOO Partner, Intellectual.
Civil Procedure Responding to a Claim.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
The English Legal System The Civil Litigation Process in outline The Woolf Reforms.
Business and Its Legal Environment (Mgmt 246) Alternative Dispute Resolution (Chapter 3) Professor Charles H. Smith Fall 2010.
ADR v Litigation in IPR Disputes One Judge’s Perspective.
Unlawful Detainer “The act of retaining possession of real property without legal right.”
AS LAW: The English Legal System
CIVIL CASES Prior to these lessons you should have read and précised Chapter 9 of ‘The English Legal System’ by J. Martin [5th edition]. PRECIS NOTES.
AS Law Civil Courts.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 15:30-16:30 Session 9, 12 Dec 2014.
Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 Peter O’Donnell, Thompsons, Solicitors.
Civil Law in Action Wednesday 17 August Court hierarchy Review: What are the advantages of having a court hierarchy?
Conference of County Court Judges July, 2015 Judge David E. Silverman Judge Michaelle Gonzalez-Paulson Managing the Landlord ~ Tenant Docket Practice Tips.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 20, 2003.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Supreme Court civil pre-trial procedures: an overview
The PCC Experiment What the US can learn from England’s “Patent Small Claims” experience Angela Fox Partner, RGC Jenkins & Co. AIPLA, Chicago, February.
CIVIL CASES Prior to these lessons you should have read and précised chapter 9 of ‘The English Legal System’ by J. Martin PRECIS NOTES WILL BE CHECKED.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
COSTS MANAGEMENT AND COSTS BUDGETING SEMINAR By Phil & Melanie Bingham PJ Bingham & Co Monday 20 August 2012.
Civil Procedure Allocation. Allocation Questionnaire Form N150 PD262.2 parties should co-operate in completing the allocation questionnaire - PD
BVC Civil Procedure Interim Applications Interim Payments.
1 English Legal System Civil court reforms. 2 Civil courts Civil reform Thermawear V Linton (1995) CA as per Lord Justice Henry, “…the adversarial system.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 11:30-12:30 Session 9.
Civil Procedure Part 36 Allocation.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 22 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2002.
Private Law Litigants: the parties involved in a civil action Plaintiff: the party initiating a legal action Defendant: the party being sued in a civil.
Civil Law Civil Law – is also considered private law as it is between individuals. It may also be called “Tort” Law, as a tort is a wrong committed against.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Patent litigation in the UK Gordon Harris Partner, Head of Intellectual Property.
Better Case Management Woolwich Crown Court An introductory briefing for advocates Friday 23 rd October 2015.
Flexible trial procedures; costs budgeting Nigel Giffin QC Procurement Lawyers’ Association AGM 29 January 2016.
Particularities of Enforcement ALASTAIR WILSON QC.
English for Lawyers 1 Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević
Many slides Copyright © 2008 by Delmar Learning
The Civil Court Procedure
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Court Procedures for Negligence Cases
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Dr Luke McDonagh Senior Lecturer City, University of London
Chapter 11.
The Courts: Procedure and damages for negligence cases
Civil Law: Trial Procedures
The Litigation Process
Arbitration Proceedings II
Introduction to CPC 1908.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Judicial Powers of Case Management
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the IPEC small claims track District Judge Melissa Clarke Competition Law Association meeting 18 May 2015

Who we are The only small claims track in the High Court A fast, cheap, accessible forum to hear certain IP claims with a value of £10,000 or less which will take no more than a day at trial Three District Judges with two deputies

What we can hear Copyright of any type UK and Community registered trade marks Passing off UK and Community unregistered design rights Confidential information

What we can’t hear Patents Registered designs Semiconductor topography Plant varieties

What we actually hear Across PCC and IPEC small claims track since October 2012: 80-85% copyright 13-15% trade mark and passing off 1-2% other (unregistered design and confidential information)

Our levels of work Issued claims rising from About 35/40% go to final hearing About 3 DJ days/month currently listed for applications and final hearings

What we might hear in future UK and Community registered designs?

Available remedies Any remedy that could be obtained in IPEC multi-track EXCEPT Interim and pre-action remedies Interim injunctions Orders for pre-action disclosure Freezing orders Search and seizure orders

Tip #1 – don’t discount IPEC small claims for larger claimants Can be used as a cheap, fast route to achieve a practical result in appropriate cases where: the claimant is more concerned with obtaining injunctive relief to prevent future infringement than in seeking high-value damages the defendant is unlikely to satisfy a damages award but the claimant would like delivery up/destruction of e.g. counterfeit goods

Issuing a claim

Procedure CPR 63 (IP) and PD 63 apply to the extent only as set out in CPR 63.28 –in particular CPR 63.27 (allocation) and 63.20 (statements of case) CPR 27 (small claims) and PD 27 also apply except re interim remedies CPR 45 (scale costs for IPEC) does not apply

Tip #2 – Follow the right Guidance Guide to the IPEC Small Claims Track (July 2014) is available on www.justice.gov.uk... …but not in the 2015 edition of the White Book… …which has instead decided to print the old guide to the Patents County Court small claims track (abolished October 2013). To be corrected in next supplement.

Tip #3 – Check your court location The IPEC small claims track is split between the Rolls Building, Fetter Lane and the Thomas More Building, RCJ To issue claims and applications and pay fees – Rolls Building To file documents, correspond with DJ clerks, attend hearings and trials – Thomas More

Tip #4 – Clearly mark claim form On issue please write “IPEC SMALL CLAIMS TRACK” on the face of the claim form Not a procedural requirement (needs only to be in Particulars of Claim) BUT Will assist staff in issuing properly and so avoid delay

Service of claim Claimants are responsible for service of claim form (together with Response Pack) and particulars of claim. Time for filing of a defence does not run until both are served. PD Pre-Action Conduct – IF C has complied and IF C states in particulars of claim that it has done so, time for D to file defence reduced from 70 to 42 days from deemed service of PoC.

Tip #5 – File certificate of service No request for default judgment can be granted without it.

Case Management

If undefended Judgment in default provided certificate of service of claim is filed and time for service of defence is past Usually provides for damages and costs to be assessed by the court Hearing or on paper

If defended Generally, no allocation questionnaires unless dispute over use of SCT Generally no CMC/directions hearing Standard form directions sent out from court (standard to the IPEC SCT and not those in PD 27) together with final hearing date in 6-8 weeks time Disclosure, witness evidence tied to issues in the case. No experts without permission (in practice none granted – proceed to IPEC) Parties provided with details of small claims mediation service - telephone based.

The final hearing Note CPR 27.9 - either party may give 7 days notice of intention not to attend final hearing and request court to consider his case on the relevant statement of case and documents. Failure to attend without such notice may result in strike-out

The final hearing CPR 27.9 gives judge basically unfettered ability to run proceedings however she thinks is fair. Evidence not under oath Cross examination only to the extent permitted by the judge Judge may question any witness Formality or otherwise depends on presence of legal representatives, level of understanding of legal concepts by those attending, quality of documentary evidence, etc.

Judgment and costs Judgment usually ex tempore, sometimes reserved. Small claims costs Court fees Witness loss of earnings max £90 each plus travel Solicitors costs where injunction sought - £26O Experts fees limited to £750

Issues encountered by parties Understanding court procedure Serving documents and filing evidence Deemed dates of service Compliance with directions How to seek default judgment How to notify and document settlement/discontinuance of claims VAT – understanding the difference between debt claims and damages

Appeals Appeal from a decision in the IPEC small claims track has moved from Court of Appeal to HHJ Hacon