Jack Ballantyne, Erin Hanson National Center for Forensic Science, UCF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brief History of Forensic DNA Typing
Advertisements

Breaking Down the Double Helix: A Crime Lab Perspective on Post-Conviction DNA Testing Dean M. Gialamas President, American Society of Crime Laboratory.
Criminal Justice 121 What is it about Men?. National Research Council Understanding Violence “ behaviors by individuals that intentionally threaten, attempt,
Sexual Assault: The Role of the Pre-hospital Provider Tiffany Kuehl, MD Spokane Emergency Medicine Associates Deaconess Emergency Department.
Case Management Issues from Crime Scene to Court Room.
STATE AND NATIONAL DNA DATABASES: CODIS Division Scientific Services CT Forensic Science Laboratory Dr. Michael Bourke
DNA & CRIME ARRESTEE DNA DATABASES Presented by Lisa Hurst Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs Atlanta, Georgia August 14, 2013 National Conference.
Trafficking Research for Law Enforcement John T. Picarelli Social Science Analyst International Center National Institute of Justice August 4,
An Essential Component of Crime Scene Investigation.
J. Ballantyne1,2, E. Hanson1, R. Green3, A. Holt3 and J. Mulero3
Lecture 12: Autosomal STR DNA Profiling
Solution: Create a databank that will have everyone’s DNA input to have some evidence in the case that DNA is found in a crime scene.
Chapter 1. Speed of Analysis (Technology) Power of Discrimination (Genetics) Low High SlowFast Markers Used (Biology) RFLP Single Locus Probes RFLP Multi-Locus.
Technology Transfer Workshop Laser Microdissection Advanced LMD Forensic Applications Patrick Wojtkiewicz, Ph.D. North Louisiana Crime Lab (318)
DNA Forensics MUPGRET Workshop. “DNA evidence…offers prosecutors important new tools for the identification and apprehension of some of the most violent.
Forensic DNA Past, Present, Future Kathy Sullivan Illinois State Police Joliet Forensic Science Laboratory.
The Basics of CODIS Combined DNA Index System
Forensic Science Education. “Neat-o. Maybe I want to be a forensic scientist.” Questions:  What does a forensic scientist do?  What type of education.
WHY Y’s? Strengths and Limitations of Male-Specific Y-STR Testing Jack Laird and Valerie Blackmore Senior Associates General Information Presentation Fall.
Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing Slides prepared by John M. Butler June 2009 Chapter 13 Quality Assurance.
Forensic Statistics From the ground up…. Basics Interpretation Hardy-Weinberg equations Random Match Probability Likelihood Ratio Substructure.
Report Standardization in the State of Arizona Kris Cano Forensic Laboratory Manager Scottsdale Police Department Crime Laboratory.
Expert Systems for Automated STR Analysis SWGDAM Quantico, VA Mark W. Perlin January, 2003.
Ronald Reinstein Chairman, Arizona Forensic Services Advisory Committee.
Crime Scene Investigation Science in Motion Cedar Crest College.
Technology Transfer Workshop Forensic LMD Research Studies at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science North Chicago, IL Christine T. Sanders.
Statistical weights of mixed DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics ( Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA.
Chapter 1 Introduction to forensic science and the law.
DNA Typing - PCR Invented in PCR offers the possibility of increased sensitivity. It requires 50 times less sample than RFLP analysis. DNA sample,
Automated STR Data Analysis: Validation Studies Automated Analysis Databasing Validation Casework Studies Mark W. Perlin (Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA)
Association for Criminal Justice Research. Forensic DNA Typing Advantages Advantages Sensitivity of method Sensitivity of method Polymerase Chain Reaction.
Crime Scene Investigator Occupation PowerPoint Created by The University of North Texas in partnership with the Texas Education Agency.
FORENSIC DNA ASSESSMENT Presented by: Smith Alling Lane, P.S. Tacoma, WA (253) Washington, DC (202) London 011 (44) Tim.
Debunking the Myths: The context of unwanted sexual experiences Ellen S. Cohn, Mary M. Moynihan, Victoria L. Banyard, Wendy Walsh, and Sally Ward, University.
Chapter 7 Forensic Issues: Degraded DNA, PCR Inhibition, Contamination, and Mixed Samples ©2002 Academic Press.
Case Management Issues from Crime Scene to Court Room.
The Organization of a Crime Lab What is the name of the system operating in Alabama?
Cybergenetics Webinar January, 2015 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © How TrueAllele ® Works (Part 4)
Washington State Postconviction DNA Testing Program Grant Prof. Jacqueline McMurtrie, J.D. Director, Innocence Project Northwest Clinic University of Washington.
Sgt. Kevin McKinney Investigations Division Elko County Sheriff’s Office.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint® Lectures Lectures by Greg Podgorski, Utah State University CSI: Reality.
Technology Management Services (TMS) CJS/IJS/FSL/ICDMS 13 May 2015.
Implications of database searches for DNA profiling statistics Forensic Bioinformatics ( Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton,
Y-STR POLYMORPHISMS IN FORENSIC CASEWORK Mgr. Jana Odlerová Institute of Forensic Science Slovak Police Corps.
Technology Transition Workshop Field Investigation Drug Officer Program History Technology Transition Workshop| David L. Sylvester.
Law Enforcement at All Levels of Government Executive Branch of Government (Enforce Laws)
Simple Reporting of Complex DNA Evidence: Automated Computer Interpretation Promega 14th International Symposium on Human Identification Pointe Hilton.
Solutions for DNA backlogs Peter M Marone Virginia Department of Forensic Science Texas Forensic Science Seminar October 7-8, 2010.
What can go wrong with DNA profiling Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling Video Series Forensic Bioinformatics (
Jack Ballantyne Department of Chemistry University of Central Florida, Orlando National Center for Forensic Science The Determination of Physical Features.
Forensic Science Education Dr. Jason Linville University of Alabama at Birmingham Forensic Science Education Finding a Forensic Job or.
Chapter 19: Y-STR Profiling and Gender Typing.  Y chromosome inherited by the father  Unique to males  Y-STR  Sexual assault investigations w/ male.
By: Casey Crawford.  - Foundation in chemistry, biology, physics, and math  - General chemistry I and II and lab for science majors (8 credit hours)
SFS1. Students will recognize and classify various types of evidence in relation to the definition and scope of Forensic Science. 8/15/13.
Forensics. Forensics: The study and application of science to matters of law. Evidence: anything that tends to establish or disprove a fact Forensic scientists.
Marjan Sjerps Kees van der Beek Ate Kloosterman
Forensic Update Nicola Clayson
DNA: TrueAllele® Statistical Analysis, Probabilistic Genotyping
1.3: Crime Labs SFS1. Students will recognize and classify various types of evidence in relation to the definition and scope of Forensic Science. 8/4/16.
Statistical Weights of DNA Profiles
Criminal Investigations
The science: accuracy, reliability and interpretation. Andrew P. Read
DRILL: What are some things you have see on TV about the field of forensics?
Crime Laboratories There are nearly 400 crime labs in US –Federal, state, county, and municipal (local) –Most function as part of a police department –Others.
Forensic significance and Population structure based on the 11-loci SWGDAM recommended Y-STR haplotypes in some Nigerian Population.
Laser Microdissection
DNA Fingerprinting and Forensic Analysis
Using NamUs to Resolve Missing and Unidentified Person Cases
Laser Microdissection
Presentation transcript:

Jack Ballantyne, Erin Hanson National Center for Forensic Science, UCF

In the US, an estimated 19.3% of women and 1.7% of men have been raped during their lifetimes -CDC Sept X 2

3

4 No suspect identified Analysis not requested by prosecutor Lab not accepting new evidence due to backlog Officer uncertain of usefulness Lab was unable to produce timely results Incident took place > 72 hours ago Worse than reported: excuses why some rape evidence is not submitted?

 some rape victims report the incident > 3 days after the incident e.g. incapacitation by drink or drugs/ acquaintance rape  in many jurisdictions, no intimate samples collected from rape victims if reported > 3 days 5

myth or fact? sperm normally only persist in observable numbers in the post-coital vagina up to 3 days after intercourse standard DNA-STR profiling is not possible in late reported intimate post coital samples male DNA profile recovery success diminishes rapidly as the post-coital interval is extended: > h difficult >72 h not normally possible BUT from the literature sperm (albeit few in number) may be detectable in the vaginal canal 7-10 days after intercourse 6

1998: maybe Y chromosome analysis can help resolve rape cases that standard DNA analysis can’t? 7

Only found in males Can ‘ignore’ any female DNA from victim In mixed M/F samples sometimes standard DNA analysis cannot detect the M component Although discrimination not as good as autosomal DNA- STR testing Use Y!!! 8

9 New Y-STR Kits -more loci -more discrimination -better chemistry -RM loci: higher probability of discriminating patrilineal relatives

10 Autosomal/total human Total Human Quant Also Also Quality (Degradation) Index Male/Y specific Male DNA Quant F/M Ratio Autosomal STR analysis (low ratio?) or Y-STR analysis (high ratio?) new YSTR kits new YSTR kits Improved sensitivity? More robust Better discrimination

Prescribes the use of Y-STRs in certain case circumstances: “Y-STR typing is also used in lieu of autosomal typing for the detection of male DNA in mixtures that contain an overabundance of female DNA. Given that under certain conditions a male minor contributor in a mixture of female:male DNA may only be detectable by Y-STR typing, laboratories should pursue Y-STR analysis as the most appropriate means of detecting a male contributor(s) in some forensic samples”. 11

12 Extended Interval Post Coital Samples Studies Use Y-STR analysis Controlled studies using volunteer couples collect samples at different time points after intercourse Evidence recovered by cervical brushing Use enhanced DNA methods

13 Extended Interval Post Coital Samples Studies 2003 Routine recovery of Y-STR DNA profiles up to 4 days after intercourse non commercial Y-STRs enhanced methods 2008 Y-STR DNA profiles up to 5-6 days commercial Y-STRs enhanced methods 2014 Y-STR DNA profiles up to 6-9 days commercial Y-STRs advanced enhanced methods 2014 Y-STR DNA profiles up to 6-9 days commercial Y-STRs (new kits) no need for advanced enhanced methods

14 More Extensive Longitudinal Studies Collaboration with Pat Speck, UTHSC, Memphis ( ) 66 consenting monogamous couples Samples collected from cervix and fornix Baseline; 4, 7 and 9 days after intercourse Enhanced compared to standard analysis Advanced enhanced Next gen commercial Y-STR kits (28 couples)

15 Significantly improved analysis using enhanced or next gen commercial kit analysis Probative (at least 10 alleles) Y-STR profiles obtained from ~23% of 9 day samples Full (highly probative) DNA profiles obtained with commercial next gen kit in ~11% of samples (from 28 couples) 61% partial DNA profiles (1-27 alleles)

16

18

19  Applied Biosystems: 5781 samples  California Department of Justice, Sacramento: 32 samples  DuPage County Forensic Science Center: 112 samples  Fairfax Identity Laboratories: 241 samples  Federal Bureau of Investigation: samples  GenQuest DNA Analysis Laboratory: 3 samples  Illinois State Police: 494 samples  Marshall University Forensic Science Center: 371 samples  National Center for Forensic Science: 2052 samples  National Institute of Standards and Technology: 974 samples  NMS Labs: 5 samples  Orange County CA Coroner: 30 samples  Oregon State Police: 394 samples  Promega: 5921 samples  ReliaGene: 3036 samples  Richland County Sheriff’s Department: 7 samples  San Diego Sheriff’s Department: 94 samples  Santa Clara County CA Crime Laboratory: 254 samples  Thermo Fisher Scientific: 1283 samples  University of Arizona: 2462 samples  University of North Texas: 951 samples  Washington State Patrol Crime Lab, Vancouver: 40 samples

20  Since January 2008, 140,000 database search queries  Currently 1300 searches per month.  Continue to solicit data from the community (i.e. forensic laboratories )  Continue to incorporate the suggestions and recommendations received from users and SWGDAM

21

Laboratories should provide or arrange to provide Y-STR typing services in addition to standard DNA analysisLaboratories should provide or arrange to provide Y-STR typing services in addition to standard DNA analysis Jurisdictions should collect samples from samples at least up to 10 days after intercourseJurisdictions should collect samples from samples at least up to 10 days after intercourse What is the limit of recovery of DNA profiles from the semen donor (surely > 9 days)?What is the limit of recovery of DNA profiles from the semen donor (surely > 9 days)? Recovery of standard autosomal DNA profile > 4 days?Recovery of standard autosomal DNA profile > 4 days? Other biological and socio-economic factors effecting recovery of male DNA from the cervico-vaginal tractOther biological and socio-economic factors effecting recovery of male DNA from the cervico-vaginal tract More loci-NGS- complete male differentiationMore loci-NGS- complete male differentiation 22

The end crowns all, and that old common arbitrator, Time, will one day end it. The end crowns all, and that old common arbitrator, Time, will one day end it. Shakespeare Thank you for your attention! Acknowledgements: Funding: NIJ and FTCOE Pat Speck (UAB), Tamyra Moretti (FBI)