Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
The New TNI Laboratory Accreditation Standards Requirements for an Accreditation Body.
ISO 9001 : 2000.
Conformity Assessment Practical Implications InterAgency Committee on Standards Policy June 2007 Gordon Gillerman Conformity Assessment Advisor Homeland.
Options for Regulation and the Impact of Regulation on the Marketplace 29 November 2005 Alan Kent
Proposed Rule Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/Certification Bodies
Accredited Third Party Certification and Food Safety Management Systems Jill Hollingsworth, DVM Group Vice President Food Marketing Institute.
The ISO 9002 Quality Assurance Management System
Chapter 10: Quality Management Systems Jennifer Sadorus Heather Heller.
ISO 9001 Interpretation : Exclusions
Quality Management Systems
Entering the North American Market
ISO 9000:2000 Quality system standards adopted in 1987 by International Organization for Standardization; revised in 1994 and 2000 Technical specifications.
1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.
FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate Robert Coleman National Expert Drug Investigator Food and Drug Administration.
A Review ISO 9001:2015 Draft What’s Important to Know Now
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
Quality Management Systems P.Suriya Prakash Final Mech Vcet
CA 101 Certification and Registration ANSI Annual Conference 2002 by: Gordon Gillerman Manager Governmental Services Underwriters Laboratories
Codes, Standards & Conformity Assessment GP Russ Chaney CEO, The IAPMO Group
ISO 9000 and Public Awareness and Information Session 22 February 2006 Owen Glave, MBA-TQM.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Software Quality Assurance Lecture 4. Lecture Outline ISO ISO 9000 Series of Standards ISO 9001: 2000 Overview ISO 9001: 2008 ISO 9003: 2004 Overview.
Conformity Assessment and Accreditation Mike Peet Chief Executive Officer South African National Accreditation System.
Implementation of the Essential Standards The Australian Quality Framework (AQTF) is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
1 CONSENSUS STANDARDS OIVD WORKSHOP April 22-23, 2003 Rockville MD Ginette Y. Michaud, M.D. OIVD.
Kimberly A. Trautman FDA’s Medical Device Quality System Expert
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
Conformity Assessment Overview Nuclear Energy Standards Coordinating Collaborative November 2009 Gordon Gillerman Chief Standards Services Division National.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Oversight Market Surveillance AS9104/2A Supplemental Oversight.
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
UPCOMING CHANGES TO IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS (IVDs) AND LABORATORY DEVELOPED TESTS (LDTs) REGULATIONS Moj Eram, PhD November 5, 2015.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
The Second Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress Presented by J. Glenn George Thursday, March 29, 2007 Day II – Track.
Using Australian Clinical Sites – Challenges for International Sponsors Prof A J (Tony) Webber Clinical Network Services Pty Ltd Brisbane, Australia.
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
KENYA ACCREDITATION SERVICE Doris Mueni - Msc. Med. Microbiology
Medical Device Regulations in Canada; Key Challenges and International Initiatives.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
Establishment of Medical Device GMP Requirements Hsiau-Wen Huang, Ph. D. Senior Researcher Bureau of Pharmaceutical Affairs Department of Health.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
High Level Symposium to Enhance Regulator Expertise on Good Regulatory Practices and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
Auditing ISO Nancy Pasquan November Introductions I am….. You are….. And we are here to discuss: Auditing ISO Quality Systems for Medical.
November 6, 2013 Purchasing Controls & Supplier Quality Best Practices Beyond Compliance for the Medical Device Industry AdvaMed 2013 Bernie Liebler Technology.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Workshop on conformity assessment procedures and certification of medical devices INT MARKT Kyiv, November 2011 Conformity assessment of medical.
ISO Certification For Laboratory Accreditation ISO Certification For Laboratory Accreditation.
UNDERSTANDING ISO 9001:2008.
Contingent Workforce: Cerner Quality System & Regulations
CA 101 Certification and Registration
GD211 Training Module 5 Conclusions.
Regulation of Medical Devices: Importance of a Globally Harmonized Approach Nicole Taylor Smith, JD September 2017.
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
Director, Asia Pacific Japan and U.S. Clinical Operations
FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Summary of Public Notification of Emerging Postmarket Medical Device Signals (“Emerging Signals”) Effective: December.
Quality Management Systems
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Medical Device Design and Development
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
ACCREDITATION PROCESS
HKAS Accreditation Service for Certification of Management System of RCHE Service Providers Mr WONG Wang-wah Assistant Commissioner for Innovation and.
Presentation transcript:

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Suzan S. Davis President & CEO Global Regulatory Partners-LLC

Agenda What is IDMRF What is MDSAP MDSAP Benefits Regulatory Authorities Usage of MDSAP How MDSAP Works? Medical Device Manufacturers Audit Criteria and Cycle under MDSAP Medical Device Manufacturers Audit Sequence and Process under MDSAP Medical Device Manufacturers Audit Outcome Auditing Organization Assessment & Recognition under MDSAP Auditing Organization Assessment Criteria and Cycle under MDSAP Auditing Organizations Assessment Process under MDSAP Auditing Organization Assessment Outcome Conclusion

What is IDMRF? (International Medical Device Regulators Forum) IMDRF is a voluntary group of medical device regulators from around the world that was created in 2011: to replace the Global Harmonization Task Force on Medical Devices (GHTF) and build on its strong foundations and previous work. to accelerate international medical device regulatory harmonization and convergence. The IMDRF Management Committee comprises regulatory authority representatives from Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Europe, Japan, Russia and United States of America. The roles of IMDRF Chair and Secretariat rotate annually.

What is IDMRF ? The IMDRF Management Committee : Provides guidance on strategies, policies, directions, membership and activities of the Forum. Oversees Working Groups formed with experts from various stakeholder such as industry, academia, healthcare professionals, consumer and patient groups. IMDRF Official Observers : The World Health Organization (WHO) and the APEC LSIF Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee IDMRF Affiliate Organizations : The Asian Harmonization Working Party (AHWP) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO).

What is IDMRF ? IMDRF Working Groups Responsible for developing technical documents, Involve the participation of stakeholders that have significant involvement in the development, manufacture or use of medical devices including, but not limited to, regulated industry, international entities and associations, academia, patient and consumer groups, medical professionals, and other regulatory authorities. Currently 4 Working Groups : - Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP), - Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), - Regulated Product Submission, - A review of the NCAR system.

What is MDSAP ? (Medical Device Single Audit Program) MDSAP is a program that allows a single regulatory audit of a medical device manufacturer’s quality management system to satisfy the needs of participating regulatory authorities. The single audit is performed by authorized third party organizations. The single audit of a medical device manufacturer’s quality management system will include the assessment of the quality management system processes including management responsibility, resource management, product realization, measurement, analysis and improvement, and adverse event reporting; as well as compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) or other applicable requirements specific to a participating regulatory authority.

What is MDSAP? The participating medical device regulatory authorities in the pilot program : Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) of Australia, Brazil’s Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), Health Canada, U.S. Food and Drug Administration MDSAP Pilot phase started in January 2014 and runs until the end of 2016 The final MDSAP will be implemented in 2017

MDSAP Benefits Single Audit used instead of multiple separate audits/ inspections by participating regulatory authorities: Reduction of Number of audits/ inspections Optimization of time and resources spent/used in audits activities. Reduction of audit costs Example: Currently, manufacturers might have a CMDCAS audit every year, an FDA inspection every other year and still waiting for an ANVISA inspection, so they can launch a product in Brazil. Instead of 3 audits/inspections in one year, the mdsap program will enable companies to schedule a single audit to address each major market at one time. When Japanese and Europeans will adopt mdsap as well, then companies will realize an even greater overall reduction in the number of audit days each year.

MDSAP Benefits Flexibility : Medical device manufacturers are free to choose among all authorized auditing organizations to perform the audits. Routine audits are announced and planned with the manufacturer. Audits performed by auditors who know the company already (notified bodies) Improved predictability of audits’ outcomes : Auditing organizations monitored by the participating Regulatory Authorities, Usage of a standard MDSAP audit model, Usage of same grading process of nonconformities Usage of standard report template to report audits’ outcomes Commitment to quality and compliance : enrolling in the MDSAP is considered as an evidence of a medical device manufacturers’ commitment to product quality and regulatory compliance.

Regulatory Authorities Usage of MDSAP United States : FDA will accept MDSAP audit reports as substitutes for the agency’s own routine 21 CFR Part 820 quality system inspections. Inspections conducted “For Cause” or “Compliance Follow-up” by FDA will not be affected by this program. MDSAP program would not apply to any necessary pre-approval or post approval inspections for Premarket Approval (PMA) applications Australia: the TGA will use MDSAP audit reports to help determine compliance with Australian medical device registration requirements

Regulatory Authorities Usage of MDSAP Brazil: ANVISA will use MDSAP audit reports and other components of the program in its pre- and post-market medical device evaluations. Canada: HC will use a MDSAP audit as part of their Canadian Medical Device Conformity Assessment System (CMDCAS) certification program. Upon the successful conclusion of the pilot, Health Canada's intent to implement the MDSAP as the mechanism to achieve regulatory compliance for quality management system requirements in Canada.

How MDSAP Works ? MDSAP uses approved third party auditing organization only in addition to regulatory authority inspectorates Greater coverage in auditing manufacturers around the globe. Government resources can focus on high risk and problematic medical devices, manufacturers that are not in compliance with regulations, and oversight of third party auditing organizations A manufacturer may exclude the requirements of a jurisdiction if not intend to supply medical devices to it.

How MDSAP Works? The MDSAP program will not replace ISO certification programs or standards; the program will not be an accredited program as the regulators do not recognize IAF (International Accreditation Forum) principles, policies or requirements. It is expected that the MDSAP program will eventually replace Health Canada’s CMDCAS program and the US FDA’s Accredited Persons Inspection program.

Medical Device Manufacturers Audit Criteria ISO 13485:2003 + Specific Requirements of: (TGA, ANVISA,HC, FDA) = One Comprehensive Audit Model Longer audits : 35-100% longer in duration. The typical ISO 13485 audit might be two days. MDSAP audit can last four days .

Medical Device Manufacturer Audit Cycle The Medical Device Single Audit Program is based on 3 year audit cycle. The Initial Audit called also the “Initial Certification Audit” : a complete audit of a medical device manufacturer’s quality management system (QMS) consisting of a Stage 1 Audit and a Stage 2 Audit. Stage 1 – Documentation review, evaluation of preparedness for Stage 2 audit. Stage 2 – Evaluation of QMS Implementation and Effectiveness. The initial Audit is followed by a partial Surveillance Audit in each of the following 2 years and a complete Re-audit (“Recertification Audit”) in 3rd year. Special audits and unannounced audits are conducted by Regulatory Authorities that may occur at any time within the audit cycle in case of noncompliance.

Medical Device Manufacturers Audit Sequence

Medical Device Manufacturers Audit Process MDSAP audits are process based audits and follow the 7 processes here below : Management. Measurement, analysis and improvement. Design and development. Production and service controls; and supporting process. Purchasing. Device Marketing Authorization and Facility Registration Medical Device Adverse Events and Advisory Notices Reporting. The audit sequence was designed and developed to allow for the audit to be conducted in a logical, focused, and efficient manner.

Medical Device Manufacturers Audit Outcome The Auditing Organization writes an audit report for each audited site, using a standard template specifically designed for medical device regulatory audits. Auditing Organizations share the audit outcomes with the participating Regulatory Authorities to support their pre-market or post market or routine compliance. Upon successful certification or recertification audits, Auditing Organizations issue MDSAP specific certification documents stating compliance to MDSAP audit criteria (See MDSAP AU P0026). Nonconformities identified during an audit are graded on a scale from 1 (least critical) to 5 (most critical), according to explicit criteria as defined in GHTF/SG3/N19.

Medical Device Manufacturers Audit Outcome Nonconformities are graded based on their degree of impact on the QMS and the frequency of their recurrence. In some cases, high grade nonconformities may trigger the performance of an unannounced audit; The manufacturer provides – and the Auditing Organization reviews – remediation plans and evidence of implementation of these plans according to a specified timeline (see MDSAP AU P0027).

Auditing Organization Assessment & Recognition During the Pilot, the only Auditing Organizations that will be allowed to apply to the MDSAP program for recognition will be the accredited organizations/registrars currently utilized in the Health Canada CMDCAS Program. Many of CMDCAS registrars are also designated as Notified Bodies under the European regulatory scheme. The list of Registrars Recognized by Health Canada can be found at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/qualsys/list_liste_regist-eng.php After Pilot period (end of 2016) additional Auditing Organizations may be eligible to apply to the MDSAP

Auditing Organization Assessment Criteria MDSAP assessment criteria: IMDRF MDSAP WG N3 – “Requirements for Medical Device Auditing Organizations for Regulatory Authority Recognition” IMDRF MDSAP WG N4 – “Competency and Training Requirements for Auditing Organizations” Particular regulatory requirements published by the recognizing Regulatory Authority : audit model or technique, audit duration calculations, sampling of product technical documentation, audit planning to include determination of sites to be audited, audit report requirements.

Auditing Organization Assessment Cycle

Auditing Organization Assessment Process Program Initial Surveillance Re - Recognition Application Review Stage 1 Including Documentation including for Changes 2 On Site (Head Office) Witnessed Audits o f On-Site Assessment of- Cr i tical L cations (as nec e ssary) ocattions Surveillance On Site (Head Office) Witnessesd Audits Activities

Auditing Organization Assessment Outcome Grade 1 nonconformity : is a nonconformity that is unlikely to have a direct impact on the Auditing Organization’s ability to routinely operate an effective, ethical, impartial and competent organization that produces acceptable audit conclusions, audit reports, and certification documents. Grade 2 nonconformity : is a nonconformity that is likely to have a direct impact on the Auditing Organization’s ability to routinely operate an effective, ethical, impartial and competent organization that produces acceptable audit conclusions, audit reports, and certification documents; and is unlikely to allow deficiencies in the manufacturer’s quality management system, or its implementation, to have a direct impact on the safety and performance of the medical device. It’s a recurrence of a Grade 1 nonconformity.  

Auditing Organization Assessment Outcome Grade 3 nonconformity: is a nonconformity that is likely to have a direct impact on the Auditing Organization’s ability to routinely operate an effective, ethical, impartial and competent organization that produces acceptable audit conclusions, audit reports, and certification documents; and is likely to allow deficiencies in the manufacturer’s quality management system, or its implementation, to have a direct impact on the safety and performance of the medical device. It’s a recurrence of a Grade 2 nonconformity. Grade 4 nonconformity – Involves fraud, misrepresentation or falsification of evidence of conformity per IMDRF/MDSAP WG/N3 Final:2013 clause 5.1. It’s a recurrence of a Grade 3 nonconformity.

Conclusion MDSAP allows the usage of authorized third parties: MDSAP eliminates the need of four separate regulatory audits : Better use of human and financial resources Reduced time required for regulatory audits MDSAP allows the usage of authorized third parties: More flexibility and better planning for the audits Build relationship with auditing organizations. MDSAP uses One Audit Model Uniformity of the requirements Better predictability of the audits’ outcome.

Recommendations To Medical Device Manufacturers Be part of the process during the pilot to help shape the policies and procedures for the operational program scheduled to begin in 2017. Contact the Auditing Organization of their choice to determine if they are – or when they expect to be – authorized to perform MDSAP Pilot audits. Perform a gap analysis between what you have now and the MDSAP audit criteria requirements and set up the appropriate strategy and action plan for compliance.

Source of Information International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF): http://www.imdrf.org FDA website : http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/InternationalProgram s/MDSAPPilot/UCM372066.pdf Health Canada Website : http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md im/activit/int/mdsap_pilot_notice_avis-eng.php

Source of Information IMDRF MDSAP WG N3 -“Requirements for Medical Device Auditing Organizations for Regulatory Authority Recognition” IMDRF MDSAP WG N4 -“Competency and Training Requirements for Auditing Organizations” IMDRF MDSAP WG N5 -“Regulatory Authority Assessment Strategy for the Recognition and Monitoring of Medical Device Auditing Organizations” IMDRF MDSAP WG N6 - “Regulatory Authority Assessor Competency and Training Requirements” IMDRF MDSAP WG N11 - document that “grades” nonconformities resulting from a Regulatory Authority assessment of an Auditing Organization and document the decision process for recognizing an Auditing Organization or revoking recognition

Questions ? For any questions please send an email to sdavis@globalregulatorypartners.com Or contact Global Regulatory Partners-LLC via www.globalregulatorypartners.com

Thank You from Global Regulatory Partners-LLC