Network Analysis and Synthesis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAPLACE TRANSFORMS.
Advertisements

Synthesis of one-port networks with two kinds of elements
Signal Processing in the Discrete Time Domain Microprocessor Applications (MEE4033) Sogang University Department of Mechanical Engineering.
AMI 4622 Digital Signal Processing
Lecture 141 EEE 302 Electrical Networks II Dr. Keith E. Holbert Summer 2001.
Digital Control Systems Stability Analysis of Discrete Time Systems.
Network Analysis and Synthesis
Multivariable Control Systems
Differential Equations
5.7 Impulse Functions In some applications, it is necessary to deal with phenomena of an impulsive nature—for example, voltages or forces of large magnitude.
Chapter 3 Limits and the Derivative
THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM LEARNING GOALS Definition The transform maps a function of time into a function of a complex variable Two important singularity functions.
ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION (ODE) LAPLACE TRANSFORM.
IIR Filter design (cf. Shenoi, 2006) The transfer function of the IIR filter is given by Its frequency responses are (where w is the normalized frequency.
Control Engineering Lecture# 10 & th April’2008.
Partial-fraction Expansion
Introduction to Laplace Transforms. Definition of the Laplace Transform  Some functions may not have Laplace transforms but we do not use them in circuit.
CHAPTER 4 Laplace Transform.
1 Inverse Laplace Transform Note that most of the transforms are written as fractions.
CHAPTER 4 Laplace Transform.
Signal and Systems Prof. H. Sameti Chapter 9: Laplace Transform  Motivatio n and Definition of the (Bilateral) Laplace Transform  Examples of Laplace.
Signals and Systems 1 Lecture 8 Dr. Ali. A. Jalali September 6, 2002.
Chapter 2 Laplace Transform 2.1 Introduction The Laplace transform method can be used for solving linear differential equations. Laplace transforms can.
1 Lecture 1: February 20, 2007 Topic: 1. Discrete-Time Signals and Systems.
Chapter 2. Signals and Linear Systems
Synthesis of R-L-C Networks EE484 – presentation Janghoon, Cho.
THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM LEARNING GOALS Definition
Network Analysis and Synthesis
Signal and System I Analysis and characterization of the LTI system using the Laplace transform Causal ROC associate with a causal system is a right-half.
Chapter 7 The Laplace Transform
Modern Control System EKT 308
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Lec. 2 Transfer Functions & Block Diagrams.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Chapter 6 The Stability of Linear Feedback System
Initial Conditions & Passive Network Synthesis. Sarvajanik College of Engineering & Technology Made by: Dhruvita Shah Khushbu Shah
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 6. TRANSIENT RESPONSE -- STABILITY Pusan National University Intelligent.
Stability Analysis for Control Systems Compiled By: Waqar Ahmed Assistant Professor Mechanical UET, Taxila Compiled By: Waqar Ahmed Assistant Professor.
EE4262: Digital and Non-Linear Control
Lecture 24 Outline: Circuit Analysis, Inverse, LTI Systems
CHAPTER 5 Z-Transform. EKT 230.
DEPT.:-ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION SUB: - CIRCUIT & NETWORK
Transfer Functions.
Digital and Non-Linear Control
Control Systems (CS) Lecture-17 Routh-Herwitz Stability Criterion
Network Analysis and Synthesis
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Learning Outcomes After completing this ppt the student will be able to: Make and interpret a basic Routh table to determine the stability of a system.
Chapter 6. Stability Youngjune, Han
Effects of Zeros and Additional Poles
Feedback Control Systems (FCS)
Unit 4 STABILITY ANALYSIS
UNIT II Analysis of Continuous Time signal
CHAPTER 19 Series and Residues.
Final value theorem Conditions: f(t) is finite and converges
Signal and Systems Chapter 9: Laplace Transform
Time-Domain Analysis of Control Systems (3)
Signals and Systems EE235 Leo Lam ©
Root-Locus Analysis (1)
Mechatronics Engineering
Chapter 6 – The Stability of Linear Feedback Systems
Network Analysis and Synthesis
Feedback Control Systems (FCS)
9.0 Laplace Transform 9.1 General Principles of Laplace Transform
Network Analysis and Synthesis
CH. 5 Stability Chapter5. Stability.
Transfer Function and Stability of LTI Systems
CHAPTER 4 Laplace Transform. EMT Signal Analysis.
Chapter 6. STABILITY Good relationships nurture you. They help you find yourself and who you are. I don’t mean just relationships with boys or men. Relationships.
THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM LEARNING GOALS Definition
Presentation transcript:

Network Analysis and Synthesis Chapter 3 Elements of Realizability Theory

Introduction In the last chapter we were concerned with the problem of identifying the response given the excitation and network. When we discuss about synthesis we are concerned with the problem of constructing a network given the excitation and response. The starting point for any synthesis is the system function

There are two considerations The first step in synthesis procedure is determining whether the system function can be realized with a physical passive network. There are two considerations Causality and Stability

1. Causality By causality we mean that a voltage doesn’t appear between any terminals in the network before a current/voltage is applied. In other words, the impulse response of the network must be zero for t<0.

Example h(t)=etu(t) h(t)=e|t| Is causal because for t<0 u(t)=0, hence, h(t)=0. h(t)=e|t| Is not causal because for t<0, h(t) is not zero.

In certain cases, the network can be made causal by delaying the impulse response by a certain time delay. If we delay h(t) by T, then h(t-T) will be causal.

In the frequency domain causality is implied when the Paley-Wiener criterion is satisfied. The Paley-Wiener criterion states that a necessary and sufficient condition for causality is

The physical implication of the Paley-Wiener criterion is that the amplitude response of a causal network can’t be zero over a finite band of frequency.

Example The ideal low pass filter The Gaussian filter Is not causal because it is zero for all frequencies w>wc. The Gaussian filter Is not causal because is not finite.

The amplitude function Is causal because

2. Stability If a network is stable, then for a bounded excitation e(t) the response will also be bounded. Where C1 and C2 are real, positive and finite numbers.

If a linear system is stable, then we get from the convolution integral and the above definition of stability The above equation implies that the impulse response be absolutely integrable. One important requirement for h(t) to be absolutely integrable is h(t) approach zero as t increases to infinity.

Note that our definition of stability implies systems with sinwt impulse response are not stable because However, a simple L-C network has such an impulse response. Since we don't want to call these systems unstable, we call them marginally stable if they satisfy the following criterion.

Stability in the frequency domain implies that the system function should only have poles on the left had side of the ‘s’ plane or simple poles on the jw axis. This is because if we have a pole on the right hand side, then the impulse response will have an exponentially increasing term, eαt. Hence, our response will not be bounded.

If there is a double pole on the jw axis, then the impulse response of the network will have a term tsin(wt). This will not be bounded.

If H(s) is given as Due to the requirement of simple poles on the jw axis, the order of the numerator shouldn’t exceed the order of the denominator by more than 1. That is If then there would be multiple poles on the s=jw=infinity.

To summarize, for a network to be stabile the following three conditions must be satisfied H(s) can’t have poles on the right side of the ‘s’ plane. H(s) can’t have multiple poles on the jw axis. The degree of the numerator of H(s) can’t exceed that of the denominator by more than 1.

3. Hurwitz polynomials We mentioned in the previous section that in order for a system to be stable, its poles must lie in the left side of the ‘s’ plane; moreover the poles on the jw axis must be simple. The denominator polynomial of a system function H(s) that satisfies these criteria belongs to a class of polynomials called Hurwitz polynomials. In these section, we will discuss the properties of these types of polynomials.

A polynomial P(s) is said to be Hurwitz if it satisfies P(s) must be real if s is real. The real part of its roots must be negative or zero. As a result of these conditions, if P(s) is a Hurwitz polynomial given by Then all coefficients an must be real and if si=α+jβ is root of P(s), then α must be negative.

Example The polynomial is Hurwitz because For real s P(s) is real, P(s)=(s+1)(s2+3s+2) None of the roots lie on the right hand side of the ‘s’ plane. The polynomial is not Hurwitz The root s=1 lies on the positive ‘s’ plane.

Properties of Hurwitz polynomial All the coefficients of the polynomial are non negative. This is readily seen by examining the types of terms P(s) can have The multiplication of these non negative coefficients can only give non negative coefficients. Simple real pole Simple pole on the jw axis Complex conjugate roots

The even and odd parts of P(s) have roots on the jw axis only. If we denote the even and odd parts of P(s) as n(s) and m(s) Then both n(s) and m(s) have roots on the jw axis only.

The continued fraction expansion of n(s)/m(s) or m(s)/n(s) of a Hurwitz polynomial yields only positive quotient terms. All the q’s are positive.

Example Obtain the continued fraction expansion of Solution: Since the order of n(s) is higher than m(s), we start with n(s)/m(s).

Note that all the coefficients of the quotients are positive

4. Positive Real Functions These functions are important because they represent physically realizable passive driving point immitances. A function is positive real if F(s) is real for real s, that is F(σ) is real. The real part of F(s) is greater or equal to zero when the real part of s is greater than or equal to zero. That is

In other words, the right half of the ‘s’ plane maps with the right half of F(s) plane. In addition, the real axis of ‘s’ plane maps with real axis of F(s) plane. A further restriction is that F(s) be rational.

Example F(s)=Ls (where L is positive real number), is positive real by definition. Inductor F(s)=R (where R is positive real number), is positive real by definition. Resistor F(s)=K/s (K real and positive) is positive real because when s is real F(s) is real and when the real part of s is positive the real part of F(s) is also positive. Capacitor

The necessary and sufficient condition for F(s) to be a positive real function is F(s) must have no poles on the right side of s plane. F(s) may have only simple poles on the jw axis with real and positive residues. for all w.

Example Is positive real function? Its pole s=-1 lies on the left of s plane No multiple poles on the jw axis Its real part is is always positive.

Is positive real? Solution: No poles on the right hand side. No multiple poles on jw axis. The real part of F(jw) is this can be a negative number. For example for w=2.

Exercise Is positive real?