Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 802.11 TGax PHY Frame Structure Discussion for Enabling New Contention Mechanism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0801r0 July 2014 Dongguk Lim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Envisioning 11ax PHY Structure - Part II Date: Authors:
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Preamble Considerations in Large Channel Delay Spread Scenarios
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Comp 361, Spring 20056:Basic Wireless 1 Chapter 6: Basic Wireless (last updated 02/05/05) r A quick intro to CDMA r Basic
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1057r0 September 2013 Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Legacy Support on HEW frame structure Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r0 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0068r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, NEWRACOM January 2015 Support of Outdoor Environments Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1167r2 Sept 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax Functional Requirement Discussion Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0818r1 July 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Synchronization Requirements Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
OFDM Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: January 2015
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 OFDMA Non-contiguous Channel Utilization Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1228r2 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, Yeungnam Univ./NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Preamble structure for 11ax system
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1228r0 Submission September 2014 xxx, NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Preamble structure for 11ax system January 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jiayin Zhang, et al. (Huawei Technologies)
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1370 Nov 2013 SubmissionZTE, CMCC, LTE OOB Interference to 2.4GHz Band Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1305r1 Submission January 2011 Monnerie (Landis+Gyr), Buffington (Itron), Shimada (Yokogawa Co.), Waheed (Freescale) Slide 1 IEEE.
September 2013 doc.: IEEE 11-13/1105r0 Submission Meng Yang (CATR) Discussion on Access Mechanism for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE ad Submission May 2010 Chin-Sean Sum, NICTSlide 1 Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 On Future Enhancements to Technology Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r4 November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors: Zhong-Yi Jin, Nokia.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1395r2 Simultaneous Transmission Technologies for HEW Date: November 2013 Koichi Ishihara, NTTSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r1 Company Confidential November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r1 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0362r0 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Beacon Transmission Issues Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Submission doc.: IEEE /1359r0 November 2015 Yu Wang, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 System Performance Evaluation of ae Date: Authors:
Introduction to OFDM and Cyclic prefix
Submission doc.: IEEE /1064r0 September 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Long Range, Low Power Design Criteria Date: Authors:
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
Requirements Discussion
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
120MHz channelization solution
EHT Potential Enhancement Discussion
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Synchronization Requirements
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Packet Design for Wake-up Receiver (WUR)
MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax PHY Frame Structure Discussion for Enabling New Contention Mechanism Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang Bo Ke Kaiying Zhendong Meng Jiadong

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Abstract CSMA/CA mechanism used in is good for low density WLAN deployment. But in high density deployment cases, the spectrum efficiency of CSMA/CA would be very low. The target of 11ax is to improve the spectrum efficiency in the high dense deployment, while maintaining or improving the power efficiency per station. This contribution is to follow up the previous contribution about enhancement of CSMA/CA mechanism using code based CSMA and to discuss some changes in the PHY layer to support the enhancement. Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Background Scope of 11ax –PAR and 5C[1] indicates that 11ax will develop a new amendment for high efficiency WLAN for the indoor and outdoor operation. –It will increase robustness in outdoor propagation environments and uplink transmissions. –It is maintaining or improving the power efficiency per station. Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Background Issues of Efficiency –CSMA has very poor spectrum and MAC efficiency at high dense deployment. –[2] analyzes the performance of contention based access, and indicates the collision probability increases significantly as the number of STAs increases in coverage. –[3] points out that the efficiency of WLAN channel usage can be as low as 10% in certain conditions, which means 90% of time is wasted on control and management frames and unsuccessful data transmissions (collisions). –In order to meet TGax PAR, it is important to improve the CSMA efficiency in high dense deployment. Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Background Issues of Power Consumption –Some study report indicates that in the real-world, more than 60% power consumption of WLAN device is from idle listening mode, even with power-saving mode enabled. –The reason of low power efficiency of WLAN device mainly comes from its CSMA mechanism the radio must be turned on and perform idle listening continuously, in order to detect unpredictably arriving packets or CCA sensing. –The energy consumption in idle listening is comparable to that in the active transmitting or receiving. –Therefore it would be critical to reduce the power consumption in the idle listening. Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Background Enhancement of CSMA/CA –[4] suggests to improve CSMA/CA performance via introducing code based contention mechanism. With a unique code for each STA, allows multiple STAs to contend the medium at same time allows the AP to detect the multiple contentions and schedule multiple transmissions without collision. –It can also improve the power efficiency per STA Slide 6 Contention Window idle xIFS Busy AP CR STA1 STA2 STA3 SIFS RTS CTS CR CA A-PPDU BA

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Frame Structure Discussions Goals of 11ax Frame Structure –Enable a new contention mechanism to improve the MAC and spectrum efficiency Reducing the medium wasted time during contention Reducing the possibility of transmission collision. Minimizing the overhead of preamble and transmission –Define a special PHY frame for the contention request Allow multiple contentions at same time without collisions Be able to fit into both indoor and outdoor scenario to improve the transmission robustness. –Co-existence with legacy STAs Allow legacy STAs to perform CCA detection to be aware of the medium occupancy condition. Reuse the existing frequency and timing synchronization algorithm. Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Frame Structure for CR/CA Frame Structure for CR and CA –CR frame is used for multiple STAs to contend the medium at the same time and allows the AP to distinguish multiple requests. –CA frame is used for AP to send a grant information to the contending STAs. –L-STF, L-LTF and L-SIG: legacy fields backward compatible to IEEE This is the generic part of HEW PHY frame structure –HEW Zadoff-Chu Field (HE-ZCF): Used to improve mulitple access via allowing contention in the code domain. It contains a ZC sequence (ZC-SEQ) and Cyclic Prefix (CP). Slide 8 L-STF 2 symb L-LTFL-SIGHE-ZCF 2 symb1 symb HE symbol ax CR/CA ZC-SEQCP

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Frame Structure for CR/CA Backward Compatibility and Co-Existence (1) –L-STF and L-LTF: Those fields are to keep the backward compatibility for legacy stations to sense the medium occupancy via CCA Carrier Sensing detection. If missing detection of those fields, it would trigger the CCA- Energy Detection which is 20dB higher than CCA-CS. Used for the receiver to the timing and frequency synchronization with the transmitter. L-STF/L-LTF allows to re-use the existing frequency and timing synchronization algorithm.

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Frame Structure for CR/CA Backward Compatibility and Co-Existence (2) –L-SIG field: Rate bits shall be set to “BPSK r=1/2” for CR/CA frame. Reserved bit shall be set to “1” to indicate CR/CA frame. Tail bits shall be set to “0” Length bits shall be set to L-SIG duration. –L-SIG Duration in CR is to protect the transmission of CR and CA –L-SIG Duration in CA is to protect the CA and following transmission All HEW STAs shall use the same settings in CR. Rate (4bits) Rsvd (1bit) Length (12bits) P (1bit) Tail (6bits) L-STFL-LTFL-SIGHE-ZCF L-STFL-LTFL-SIGHE-ZCF HE IFS L-SIG Duration (CR)

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Frame Structure for CR/CA Discussion –Since all HEW STAs use the same setting in L-SIG of CR frame during the contention, L-STF/L-LTF/L-SIG signal sent from multiple stations could be viewed as multi-path from a single source. –Assuming that STAs have synchronized to AP based on AP’s DL frame, if the timing and frequency alignment of STAs to AP is within a certain threshold, the AP and other nearby STAs (including legacy) could be able to synchronize with CR frame transmission and decode the L-SIG. –Therefore the L-STF/L-LTF/L-SIG in the new PHY frame structure could support simultaneous transmissions from different STAs without self interference and can be detected by 3 rd part STAs.

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Numerology Discussion FFT Size –The current uses 64 FFT in 20MHz bandwidth Subcarrier Spacing: 20MHz / 64 = 312.5KHz The DFT duration and CP of OFDM symbol is 3.2us and 0.8us respectively. Channel Model for Outdoor –Three channel models are considered for WLAN outdoor scenario [7]: IEEE Channel model F [5], UMi and UMa channel models [6] –The current CP (0.8 us) defined in current IEEE ac spec [8] may not be long enough to cover the maximum delay spread in outdoor case. Slide 12 RMSMax Delay Spread IEEE model F (NLOS) [5]150ns1050ns UMi (NLOS) [6]129ns615ns UMa (NLOS) [6]363ns1845ns

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Numerology Discussion HEW PHY Numerology –To make link more robust in the outdoor case, it might need to increase CP. But increasing CP length without changing the FFT size (i.e. keep the same symbol duration) would cause the degradation of efficiency. –[9], [10] analyzed different options of new PHY numerology FFT size: 2x (128); 4x (256) or 8x (512) CP lengths: 0.4us, 0.8us, 1.6us, or 3.2us –It shows the performance at difference FFT sizes 0.8us CP is not secure for the robustness of outdoor case The compensation of carrier frequency offset is well performed up to 500KHz at CP = 0.8us for 4x FFT size. –It suggests HEW FFT size = 4x 64 = 256. HEW Subcarrier Spacing: 20MHz / 256 = KHz. HEW DFT length TDFT: 1 / = 12.8us HEW CP length: TCP = 1/32, 1/16, 1/ 8 or ¼ x TDFT = 0.4us, 0.8us, 1.6us or 3.2 HEW symbol length: 12.8us (or 0.8, 1.6 or 3.2)us = 13.2us … Slide 13

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Numerology Discussion Zadoff-Chu Sequence The u th root Zadoff-Chu Sequence is defined as where N ZC is the length of Zadoff-Chu sequence, N SC is the number of Subcarrier, (N ZC < N SC ) From the root Zadoff-Chu sequence, the Contention Request frames with zero correlation of length N CS – 1 are defined by cyclic shifts –where C v is the cyclic shift Slide 14

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Numerology Discussion Zadoff-Chu Sequence Numerology –FFT size N SC also impacts the number of available Zadoff-Chu sequences N ZC. In LTE, it uses 1.25kHz subcarrier spacing in RACH for small cell and 7.5kHz subcarrier spacing for large cell, which supports 139 and 839 ZC sequences respectively. –For 256 FFT, we may choose numerology for CR/CA N ZC = the prime number (<=251) Zadoff-Chu Sequence time: T SEQ = T DFT = 12.8us Zadoff-Chu CP time: T CP = 1/8 x T SEQ = 1.6us Zadoff-Chu C symbol time = T symb = T SEQ + T CP = 14.4us Slide 15

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) 11ax PHY Numerology Discussion Zadoff-Chu Sequence Numerology Cyclic Shift C v –C v = v N CS, where v = 0, 1, 2, … [N ZC / N CS ] – 1 N CS depends on the cell radius. In order for the STA at cell edge to be distinguishable, –N CS x T SEQ / N ZC > Time Sync Offset (TSO) + Delay Spread (DS) For example: –For ICD = 150m, TSO = 0.4us, DS = 0.8us, N ZC = 251, then N CS >= 24, N ZC / N CS = 10. –For ICD = 30m, TSO = 0.1us, DS = 0.2us, N ZC = 251, then N CS >= 6, N ZC / N CS = 41. Slide 16 Configuration Index Number of cyclic shifts per ZC root sequence Number of ZC root sequences Cyclic shift size N CS (samples) Cell radius (m)

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Conclusion Summary –Code based contention mechanism would help to reduce the collision and improve the spectrum usage efficiency. –Code based contention mechanism would reduce the idle listening time and improve the power efficiency. –The new PHY frame structure for contention request frame is backward compatible to legacy system, and allow 3 rd part stations to sense the medium occupancy. –The new contention request frame supports multiple stations to contend the medium at same time and allows AP to distinguish and arbitrate multiple contention requests. Slide 17

doc.: IEEE /1168r1 Sept 2014 Submission Yonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) References hew hew-sg-proposed-par hew-mac-efficiecy-analysis-for-hew-sg ax-functional-requirements-discussion 4.IEEE ax-CSMA-enhancement-suggestion 5.IEEE n-tgn-channel-models ax-tgax-channel-model-document ax-simulation-scenarios 8.IEEE AC Specification ax-envisioning-11ax-phy-structure-part-ii ax-envisioning-11ax-phy-structure-part-I 11.Daniel Halperin, etc. “Demystifying n Power Consumption” 12.Xinyu Zhang, etc. “E-MiLi: Energy-Minimizing Idle Listening in Wireless Networks” Slide 18