An Historically Consistent and Broadly Applicable MRV System Based on Lidar Sampling and Landsat Time-series Warren B. Cohen 1, Hans-Erik Andersen 1, Sean.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REDD+ Methodologies for Regional and Local Land- cover Thelma Krug Co-Chair of the IPCC Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Head of INPE´s.
Advertisements

Ispra, 2 2 – 2 3 September Recommendations for the content of the NIRs and CRFs by Zoltan Somogyi, Sandro Federici and Günther Seufert.
Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
Time Series Fusion of Optical and Radar Imagery for Improved Monitoring of Activity Data, and Uncertainty Analysis of Emission Factors for Estimation of.
Meeting Forest Carbon Planning Needs with Forest Service Data and Satellite Imagery Sean Healey, Gretchen Moisen RMRS Inventory, Monitoring, and Analysis.
SilvaCarbon Program Capacity building for implementing Monitoring, Reporting and Verification systems for REDD+ Sylvia Wilson U.S. Geological Survey SilvaCarbon.
THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE US FOREST CARBON INVENTORY: RECENT PAST AND NEAR FUTURE Christopher W. Woodall, Research Forester, U.S. Forest Service,
Spatial monitoring of late-successional forest habitat over large regions with nearest-neighbor imputation Janet Ohmann 1, Matt Gregory 2, Heather Roberts.
TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE FOREST CARBON INVENTORY OF THE UNITED STATES: RECENT PAST AND NEAR FUTURE Christopher W. Woodall, Research Forester, U.S. Forest.
US Forest Disturbance Trends observed with Landsat Time Series Samuel N. Goward 1 (PI), Jeffrey Masek 2, Warren Cohen 3, Gretchen Moisen 4, Chengquan Huang.
Comparison of biomass allometric approaches for regional scale carbon mapping Scott Powell – Montana State University Robert Kennedy – Boston University.
A data assimilation approach to quantify uncertainty for estimates of biomass stocks and changes in Amazon forests Paul Duffy Michael Keller Doug Morton.
US Carbon Trends March 17, USDA Greenhouse Gas Symposium1 Spatial and Temporal Patterns of the Contemporary Carbon Sources and Sinks in the Ridge.
Interagency Whitebark Pine Health Monitoring Program for the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Cooperating Organizations: USDA Forest Service Greater Yellowstone.
Mapping change in live and dead forest biomass with Landsat time-series, remeasured plots, and nearest-neighbor imputation Janet Ohmann 1, Matt Gregory.
Operational multi-sensor design for forest carbon monitoring to support REDD+ in Kalimantan, Indonesia Stephen Hagen (Applied GeoSolutions) NASA Carbon.
Chapter 12 - Forecasting Forecasting is important in the business decision-making process in which a current choice or decision has future implications:
Advantages of Monitoring Vegetation Restoration With the Carolina Vegetation Survey Protocol M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, and.
Module 2.5 Estimation of carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World.
MRV & Reporting Status & Related Space Data Needs CAMBODIA SDCG-7 Sydney, Australia March 4 th – 6 th 2015.
METHOD A sample design for Landsat-based estimation of national trends in forest disturbance and regrowth Presented by Kennedy at the Joint Workshop on.
Compton Tucker, GSFC Sassan Satchi, JPL Jeff Masek, GSFC Rama Nemani, ARC Diane Wickland, HQ Terrestrial Biomass Pilot Product: Estimating Biomass and.
Update of the National Biomass and Carbon Dataset 2000 using ALOS PALSAR L-band data Josef Kellndorfer, Wayne Walker, Oliver Cartus The Woods Hole Research.
Introduction Evaluating Population-Habitat Relationships of Forest Breeding Birds at Multiple Scales Using Forest Inventory and Analysis Data Todd M. Fearer.
Samuel H. Huang, Winter 2012 Basic Concepts and Constant Process Overview of demand forecasting Constant process –Average and moving average method –Exponential.
USDA Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Center Forest Inventory and Analysis New Technology How is FIA integrating new technological developments.
PROGRESS TOWARD CREATING A NATIONAL TPO PROGRAM John Coulston 2015 National FIA User Group Meeting April 1-2, San Antonio TX.
Moving on From Experimental Approaches to Advancing National Systems for Measuring and Monitoring Forest Degradation Across Asia Moving on From Experimental.
Changing Forests…Enduring Values NACP Research Supporting Mandated Forest Service Carbon Monitoring Activities Sean Healey 1, Warren Cohen 1, Chris Woodall.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Mapping Forest Canopy Height with MISR We previously demonstrated a capability to obtain physically meaningful canopy structural parameters using data.
Forest Inventory and Analysis USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Remote sensing; The world beyond aerial photos.
FAO Actions Related to GFOI Components. FAO history in forest monitoring and assessment Began in 1946 focused on commercial timber Activities involving.
Planning for Inventory & Monitoring Chip Scott National Inventory & Monitoring Applications Center (FIA-NIMAC) Northern Research Station U.S. Forest Service.
Introducing the New Forest Carbon Accounting Framework The FIA Carbon Accounting Team: Christopher Woodall, Grant Domke, John Coulston, Dave Wear, James.
1 Breakout Notes Session 3 Group 2 – (Global/Broad Scale/Regional) Integrated assessment models (socio-economic/biophysical) in relationship to land cover.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
1 Expert workshop on components of EEA Ecosystem Capital Accounts (ECA) Focus on biomass carbon and biodiversity data 24/03/2015.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Inventory of U.S.GHG Emissions and Sinks: UNFCCC Reporting Requirements and IPCC Methodological Guidance FIA User Group Meeting San Antonio, TX—April 2,
The US National Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Forests: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Christopher W. Woodall with Domke, Smith, Coulston, Healey,
Measuring degradation for REDD+ forest reference emission levels / forest reference levels (FREL/FRL) Julian Fox Forestry Officer (UN-REDD) Food and Agriculture.
 “Best” permutation for each model type determined by ranking RMSE, variance ratio, bias, and R 2 (Table 5).  Arizona favored less complex variable permutations.
Monitoring Tropical forests with L-band radar: lessons from Indonesian Peat Swamps Matt Waldram, Sue Page, Kevin Tansey Geography Department.
Integrating time series of Landsat-based information into FIA's estimation process RMRS: Gretchen Moisen, Todd Schroeder, Sean Healey, Ray Czaplewski PNW:
Biometrics Working Group Meeting – New Orleans, LA. 04 March, 2009 Forest Inventory Components of Change (Growth, Removals & Mortality): Christopher M.
Site Harvard Hemlock Site 305 Site Harvard EMS tower  The LAI estimates are impacted by changes in the occlusion effect at the different scales.  75.
Other issues for volume 2 of the revised SEEA Peter Comisari London Group meeting, Wiesbaden 30 Nov – 4 Dec 2009.
SDCG-4, Caltech, CA, USA 4 th -6 th September 2013 Author/Presenter Indonesia MRV & Reporting Status & Related Space.
An Examination of the Relation between Burn Severity and Forest Height Change in the Taylor Complex Fire using LIDAR data from ICESat/GLAS Andrew Maher.
Status: Criterion 5—Maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles Linda S. Heath James E. Smith USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research.
AN IMPROVED VOLUME, BIOMASS, AND CARBON DATABASE FOR U.S. TREE SPECIES James A. Westfall U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis.
Uncertainty in national-scale soil C inventory estimates Keith Paustian 1,2, Stephen Ogle 2, Jay Breidt 3 1 Dept of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State.
Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Survey of a Sky.
Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: Welcome from NASA HQ November 12, 2014.
Carbon in United States Forests and Wood Products, : State-by-State Estimates Richard A. Birdsey George M. Lewis USDA Forest Service Global Change.
2004 Highlights Environmental Analysis & Research Team (EAR) 2005 PNW-FIA Client Meeting 15 March 2005 Troutdale, OR.
NASA Carbon Monitoring System (NASA-CMS) NASA Carbon Monitoring System Science Team Overview George Hurtt NASA-CMS Science Team Leader Department of Geographical.
Prototyping a methodology to develop regional-scale forest aboveground biomass carbon maps predicted from Landsat time series, trained from field and lidar.
Experience Michigan! Kirtland's warbler Photo by Ron Austing Taken in Huron-Manistee National Forest.
NASA CMS Algorithm Assessment/Intercomparison Working Group Summary Presentation November 6 th, 2013 Coordinator: Scott Powell Members: David Baker, Molly.
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Monitoring and MRV context of the Country National Forest Inventory (NFI): the previous NFI has not covered some forest type (the sampling strategy did.
Using inventory data as a proxy de delimit forest degradation Joint GFOI/GOFC-GOLD Expert Workshop 2: Approaches to monitoring forest degradation for REDD+
Western Mensurationists Meeting 2016
OGWC – Forest C Bev Law Prof. Global Change Biology & Terrestrial Systems Science Oregon State University Oct 6, 2016.
Operational Regional Carbon Assessment
Potential Landsat Contributions
Chapter 5 Cross-cutting Issues.
Presentation transcript:

An Historically Consistent and Broadly Applicable MRV System Based on Lidar Sampling and Landsat Time-series Warren B. Cohen 1, Hans-Erik Andersen 1, Sean P. Healey 1, Gretchen G. Moisen 1, Todd A. Schroeder 1, Christopher W. Woodall 1, Grant M. Domke 1, Zhiqiang Yang 2, Stephen V. Stehman 3, Robert E. Kennedy 2, Curtis E. Woodcock 4, Zhe Zhu 5, Jim Vogelmann 5, Dan Steinwand 5, Chengquan Huang 6 1 USDA Forest Service, 2 Oregon State University, 3 State University of New York, 4 Boston University, 5 USDI Geological Survey, 6 University of Maryland CMS Science Team Meeting, November, Bethesda, MD

What’s It About? Pilot MRV system for possible use by developing counties in reporting an annual forest sector NGHGI – Map & estimate biomass density from present using consistent methodology – Develop and test methods in the US where The best datasets available for understanding effects of potential components on uncertainty And to improve US NGHGI reporting

What Are the Main Components? Field plots for current biomass data Lidar strip samples to “assist” the plot data Landsat time series characterize forest change Two biomass estimation frameworks: design- based & model-based

What is Design-based Estimation? Where unbiased estimates (of biomass) are derived from a probability-based sample of plots, and estimator used to characterize uncertainty associated with sample size and design; examples include – Large sample of plot measurements (e.g., NFI, such as FIA) – Plots (fewer) & lidar strips and other datasets to reduce uncertainty (model-assisted) Good solutions for current biomass depending on country-specific data capabilities & costs – Historic datasets likely rare or inconsistent

What is Model-based Estimation? Where (often biased) estimates (of biomass) are derived from a model, and uncertainty characterized by the model and conditioned on the sample used to develop the model – Probability-based sample not required – Model predictor datasets must be available Good solution for historic biomass prediction where Landsat data exist that describe forest disturbance history, from which history metrics can be used as predictors – Strategy to minimize bias

What is Forest Disturbance History? Incudes both disturbance & succession – continuous processes that alter the composition and structure of a forest Fire Insects Harvest Succession

Why Are History Metrics Important? They describe disturbance & recovery history Their use can help bust through the reflectance saturation problem significantly strengthening the Landsat signal: And a single model can be applied through time…

Predicting Current & Past Biomass Density e.g., 20 years disturbance history to predict current and historic aboveground live biomass TM  OLI MSS  TM Annual hindcast = Biomass trajectory MSS  OLI

How Well Can History Metrics Work?

How Can the US NGHGI Be Improved? UN review highlighted two important problems 1.Re-assess the 1990-present forest carbon trendline derived from periodic and annual FIA data to ensure trendline fluctuations are accurate as opposed to artifacts of inventory design changes 2.Clearly account for carbon stock and stock change trends for forestland remaining forestland separately from land converted to & from forest This project should help with both of these, using the model-based approach that employs a consistent, time invariant disturbance-based model that captures change agent

Can Disturbance Mapping Be Improved? Disturbance maps are always biased, with some imbalance in omission and commission; commonly lacking causal agent information Omission usually dominates because there is a lot of relatively subtle, but widespread (and thus important) disturbance that most algorithms do not detect Our solution is ensemble integration of multiple maps – Working with a number of the best algorithm developers in the business towards this end – Trained with casual agent information – Early indications positive

Landsat stacks Ensemble disturbance map TimeSync reference data Biomass estimates: 1. Design-based (current), 2. Model-based (current, historic) Field plots Lidar strips Disturbance metrics Biomass maps Disturbance estimates Individual disturbance maps