A. Baikov (MUFA), I. Syratchev (CERN), C. Lingwood, D

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X Band Vacuum Devices Presented by: Tony Johns,
Advertisements

CHAPTER 3 MICROWAVE ‘O’ TYPE TUBES
Efficient RF sources for Linear Accelerators
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
1.0 MW / 175 MHz Source for IFMIF: a study of alternatives
High efficiency – high perveance Klystron (X-band)
2009/3/3US High Gradient Research Collaboration Workshop 1 Design Studies of an X-band Multi- beam Klystron S. Fukuda KEK Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.
Microwave semiconductor devices
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
Conventional Tubes Conventional Device tubes cannot be used for frequencies above 100MHz 1. Interelectrode capacitance 2. Lead Inductance effect 3. Transit.
Thales Components & Subsystems
Multiple Beam Klystrons for Accelerators and Collider
Design Status of IOT for ILC
Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources Heinz Bohlen, Thomas Grant Microwave Power Products Division CPI, Palo Alto 1.
I. Syratchev, April 2015, EuCARD2, Barcelona. Review of Efficient RF Sources I. Syratchev, CERN.
CLIC meeting, Prospects for developing new tubes I. Syratchev, CERN.
CLIC Project meting #16. June 2014 I. Syratchev High efficiency power sources I. Syratchev, CERN.
ECE 662 – Microwave Electronics
The selection of operating mode for 10MW L-band MBK with high efficiency Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China November.
High Efficiency Klystron Design and Simulations Chiara Marrelli, Wednesday
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Development of The Klystrons for J-PARC Project
CLIC Workshop, February, CERN. I. Syratchev Roadmap for CLIC high-efficiency klystron development I. Syratchev, CERN.
ParameterL-bandS-bandX-band Length (m) Aperture 2a (mm) Gradient (Unloaded/Loaded) (MV/m)17/1328/2250/40 Power/structure (MW) Beam.
DEVELOPMENT OF A STEADY STATE SIMULATION CODE FOR KLYSTRONS
Considerations on Drive Beam Klystrons and Phase Stability Erk Jensen, BE-RF RF and Beam Physics Meeting on CLIC Drive Beam Generation12-August th.
RF Sources – Klystrons I. Syratchev on behalf of
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
RF SYSTEM FOR THE DRIVE BEAM LINAC Erk Jensen BE-RF TDR Task force meeting 21-April-2009.
Status of the 1.2 MW MB-IOT for ESS Morten Jensen CLIC Workshop 2016, January, CERN.
2 Décembre 2014 F. Peauger, J. Plouin, B. Dalena, A. Mollard, A.Chancé, L. Boudjaoui CEA/IRFU/SACM Nouveau concept de source de puissance 12.
HIGH EFFICIENCY KLYSTRON DESIGN Chiara Marrelli RF CLIC meeting 25/06/2014.
20/3/2014 MEW weekly meeting Summary on high efficiency klystron design Chiara Marrelli.
PPM Focusing in Klystrons Michael Read Calabazas Creek Research Presented at CERN Aug 30, 2013
European Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop, Elba, September 14 th -18 th, 2015Steffen Döbert, BE-RF Electron accelerator for the AWAKE experiment.
Doubly Convergent Multiple Beam Guns Lawrence Ives, Thuc Bui, Michael Read Calabazas Creek Research, San Mateo, CA. USA Adam Attarian, Billy Tallis, Cynthia.
Erk Jensen/CERN Many thanks to: A. Butterworth, O. Brunner, R. Calaga, S. Claudet, R. Garoby, F. Gerigk, P. Lebrun, E. Montesinos, D. Schulte, E. Shaposhnikova,
Copyright 2007, Toshiba Corporation. Prospects of X-band Klystron Based on Experience of High Power Klystron Development in TETD 31 st /Jan./2013 Toshiba.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
Klystrons C Lingwood, Lancaster University/Cockcroft Institute on behalf of HEIKA (High Efficiency International Klystron Activity)
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
Prospects for developing new tubes
How does a klystron work? TE-MPE Section Meeting Karolina Kulesz
Syratchev(CERN) on behalf of
High efficiency klystron technology.
High efficiency work and MBK development for accelerators
Development of high-power IOTs as an efficient alternative to klystrons Morten Jensen Energy for Sustainable Science 24 October 2013, CERN.
Visit for more Learning Resources
High-Efficiency Klystron Design for the CLIC Project
Prospects for high-efficiency klystrons
CEPC 650MHz High Efficiency Klystron R&D
Thales Klystrons for Linacs
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
with operating voltage
A frequency choice for the SPL machine: Impact on hardware
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
Klystron efficiency.
X-band Facilities and High Gradient Tests Stands Around the World
CLIC Klystron based. Updates 2017.
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
CEPC RF Power Sources System
CEPC 650MHz High Efficiency Klystron R&D
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
CEPC 650MHz Klystron Development
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Panel Discussion: Future of Vacuum Tubes
Plans for future electron cooling needs PS BD/AC
Presentation transcript:

Development of klystrons with ultimately high - 90% RF power production efficiency A. Baikov (MUFA), I. Syratchev (CERN), C. Lingwood, D. Constable (Lancaster University) LANCASTER UNIVERSITY POWERPOINT TEMPLATES These PowerPoint templates are for use by all University staff. Please see below for further information regarding the use of these templates. Should you have any further queries, please contact the marketing team via webmaster@lancaster.ac.uk Template slide 3: Insert a new slide If you need to insert a new slide, from the ‘home’ toolbar, click on ‘new slide’ and select from the templates the style you require from the dropdown box. Template slide 4: Typing new text and copying text from another document New text should be typed over the text in the appropriate template. Copy and pasting text from another document will result in changing the style of the typography and layout. This is unavoidable as it is part of the Microsoft software. We appreciate that in sometimes you will need to copy text from another document into this template. Once you have pasted the existing text into the template, you will need to change the formatting so that they typefaces, sizes, colour, line spacing and alignment are consistent with the rest of the template. Template slide 5: Inserting images There are three choices of templates with images already inserted. Please use the template with the relevant image size and positioning. To insert an image, please go to ‘insert’ then ‘picture’ and find your image, highlight it and ‘insert’. Resize the image and position as per the example template. Template slide 6: Text boxes If a text box is deleted, either insert a new slide (using the appropriate template) or go to another slide and copy a text box. To select a text box for copying, please click on the outer edge of the text box so that the line goes solid (not dashed). Right click your mouse and select ‘copy’, then go back and ‘paste’ it into the slide where the text box is missing which should paste into the correct position on the slide. Template slide 7: Other information Typefaces, sizes and colours All copy is Calibri. Slide title copy throughout: Size: 36 point Colour Lancaster University red: (RGB) R: 181 G: 18 B: 27 (recent colours on PowerPoint) Small copy on first and last slide: Size: 16 point Colour grey: (RGB) R: 102 G: 102 B: 102 (recent colours on PowerPoint) Sub-headings: Size: 24 point – italics Colour grey: (RGB) R: 102 G: 102 B: 102 (recent colours on PowerPoint) Bullets copy and body copy: Size: 24 point (see below for a further option) Colour grey: (RGB) R: 102 G: 102 B: 102 (recent colours on PowerPoint) It isn’t advisable to have too much text on a slide, however on rare occasions it may be necessary, therefore there is a slide using 20 point bullet pointed text. Line spacing and alignment Single line spacing (apart from the main headings which is ‘exactly 35 point’) All text is aligned left Slide title options There are two options for titles on the slides – one line or two lines for longer titles. Ideally, the one line title should be used, however on rare occasions a two line title maybe needed.

Introduction FCC has high power requirements due to high SR in FCC-ee. 100 MW CW Traditional Klystrons -> 70% Theoretical efficiencies up to 80% MBIOT -> 80% Simple minded calculation of wall plug power @ 70% = ~140 MW @ 90% = ~110 MW

State of art: L-band 10 MW MBK klystrons for ILC. In terms of achieved efficiency at 10 MW peak RF power level, the existing MBK klystrons provides values very close to 70%.

Scaling of the klystron parameters thanks to (C Marelli) Design values are in black To go higher in efficiency, the intrinsic limits of the bunching processes and deceleration in the output cavity need to be understood

Process in the traditional Klystron Bunching monotonic – electrons move to center of bunch Many electrons miss bunch. Significant energy left in bunch! Significant charge outside bunch. Velocities aligned…

Process in the traditional Klystron Bunching monotonic – electrons move to center of bunch Significant charge outside bunch. Velocities aligned… Many electrons miss bunch. Significant energy left in bunch!

Limitations For high efficiency traditionally we chase low perveance High voltages Low currents (many beams) For high power both become “unpleasant”. Limited by the slowest electrons (must avoid trapping or reflecting electrons) Ultimate theoretical efficiency limited to 80%

Methods to get high efficiency Space charge Debunching Bunching split into two distinct regimes: non-monotonic: core of the bunch periodically contract and expand (in time) around center of the bunch outsiders monotonically go to the center of the bunch Core experiences higher space charge forces which naturally debunch Outsiders have larger phase shift as space charge forces are small Very long very efficient tubes result. Phase Traditional bunching Core oscillations Cavity ё Space

90% Efficient Klystron Efficiency increases with number of core oscillations and reaches 88-90% for 4-5 oscillations

Process in the high efficiency klystron Final compression and bunch rotation prepare congregating FS bunch. After deceleration all the electrons have identical velocities. Mission accomplished Electron velocity/density The fully saturated (FS) bunch

Process in the high efficiency klystron Final compression and bunch rotation prepare congregating FS bunch. After deceleration all the electrons have identical velocities. Mission accomplished Electron velocity/density Output of traditional klystron The fully saturated (FS) bunch

Comparison of the two bunching methods. Core oscillations RF current harmonics For the ultimate high efficiency, there is a substantial increase of the bunching length. Efficiency degradation up to perveance as high as 110-6 appeared to be rather small (about 3%). Standard practice of reducing the klystron perveance is not the way to achieve very high, above 80%, efficiency.

Methods to get high efficiency BAC Method (I. Guzilov) Again based on core oscillations Interaction space is wasted “waiting” for space charge forces to debunch. A cavity can achieve the same thing in a shorter space by aligning electron velocities Structure half the length while maintaining efficiency. ё 13

Potential FCC Klystron Specification Using core oscillation method Frequency: 0.8 GHz RF power: 1.5 MW Beam voltage: 40 kV Number of beams: 16 Total current: 42A Per beam 2.6 A Efficiency: 90% Perveance: 0.326 microPerv Duty 100% ~90% @ ~0.3

Tube configuration Cathode loading: 2 A/cm^2 Beam radius: 3 mm Filling factor 8 mm Length: 2.3 m Beam circle radius: 75 mm Solenoid field (2x): 600 G Solenoid radius: 150 mm Collector: common Nominal load: 170 kW Peak load: 1.5 MW (no RF)

MBK Structure: Cavity Coaxial cavity Best trade off between compactness, R/Q and manufacturability R/Q 22 Ohms @ ~800 MHz Single beam equivalent 352 Ohms Ez

Proposed Interaction Structure 3 Oscillations of core. 90.42% efficient

AJDisk comparison A dubious 92.2% but some validation Some reflected electrons Greens function method limited at high efficiency

PIC

Outlook 90% is theoretical but: No new materials needed No new manufacturing techniques needed No additional complexity Simply existing technology reconfigured Would normally expect to lose 5% points (so 85%) from simulation to reality Tube also well suited to ESS, potential for prototype? Prototypes planned for proof of concept

HEIKA Collaboration ( as of January 2015) CEA PEAUGER Franck PLOUIN Juliette DALENA Barbara Thales MARCHESIN Rodolphe VUILLEMIN Quentin Lancaster LINGWOOD Christopher CONSTABLE Dave HILL Victoria ESS MARRELLI Chiara CCR Inc. READ Michael CERN SYRATCHEV Igor MUFA, Moscow BAIKOV Andrey JSC ‘VDBT’ GUZILOV Igor

HEIKA’s tubes selection L-band: CLIC: Frequency 1.0 GHz, pulse length 150 microsecond, 20 MW Multi-beam klystron with 40-60 beams. Microperveance per beam 0.3-0.5, operating voltage below 60 kV. Expected efficiency above 85%. FCC (ESS): Frequency 0.8 GHz, continuous wave, 1.5 MW Multi-beam klystron with 10-16 beams. Microperveance per beam ~0.2, operating voltage 40-50 kV. Expected efficiency above 90%. S-band: 3 GHz technology demonstrator. 6 microsecond, 6 MW Multi-beam klystron with 40 beams. Microperveance per beam <0.3, operating voltage 52 kV. Expected efficiency >70% (with PPM focusing). X-band: 12 GHz klystron with adiabatic bunching. 5 microsecond, 12 MW. Microperveance per beam ~1.5, operating voltage 170 kV. Expected efficiency >75%. Low perveance MBK High perveance single beam

Prototype (KIU-147A) I Guzilov (JSC) F 2.856 GHz Power 6 MW Voltage 52 kV Efficiency > 76 % F 2.856 GHz Power 6 MW Voltage 52 kV Efficiency 45 % Beams 40

Roadmap for high-efficiency high RF power klystron development L-band, CW/long pulse FCC, ESS <20 beams; <50 kV Optionally – gun with controlled electrode (2.5 kV) 3 years 3 years L-band. CLIC. 40 beams; 60 kV 1.0 year X-band Kladistron S-band Demonstrator 40 beams; <60 kV L-band CLIC 6-10 beams; ~160 kV L-band ILC 6 beams; 116 kV 1.0 year Exists 2 6 20 40

Conclusion Using new bunching theory 90% (at least in simulation) looks possible for FCC/CLIC/ESS klystrons Low voltages achievable No new technology, simply a design breakthrough Prototypes and further validation required International collaboration at work