An MPO “Big Data” Application Colorado Springs Metropolitan Planning Area Congestion Management Process 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Involvement Open Houses Develop Problem Statement Review plans, policies, regulations, and standards Identify and assess Alternate Mobility.
Advertisements

Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Tower Road Enhancement Project Prepared for Alachua County By Causseaux & Ellington, Inc. Alachua County Roadway Network Improvements.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
Congestion Management System The Mobility Management Process.
ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,
Nonmotorized Regional System Plan 1 3 rd Technical Task Force meeting Regional Nonmotorized Transportation System Plan Thursday April 3 rd 2014 Steer Davies.
Waheed Uddin, PhD., P.E. Professor and Director, CAIT Center for Advanced Infrastructure Technology Department of Civil Engineering The University of Mississippi.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Management and Operations In MPO Planning Christopher O’Neill.
Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.
Congestion Management Process (CMP) Briefing to the Technical Committee May 2, 2012.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
2011 Freeway Congestion Monitoring Program Findings TPB Technical Committee December 2, 2011 Greg Jordan, SKYCOMP, Inc & Daivamani Sivasailam, DTP TPB.
15 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey Joyoung Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Byungkyu Brian Park, University.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. A Colorado Springs MPO Pilot Implementation Study Network Robustness Index (NRI) Application to Security Critical.
Can Multi-Resolution Dynamic Traffic Assignment live up to the Expectation of Reliable Analysis of Incident Management Strategies Lili (Leo) Luo, P.E.,
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Incorporating Management and Operations and the Congestion Management Process into Metropolitan Transportation Planning FHWA/FTA Webinar June 24, 2008.
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
 Presentation at the 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, NJ Monday, May 18 th Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
SHRP 2 TOOL EXAMPLES Minnesota Pilot Test Site 1.
Travel Speed Study of Urban Streets Using GPS &GIS Tom E. Sellsted City of Yakima, Washington Information Systems and Traffic.
The Science of Prediction Location Intelligence Conference April 4, 2006 How Next Generation Traffic Services Will Impact Business Dr. Oliver Downs, Chief.
Cell Phone Traffic Data Technology Demonstration in Minnesota ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition Bernie Arseneau, Mn/DOT Rashmi Brewer, Mn/DOT.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Preliminary Findings March 23, 2006 Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
National Society of Professional Engineers-Colorado Engineers Week Forum February 19, 2010.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Southwest Washington ITS Traffic Data Collection & Analysis: A Tale of 3 Projects Jill MacKay ITE Traffic Simulation Roundtable October 4, 2012.
Integrated Macro-Micro Highway Demand/Operational Analysis Case Study: Cross Bronx Expressway Corridor, Bronx, NY Presented at the 15 th TRB Transportation.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
MOBILITY 2030: THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN AREA North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation.
Praveen Pasumarthy, P.E., PTOE, CDM Smith Chris Edmonston, AICP, FDOT Paul Fang, FDOT INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY CONGESTED ROADWAYS AND BOTTLENECKS.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Orange County Traffic Signal System Consolidation of Services Study Commission Meeting September 8, 2005.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
1 Update on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) and Related Data Activities Wenjing Pu COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee Meeting May 26,
Rainier Avenue South Pilot Project Update Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board Project Manager Jim Curtin September 2, 2015.
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
I-270/MD 355 Simulator: An Intelligent Online Traffic Management System Dr. Gang-Len Chang Nan Zou Xiaorong Lai University of Maryland Saed Rahwanji Maryland.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.
TRAVEL TIME ANALYSIS Use of Data IN-KY-OH Traffic Incident Management Conference October 9, 2015 Dayton, OH.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
Summary of the WILMAPCO Congestion Management Process Prepared for T3 Webinar September 18, 2007.
Corridor Management Planning in California Jeff X. Ban CCIT, UC-Berkeley Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Congestion Management Process / Performance Measures Report
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Broward County Congestion Assessment
Presentation transcript:

An MPO “Big Data” Application Colorado Springs Metropolitan Planning Area Congestion Management Process 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 17 – 21, 2015 Atlantic City, New Jersey Data Collection & Management Session: May 18, :30 AM – 10:00AM

01 Pikes Peak/Colorado Springs Region

 Population over 600,000  Nine Member Agencies  Over 800 roadway miles Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG)

02 Regional Transportation Plan—Congestion Management Process (CMP)

 Develop strategies to improve transportation system  Systematic assessment  Alternative assessment  Implementation strategies  Funding Congestion Management Process (CMP)

 2035 Update RTP Corridors o Significant Corridors o Strategic Corridors Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Corridors

National Highway System Additions  MAP-21 included the full NHS network facilities in CMP network

03 What are the evaluation options?

 Static  Resource Intensive  Peak Hour Data Collection  Limited Data on Roadway System Traditional Data Collection

 Dynamic  Regional System View of Roadway Operations  Comprehensive Data on Major Roads Big Data Collection  24/7 Data Records  Seasonal Variations Recorded  Bottleneck Identification  Data Collected in 1 minute intervals

04 Development of the Colorado Springs Congestion Management Process

 INRIX Vehicle Probe data provided travel times/speed coverage for most corridors  Additional Travel Time Surveys conducted manually to “spot check” recorded data  Travel Time Surveys conducted on corridors not included within the INRIX data set Travel Time Data Collection – INRIX Data

Congestion Management Process (CMP) Corridors  20 corridors to analyze  200 Corridor Miles  30 Interchanges  150+ Signalized Intersections

05 Performance Measures

Congestion Greatest at Roadway Termini Source: INRIX Analytics Woodmen Road Corridor

Congestion Greatest Through Urban Core Source: INRIX Analytics Platte Avenue Corridor

Source: INRIX Analytics When Are the Queues the Greatest?

 Illustrate Queue Build-Up  Length of Queue  Time of Day Source: INRIX Analytics Congestion Scans

I-25 Congestion Management/Incident Planning Source: INRIX Analytics Big Data reveals progression of an incident –10:45 a.m. February 26, 2014 –11:00 a.m. February 26, 2014 –11:15 a.m. February 26, 2014 –12:00 noon February 26, 2014 –12:15 p.m. February 26, 2014 –12:30 p.m. February 26, 2014 –12:45 p.m. February 26, 2014 –1:00 p.m. February 26, 2014 –1:45 p.m. February 26, 2014

06 Now What?

 150+ Congested Intersections  Corridor Data o Travel Speeds o Travel Time  Intersection Data Rich o Average Duration o Average Maximum Queue Length o Number of Occurrences o Impact Factor So Much Information

Powers BlvdAirport Road I-25 (Exit 135)S. Academy Blvd Platte AveAcademy Blvd I-25 (Exit 146)Garden of the Gods Rd N. Circle DrPlatte Ave I-25 (Exit 156)North Gate Road I-25 (Exit 149)Woodmen Road I-25 (Exit 161)SH 105 I-25 (Exit 150)N. Academy Blvd I-25 (Exit 153)Interquest Pkwy Winter Season Summer Season Top Five (5) Congested Intersections by Season

Impact Factor Number of Occurrences Top Five (5) Congested Intersections Occurrence and Impact I-25 (Exit 135)S. Academy Blvd Platte AveCircle Drive Powers BlvdAirport Road I-25 (Exit 141)Cimarron St Academy BlvdGalley Road I-25 (Exit 125)Ray Nixon Road I-25 (Exit 167)Greenland Road I-25 (Exit 163)County Line Road Powers BlvdAirport Road I-25 (Exit 132)SH 16

Congestion Classification Congestion Experienced (Number of Occurrences) Recurring Congestion Continuous Congestion> 100 Anticipated Congestion31<x<100 Non-Recurring Congestion<30 Recurring: Continuous: Frequent/Regular Occurrence Anticipated: Occurs Frequently Non-Recurring: Infrequent Occurrences with Great Impacts Types of Congestion

07 Summary of Findings

Powers BlvdAirport Rd I-25 (Exit 135)S. Academy Blvd Platte AveAcademy Blvd Platte AveCircle Dr I-25 (Exit 141)Cimarron St

 Developed strategies to reduce congestion  Utilized objective-driven and performance-based processes  Incorporated safety, security, mobility, recurring and nonrecurring congestion  Multiple strategies including a mix of infrastructure and operational strategies Congestion Management Process (CMP) Results