Developing Analytical Processes and Tools to Evaluate Transit-Oriented Developments Scott Holcomb, PE, Gannett Fleming, Inc. Mark Radovic, Gannett Fleming,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

VTrans2035 Update March 30, Dironna Belton Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment.
Transportation/Land-Use Connections Program Status Report Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board July 18, 2007 Sarah Crawford Transportation.
East Central Florida HUD Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Project “Transit as an Economic Catalyst” $2.4 Million Awarded to the East Central.
Gabe Rousseau Federal Highway Administration Office of Human Environment.
New Directions Forward Scott Omer, PTP, Director Multimodal Planning Division Arizona Department of Transportation 2014 AzTA / ADOT Annual Conference April.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
An Integral Perspective on the S.E. 17 Corridor October 29, 2013 Calgary.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,
Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc Hartford, CT Study Advisory Committee Meeting #2 April 10, 2014; 4-6 PM Route 1 Corridor Plan Clinton, Westbrook, Old Saybrook,
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
LOGO 1 Sustainable Transportation Research and Practical Needs for Asian Countries Pawinee IAMTRAKUL, Thammasat University 24 November 2009 Asian Institute.
Multimodal Concurrency: Response to 2005 Legislative Session Briefing for House Local Government Committee November 30, 2006 King Cushman Puget Sound Regional.
How Can Connecticut Take Advantage of Transit-Oriented Development? Robert N. Lane, Director Regional Design Program Regional Plan Association
Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
T-BEST Nothing But the BEST for Transit Planning and Ridership Forecasting TBAG, October 28, 2004.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
Challenges of Integrated Transportation and Land Use Planning Reid Ewing Rutgers University.
Transportation and Cities Mark Magalotti P.E. Senior Lecturer University of Pittsburgh School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
2030 Mobility Plan City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department January 2011.
Connectivity & Mobility
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Jefferson Area Eastern Planning Initiative Project Overview.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
What are Intelligent Transportation Systems? Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) are existing and new technologies, including information processing,
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.
S. Erdogan 1, K. Patnam 2, X. Zhou 3, F.D. Ducca 4, S. Mahapatra 5, Z. Deng 6, J. Liu 7 1, 4, 6 University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN Future Scenarios October 19, 2009.
Public Open House Thursday, March 19, 2009 TOD Plan & Park-and-Ride Location Study Village of Montgomery, Illinois Public Open House TOD Plan & Park-and-Ride.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee April 12, 2006.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
1/14 Next Steps for Participating Economies to Develop EE Urban Passenger Transportation 5 March, 2012 APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur Bing-Chwen Yang Team.
National Transportation || || Presentation at 15 th TRB Planning Application.
1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
1. 2 Which attributes make a community successful?
Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
Complete Streets Training Module 4a – Understanding Context.
DeSoto Hampton Corridor Revitalization Overview of Mixed Use Development.
Project Development and Environmental Study (PD&E) S.R. 30 (U.S.) 98 Gregory Street and Bayfront Parkway at 17 th Avenue Intersection Project Development.
WSDOT’s Dynameq Projects
2017 SCORT Conference Washington, DC
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
Shanghai 2040 : Integration between urban transport and land use
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Developing Analytical Processes and Tools to Evaluate Transit-Oriented Developments Scott Holcomb, PE, Gannett Fleming, Inc. Mark Radovic, Gannett Fleming, Inc. Derek Gunn, Maryland State Highway Administration

Status of TODs In Maryland Maryland legislature defined TODs as "a dense, mixed-use deliberately-planned development within a half-mile of transit stations that is designed to increase transit ridership." Maryland Department of Transportation promotes TOD as a “tool to support economic development, to promote transit ridership, and to maximize the efficient use of transportation infrastructure.” Source – Maryland Dept. of Transportation TOD Website Page

Status of TODs In Maryland To support use of TOD in Maryland, MDOT initiated the TOD Designation Program – Access to economic and technical assistance Source – Maryland Dept. of Transportation TOD Website Page

Developing MDOT’s TOD Support Framework MDOT TOD website provides information on TOD programs and resources (

Developing MDOT’s TOD Support Framework Modal administrations (State Highway and Transit Administrations) developing tools and methodologies for evaluations – – TOD Development Guidelines Publication in review – TOD Dashboard web application under development

TOD Place Types Place Types guide SHA, MTA, local governments, and developers on design and configuration of transportation elements of a TOD project. SHA and MTA developed four distinct place types. TODs do not come in one shape or size. – Downtown – Urban Neighborhood – Town Center, Suburban Corridor, or Employment Center – Village Center or Rural Town

TOD Place Types TOD Place Types are characterized by: – variations in network connectivity – development form – parking provisions – intermodal splits – regional network analysis – the ease of intermodal connections – public space – pedestrian access – bicycle access and parking – the number and frequency of transit services

Tools for Evaluation of TOD Transportation Elements Place Types provide goals for transportation element design and performance Agencies need to evaluate mode splits, internal capture, regional impacts, and internal operations Issues: – Traditional analyses focused on suburban growth – MPO/Statewide Travel Demand Models provide static analyses and operational models not multimodal – Integrate travel demand and operational analysis

Tools for Evaluation of TOD Transportation Elements SHA working with University of Maryland to develop methodology with DTALite demand modeling combined with VISSIM operational analyses – Dynamic assignment – Internal trip capture – Block level modeling – Multimodal capabilities including bicycle and pedestrian modes visualization

DTALite and VISSIM – DTAlite Subarea Analysis and VISSIM simulation part of developing SHA Planning and Operations Data Hub Source – University of Maryland

DTALite and VISSIM Source – University of Maryland

DTALite and VISSIM Source – University of Maryland

DTALite and VISSIM Source – University of Maryland

DTALite and VISSIM Source – University of Maryland DTALite/VISSIM Methodology provides:

Thank You Thank you: University of Maryland National Transportation Center SHA Data Services Engineering Division SHA Regional and Intermodal Planning Division SHA Access Permits Division Maryland Transit Administration Maryland Department of Transportation Contact Information: Scott Holcomb, Project Manager Gannett Fleming, Inc. ( ) ( )