Co-ordination of unemployment benefits An overview of the main rules in Regulations 883/2004 & 987/2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health Insurance and Europe Hungary’s example
Advertisements

Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 2: Maternity Protection at work: For whom? Maternity.
By Javier Martinez, Director of Payroll Management Services October 2008.
Changes to Housing Benefit Entitlements for EEA Migrants from April 2014 The Housing Benefit (Habitual Residence) Amendment Regulations.
Employee Insurance Education Part #1. Introduction and Eligibility.
THE POSITION OF JOBSEEKERS Paul Minderhoud Centre for Migration Law Coordinator Network on Free Movement of Workers.
Coordination of unemployment benefits An overview of the current rules in Regulation 883/2004 trESS Seminar UK, Nottingham, 26 June 2013 Filip Van Overmeiren.
1 Liene Ramane Social Insurance Department Ministry of Welfare trESS seminar RIGA, 19 April 2012 Latvian experience and problems of coordination of unemployment.
Massimo Serpieri EU Commission – DG Research
1 Transnational working biographies: What should we measure? Nationality, place of residence, place of work or place of birth? Tatjana Mika Research Data.
Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) Chapter 48 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Copyright 2009, The National Underwriter Company1 What is it?
1 Health Benefits Under COBRA Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration.
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Shared Work Program Employee/Claimant Presentation.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Chapter 8: Economic integration, labour markets and migration As the extent of economic integration approaches that of the United States, labour market.
SFB International Tax Coordination 10/21/2005, Timo Fischer Europeanization of Long-Term Care – An economic approach to European Social Security Law –
Establishing a Return-To-Work Program Complying with Statutes, Laws and Rules on Return to Work.
Health Insurance Chapter 45 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Copyright 2009, The National Underwriter Company1 What is it? The most widespread employee.
Incorporating Mechanisms for the Protection of Rights into Temporary Worker Programmes: Experiences, Lessons Learned, Challenges, and Possibilities Luis.
3 rd 9 Weeks Benchmark Review Career Preparedness.
1 Ibero-American Multilateral Agreement on Social Security Francisco Jacob General Vice-Secretary, OISS.
1 TYPE OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS CHAPTER FOUR 4.
UWC in Mostar Academic year 2007 / 2008 ECONOMICS Standard Level – Second Year Azra Bajramović.
Post-completion OPT.  Four categories of OPT authorization:  Standard  Pre-completion OPT  Post-completion OPT  OPT Extensions  Cap-gap OPT extension.
Chapter 9 Employee Expenses and Deferred Compensation.
The Habitual Residence Condition PILA Training 18 August 2010 FLAC – the Free Legal Advice Centres.
Labor migration and remittances in Tajikistan Zafar Burhonov.
EU co-ordination of sickness benefits An overview of the main rules in Regulations n° 883/2004 (BR) & 987/2009 (IR) Prof. dr. Herwig VERSCHUEREN University.
Post-Completion Optional Practical Training Part I : Before you apply for OPT Stanford University Bechtel International Center.
Determining the applicable national social security scheme An overview of the main rules in Regulations n° 883/2004 & 987/2009, …but also in Regulations.
Determining the applicable national social security scheme An overview of the main rules in Regulations n° 883/2004 & 987/2009,
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division UNECE Workshop on Consumer Price Indices Istanbul, Turkey,10-13 October 2011 Session.
1 Liene Kiršfelde State Social Insurance Agency trESS seminar RIGA, 19 April 2012 Actual problems of legislation applicable in Latvia.
H&S week. Working Time Regulations 1998 (U.K.) Purpose of Working Time Regulations Why do we need this regulation? To prevent employers from taking advantage.
ICT for the Single Market: e-Government driving innovation 17 June 2011 « Coordinating National Social Security Systems: the case of EESSI » Jackie MORIN.
Participation and dissemination Rules and Contracts FP6.
For example, standards are set by  legislation and institutional framework conditions  dialogue, mutual learning and coordination European Lisbon Strategy.
Universal Credit Presentation 1 st September 2015.
Flexible Spending Account (FSA) Chapter 40 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Copyright 2011, The National Underwriter Company1 What is it? A type.
Chapter Objectives Be able to: n Apply the factors that will be considered when determining whether an individual is considered employed or self-employed.
AfRE self assessment Birgit Whitman, University of Bristol, July 2015.
Employment. What you need to know The Labour Force The number of people aged 16 or over who either have a job (employed) or are actively looking for.
Hendrix and Exporting SNCBs Lize Glas 1. Introduction  1. Facts  2. Reference for a Preliminary Ruling  3. CJEU’s Preliminary Ruling  4. Dutch Court’s.
“The EU coordination of social security” Seminar in Tallinn, Topical questions between Estonia and Finland Merit Aavekukk-Tamm Estonian Unemployment.
1 CHOICE OF LAW a) overview Art. 11 – 16  functions: Which law applies? Only one law applies - no loopholes, no double protection. example:NL - resident.
Dr. Gellérné dr. Éva Lukács Unemployment benefits for the self- employed in EC Law – Incentives for discussion Seminar, Budapest, 8-10 February, 2006.
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Modernised EU Social Security Coordination Social Security Rights when moving in Europe.
Self employed persons (SEP) Slovak Republic Budapest
Financial Management Services 101 An Introduction to Financial Management Services (FMS) for Participant Self-Direction Programs.
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Modernised Social Security Coordination Zagreb, June 2010 Coordination in the field of sickness,
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 2– Freedom Movement for Workers Bilateral.
Commission Staff Working Document Free Movement of Workers in the Public Sector 18 January 2011 Ursula Scheuer European Commission DG Employment, Social.
FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS: AN OVERVIEW OF HISTORY AND RELATED AREAS AS RECOGNITION OF PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND RESIDENCE RIGHTS Paul Minderhoud,
Presentation of the scheme designed by group XX
Microeconomics Topic 1: The Economic Problem
Chapter 8: Economic integration, labour markets and migration As the extent of economic integration approaches that of the United States, labour market.
Social Security
Unemployment Insurance
Protection against Unemployment and Promotion of Employment
Social security – persons covered
Co-ordination of unemployment benefits
Hendrix and Exporting SNCBs
China Teachers Program
Administrative concertation (Brussels, 4 October 2017)
of social security systems, COM (2016)815”
Legislative Developments
Freedom of movement of workers in the EU
Presentation transcript:

Co-ordination of unemployment benefits An overview of the main rules in Regulations 883/2004 & 987/2009

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 2 Implementation of the basic coordination principles The coordination rules on unemployment benefits are peculiar:  Totalisation principles are not fully implemented  Only a marginal implementation of the export principles

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 3 Specific features Umemployment benefits cover the risk associated with the involuntary loss of revenue whilst still being able to work Tight link to employment policy  registration with employment service;  active participation in employment promotion measures …… Remain available for monitoring & control by the employment service (►residence requirement)

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 4 Three different situations 1. A migrant worker becomes unemployed afterwards 2. Looking for a job abroad: export of benefits 3. Workers residing outside the competent State 1. Frontier workers: typical – atypical 2. Workers other than frontier workers

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 5 A migrant worker becomes unemployed after his move

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 6 A migrant worker becomes unemployed after his move Usually a qualifying period (1 - 2 years) Aggregation principles: For employed and self-employed workers Last insurance/employment in the State where the claim is lodged Taking into account the actual earnings U1 - SED

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 7 Looking for a job abroad

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 8 Looking for a job abroad ↔ Requirement to be available for work in the competent State ↔ Need for control & monitoring (►residence)  In principle no export of unemployment benefits  Contrary to the freedom of movement or European citizenship? ECJ C-406/04

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 9 Looking for a job abroad Exception: a limited export possible when all the following conditions are met (I): 1. Registration of – at least – four weeks with the employment service of the State of last employment;  Possible reduction of this period 2. Registration with the employment service of the State of stay, at least within seven days after departure;  Possible extension of this period

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 10 Looking for a job abroad Exception: a limited export possible when all the following conditions are met (II): 3. Comply with the control procedure of the State of stay; On request: monthly follow-up on persons’ situation 4. Return within 3 months to the competent State Possible extension of this period to 6 months Late: loss of benefits except if more favourable national legislation 5. Usable several times per unemployment period (max. total 3-6 months)

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 11 Looking for a job abroad Mechanism Benefits directly paid by the competent institution ↔ Reg.1408/71: Benefits were provided by the institution of the State where the person went to look for a job. The serving institution was afterwards reimbursed by the competent institution. U2 - SED

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 12 Residing abroad

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 13 Frontier workers Persons employed in territory of a State other than their State of residence, who return at home at least once a week.  Partial or intermittent unemployment  Full unemployment legislation of the State of employment legislation of the State of residence + optional registration in former State of employment

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 14 A-typical frontier workers Persons who maintain in the State of last employment personal and business links of such a nature as to give them a better chance of finding new employment there (Miethe-case)  Partial or intermittent unemployment  Full unemployment legislation of the State of employment legislation of the former State of employment

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 15 Workers other than frontier workers Persons residing outside of the competent State, who are not frontier workers (e.g. seasonal workers)  Partial or intermittent unemployment  Full unemployment legislation of the State of employment legislation of the former State of work / Home State (return or not)

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 16 Reimbursements between institutions When the State of residence has to provide the unemployment benefits without having collected the contributions: unfairness  new system on reimbursements for the State of residence 3 or 5 months Limited by ceiling Evaluation of this mechamism after 5 years

Sarajevo 2010 Co-ordination of unemployment benefits by B. De Pauw 17