1 New Resource Qualification Testing Sandip Sharma Supervisor, Operations Analysis New Generation Information Forum ERCOT Public November 4, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

Questions about AVR & PSS
January 9, 2013 BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response Update for Texas RE RSC.
Understanding Electrical TransmissionDemonstration C2 A Guide to the National Grid Transmission Model Demonstration C2 Why are high voltages used for transmission?
Testing Workshop: Reactive Capability Testing
1 New Generation Commissioning Emal Latifzai Operations Support Engineer New Generation Information Forum ERCOT Public November 4, 2014.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING BLACK START OPERATIONS
1. 11/26/2012: NERC Board of Trustees adopted CIP v5 CIP thru CIP CIP and CIP Version 5 Filing FERC requested filing by 3/31/2013.
Rudolf Wieser, Matthias Baechle, Valerijs Knazkins – ATPE
A Partial Interim Report To WMS Guidance on Implementing Protocol Implementation Plan (PIP) 102 Reactive Power Task Force.
Frequency Control Turbine Governor Droop NERC Requirement
Small Signal Stability Analysis Study: study prepared by Powertech Labs Inc. for ERCOT Vance Beauregard AEP 9 April 2002.
Generator Data Submittals 5/8/ Transmission Customer Forum Bob Jones Transmission Planning Southern Company Transmission 5/8/ Transmission.
Audit & Compliance Tips Jagan Mandavilli Senior Compliance Engineer.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
Cohort 8 Grant Closeout Procedures HEIDI SCHULTZ DEBRA APPLETON.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
Workshop: Reactive Power Testing:
April 23 rd OWG UFLS Survey & Power Factor Review.
Generator Test Data, Generator Capability Curve, and NPRR 366 Terms March 14, 2012 Mike Noth & Bracy Nesbit 1.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Resource Entity Owned Transmission Asset Data Collection Feb 27, 2009 Kick Off Meeting.
RARF Frequently Asked Questions from Resource Entities Ed Geer RARF Workshop III 8/29/2013.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
ROS Feb 2006 The Model Curtis Crews Network Model Engineering Supervisor
PRR835 – Reactive Power Capability Requirement
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call Mar 13, 2009.
August 17, 2012 Solar PV Inverters Anuj Dixit Planning Engineer Resource Integration RPG Meeting.
Vestas.com Wind Power Plant Dynamic Reactive Power “Hybrid” Solutions to meet ERCOT Reactive Power Capability Requirements Presented at ERCOT ROS Meeting,
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
NPRR425 - Creation of a WGR Group for GREDP and Base Point Deviation Evaluation and Mixing Turbine Types Within a WGR Art Deller, P.E. RARF Workshop 8/29/13.
Date 05/01/2012 MIT Manual TEC Analysis Sandip Sharma ERCOT.
GENERATION PROTOCOL AND SETTLEMENT TODAY COMET WG / RMS Workshop Electric Reliability Council of Texas May 2, 2007.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call Mar 27, 2009.
Operational Issues & Risks ERCOT Operations Planning August 22, 2008.
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) August 8, 2012 PDCWG August 9, 2012 ETWG/QMWG.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
1 Presentation MIT November 14, 2011 Metering Issues Taskforce (MIT) Elimination of Time Error Correction Potential Impact on Wholesale Settlements.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
NERC Standards Update Colleen Frosch ROS Meeting January 7, 2016.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
BAL-001-TRE-01 ERCOT CPS2 R2 Waiver Regional Variance April 16, 2009 Sydney Niemeyer.
Steady-State Working Group: Resource Modeling Discussion Wes Woitt September 27 th, 2011.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
14 Minute Ramp Period Testing Workshop June 30, 2009.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting NATF Sep 29, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
© CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. THE OFFERING DESCRIBED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS SOLD AND CONTRACTED BY CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC., A SUBSIDIARY.
Restoration Concepts PEAK RC Training Classification: Confidential Version No.: 1.5 Date of Document: Document Owner/Author: B Pederson Classification:
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 13, 2012 WMS and June 14, 2012 ROS.
Voltage Control Brad Calhoun Consultant, Sr. Trainer Spring 2016.
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
NERC BAL-005, BAL-006, FAC-001 Gary Nolan WECC ISAS April 20, 2016.
Issues with Reactive Testing and the NDCRC S. Looney QMWG, 11/5/2012.
October 15, 2012 PV & Storage Workshop ERCOT’s Interconnection Process John Adams Principal Engineer.
Remedial Action Scheme Workshop RAS Workshop May 9, 2016.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
UFLS Survey Explanation
Agenda TSOG 8th November
Nodal COMS Additional Items Update
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
Reactive Power Task Force
Presentation transcript:

1 New Resource Qualification Testing Sandip Sharma Supervisor, Operations Analysis New Generation Information Forum ERCOT Public November 4, 2014

2 Required prior to Part III approval –AVR –PFR –Reactive Capability –PSS (if appropriate) New Resource Testing

3 ERCOT Nodal Protocols section: ( 5)The Resource Entity shall perform the Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) tests and shall supply AVR data as specified in the Operating Guides. The AVR tests must be performed on initial qualification. The AVR tests must be conducted at a time agreed on in advance by the Resource Entity, its QSE, the applicable TSP and ERCOT. Nodal Operating Guide section: The test reports should include the minimum and maximum excitation limiters, volts/hertz settings, gain and time constants, type of voltage regulator control function, date tested, and voltage regulator control setting. Performance can be evaluated by changing the AVR voltage set point between it’s high set point and low set point values Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR)

4 ERCOT AVR Performance Test Submittal Guidelines Please submit data in the following format for AVR Performance Test submittal: Time Stamp (1 sample per 4 seconds resolution minimum) AVR Set Point Actual Voltage at Monitored Terminals Note: These values should not be attained by manual switching static reactive devices Q OUT Gross MVAR output of the Unit Note: These values should not be attained by manual switching static reactive devices The test should demonstrate an increase and decrease of the AVR set point voltage. Additional AVR test documentation is not required however may aid in the approval process.

5 –Droop setting shall not to exceed 5% with a maximum frequency Dead-Band not to exceed ± 0.036Hz. –The test should be conducted both with positive and negative frequency offsets (±0.20 Hz). –Test is considered successful if after the offset signal becomes active at least 70% of the calculated MW contribution is delivered within 16 seconds and the response is maintained for an additional 30 seconds. PFR Testing (NOP Guide Section 2.2.7)

6 Nodal Protocols – Reactive Capability NP 3.15 (2): Units Required to Provide VSS All Generation Resources (including self-serve generating units) that have a gross generating unit rating greater than 20 MVA or those units connected at the same Point of Interconnection (POI) that have gross generating unit ratings aggregating to greater than 20 MVA, that supply power to the ERCOT Transmission Grid, shall provide Voltage Support Service (VSS). NP 3.15 (2): Units Required to Provide VSS All Generation Resources (including self-serve generating units) that have a gross generating unit rating greater than 20 MVA or those units connected at the same Point of Interconnection (POI) that have gross generating unit ratings aggregating to greater than 20 MVA, that supply power to the ERCOT Transmission Grid, shall provide Voltage Support Service (VSS). NP 3.15 (3): Reactive Requirement (POI) (a)An over-excited (lagging or producing) power factor capability of 0.95 or less determined at the generating unit's maximum net power to be supplied to the ERCOT Transmission Grid and at the transmission system Voltage Profile established by ERCOT, both measured at the POI; (b) An under-excited (leading or absorbing) power factor capability of 0.95 or less, determined at the generating unit's maximum net power to be supplied to the ERCOT Transmission Grid and at the transmission system Voltage Profile established by ERCOT, both measured at the POI; NP 3.15 (3): Reactive Requirement (POI) (a)An over-excited (lagging or producing) power factor capability of 0.95 or less determined at the generating unit's maximum net power to be supplied to the ERCOT Transmission Grid and at the transmission system Voltage Profile established by ERCOT, both measured at the POI; (b) An under-excited (leading or absorbing) power factor capability of 0.95 or less, determined at the generating unit's maximum net power to be supplied to the ERCOT Transmission Grid and at the transmission system Voltage Profile established by ERCOT, both measured at the POI; NP (2): Reactive Testing Requirement The Resource Entity shall conduct reactive capacity qualification tests to verify the maximum leading and lagging reactive capability of all Generation Resources required to provide VSS. Reactive capability tests are performed on initial qualification and at a minimum of once every two years. ERCOT may require additional testing if it has information indicating that current data is inaccurate. The Resource Entity is not obligated to place Generation Resources On-Line solely for the purposes of testing. The reactive capability tests must be conducted at a time agreed to in advance by the Resource Entity, its QSE, the applicable TSP, and ERCOT. NP (2): Reactive Testing Requirement The Resource Entity shall conduct reactive capacity qualification tests to verify the maximum leading and lagging reactive capability of all Generation Resources required to provide VSS. Reactive capability tests are performed on initial qualification and at a minimum of once every two years. ERCOT may require additional testing if it has information indicating that current data is inaccurate. The Resource Entity is not obligated to place Generation Resources On-Line solely for the purposes of testing. The reactive capability tests must be conducted at a time agreed to in advance by the Resource Entity, its QSE, the applicable TSP, and ERCOT.

7 Nodal operating guide section: 2.2.6Power System Stabilizers (3)The Generation Resource shall establish PSS settings to dampen modes with oscillations within the range of 0.2 Hz to 2 Hz. The PSS settings shall be tested and tuned to ensure the PSS has appropriate damping characteristics. Final PSS settings shall be provided to ERCOT and the TSP within 30 days of the PSS in-service date. (6)If it is determined that a change in PSS settings or the addition of a PSS to a synchronous Generation Resource would improve overall system performance, ERCOT shall coordinate with the Generation Resource owner to determine appropriate settings. Within 180 days of determining appropriate settings, the Generation Resource owner shall revise the PSS setting and/or install the PSS. Any PSS setting established pursuant to this section shall be established to dampen modes with oscillations as directed by ERCOT and place the PSS in-service. Final PSS settings shall be provided to ERCOT and the TSP within 30 days of the PSS in-service date. (7)At least every five years, Generation Entities shall conduct performance tests on PSS settings or verify PSS performance based on operational data Both AVR and PSS tests should be sent via to Power System Stabilizer (PSS)

8 Questions ?