Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide: 1 Welcome to the Non Linear Beam Dynamics Workshop P. Elleaume Non Linear Beam Dynamics Workshop, ESRF May 2008.
Advertisements

EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Isaac Vasserman Magnetic Measurements and Tuning 10/14/ I. Vasserman LCLS Magnetic Measurements and Tuning.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Hybrid QD0 Studies M. Modena CERN Acknowledgments: CERN TE-MSC CLIC Magnets Study Team: A.Aloev, E. Solodko, P.Thonet, A.Vorozhtsov “CLIC/ILC QD0” Meeting.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet Design Workshop: Magnet Design and Analysis Charles Spataro, NSLS-II Project NSLS-II is a new 3Gev synchrotron.
Powered Magnets, DB Formation and Decelerator Alexey Vorozhtsov (JINR) International Workshop on Linear Colliders October 2010.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Options for Final Focusing Quadrupoles Michele Modena CERN TE-MSC Many thanks for the contributions of: J. Garcia Perez, H. Gerwig, C. Lopez, C. Petrone,
Status of: CLIC Two-Beam Module Magnets R&D and Procurement 1 Michele Modena, CERN TE-MSC IWLC10, WG8, 21October 2010.
Permanent Magnet Quadrupoles for the CLIC Drive Beam Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Neil Marks, James Richmond, and Ben Shepherd STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
E. Karantzoulis - BESSY, June Elettra2.0-The next generation Emanuel Karantzoulis Circumference m 12 fold symmetry Energy 2 (& 2.4 GeV.
F James T Volk June Permanent Magnets for Linear Colliders James T Volk Fermilab.
Permanent magnet wiggler based on NdFeB material. This wiggler type uses the same design principles as the wigglers which have been developed for PETRA.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Bending Magnets for the Metrology Light Source
Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Drive Beam Quadrupoles Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Ben Shepherd, Graham Stokes STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK Antonio Bartalesi, Michele Modena, and Mike.
Magnets Technologies for NOνA Transfer Line (& RR30 section) July 21-23, 2009.
CLIC requirements on Warm Magnets (for CLIC Modules mainly) 1 M. Modena, CERN TE-MSC 13 April 2011 CERN-UK Collaboration Kick-off Meeting.
Artwork: S. Kimball. The CLIC Drive Beam The drive beam decelerates from 2.4 GeV to 0.24 GeV transferring energy to the main beam As the electrons decelerate,
Power Supply & Electrical Engineering for sustainable science
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Practical aspects of small aperture quadrupoles Dr Ben Leigh Tesla Engineering Ltd.
1 Magnetic measurements of the Super-FRS magnets 1 Overview: - Measurement systems for dipoles - requirements - Measurement systems review - Open points.
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
DDBA magnets Chris Bailey Low emittance rings Sept Frascati.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
New Magnet Design for FCC- ee Attilio Milanese, CERN 26 Oct presented by Frank Zimmermann.
A new QF1 magnet for ATF3 Alexey Vorozhtsov
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
High Gradient Magnet Design for SPring-8 Upgrade Plan
Summary of Session: Magnets and undulators for light sources 2
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
CLIC DR Gradient Dipole
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
CLIC Workshop 2016, CERN 20th January 2016
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
10th Feb 2017, CLIC Implementation Meeting
Magnet developments for the ESRF-EBS
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
Superconducting Ultimate-Storage-Ring Design
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Fusan Chen, Wen Kang, Mei Yang*
CLIC Damping Rings Gradient Dipoles
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2 Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Designs for Future Linear and Circular Colliders Geneva, November 26-28, 2014 Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2 G. Le Bec, J. Chavanne

Introduction: the ESRF-SR2 OUTLINE Introduction: the ESRF-SR2 Generalities about compact and efficient magnets Reducing the aperture Minimum aperture magnets Permanent magnets? Compactness and power efficiency for the ESRF-SR2 PM dipole with longitudinal gradient EM high gradient quadrupole EM combined dipole-quadrupole Conclusion G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

OUTLINE Introduction G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Reduced horizontal emittance: 4000  147 pm.rad Introduction ESRF Upgrade Phase II Reduced horizontal emittance: 4000  147 pm.rad Same insertion devices source points New storage ring Increased number of magnets: 7-bend achromat Reduced longitudinal space Reduced power consumption G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

ESRF Upgrade Phase II magnets: one cell Introduction ESRF Upgrade Phase II magnets: one cell 32 cells ~1000 magnets (without correctors) G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

High gradient quads (up to 85 T/m) High gradient combined magnets Introduction Design challenges High gradient quads (up to 85 T/m) High gradient combined magnets Dipoles with longitudinal gradient Longitudinal compactness required Integration of vacuum chambers and beam ports G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

OUTLINE Compact and efficient magnets Reducing the aperture Compactness and power consumption G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Small aperture magnets Power consumption and bore radius If the magnets are not saturated: Dipole power consumption  g 2 Quadrupole power consumption  R 4 Sextupoles power consumption  R 6 Low power and compactness  Reduced magnet apertures Main limitations Integration: vacuum chambers, beam ports, etc. Sensitivity to mechanical errors Compact magnet Minimum aperture reached Compactness refers to the external dimensions G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Small aperture magnets Mechanical error Assembly errors Errors at the GFR boundary Multipolar error at the bore radius Bore radius (GFR radius = r) Error @ r =R/4 r0=R r0=R/2 Quadrupolar e2 4e2 Sextupolar e3 8e3 Octupolar e4 16e4 Compact & low consumption  Tigh mechanical tolerances G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Compactness… in which direction? Compact magnets Compactness… in which direction? At constant integrated field (in first approximation: no saturation, no flux leakage, etc.) Transverse size variation is much faster if the magnet is saturated H L Compromise Longitudinal compactness Transverse compactness (also true for EM magnets) G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Transverse Compactness vs. Power consumption WYOKE WPOLE WCOIL HCOIL Fixed parameters NI WPOLE & WYOKE WCOIL (magnet length is fixed) Compact Low power High J Low J G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Length, transverse dimensions AND Power consumption Fixed integrated gradient: 50 T Variable length Variable NI and outer radius Bore radius: 12.5 mm Constant current density: 5 A/mm2 G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Compact and efficient magnets Normal conducting vs. permanent magnets OUTLINE Compact and efficient magnets Normal conducting vs. permanent magnets G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Short period undulator Lattice magnets PM micro-motor PM DC motor Asynchronous motor Power plant generator mm m Short period undulator Lattice magnets G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

scale factor g g g g g Characteristic aperture (g0 is obviously design dependent, this is a very first approximation) Gap < a few centimeters PM dipoles are more compact than EM dipoles G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

More compact for small aperture magnets Permanent magnets PM systems advantages More compact for small aperture magnets No coil head: iron length = magnet length No power consumption But… Risk of radiation damage? No if Sm2Co17 material is used Temperature variation? Can be compensated passively Mechanical complexity, tolerance stack-up Limited tunability G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Mechanical complexity Permanent magnets Mechanical complexity Yoke+pole: rigid assembly Yoke+pole: different parts Need spacers Tolerance stack-up Not compatible with laminated designs G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Permanent magnets Tunability h Trimming coils Permanent magnets = air gaps for coils Field in the gap: Optimization of PM volume: Coil field at optimum PM dimensions: x2 Amp turns needed! wY Yoke wP g Coils G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Permanent magnets Tunability x1 x2 w h Trimming coils Similar result for quad (Tosin, NIMA 2012) Optimization of PM volume: Coil induced gradient at optimum PM dimensions: where G0 is the gradient obtained without PM Coil efficiency reduced by a factor 2 G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Permanent magnets Tunability 10% of these Amp turns 5% tuning range G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Permanent magnets tunability Moving parts? Gap motions on insertion devices: 100% field tunability But… Field quality and magnet centre may depends on the position of the moving parts Possible reliability issues (may be improved using stepper motors) Accuracy of mechanical assembly is not easy to reach, even without motion Complex mechanical system high cost G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Outline Compactness and power efficiency for the ESRF-SR2 Dipoles with longitudinal gradient (DL) G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

ESRF dipole with longitudinal gradient (DL) Field ranging from 0.17 T up to 0.55 T or 0.67 T Total length: 1.85 m Gap: 25 mm Magnet mass: 400 kg PM Mass: 25 kg/Sm2Co17 and 25 kg Strontium ferrite per dipole (Design and measurements of the DL magnet: J. Chavanne) G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

ESRF dipole with longitudinal gradient (DL) Aluminium spacers Iron pole and yoke PM blocks DL module Number of PM blocks is module dependent Temperature compensation is not shown here Complete DL magnet on its support G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

ESRF dipole with longitudinal gradient (DL) Homogeneity of central field Quality dominated by pole faces parallelism May need refinement of mechanical tolerances Easy and fast mechanical correction (shimming) Tolerance: DB/B < 10-3 @13 mm Module 1 without shims (Hall probe meas.) Module 2 without shims (Hall probe meas.) G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

ESRF dipole with longitudinal gradient (DL) Integrated field Preliminary study on straight integrals Stretched wire method Two modules with 0.62 T and 0.41 T Longitudinal gap 5 mm between poles End effect (sextupole) shims not installed Will improve with additional modules G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

ESRF dipole with longitudinal gradient (DL) Longitudinal field Flat top field at longitudinal gap gs = 5 mm The optimum gs may change between the modules of the full magnet (field step dependence) gs G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Outline Compactness and power efficiency for the ESRF-SR2 High gradient quadrupoles G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

High gradient quadrupoles ESRF-SR2 85 T/m nominal gradient 12.8 mm bore radius, 0.5 m long Normal conducting Longitudinal compactness optimized 90 A, 69 turns Low power consumption (1.6 kW) Total mass ~1 ton Fast pole shaping algorithm developed Prototype being manufactured 600 mm 600 mm 500 mm G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

High gradient quadrupoles Excitation curves and saturation Moderate gradient quads optimized at a linear working point High gradient quads optimized at a saturated working point 1.5 T 2 T 1.5 T 1 T 1 T 0.5 T 0.5 T (a) (b) Magnetization m0M [T] of a moderate gradient (a) and high gradient (b) quadrupoles at nominal current. Excitation curves G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

High gradient quadrupoles Energy savings and compactness Low power quadrupole Compact quadrupole Current density 3.25 5 A/mm2 Power 1.65 2.50 kW Height 605 535 mm Mass 860 740 kg G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Outline Compactness and power efficiency for the ESRF-SR2 Combined dipole-quadrupoles (DQ) G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Combined Dipole-Quadrupoles Bz Bz x x Tapered dipole High field, low gradient Offset quadrupole High field, high gradient G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Combined Dipole-Quadrupoles Bz x DQ specifications GFR radius 7 mm Field 0.54 T Gradient 34 T/mm Offset quadrupole High field, high gradient G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Combined Dipole-Quadrupoles Field of an offset quad GFR x Bz Region of interest Additional power consumption, weight, etc. G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Combined Dipole-Quadrupoles A new target for DQ field Pro Lower power consumption and weight Easy access on one side (vacuum chamber, magnetic measurements) Cons Design and construction are more complex GFR x Bz G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Combined Dipole-Quadrupoles Single-sided dipole-quadrupole 2 poles + 2 “half” poles 0.54 T field, 34 T/m gradient Iron length: 1.1 m Magnet mass ~ 1 ton Power consumption: 1.5 kW Main pole Main coil Auxiliary pole Auxiliary coil (in series with main coil) Trimming coil G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Combined Dipole-Quadrupoles Magnetic design GFR Vertical field vs. position. Field is almost zero on one side. DG/G expressed in 10-3. Specification: DG/G < 10-2. GFR: 7x5 mm Field integration along an arc. G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Combined Dipole-Quadrupoles Energy savings and compactness Single-side DQ vs. offset quadrupole Single-sided DQ Compact offset quadrupole Low power offset quadrupole Current density 3.25 5 A/mm2 Power 1.5 3.9 2.5 kW Width x height 330 x 470 415 x 415 465 x 465 mm Mass 900 940 1050 kg G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Compactness and efficiency Small aperture magnets (tight tolerances) Conclusions Compactness and efficiency Small aperture magnets (tight tolerances) Trade off between compactness and power consumption Trade off between length and transverse dimensions PM magnets? Good choice if reduced a tuning range is accepted (coil efficiency x1/2 for dipole and quadrupoles) Tight tolerances to be anticipated (more parts, tolerances stack-up) ESRF-SR2 magnets: lower power and compact designs Dipole with longitudinal gradient: PM, compact, no power consumption Quadrupoles: low power, not so compact Combined dipole-quadrupoles: low power, single-sided design G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014

Many thanks for your attention G. Le Bec, Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2, Compact and Low Consumption Magnets Workshop, Geneva, November 2014