Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” www.gadoe.org Assessment for Learning Series Module 1: Understanding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Performance Tasks for English Language Arts
A Parent’s Guide to Standardized Testing in Georgia
Sugar Hill Elementary Parent Information Night. Georgia Milestones Why do we have a new state test? Comprehensive  single program, not series of tests;
7 Strategies of Assessment for Learning
P ARENTS GUIDE TO G EORGIA MILESTONES. W HAT IS THE NEW G EORGIA MILESTONES ? A comprehensive assessment system spanning grades three though high school.
Explicit Instruction.
WORSER BAY SCHOOL: CHILDREN AS WRITERS: A PRESENTATION FOR PARENTS MURRAY GADD: 2015.
Procedural Writing Writing a How-To Paper.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Assessment for Learning Series Module 3: Understanding.
Visit the Georgia Milestones webpage:
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Assessment for Learning Series Module 2: Understanding.
Welcome Georgia Milestones Assessment at Rocky Creek Elementary Curriculum Night September 23, 2014 Presented By: Math Instructional Lead Teacher: Krystal.
Welcome to the Practicing for the Smarter Balanced Writing Performance Task Online Session West Virginia Department of Education Office of Assessment and.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Assessment for Learning Series Overview and Introduction.
Title I Workshop: Testing 101 Introducing Georgia Milestones.
Benefits from Formal and Informal Assessments
Northeast Academy “News and Views with the Principal” November 7 th, 2013 Common Core State Standards Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium.
Learning Target Four “ I can plan meaningful success
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5 Whitney Shook, Assistant Principal/Testing Coordinator Lori Dunagan, Curriculum Support.
Common Core Orientation Transforming Teaching & Learning DELCAC Session March 20, 2013.
SCORING. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Define what SCORING means for the purpose of these modules Explain how and why you should use well-designed tools, such.
Presented by: COMMON CORE Standards Plus ®. A nonprofit group of educators All Learning Plus instructional materials are developed by educators. Our mission.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” West Georgia RESA Elementary ELA Accessing Georgia.
Standards! What are we writing? What are we practicing?
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
English Language Arts (ELA) Sample Item Set
Common Core State Standards ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS GRADES 6-12.
Empowering Parents to Support Literacy and Math Instruction Compiled by Dr. Zackory Kirk Dr. Lya Snell ELA Coordinator Math Coordinator Spring 2015 Presented.
Patterns of Square Numbers Module 1. A Question For You… You are helping your niece with her homework and she says, “I notice that every time I square.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Assessment for Learning Series Module 2: Understanding.
Writing a Thesis for a Literary Analysis Grade 11 English.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Assessment for Learning Series Module 4: Working through Complex.
MATH COMMUNICATIONS Created for the Georgia – Alabama District By: Diane M. Cease-Harper, Ed.D 2014.
Unit 3: Looking at Student Work Learning Objectives Become aware of key components of quality classroom assessment aligned with on CCSS-ELA Literacy in.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
College Career Ready Conference Today we will:  Unpack the PARCC Narrative and Analytical writing rubrics while comparing them to the standards.
ELACC7W1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
LITERACY-BASED DISTRICT-WIDE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aiken County Public School District January 15, 2016 LEADERS IN LITERACY CONFERENCE.
Georgia Milestones and CCRPI Dan McGuire, Principal Ashley Bagwell, Assistant Principal Parent Presentation February 9, 2016.
Key Stage 2 SATs 2016 Childer Thornton Primary School.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
ELA - 3 Common Core Vs Kansas Standards. DOMAIN Standards For Literature (RL)
Third Grade Milestones. Georgia Milestones The Georgia Milestones Assessment System is a comprehensive summative assessment program spanning grades 3.
Welcome Georgia Milestones Assessment at Goshen Elementary FULL STEAM AHEAD February 18, 2016 Presented By: Academic Support Specialist, Nakia Johnson.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
An Overview of Georgia Milestones 4 th Grade Parent Involvement.
3rd Grade NJ ASK Parent Workshop Weston Elementary School 2013.
Good Evening! Suwanee Elementary March 3, 2016 Parent Outreach.: TODAY’S AGENDA :. o Overview of the Georgia Milestones Test o What you can do at home.
Writing in Math: Digging Deeper into Short Constructed Responses
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Coventry Public Schools
NYS English Regents Preparing for the 2011 Exam.
Stone Lakes Elementary
DC CAS Anchor Paper Training Reading – Secondary Grades 7, 8 & 10
Math Milestones Information Constructed Response
Preparation for the American Literature Eoc
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Testing Schedule.
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division
Presentation transcript:

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Assessment for Learning Series Module 1: Understanding and Using Constructed Response Items in Elementary Classrooms Georgia Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Division

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Definition Constructed response is a general term for items that require the student to generate a response as opposed to selecting a response. Constructed response items require more elaborate answers and explanations of reasoning. They allow for multiple correct answers and/or varying methods of arriving at the correct answer. Examples of skills required on constructed response tasks include, but are not limited to: English Language Arts – Utilize close analytic reading – Compare and contrast ideas and themes – Synthesize ideas and concepts across a single or multiple texts Mathematics – Apply mathematical procedures and skills to real world problems – Express mathematical reasoning by showing work or explaining an answer

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Using Assessment for Learning in Classrooms: A Continuous Cycle Assess Current Knowledge Deconstruct Standard Create Lesson & Assessment Teach Assess Learning Redesign and Teach Provide Feedback

English Language Arts (ELA) Sample Item Set Grade 3

Standards to be Assessed ELACC3W2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas and information clearly. ELACC3L1: Demonstrate command of the conventions of Standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. ELACC3L2: Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing. ELACC3RL1: Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for the answers.

Passage For this item, the students are asked to read a poem entitled, “Healthy Cookies.” The poem is about a girl whose mom purchased a healthy cookie snack in an attempt to replace the daughter’s preferred sugary cookie. The daughter was initially reluctant to try the healthy cookie, but eventually tasted the new cookie and decided it wasn’t that bad.

ELA Task ELACC3RL1, ELACC3W2, ELACC3L1 and ELACC3L2 Explain why the speaker believes that the healthy cookies will taste bad. Write your explanation in a paragraph that includes many supporting details from the text. Answer with complete sentences, and use correct punctuation and grammar.

Rubric ScoreDesignationDescription 4Thoroughly Demonstrated The student demonstrates a thorough understanding of the question and the text by completely explaining why the reader expects the healthy cookies to taste bad using details from the poem as support. The student’s response uses complete sentences and correct punctuation and grammar. 3Clearly Demonstrated The student demonstrates a clear understanding of the question and the text by providing an explanation of why the reader expects the healthy cookies to taste bad and uses some details from the poem as support. The student’s response uses mostly complete sentences and mostly correct punctuation and grammar. 2Basically Demonstrated The student demonstrates a basic understanding of the question and the text by providing a general explanation about why the speaker expects the healthy cookies to taste bad. However, the student offers little support from the poem. The student’s response uses some complete sentences and some correct punctuation and grammar. 1Minimally Demonstrated The student demonstrates a weak understanding of the question and provides a minimal explanation of why the speaker expects the healthy cookies to taste bad OR the student provides no details from the poem for support. The student’s response uses mostly incomplete sentences and mostly incorrect punctuation and grammar. 0Incorrect or Irrelevant The response is incorrect or irrelevant.

Exemplar Response One thing the speaker thinks will make the healthy cookies taste bad is the ingredients list on the box. These include “Vitamins and fiber, with no sugar to be found…” The speaker likes sweet snacks such as “Choco-Wonder-Treats and goo-filled Tasty Rings." Since she likes sweet snacks she does not expect cookies that do not have sugar to taste good. Also she thinks that cookies that are low fat and have no preservatives will "taste like wood!”. Note: Other exemplary responses could include a different reason that the healthy cookies might taste bad. The student must provide a clear explanation supported by evidence and specifics from the poem. The student clearly explains why the reader expects the healthy cookies to taste bad. This explanation is supported with direct evidence from poem. Remember: There can be multiple correct responses for constructed- response items, just as there can be more than one way at arriving at a correct answer.

Student Response Score 3 The speaker thinks that the cookies will taste bad because they are healthy cookies.The reason the speaker thinks that the cookies taste bad is because they have healthy stuff in it. The girl thinks they might taste bad is because she likes junk food.the girl says in the middle of the poem that the cookies where good.At the end of the poem the girl said, "No more junk food." The student response provides an explanation of why the speaker expects the healthy cookies to taste bad (because they are healthy cookies). The student provides some details from the poem that support the explanation (she likes junk food…At the end of the poem she said, ‘No more junk food’). The student uses complete sentences as well as correct punctuation and grammar in most of the writing.

Teacher Feedback for Score Point 3 Commend for quality characteristics Re-read text to find key details More descriptive vocabulary

Student Response Score 2 She thinks the healthy cookies will taste bad because they don't have a lot of sugar and it has a lot of vitamins in the cookies. The girl is used to unhealthy cookies not healthy cookies. If she would try them she might would like them. The student provides a general explanation of why the speaker expects the healthy cookies to taste bad (they don’t have a lot of sugar and it has a lot of vitamins in the cookies), but offers little support from the poem. The student uses complete sentences as well as correct punctuation and grammar in most of the writing.

Teacher Feedback for Score Point 2 Use ideas from exemplar response Attention to details in text Improvement to written language Vocabulary development

Student Response Score 1 Because she eat sweets.So she thought it was going to taste bad. The student provides a minimal explanation of why the speaker expects the healthy cookies to taste bad (she eat sweets...it was going to taste bad) with no details from the poem as support. The student response uses incomplete sentences.

Teacher Feedback for Score Point 1 Improve attention to detail Chunk text to improve comprehension Use of graphic organizer Work with high performing peer

Mathematics Sample Item Set Grade 3

Standard to be Assessed MCC.3.NF.3.d: Compare two fractions with the same numerator or the same denominator by reasoning about the size. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with the symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using visual fraction model.

Mathematics Task MCC.3.NF.3d Think carefully about the following question. Write a complete answer. You may use drawings, words, and numbers to explain your answer. Be sure to show all of your work. José ate ½ of a pizza. Ella ate ½ of another pizza. José said that he ate more pizza than Ella, but Ella said they both ate the same amount. Use words and pictures to show that José could be right.

Rubric – Qualitative Example

Exemplar Response Meets “Extended” Criteria Student fully explains and mentions relative size of the pies (his pizza could be bigger).

Sample Student Response Meets “Satisfactory” Criteria Gives a picture where sizes are different, but gives no explanation.

Teacher Feedback for “Satisfactory” Response Commend attention to detail in drawings Better written sentences to represent drawing More original word choices

Sample Student Response Meets “Minimal” Criteria Student draws a picture showing that ½ is always equal to ½.

Teacher Feedback for Minimal Response Direct instruction Use of number line

Teaching Plan Based on Formative Assessment Results Appropriately use symbols in a visual fraction model Compare fractions, make judgments about their size in relationship to the same whole Extended Student 1 Satisfactory Student 2 Minimal Student 3 Partial Student 4 Irrelevant Student 5

Demonstration lesson with active discussion Whole class instruction/direct instruction Small, cooperative group activity where students examine sample responses and their rubric components Parent conferences Inclusion classes with multiple adult supervisors/coaching Homework (only following extensive explanation and experience with open-ended items provided by the teacher in the classroom) Parent Night activity where parents and their children work together No grades----rubric score accompanied by written and/or oral feedback highly suggested because students are in the process of learning the standards and improving based on feedback Ways to Use Constructed Response Items

How Teachers Use Student Responses Determine students’ progress towards mastery of standards and readiness to proceed to next level Provide students with oral and written feedback specific to the standard Design instructional next steps, which includes re-teaching, remediation, and differentiation Self-assess professional growth needs, such as additional professional learning, collaboration, classroom materials and resources

Close-out Constructed response items require students to construct an answer for the formative task and are scored based on criteria defined in rubrics. Constructed response items can be used formatively to learn how well students are progressing in mastery of standards. Student performance on constructed response items gives teachers information to adjust instruction and know if students are able to demonstrate complex thinking.

References Ericsson, K. A., & et al., (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), Georgia FIP Module 4: Analyzing evidence and providing effective feedback. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium General Item Specifications. (April 2012). Retrieved from: content/uploads/2012/05/TaskItemSpecifications/ItemSpecific ations/GeneralItemSpecifications.pdf content/uploads/2012/05/TaskItemSpecifications/ItemSpecific ations/GeneralItemSpecifications.pdf Universal design for learning. Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST)