Engineering 10 Trebuchet Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trebuchet competition
Advertisements

Work and Simple Machines
How a Trebuchet works MFET 3320 Machine Design Geoff Hale.
Section 7.3 Torque © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc..
Address Your posture looks pretty good here. Basically, with perfect posture, that line I drew should go through the balls of your feet, the tips of your.
Conservative Forces & Potential Energy
The Catapult  A catapult is any one of a number of non-handheld mechanical devices used to throw a projectile a great distance without the use of explosives.
Exploring Engineering Darin Gray Group 5 July 15 th, 2011 Darren Draper Sinem Sargin Ryan Vo Marquel Jones-Francis.
Projectile Projection Trebuchets Jack Tiffany
Answer each of these with your first instinct to the answer. You will have limited time to submit an answer. There will be a bit of discussion after most.
ConcepTest 3.4aFiring Balls I ConcepTest 3.4a Firing Balls I A small cart is rolling at constant velocity on a flat track. It fires a ball straight up.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. ConcepTest Clicker Questions Chapter 4 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
Structures 1 Technology This presentation will explore: components of structures strengthening structures principle of moments types of levers Structures.
The Trebuchet Design Project By: Nick Hansen, Thomas Smith, Matt Borges & Emily Byers University of the Pacific School of Engineering.
Popsicle Stick Bridge Challenge Engineering 9
Trebuchet Project By AM and CS.
The Super Scooper: Self Scooping Wheelbarrow
Work and Machines.
University of the Pacific1 PFADS Project Team P.O.C. Gavin Saito Miguel Perez Michael Bruch December 5, 2002 University of the Pacific Introduction to.
December 10, 2002 We Fling Foo 1 We Fling Foo Parabolic Food Aid Delivery System(PFADS) By Rob Berkeley Chris Giuffra University of the Pacific.
Trebuchet Design Project Presentation Team H.E.D. Huy Nguyen | Edward Lau | Daniel Vizcaino Lab Section Tuesday 4-6 PM.
Bridge of Arc’s Design Brief
Team JADS 1 The PFADS Competition Team JADS Sean McNary John Yoshimura ENGR 5 - Lab 5.
T r e b u c h e t By Jonathan Ching, Isaiah Lilly Karen Quach, Brain Westrick Lab: Wednesday 6-8 p.m.
Team JADS1 The PFADS Competition Team JADS David Rosenberry Adam Yee ENGR 5 - Lab 5.
The Creation of Hera “The Treb Tigers” Stacy Costello & Jennifer Shore oh, and the dudes too: Travis Ford & Kevin Petros University of the Pacific Engineering.
Physics 430: Lecture 22 Rotational Motion of Rigid Bodies
Problem Solving Unit 2. Problem Solving 1. Define the problem – What is the problem? 2. Generate possible solutions – What are some things I can do to.
Jessica Linus Ms. Fitzpatrick December 5,2012. Define The Problem Students will research, design and construct a catapult that will be able to launch.
Project Launcher Project #3 Introduction to Transportation.
Storm the Castle Building Portfolio Mini Competition 2011
Chapter 4 Process Design.
ROBOTIC DESIGN CHALLENGE Robotics and Automation Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
1 TREBUCHETTREBUCHET A trebuchet owner’s manual by Jennifer & Andrea.
Percussion drilling By Batch -2. Percussion drilling Cable Tool Drilling Percussion drills have been used to drill thousands of feet, though they are.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Chapter 10. Energy This pole vaulter can lift herself nearly 6 m (20 ft)
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
What is the engineering design process and how does it help us?
The Mystery Machine Created by Kyle Rockwell, Ronan Shaffer, Dalton Scheiner, Emmy Nam.
Team E.B.4.H. Lil Woody. Team Members Remy Devoe Jordan Sprouse Jeff Dix Ryan Beeler.
Catapult Project Mr. McLean: 8 th Grade Physical Sciences Final Project.
Engineering Design Purpose of the Lesson: To have students demonstrate the steps and processes involved in engineering design. Warm-up – Copy and complete.
Trebuchet: Main Parts of a
Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context Lesson 6
Chapter Eight: Work 8.1 Work 8.2 Efficiency and Power.
1.2 How Can We Work Together? Pg. 7 Creating a Quilt Using Symmetry and Investigations.
BY BAKER MCC. Compound Bow. Diagram Energy Transformations 1. Kinetic. You pull back the string 2. Mechanical. When you pull the string it moves the.
Designing Robots How to make a stable robot! Much of the information in this power point is from Winning Design! By James J. Trobaugh.
WOOD TOWER DESIGNS Objective: Students will be able to construct a tower out of wood in order to investigate the physics of structures.
By: Jason Anna, Cody Beatty, Mark Brumbaugh, Dave Clapper, Trevor Helsley, Ben Zurilla.
The Effects of Newton’s Law on a Catapult By: Jonas Exey, Bjorn Grong, David Dininger, Donald Kjornes, Tyler Hamann.
Garden Box Design Plans. Garden Box Materials List QTY (Lumber)* 2”x4”x120”(10’) - Cut one of these boards into two 41” pieces and two 17” pieces.
Electric Field. The Concept of the Electric Field  In the force model of the electric field, the positive charge A exerts an attractive force on charge.
Safe Use of Agricultural Mechanics Hand Tools
Foundations of Technology.  Common components (levers, inclined planes, wedges, wheels and axles, pulleys, screws, gears, cams, linkages, shafts, couplings,
1 Westwood Catapults 2014 Elliot Rose March 19, 2014
Trebuchet Project By AM and CS.
Nazaha Muntafi May-cie
Fluid Power Challenge Suggested Workshop Lessons
ConcepTest Clicker Questions
Catapult.
Kristin McCoy Academic Coordinator, CSU Fresno MESA
Team 3: “The Quick-E” Bryant Harrang -Freshman -Biomedical Engineering
Structures.
Popsicle stick bridge Ryan and Simon.
SIMPLE MACHINES TOPIC: THE LEVER!! Item: THE CATAPULT.
MULTI TASK TREBUCHETS IT’S ALL ABOUT ENERGY!.
Simple Machines Ancient people invented simple machines that would help them overcome resistive forces and allow them to do the desired work against those.
By Savannah and Sophie Block 5
Presentation transcript:

Engineering 10 Trebuchet Project By HL and TC Blk. 2

Introduction Statement of Inquiry: Historical technical innovation has contributed to advances in modern human process. Global Concepts Scientific and technical innovation Materials Provided Wood ( 36 by 12 inches) Lead counterweight Various screws, bolts etc. Sling fabric, plastic wheels Description: Students will use the design cycle to create a functioning Trebuchet that is capable of throwing an object with repeated accuracy. (25 feet, 5 consecutive times). Learning Outcomes -Work collaboratively in a team -learn about historical significance of the trebuchet -Understand basic principles and functions behind the trebuchet

Investigation Inquiry questions What materials are needed What are some common issues/problems What does it mean to be proportionate What is the recommended size How much counterweight is needed What type of wood is used How far should the distance be What are we throwing How much time is required How do we attach the components What are the components What type of trebuchet are we building What calculations are required What is an effective planning method Inquiry questions At the start of this project, we were given time to research info about the trebuchet and brainstorm possible designs. We then researched potential trebuchet designs to create; evaluating each on its characteristics or pros/cons

Design We also had to familiarize with basic physics concepts as well Prior to brainstorming designs, we were unfamiliar with the Etymology of the trebuchet, therefore we researched The 5ws of it We also had to familiarize with basic physics concepts as well Definition/purpose- A trebuchet is a battle machine used in the middle ages to throw heavy payloads at enemies. The payload could be thrown a far distance and do considerable damage, either by smashing down walls or striking the enemy while inside their stronghold. Where- Ancient China, then /Europe/ Middle east What replaced Trebuchets?- The Cannon Ex. Torsion, lever arms, moment, momentum, force, potential energy, kinetic energy, arm ratios. These concepts had to be understood in order to design a fully functioning trebuchet.

Design To answer our inquiry questions, we conducted research On the trebuchet, and what designs might inspire us. There were 4 types we could choose from. Fixed counterweight on a fixed frame -weight is fixed -Weight hits base to fling object Swinging Counterweight -weight is loose Weight falls vertically F.C on a floating Frame -fixed weight -allows weight to fall through the frame Floating Arm (FAT) -weight falls, causing one part of arm to fall, and other to swing up

Design We came up with three designs after researching various models Fixed Counterweight with Floating frame -Had wheels to absorb recoil and use it to increase thrust. However object had to be attached to a sling as well as balancing the counterweight with the arm size, therefore making it difficult to shoot without calculations Fixed free swing counterweight This model would allow the object To be shot in a catapult launch method. However the object would not go far due to the size ratio. This trebuchet type is unique, as the bigger the object is, the farther it can throw.

Design In the end we chose the fixed counterweight on a fixed frame. This model has wheels the frame could surge back and forth by a small amount, allowing the counterweight to fall more vertically. Secondly, the recoil force absorbed by the wheels could throw the object farther. Although this type of trebuchet usually has a firing pin that pulls out of the Frame to fire, we decided to use a string ties to a hook to create an elastic type of launch sequence. Our good copy design sketch of our chosen design

Plan After creating a blueprint for our project, we created a concise plan to help us build efficiently. Goals of the team We plan to finish the trebuchet by Jan 21st; the final deadline for construction. Utilizing any remaining time and resources to add final tweaks and adjustments. The PPT will be finished by Jan 21st, after construction is complete, and the trebuchet has been test fired. Until we reach those deadlines though, we will begin a steady construction process of both these Assignments simultaneously. Adding/removing info based on results. Roles of the team -Tyler-building -Hoya- Design brief/building

Plan Strategies Used: 1. Be industrious and diligent during work time. 2. Make sure each group member fulfills their role. Make sure the final product is in full working order to compete. 3. Calculate amount of resources needed and how to use them wisely. 4.Take risks and look for new effective ways to improve the product. No matter how exotic the process. 5. If we make a mistake during construction, we stop and refine before considering Anything else. 6. Teamwork and cooperation are essential for creating a successful project.

Schedule/Manual (by relevance) Plan Design Brief Building Finish research assignments done in class. Start the investigation process, research types and pros/cons. Create multiple designs, then decide on the most feasible. Create a Blueprint/good-copy sketch. Write down design process Create a Plan including schedule and goals/roles of the team. List Creation Process step by step Take pictures of creation process Evaluate by test firing. Cut out wood pieces after measuring Verify that all pieces are compatible with each other Build the horizontal and vertical frame. Nail pieces together. Add Gussets to strengthen edges and frames. Nail gussets after gluing. Cut out plastic wheels Trim out ready-rod for arm, attach wheels with screws. Calculate arm ratios and strength, then attach to frame. Attach Sling with firing pin Attach counterweight Test fire (using different counterweights)

Create Sanding, refining/assisting. Cutting and Drilling Hoya Tyler Part 1# Assembly After cutting out the required pieces, we can begin construction on the frame. We create the horizontal base first, then begin the vertical frame. We plan to create the design exactly how we pictured it in the planning stage. Considering its pros and cons and evaluating them based on potential positive or negative results.

Part 2# Strengthening/refining After creating the frame, we measured and cut out a dozen triangles of thin wood to use a s gussets. Gussets would help stabilize the frames and angles, thus prevent the frame from becoming loose.

Part 3# Arm and Wheels We used a ¼ ratio for our arm. When the frame was sturdy enough, we attached a ready-rod to hold the arm in place. Our arm wasn't a straight piece of wood, but consisted of 4 different pieces. Two pieces were added to stabilize the arm at the revolving point to equalize the weight and prevent the arm from snapping. -Once the arm was done, we cut out 4 plastic wheels approx. 10cm in diameter to absorb the recoil of the trebuchet when firing. We used a ¼ ratio for our arm. Our arm was approx. 25 inches in length

Part 4# Sling and weights Now that the initial structure of the trebuchet was finished, we could begin sling and weight assembly. We used a square piece of fabric approx. 15cm by 10cm as the pouch. Secondly, we tied the pouch to the arm with a thin string. Thirdly, we made a firing pin out of a string and a hook that was released by pulling on it. Therefore releasing the arm. (The idea of a string firing pin was to give the arm an almost elastic type of force instead of relying on the removal of a rod pin to increase centrifugal force.) In the end, we used two large weights instead of one.

Evaluation of Final Product Test /firing results (Approx.) First time- 10ft Second time- 15ft Third time- 27ft Fourth time -18ft Fifth time-15ft Average of 17ft/five consecutive tries The reason for the large difference in distance was due to the loosening of the sling. The sling should have been larger and the string should ha been tighter. In other words, the Movement and arrangement of the string and sling (which was different each time) resulted in a Different firing trajectory.

Evaluation (Tyler) Overall, I am happy with our final product in terms of structure and resource use. We effectively utilized all resources to create the trebuchet. ( we even had leftover wood). We managed to complete the trebuchet and test it before the deadline but we didn’t have enough time to make modifications or improvements. The string and sling were not accurately assembled, which resulted in the inaccurate results of firing. I feel that I could have done a better job in measuring and testing parts such as the sling before permanently attaching them to the trebuchet. In the future, I plan to do 100% checkups on each part before proceeding to the next.

Evaluation (Hoya) In the end, I am proud of our final product and the ways we used our resources and time. We made good use of every resource to make sure we didn’t over over-budget, and we worked on regular basis every class to consistently improve the trebuchet. Our firing results were a bit disappointing due to the odd pattern results. We had figured out a solution to the problem, but we had run out of time and had to reflect on the process we had managed to make. My role was to assist in the crating process any way I could, and to successfully complete the required design brief. I am satisfied with my role in the design brief as I went in depth of all factors and concept prior, during, and after the construction process. However, I wasn't very effective with my time as I did not get to complete the reflection process in time with the project. Our trebuchet was tested at the final day and I did not get to submit any possible improvements for the brief. For future projects, I intend to keep a tight schedule for our process. This included taking time time out of our own day if we didn't’t finish the required materials for that specific date. I feel that if I had done that, we would have had time to make any necessary improvements to create the best final product, as well as competing the brief in sync with the construction.

Team Evaluation Our team managed to successfully complete the Trebuchet by the deadline, along with the Brief. Each team member contributed equally to the project to enable a successful final product. The trebuchet itself is in perfect working order. It is easy to use with a simple firing mechanism which included advanced firing physics. (Elastic Theory). Our wheels worked fabulously as they transferred the recoil into momentum energy. On the contrary, we did have a significant problem. Our sling was not the right size for the tennis ball we were throwing. It was too large for the ball, therefore causing it to slip around when it fired. We figured this was the reason for the odd pattern of distances. Secondly, the string was very thin and often entangled with the trebuchet, delaying firing and causing confusion. Our Solution to these problems were to accurately measure out a sling proportionate to the object being thrown as well as using tighter stronger wiring for the arm. We feel that we would have had a perfect work schedule and product if we tested/measured all materials prior to permanent attachment. Doing so would help us create the best product as well as leave time for improvements and reflection. In term of competition, our trebuchet was average, but we could have done better if we had time to make modifications. Our work ethic and knowledge of shop materials mainly contributed to our success in creating the project. Each team member did an excellent job of fulfilling their role. We worked hard every class and it sped up the process. In the future we should accurately measure and test all materials in sync with deadlines to prevent problems and to effectively reflect on the project for any improvements.

"Main Page. " Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation. Web. 17 Jan. 2015 "Trebuchet." Trebuchet. Web. 25 Jan. 2015. <https://www.msu.edu/~hartle35/KHweb/webquest/WebQuest Stuff/Trebuchet.html>. "Trebuchet Physics." Real World Physics Problems. Web. 25 Jan. 2015. <http://www.real-world-physics-problems.com/trebuchet- physics.html>. "Trebuchet Types." Trebuchet Types. Web. 25 Jan. 2015. <http://tantaurus.net/trebuchet/php/trebtypes.php>. Bibliography (MLA)