Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading II Planning Core/Benchmark, Strategic, & Intensive Interventions.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades

Advertisements

November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.

Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Enhancing Vocabulary Instruction in Core Reading Instruction (2-3) Institute on Beginning.

Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.

General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus

Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007

MTSS – What’s That? Session 1 Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 ) – Work we are doing Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)  What is this.

1 Achieving a Healthy Grade- Level System in Beginning Reading Content developed by Carrie Thomas Beck.

Deborah Simmons, Hank Fien and Nicole Sherman Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs:

Oregon Reading First Leadership Session October 20, 2005 (Cohort B) October 21, 2005 (Cohort A) Erb Memorial Union University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon.

Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading Day 4: Instruction: Time, Scheduling & Grouping / Reading.

Supplemental and Intervention Programs

Institute on Beginning Reading II

1 Using Data to Plan Interventions: Determining Student Needs and Making Instructional Recommendations Kathryn Howe Trish Travers

1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of.

1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,

Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading II Enhancing Comprehension Instruction in Core Reading Instruction.

Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D Coordinator, Oregon Reading First Center

1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort B.

Scott Baker, Ph.D. Michael Rebar, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential.

Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential Component Reading Comprehension Edward J. Kame’enui, Ph. D.

What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.

1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading.

1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.

Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading Day 1: Knowledge and Goals.

IBR II Cohort B September 28 and 29, 2005

1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.

1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning.

Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Overview of Advanced DIBELS Applications Institute on Beginning Reading II.

1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.

Beth Harn & Rachell Katz Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential Component.

Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Using Assessment Data to Improve Outcomes for Each Student Institute on Beginning Reading.

From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf

Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring

Core Program Analysis Coaches’ State Conference Winter 2009.

Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf

Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.

1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.

Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.

D62 Response to Intervention

B-ELL Leadership Session May 26, 2009 Jorge Preciado University of Oregon © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.

Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,

FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.

A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida PS/RtI Train the Trainers Regional Meetings.

STUDENT GROWTH UPDATE LEARNING GOALS FOR TODAY - Teachers will be able to clearly delineate between the 4 levels of expectations on student.

1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,

Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.

Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.

Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell

CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.

Cohort 4 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring

RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.

Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.

Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.

Presented by Dr. Jalilah Dukes and Bobbie Sievering Chicago Heights School District 170 October 2010.

Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring

Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.

Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.

DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.

Oregon Reading First Leadership Session October 20, 2005 (Cohort B) October 21, 2005 (Cohort A) Erb Memorial Union University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon.

1 Linking DIBELS Data to Differentiated Instructional Support Plans 32 nd Annual COSA Seaside Conference June 23, 2006 Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching.

1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.

Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.

Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.

Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.

Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.

Data-Based Leadership

Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A

Presentation transcript:

Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading II Planning Core/Benchmark, Strategic, & Intensive Interventions - Fall to Winter

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Acknowledgments  Oregon Department of Education  Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement, College of Education, University of Oregon  U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Content Development Content developed by: Edward J. Kame’enui, Ph. D.Deborah C. Simmons, Ph. D.Professor, College of EducationUniversity of Oregon Beth Harn, Ph.D.Michael D. Coyne, Ph. D. University of OregonUniversity of Connecticut David Chard, Ph. D. University of Oregon Additional support: Patrick Kennedy-Paine Katie TateNicole Sherman-Brewer University of OregonOregon Reading First

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Copyright  All materials are copy written and should not be reproduced or used without expressed permission of Dr. Edward J. Kame’enui or Dr. Deborah C. Simmons. Selected slides were reproduced from other sources and original references cited.

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Schoolwide: Each & All Prevention Oriented Scientifically Based Results Focused IBR Foundational Features: Translating Research into Practice

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Today’s Focus 1.Goals: What outcomes do we want for our students in our state, district, and schools? 2.Knowledge: What do we know and what guidance can we gain from scientifically based reading research? 3.Progress Monitoring Assessment: How are we doing? What is our current level of performance as a school? As a grade? As a class? As an individual student? 4.Outcome Assessment: How far do we need to go to reach our goals and outcomes? 5.Core Instruction: What are the critical components that need to be in place to reach our goals? 6.Differentiated Instruction: What more do we need to do and what instructional adjustments need to be made? IBR Guiding Questions

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © The objectives of today’s session are to: 1.Introduce the alterable variables used to enhance core instruction and learning. 2.Develop plans for core, strategic, and intensive (CSI) interventions for fall to winter. Objectives: What You Will Learn and Do

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Enhancing Instruction  Few core programs are adequate for all children.  Some children will need more examples, teacher support, and practice on selected skills.  A few children will need much more intensive intervention not provided in the core program.

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © How Do We Enhance Instruction & Learning?  Remember the focus must be on factors over which you have jurisdiction:  Program & program emphasis  Time (opportunities to learn)  Grouping structures  Quality of instruction & program implementation Alter the fewest number of factors possible that provide the greatest return.

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Instructional Enhancements Increasing Intensity

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Planning Core/Benchmark Instruction: CSI Maps  Goals: Each big idea and high priority skills for months 1-5.  Instructional Need: DIBELS recommendation Instructional Details  Program/materials  Time/day  Grouping  Assessment: Progressive benchmark for fall.

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Kindergarten

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Kindergarten

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Grade 1

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Grade 1

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Grade 1

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Grade 2

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Grade 2

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Grade 3

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Grade 3

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © CSI Map: Grade 1 Example  Following is a sample CSI map for Grade 1. The full example can be found in the materials for this section.

Simmons, Kame'enui, & Harn © Application Activity  Plan instruction for your core/benchmark students.  Meet with your grade-level team.  Document in each column: programs, time, grouping, and assessment the specific information that communicates your plan to teach all children to attain critical benchmarks by January.  If time permits, proceed to your plan for strategic & intensive intervention.