Writing Instructionally Appropriate IEPsWriting Instructionally Appropriate IEPs Special Populations DepartmentSpecial Populations Department Tennessee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Including Other Professionals In the SAT Process: Factors for Consideration by Donald J. Frazier, Ph.D.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Creating Collaborative Standards-Based IEPs: A Training for IEP Team Members Session Three.
Module: IEPs Head Start Center for Inclusion
Understanding the IEP Process
Writing Instructionally Appropriate IEPs
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Meeting Mechanics & MIBLSI (Integration) Sue Mack, Muskegon Area ISD Cherrise Benwell, Shiawasee ISD.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Does this look like your RTI team?. Maybe this looks like your team!
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
By Paula Jacobsen Chapter 12
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
As Services and Not a Place Quality IEPs + Tiered Interventions and Supports.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
OBSERVATIONS For SLD Eligibility Make sure you sit with your school’s team.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Instructional Practices in Preparation for NCSC AssessmentInstructional Practices in Preparation for NCSC Assessment Jill Omer, Speech, Language, and Autism.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Understanding Common Core for Special Education South Pasadena PTSA; Special Needs Committee Presenters: Angelique Burzynski Vivian Fonseca Janet Wichman.
Developing the Foundation for the PLAAFP
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
Professional Learning Resources Download presentations and resources from today’s sessions!  Go to BISD homepage  Departments  Professional Learning.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Special Education The Role of the School Counselor.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Prevent Teach Reinforce PTR and PTR-YC
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
Understanding the IEP Process
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Autism Supplement.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Developing an IEP for my child
Presentation transcript:

Writing Instructionally Appropriate IEPsWriting Instructionally Appropriate IEPs Special Populations DepartmentSpecial Populations Department Tennessee Department of EducationTennessee Department of Education

Norms We Will:  Be open to others’ views and input  Share experiences and ideas  Determine roles and responsibilities  Ask questions within and outside of our own group  Provide constructive feedback  Be engaged in the presentations and group work  Be respectful and turn all technology to silent mode during work time 2

Procedures Roles and Responsibilities of Group Members  Make sure that each person in your group is serving in at least one role. If you have more than 4 people in your group, have more than one Timekeeper/Gatekeeper. If you have less than 4 people in your group, have group members serve in more than one role. Everyone should serve as a secondary facilitator, helping make the group’s work easier. Small Group Facilitator  The Facilitator leads the discussion, making sure that everyone is fully participating.  Examples of getting all to provide input: “Will each person give your thoughts about what data we should include in our present levels of performance?”  “As the most highly qualified professional providing the most intense intervention, what supports would we have in place for our student? What do you all suggest? We will start with (name) and go around the group”. Scribe  The Scribe writes the information for the group on the presentation chart Reporter  The Reporter reports the small group's work to the whole group. Timekeeper/ Gatekeeper  The Timekeeper keeps track of the time and makes sure that the group finishes the task on time as well as ensuring everyone remains on task. 3

Procedures  This activity is meant to simulate the collaboration that is needed to gather all the necessary information to write an instructionally appropriate IEP.  As a professional educator, there might be times when you receive a file on a student and there will be things missing. This is a time where you might have to go look for the information to make your file complete. – For example, you might need to discuss with the general education teacher, special education teacher, school psychologist, and any one else necessary to make sure all information is collected. 4

Procedures  Identify partners by colored folders 5 SLD Math Ryan Calculation 3 rd Grade OHI Elementary Skylar Smith 6 th Grade OHI High School Kingston Smith 11 th Grade Autism Andrew Smith 4 th Grade Speech/ LanguageOlivia Brown 3 rd Grade

Phone A Friend You have a file at your table, but the contents in that file are not an exact match to your case partner’s file. To find your case study partner, raise your “Phone a Friend” paper and the facilitator can guide you, or go to the table with the same color folders. You may then collaborate with your new partners, much like we collaborate with general education, psychologist, therapists, parents, etc. Any thing you learn in collaboration can now be used in developing the IEP for your case study 6

File Cabinet Search Sometimes we, as special education teachers, are not given all the information we require for IEP development. To simulate this, we have created a “File Cabinet” for you today. If you would like to search for more information or missing information, hold up your “File Cabinet Search” paper and the facilitator will bring you the “file cabinet” to search. Items found may now be added to your case study. 7

Clarifying Questions This is difficult work and we realize that. At any time, you can raise the “Clarifying Questions” and the facilitator will come to your table to help answer or clarify anything that is related to the 2 days of training or case study work. 8

Developing A Strong Narrative A quick snapshot describing the student’s strengths and concerns Must include: Student’s strengths Parent concerns in their own words to the greatest extent possible Impact on mastery of standards Medical information, even if no concerns (don’t leave blank) Must pass the “stranger test” 9

20 Minute Timer End

Share Your Work Reflect and make changes as necessary 11

Developing A Strong PLEP A summary of assessments aligned to area(s) of need Must include: Student’s current assessment data Narrative description of ability level related to skills Impact on mastery of standards Exceptional: yes or no Positive terms and language Must pass the “stranger test” 12

20 Minute Timer End

Share Your Work Reflect and make changes as necessary 14

Developing A Strong MAG A clear description of an observable behavior a student will be able to do within one year Must Include: Condition Behavior Performance criteria (How well? How consistently? How often? How measured?) Must pass the “stranger test”  Look at the template provided 15

Goal Setting with CBM data 16 _________ + __________ = _____________ Initial Score (Goal ROI) X (# of weeks) Goal Score

20 Minute Timer End

Share Your Work Reflect and make changes as necessary 18

Characteristics of the Most Intensive Intervention Potential intervention components: specifically target student’s skill deficit are research based, explicit, and systematic are more intensive than general education interventions for academics, must be more intensive than Tier III provides support to students in addition to intervention 19

20 Minute Timer End

Share Your Work Reflect and make changes as necessary 21

Accommodations Accommodations change the “how” Must address: Core instruction participation and access Assessment participation and access Student’s entire school day; not limited to ELA & Math 22

Modifications Modifications change the “what.” This is a very significant decision that should only be considered as a last resort.  Scaffolding, accommodations, support, interventions, and additional adult assistance should all be tried first with data collected to determine effectiveness and fidelity of each accommodation.  Modifications are restrictive by nature. They are only the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) once all other options have been implemented with fidelity and data has been collected. Only then can we determine that modifications are required. 23

20 Minute Timer End

Share Your Work Reflect and make changes as necessary 25

Considerations of Service Delivery Least Restrictive Environment – All students are general education students first – All students receive high quality core instruction— for students with the most significant needs, the “how” and “where” is the “I” in IEP Areas of deficit Intervention required to meet student’s need – Directly linked to the MAG – A person is not an intervention 26

Considerations of Service Delivery Cont. Student independence – The MAGs should be increasing the student’s skills so he or she requires increasingly less accommodation/modifications the following year. Collaboration between general and special education teachers Training support for staff/peers – May be noted in the MAGs under “details—supplementary supports for school personnel” Ex: A child has a visual schedule. A special education professional would provide a fifteen minute training to all staff on that particular schedule. 27

20 Minute Timer End

Share Your Work Reflect and make changes as necessary 29

Sharing what has been developed  Present Your Student (Case study) 30

Moving Forward—Self Reflection  What questions do you still have?  Who on your team/school/LEA can assist you moving forward?  How will you communicate about the changes to parents? When? In meetings, prior, multiple times?  What interventions do you have available at your school?  What interventions might you need?  How will your schedule be different next year? If you have questions you would like answered, please place the index card in the box in your room. 31

Programming team Joann Lucero, Literacy Intervention Specialist Ryan Mathis, Mathematics Intervention Specialist Alison Gauld, Behavior and Low Incidence Coordinator Jill Omer, Speech, Language and Autism Coordinator Tie Hodack, Executive Director, Instructional Programs Vacant, High School Intervention and Transition Coordinator 32