1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
Advertisements

Project Management Concepts
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
WAREHOUSING MANAGEMENT
UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants
20.1 Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Umut Girit  One of the core members of the Internet Protocol Suite, the set of network protocols used for the Internet. With UDP, computer.
Geography FACULTY OF Environment Living with Difference in Europe: making communities out of strangers in an era of super mobility and super diversity.
HIGH-LEVEL DATA LINK CONTROL (HDLC) HDLC was defined by ISO for use on both point-to-point and multipoint data links. It supports full-duplex communication.
A General Purpose CCSDS Link layer Protocol Next Generation Data Link Protocol (NGDLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 10/17/
- Overview- Program Review and SLOs Preparing to Write the Self-Study Why? What? How? For more SLO resources see:
8-Reliability and Channel Coding Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTPA.
Polar Highly Elliptical / Molniya Orbit Science (PHEMOS) Mission Phase 0/A Studies Mid-Term Review Meetings January 12-14th, 2011.
Stephen Horan New Mexico State University. Topics Background Program Vision Differences with HASP Next Steps 9/25/20082BalloonSats.
PHEOS PSRR Concept of Operations. 2 Scope The purpose of the PCW-UVI Concept of Operations (ConOps) is to communicate how mission systems will operate,
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks Lecture 10 Wenbing Zhao (Part of the slides are based on Drs. Kurose & Ross ’ s slides for their Computer.
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
JPL Autonomous Space Mission Simulation Ground / Mission control: Abraham Hart Gary Kahler Filip Mladenovic Steven Palmer.
Working with SQL and PL/SQL/ Session 1 / 1 of 27 SQL Server Architecture.
In today’s world technological advances are taking place at a rapid pace. One of the goals of everyone is working towards is to satisfy customer needs.
Iridium WOCE/SVP/BP Buoy METOCEAN WOCE/SVP/BP/Iridium By Bernie Petolas, P. Eng. Product Manager METOCEAN Data Systems Ltd. Dartmouth NS B3B 1R9 Canada.
Vladimir Liberzon Oksana Sakhraui Victoria Shavirina Spider Management Technologies, Moscow, Russia
EC4019PA Intrusion & Access Control Technology (IACT) Chapter 4- CAMS Prepared by Sandy Tay.
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite Chapter 4. Multilayer communication. A series of layers, each built upon the one below it. The purpose of each layer is.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
G64INC Introduction to Network Communications Ho Sooi Hock Internet Protocol.
Unicast Routing Protocols  A routing protocol is a combination of rules and procedures that lets routers in the internet inform each other of changes.
Protocol Architectures. Simple Protocol Architecture Not an actual architecture, but a model for how they work Similar to “pseudocode,” used for teaching.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
Software Inspection A basic tool for defect removal A basic tool for defect removal Urgent need for QA and removal can be supported by inspection Urgent.
Data management in the field Ari Haukijärvi 2nd EHES training seminar.
OPERATING ROOM DASHBOARD Virginia Chard, RN, BSN, CNOR
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
Managing Project Through Information System.  Monitoring is collecting, recording, and reporting information concerning any and all aspects of project.
Software Project Management Lecture # 7. What are we studying today? Chapter 24 - Project Scheduling  Effort distribution  Defining task set for the.
Page No. 1 Kelvin Nichols Payload Operations and Integration Center EO50 Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) Implementation on the International Space Station.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
November 4, 2003APOC 2003 Wuhan, China 1/14 Demand Based Bandwidth Assignment MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs Presented by Ruibiao Qiu Department of Computer.
Section Number - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Communication Systems Jason A. Soloff NASA/GSFC Code 567 August 16-17, 2005.
CCSDS Security WG meeting October 2008, hosted by DLR at DIN premises (Berlin) 1 Data Link Security BOF An ESA contribution on Lessons Learned and Issues/Questions.
2.8. Data Communication The data that flows on a connection may be thought of as a stream of octets. The sending user indicates in each SEND call whether.
Presented to: IWG 26 By: Jason Burns (FAA) Date: February 5-7, 2014 Federal Aviation Administration DFMC Work Plan Update.
SWE-DISH SATELLITE SYSTEMS
FSH/security SLS-SLP fall2009 (version 4) Page 1 Security Headers + Homogeneous approach to FSH and Insert Zone in TM/AOS/TC frames: some problems and.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
Judges Score Card Overview Mark Turner NASA Ames Research Center.
NPOESS Transmission Frequency Issues Satellite Direct Readout Conference for the Americas 11 December 02 David F. McGinnis.
Preparing the Phase 0 Proposal What in the world are the proposal reviewers looking for?
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
1 Project Management C13PM Session 2 Project Initiation & Definition Russell Taylor Business Department Staff Workroom
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
Figure 2-6: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End) Figure 4-14: Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End) MAP Packet Service.
1 Addendum FALL 2004 RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. November 2004.
Why we need USLP Greg Kazz Ed Greenberg November 9-10, 2014 CCSDS Fall London Question: Why the change of name from NGSLP to USLP? Answer: 1) In time the.
ECE 544 Group Project : Routing KC Huang. Objective Application: message multicast. A message is sent from one sender to 1~3 recipients. Reach a protocol.
Project Management PTM721S
Instructional Guide on Licensure Advancement
Transfer Frame Structures
Standards Basics.
THE Production Portfolio
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTPA
Site classifications, definitions, and updates to Landnet
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks
Overview Information Before You Start Important Documents Rules
Dr. John P. Abraham Professor UTPA
ZERO LATENCY Satellite Data Delivery DEMAND AND CHALLENGES
A. The signal strength of received signals
SYSTEM TESTING AND DEPLOYMENT
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate

2 Topics Goals General Rules Specific Requirements

3 The Cube Quest Challenge is designed to (1) encourage innovation in communications technology for small missions, (2) demonstrate operations in a new, challenging small satellite environment, and (3) demonstrate that data volumes and rates necessary to sustain useful science missions can be achieved. The amount of proscription was kept to a minimum to encourage the innovation. The rules are designed to maintain a level playing field for all Teams and to provide NASA with insight/oversight to minimize the potential for spoofing the Challenge. Innovation to demonstrate new small satellite capabilities Goals

4 Ground Tournaments are designed to give NASA insight into the design details and to make sure that the judges can evaluate the data blocks. NASA is not coordinating the licensing for RF transmission. Each Team must do that themselves for their satellite and, if required, their ground station. –The Ground Tournaments require submission of data packages using the EL-CID program to give uniformity in data presentation and help the Teams prepare their actual packages. –It is not too early to start coordinating with the FCC for any licensing needs. Document your application stages. –If the Team is using someone’s ground station, include their licensing information in the Team data package. General approach to communications – pre flight General Rules

5 NASA wishes to have awareness of the Challenge communications for verification purposes –Teams will need to inform NASA at least 24 hours in advance of when they are communicating as part of the Challenge so that NASA can listen in for verification purposes. –Routine mission operations or science operations do not require a notification to NASA. –NASA will also negotiate times to visit and observe operations and data collection to verify compliance. –NASA will not coordinate operational schedules to avoid mutual interference. The Teams will need to do this function in cooperation with their ground station operators. NASA will perform monitoring to provide insight and verification General Rules

6 Document your design for –Forward Error Correcting code methodology if it is used. Note: FEC additional bits do not count for the data volume metric, only the uncoded bits count. –Specific details of the data transmission protocols and frame formats. Document design details General Rules

7 Frequency Allocation Packages –The Preliminary Frequency Allocation Data Package is basically the line diagram for EL-CID. Also include expected frequencies and data rates in addition to ground station locations. –Data Packages for Ground Tournaments are detailed updates to the EL-CID database as the design matures. Link Budgets –The Judges and SMEs reviewing the design need data to assess the viability of the forward and return links. –The Ground Tournament data package needs to include a detailed link budget for the command and telemetry links. This is for both RF and optical communications links. –An example link budget is shown on the next page. A similar computation is to be included in the documentation. Documenting the link design Specific Requirements

8 Example Link Budget Specific Requirements Example RF Link Budget; similar computat ion for optical links as well.

9 Random data generation is to be accomplished via: 1.NASA assigns the Team with a unique competition key that is 256 bits in length. The Team will use this key in generating the random data and include the key in the header of the transmitted data packet containing Challenge random data. 2.Data blocks are defined as 1024-bit units (128 octets). Multiple data blocks can be generated consecutively and stored in the transmission packet. The maximum number of data blocks in a single transmission packet is left for the Team to determine based on data protocol constraints, coding efficiency, and operational constraints. Only complete blocks will be counted in Challenge scoring. Random Data Generation Specific Requirements

10 Random Data Generation Specific Requirements

11 Random data generation is to be accomplished via: 5.The values for a, b, and M shall be a) = a b) = b c) 2 32 = M 6.The seed value shall be computed by a) Concatenating the Team key with the spacecraft time to form a 384-bit string. b) This 384-bit string is to be divided into 32-bit segments. c) The 32-bit segments are bitwise XORed to form a 32-bit seed value. Random Data Generation Specific Requirements

12 The recommended data transmission packet is based on the CCSDS 133-B-1 recommended standard. Data Transmission Packets Specific Requirements Attached Synch Marker Packet Primary HeaderPacket Data Field Version No. Packet Identification Packet Sequence Control Packet Data Length Packet Secondary Header Competition Data Block Type Indicator Packet Secondary Header Flag Application Process Identifier Sequence Flags Packet Sequence Count Spacecraft Time Stamp UTC as YYYYMMDDHHMMSS. S Team-unique Competition Key 32 bits3 bits1 bit 11 bits2 bits14 bits16 bits128 bits256 bits User Determined Length

13 Each team shall supply a CubeSat communications log to the judges to verify competition timing. This log shall contain this minimum set of data: –UTC time and date for the beginning of the operating period –UTC time and date for acquisition of signal –Total time of acquired signal (seconds) –UTC time and date for the loss of signal/end of operating period –Rest carrier frequency –Beginning and ending Doppler offsets at a minimum; intermediate values taken at least once per five minute period are preferred –Data Rate –Link Quality (BER, C/N, etc.) estimate –Total data received when in receiver lock –Azimuth and Elevation pointing data during the operational period Each Team shall also supply a raw data archive. Innovation to demonstrate new small satellite capabilities Specific Requirements