ASW 101.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Analysis of Student Work Spring 2014 Pilot Webinar #2 h Broadcast: Wednesday, April 23 4:00 – 5:00 p.m.
Check-in & Preparation
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Public Schools of Robeson County ASW Analysis of Student Work ASW Analysis of Student Work The Standard 6 Process: What Teachers Need to Know Now The Standard.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
LOGO August The Basics What is the Analysis of Student Work (ASW)? ASW is the process North Carolina has decided to implement in order to obtain.
ASW Process World Languages, Arts Education, Health and Physical Education, AP & IB.
Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank Update Broadcast: Wednesday, July 16 1:00 – 3:00 p.m.
Check-in & Preparation ASW Wiki has today’s materials posted under ASW Professional Development on the Summer RESA Sessions.
School Board Update Creating a Balanced Elementary Math Program.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
FITNESS MODEL. Q&A  How would you incorporate fitness into your program/curriculum if you were the benevolent dictator? Work with a partner, write several.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
Physical Education SLOs: A Clarification of the State Education Department’s 8 Component SLO Template: Grades K-5 Presented By: Laura Shaw – Dows Lane.
Fitness Education. Traditional physical education teaches students baseball, football, and basketball. Concepts-based fitness education teaches students.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Welcome Arts Educators Please sign in! tinyurl.com/arts14-15.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Why the Arts?. Art is … Creativity Problem-Solving History Culture Arts is what makes us HUMAN!
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Welcome! Please visit Our Wiki and download resources
Opportunity through Risk and Failure. Objectives Updates on: ASW Process Pieces of Gold/Gifts of Gold Artsfolio.
Fitness Education Chapter 13. Traditional Views of Fitness Goal was to get kids fit Focus was on activities and doing fitness (for example, weight training,
VDOE STANDARDS OF LEARNING: AN OVERVIEW October, 2015.
Objective Selection For teachers who have a combination of semester and yearly classes.
PE Standards. What are the purpose of educational standards? –All disciplines have them.
Professional Development Resources for Standard 6.
Opportunity through Risk and Failure. Objectives Updates on: ASW Process Pieces of Gold/Gifts of Gold Artsfolio.
DPI ASW August 2014 Training. Check-in & Preparation ASW Wiki has today’s materials posted under ASW Professional Development.
2015 NCAAHPERD-SM ASW What We Learned in Year One Today’s ppt is available on the Professional Development page of Healthful Living Wiki at
ASW Process for Standard 6 Virtual Meeting July 10, 2015.
North Carolina Healthful Living Leaders Webinar May 29, :30 – 4:30 p.m.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
North Carolina Student Perception Surveys Jennifer DeNeal Principal READY – Fall 2015.
Included In the Online Platform (Context) What is the purpose of the Narrative Context? To communicate to the reviewer where the students’ skills or knowledge.
2015 NCAAHPERD-SM DPI: An Overview Today’s ppt is available on the Professional Development page of Healthful Living Wiki at
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Analyzing Student Work to Change Teacher Practice.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
ASW Saw WaS… Making sense of the standard 6 Measure for Arts Educators.
Middle School Spanish January 6, Agenda  ASW google doc.  Exit Exam Updates  ASW Updates.
Modified & Track 4 Teachers Southeast Raleigh High School July 22nd, 2015 Office of School Performance Healthful Living Kickoff Meeting.
From a District’s Perspective Tips and Tools for Supporting ASW Implementation Davidson County Schools Lexington, North Carolina.
North Carolina Student Growth Portfolio Spring 2013 Pilot Arts Education, Healthful Living, World Languages February 25, 2013.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Check-in & Preparation ASW Wiki has today’s materials posted under ASW Professional Development on the Summer RESA Sessions.
Welcome! Please visit Our Wiki and download resources
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
LOGO The Narrative Piece. The Basics Student participation forms will be required for any photo or video assignments. (change) - This can be the general.
LOGO The Basics What is the Analysis of Student Work (ASW)? ASW is the Standard 6 student growth measurement process in North Carolina for.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Beth Fornadley-Johnson Jennifer Delcourt Rebekah Edens
National Board Process
Overview of ASW Process
The Portfolio Process.
Overview of ASW Process
Measures of Student Learning
Georgia Department of Education
Local Option Plan for Analysis of Student Work (ASW)
Implementing the Physical Activity Plan
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
What Teachers Need to Know Now
WCPSS HEALTHFUL LIVING CHAIRS MEETING - Middle
Presentation transcript:

ASW 101

NC Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students. Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach. Standard IV: Teachers facilitate learning for their students. Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice. Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students. ----- Meeting Notes (12/22/14 10:03) ----- measured in different ways

Overview of Standard 6 6 Analysis of Student Work End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests 6 NC Final Exams Career Technical Education Assessment Analysis of Student Work K-3 Checkpoints Contribute to Academic Success

Analysis of Student Work In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages. Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process. Contribute to Academic Success 6 Analysis of Student Work

Participation in ASW Process for High School Teachers (60% rule) If 60% of an educator’s classes* are in ASW subject areas, then the educator must participate in both ASW and any other Standard 6 measure covering the remaining classes. If 60% of an educator’s classes* can be covered by an existing measure of student learning, then the teacher is not required to participate in ASW. *Please note that locally developed electives that do not follow the standards set forth in the NC Standard Course of Study are not included in the ASW Process.

Participation in ASW Process for K-8 Teachers (45 minute rule) Educators who have 45 minutes per week scheduled with students in these content areas are required to participate in ASW. Educators who do not have 45 minutes per week scheduled with students in these content areas are not required to participate in ASW. For educators who do not meet the requirements to participate in the ASW Process, the district may choose to opt in to the ASW Process for those educators. The decision to opt in for a group of educators must be a district-wide decision. ----- Meeting Notes (12/22/14 13:01) ----- Will also include your classes that less then 45 min if you participate

8 Step Process: Step 1 Teacher Responsibility

Teaching Context Screen shot

Principal’s Input Principal receives a notification once a teacher’s schedule has been validated. The principal will then log into the Online Platform to confirm that the schedule is correct. After the teacher validates the schedule in the Online Platform, the principal will receive a notification from the online platform. The principal will need to log into the online platform and confirm that the teacher’s schedule is correct.

8 Step Process: Step 2 Platform Responsibility

Class Selection Beginning in 2014 – 2015, the online platform will select the classes in which the teacher must collect artifacts. .

8 Step Process: Step 3 Teacher Responsibility

Objective Selection Objectives: Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, the teacher will choose 5 objectives. Health Education Only Include 1 Timelapse Artifact representing each of the 5 strands of Health Education. HEALTH Mental & Emotional Health (MEH) Personal & Consumer Health (PCH) Interpersonal Communications & Relationships (ICR) Nutrition & Physical Activity (NPA) Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs (ATOD) Physical Education Only Include 1 Timelapse Artifact representing each of the 4 strands of Physical Education + 1 additional Timelapse Artifact representing any of the four Physical Education strands. PHYSICAL EDUCATION Motor Skills (MS) Movement Concepts (MC) Health-Related Fitness (HF) Personal/Social Responsibility (PR) Healthful Living (Health Education & Physical Education) Include: 1 Timelapse Artifact from the group of MEH, NPA, or ATOD strands (peach group); 1 Timelapse Artifact from the group of PCH or ICR strands (orange group); 1 Timelapse Artifact from the MS or MC strand (green group); 1 Timelapse Artifact from the HF or PR strand (blue group); and 1 additional Timelapse Artifact representing any of the 9 strands of Health and Physical Education.

Can You find?????

Lessons Learned from Pilots Choose objectives carefully Match teacher’s instruction and assessment Select artifacts that demonstrate: the objective selected at 2 points in time Realize not all objectives link easily to ASW process Activity Coming Soon! ----- Meeting Notes (12/22/14 10:03) ----- 2 points in time

Verb…That’s What’s Happening!!!!! Understand Evaluate Use Implement Demonstrate Apply Analyze Select Execute Organize Differentiate Interpret Explain Recall Identify

Principal’s Input Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart Some examples of meetings: PDPs teacher meetings

8 Step Process: Step 4 Teacher Responsibility

5 Timelapse Artifacts Teacher decisions needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA): A specific objective Sample type Individual Student or Whole Class Collection Method Samples from Point 1 and Point 2 There are several items needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact: A specific objective to measure over 2 distinct points in time; Click The selected TA option, either student or whole class; Click A method or tool for collecting; Click 2 work samples; and Context. Teachers may choose their type of student grouping for each Timelapse Artifact in their Evidence Collection. Student or Whole Class Work Samples, which are evidences, can be any kind of uploadable file or files, as specified with parameters for the online platform, that convey meaningful and authentic student learning in the classroom. The two evidences that encompass a Timelapse Artifact should demonstrate growth from the same student or group in relationship to the identified objective. Details in narrative format about the evidences in each Timelapse Artifact will be added. If needed, supporting document(s) may be linked to the narrative (For example, dance notation, sheet music, clips of audio or video prompts, readings, scoring rubrics, event programs, excerpts of published works, play diagram, etc.).

OR Work Sample Type The Teacher may choose: 2 2 The Teacher may choose: Option 1 – Student Work Samples Collect and keep 2 work samples: for each class member for the objective at 2 separate points in time OR 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 Student Work Samples involves a teacher collecting and keeping 2 work samples: • for each class member, • for the objective, • at 2 separate points in time. 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1

2 1 Work Sample Type The Teacher may choose: Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples 2 work samples that represent the entire class for the objective at 2 separate points in time Whole Class Work Samples involves a teacher collecting and keeping 2 work samples that represent the entire class: for the objective, at 2 separate points in time.

Collection Method Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting: Pre Test Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf Pre Test Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf

Collection Method → File Size Up to 10 MB per file! Pre Test Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljd ----- Meeting Notes (12/22/14 10:03) ----- compress video

8 Step Process: Step 5 Platform Responsibility

Student Selection Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples Online platform will select 3 students The TA will be compiled using the Individual Student Work Samples from these selected students. TA 1 When it is time to upload Option 1 Timelapse Artifacts, teachers will receive a random sample of students for whom they must upload Timelapse Artifacts to the online platform. The online platform will randomly identify or select 3 students for each objective chosen by the teacher. The TA will be compiled using the Student Work Samples from these selected students.

Student Selection Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled to create another sampling. TA 1 If a work sample from a selected student is unavailable, the teacher may request that the online platform identify a new student to replace that one. This may occur if a student was not present for instruction or if he or she is no longer in class. Then, the missing student will be reshuffled by the online platform and another sampling will be created.

8 Step Process: Step 6 Teacher Responsibility

Upload Evidence Context for 1st work sample in each Timelapse Artifact How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? This artifact was created using an 8th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the student did not show proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways. 1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist. 2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper chest. 3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow. 4. The elbows are bending during the compression.

Upload Evidence Context for 2nd work sample in each Timelapse Artifact How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? This artifact was created using an 8th grade Health Education Class containing 32 students three class days after instruction began. In this video, the student shows proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways. 1. The student has the proper body position, on his knees next to the victim. 2. The force of the compression is generated from the hips and applied in a vertical direction. 3. The hands are positioned with an interlocking grip. 4. The heel of the bottom hand has been placed on the sternum.

Upload Evidence Context for Growth in each Timelapse Artifact Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2. Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2. CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival

Upload Evidence 1 Timelapse Artifact Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples 1 2 1 Timelapse Artifact 1 2 1 2

Upload Evidence Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples 2 1 1 Timelapse Artifact

Upload Evidence TA 3 Student TA 1 Student All 5 Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platform as the teacher’s Evidence Collection for the school year. TA 4 Student TA 2 Whole Class TA 5 Whole Class

8 Step Process: Step 7 Platform Responsibility

Blind Review The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists. E D M Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by two content area specialists. The teacher does not know who the reviewers are and the reviewers do not know who the teacher is. Reviewers are fully licensed North Carolina educators with a minimum of 5 years classroom experience in the subject areas they review.

Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth Blind Review If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 M M If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year. Don’t forget: For Status, 3 years of ratings or growth data from Standard 6 must be known. Teachers using the ASW process will receive their first year of data in 2014-2015. Year 2 of growth data will be 2015-2016, and Year 3 will be 2016-2017. That means that teachers receiving their Standard 6 rating will receive their first Status (Highly Effective, Effective, or In Need of Improvement) in Fall 2017. Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth

Blind Review If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. Reviewer #3 If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. As always, 3 years of ratings or growth data from Standard 6 must be available before teachers participating in the ASW Process will receive their first Status (Highly Effective, Effective, or In Need of Improvement) in Fall 2017. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 M E

#1 Evidence Collection Checklist Blind Review 2-Step ASW Process Review These will be explained in detail in later modules. #1 Evidence Collection Checklist #2 ASW Quality Rubric There are two steps to the Analysis of Student Work (ASW) Process review for evaluators. The first step involves using the Evidence Collection Checklist to verify that all five Timelapse Artifacts of the Evidence Collection are present, visible, and accessible. This checklist is used to confirm that each Timelapse Artifact: Has student work samples from two points in time, presented as either 3 individual student work samples or a whole class sample; Meets the guidelines set forth in the Strands and Standards chart. Once the Evidence Collection is verified, the reviewer continues the evaluation using the ASW Quality Rubric. CLICK The ASW Quality Rubric measures the degree to which a Timelapse Artifact demonstrates quality relative to the objective selected. Specifically, the reviewer determines if the evidence shows that the student(s) Cannot, Can partially, Can, or Can extensively Demonstrate the objective chosen. The reviewer then uses professional judgment and expertise to determine the amount of growth demonstrated in the Timelapse Artifact.

8 Step Process: Step 8 Platform Responsibility

Receive Rating TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5 D M M M E Evidence Collection Rating Form: D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth M = Meets Expected Growth E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: This is the Evidence Collection Rating Form. Reviewers will use this form to determine the final rating of the entire Evidence Collection. The table in the middle of the slide shows all possible rating combinations a complete Evidence Collection with 5 Timelapse Artifacts could receive. Based on the combination of ratings the reviewer assigns, the reviewer then selects one of the following ratings for the entire Evidence Collection based on the table: Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5   D M M M E

Synthesis table to determine Standard 6 rating Receive Rating Synthesis table to determine Standard 6 rating Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds D D D D D M M M M M E E E E E D D D D E M M M M E M E E E E D D D D M D M M M M M M E E E D D D E E M M M E E D E E E E D D D M E D D M M M D M E E E D D D M M D M M M E D D E E E   D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E a This is the Evidence Collection Rating Form. Reviewers will use this form to determine the final rating of the entire Evidence Collection. The table in the middle of the slide shows all possible rating combinations a complete Evidence Collection with 5 Timelapse Artifacts could receive. Based on the combination of ratings the reviewer assigns, the reviewer then selects one of the following ratings for the entire Evidence Collection based on the table: Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth a

6 Effectiveness Status 3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6 An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of their own data for Standard 6 The use of three years of data for Standard 6 safeguards teachers from errors in calculation.

Effectiveness Status Only for 2014 – 2017: Best 2 out of 3 years of data Mr. NC’s 3 years of growth data: 2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1) 2015-16 Meets (Year 2) + 2016-17 Meets (Year 3) Mr. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth Standard 6 Year 1 2014-2015 Does Not Meet Expected Growth Year 2 2015-2016 Meets Expected Growth Year 3 2016-2017 Meets Expected Growth Contribute to Academic Success

New Timeline Sept. – Dec. District time to train teachers and correct 2nd semester schedule data in PowerSchool. January Teachers access schedule information in ASW Platform to complete a practice validation of their 2nd semester schedules Districts correct teacher schedule information Teachers access schedule information in ASW Platform to complete the final validation of their 2nd semester schedules

New Timeline February – May 2nd Semester Evidence Collection Window Can evidence be collected during 1st semester? Teachers of year-long classes may voluntarily choose to collect and keep evidence from the first semester for use in one or more of their 3 Timelapse Artifacts, but are not required to do so. The expectation for the ASW Process is that teachers will only need to collect and keep evidence for 3 Timelapse Artifacts in the spring of 2015. For semester teachers – the online platform will only choose classes from the 2nd semester. Teachers with semester classes should only collect evidence from 2nd semester classes.

New Timeline May 2nd Semester Student Selection/Evidence Upload Window Opens June 2nd Semester Evidence Upload Window Closes

World Languages D234 Elementary Art D127 Middle/ HS Art D124 PE - Elem/ Middle/ High Auditorium Middle / High Music Mr. Street's Rm Elementary Music Ms. Wyatt's Rm AP Teacher Workroom D Hall

Strands & Standards Guidance Charts Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, 5 objectives will be chosen. Health Education Only Include 1 Timelapse Artifact representing each of the 5 strands of Health Education. HEALTH Mental & Emotional Health (MEH) Personal & Consumer Health (PCH) Interpersonal Communications & Relationships (ICR) Nutrition & Physical Activity (NPA) Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs (ATOD) Physical Education Only Include 1 Timelapse Artifact representing each of the 4 strands of Physical Education + 1 additional Timelapse Artifact representing any of the four Physical Education strands. PHYSICAL EDUCATION Motor Skills (MS) Movement Concepts (MC) Health-Related Fitness (HF) Personal/Social Responsibility (PR) Healthful Living (Health Education & Physical Education) Include: 1 Timelapse Artifact from the group of MEH, NPA, or ATOD strands (peach group); 1 Timelapse Artifact from the group of PCH or ICR strands (orange group); 1 Timelapse Artifact from the MS or MC strand (green group); 1 Timelapse Artifact from the HF or PR strand (blue group); and 1 additional Timelapse Artifact representing any of the 9 strands of Health and Physical Education.

(MS) Motor Skills PE.1.MS.1.2 Use recognizable forms of the five basic manipulative skills. PE.6.MS.1.3 Explain the importance of practice to improve skill level. PE.9.MS.1.4 Create movement combinations in rhythmic activities with an emphasis on keeping to the beat of the music.

(MC) Movement Concepts PE.4.MC.2.4 Classify examples of health-related fitness into the five components. PE.7.MC.2.3 Apply game strategies and tactics at appropriate times and in appropriate ways. PE.9.MC.2.1 Create plans for establishing and maintaining lifelong health-enhancing behaviors based on concepts of health, fitness, and nutrition.

(HF) Health-Related Fitness PE.3.HF.3.1 Summarize four or more of the five health-related fitness assessments and the associated exercises. PE.8.HF.3.1 Evaluate progress toward achieving health-related fitness standards, using the results to make improvements. PE.8.HF.3.3 Use a variety of resources to assess, monitor, and improve personal fitness. PE.9.HF.3.1 Evaluate personal health-related physical fitness status in terms of cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength, muscular endurance, flexibility, and body composition.

(PR) Personal/Social Responsibility PE.5.PR.4.2 Use cooperation and communication skills to achieve common goals. NO MIDDLE SCHOOL PE.9.PR.4.2 Select the most appropriate ways of responding and mediate to settle conflicts.