Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process © 2011 National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate without permission.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Minnesota State Community and Technical College Critical Thinking Assignment Example and Assessment.
Chapter 4 How to Observe Children
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
Ohio Teacher Evaluation System: Assessment of Teacher Performance
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Mentoring and Coaching: Feedback for Better Teaching
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process Day 1 © 2011 National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate without permission.
Observation Process and Teacher Feedback
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Customer Focus Module Preview
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
2008 History and Social Science Standards of Learning: Using Student Engagement To Support Active Learning and Assessment January 2013.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Facilitating Reflective Feedback as a Complementary Evaluator “It is when you lose sight of yourself, that you lose your way. To keep your truth in sight.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
A Closer Look I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Inquiry Based Learning District Learning Day 1:45-2:45 August 5, 2015.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
Math Professional Development Day What is a learner's profile? 2.How do you differentiate in your classroom? 3.Rate the level of comfort with.
A brief introduction to
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
Hosted by Julie Milder Unpacking the Classroom Environment and Culture and Professional Collaboration and Communication Dimensions of 5D+
Denver Public Schools Understanding the Revised Framework.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
QUADRANT PARTNERS VIDEO SUCCESSFUL COACHING Know contemporary views & standards Model & demonstrate effective instructional behaviors Provide.
Assessment My favorite topic (after grammar, of course)
Denver Public Schools Illuminating the revised framework Taking a Closer Look at I3 Exploring Instructional Methods and Pacing.
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
February 19, 2013 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION.  After achieving a working knowledge and components of explicit instruction, teachers will self-assess their.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Observation System Kidderminster College January 2012.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
The Framework for Teaching
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
*Note to facilitator—prior to conducting this learning session, it is strongly advised that you have watched and scripted the video less and thoroughly.
Presentation transcript:

Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice

Norms  What is it that other people do during a training that makes it very difficult for you to learn?  Put your thoughts on a sticky note…or 2…or 10.  Find someone who shares at least one of the items on your list.

 By the end of this session, participants will:  Gain ideas for getting teachers to commit to changing practice,  Have a structure for evaluation conversations,  Have concrete ideas for dealing with difficult people during the evaluation and coaching processes, and  Begin the process for IRA by analyzing instruction and studying evaluation skills. Purpose and Objectives

 Read “Handout 9—”Making Evaluations Accurate, Fair, Consistent and Helpful” to identify:  Points you agree with,  Points you will need to consider further, and  How the article relates to your current job responsibilities. Research Handout 9

Let’s Begin…

 The “X Factor”  What do you notice about the structure?  What questions do you have?  View a Conversation Video  Look for the structure  What are some of the strategic moves the evaluator is making to get the teacher to reflect on her practice? The Evaluation Conversation

 Impact on learning  “Doable” for that teacher  Sequencing  Ripple Effect  The degree of need for change  Connection to relative strengths Focusing on What Is Important

 Read “Part 1”. Stop at the. What connections are you making?  Read “Part 2”. Stop at the. What are the implications for your behavior?  Read “Part 3”. Stop at the. Given what you know about yourself, which tips will prove most helpful to remember? Read and Discuss Handout 2

Emotional Intelligence (EQ)  Read Handout 3.  What are the implications for your reflective feedback conversations?  Emotional Intelligence is a key component of getting teachers to accurately reflect on their practice and make instructional changes.  How does EQ need to be connected with “Candor”?  Read Handout 3.  What are the implications for your reflective feedback conversations?  Emotional Intelligence is a key component of getting teachers to accurately reflect on their practice and make instructional changes.  How does EQ need to be connected with “Candor”? 9 Handout 3

 What ideas for getting teachers to commit to changing practice are you now considering employing into your practice?  How could the “X Factor” assist you with conversations?  What 2 ideas for dealing with difficult people during the evaluation process do you want to focus on in your upcoming evaluations? Objectives Check

 Read through the “Proficient” column for all indicators in all domains.  Highlight 3 key words or phrases that capture the essence of each indicator.  Compare and contrast your list with a partner. Where are there differences? Why? Where are there similarities? Why? Vertical Read

Horizontal Read In triads:  Read the framework vertically.  What are the general characteristics of each of the performance levels?  Keep a list as a group of the general characteristics.

General Characteristics Unsatisfactory --Wrong information that inhibits the learning. --Focus solely on behavior. --No use of information that students give. --Negativity --Absence of essential information. --No learning --Incorrect learning --Unclear learning --Low/none student engagement --Low/none differentiation --Management --Task/purpose is questionable Basic --Some engagement --Learning expectations are clearer --Low participation --Some student compliance --Consistency of progress is questionable. --Teacher knows what to do, but may not know why or how --Lacks authenticity Accomplished --Consistency --More Teacher Directed --Adjustments --High Quality --Knows how to use effectively --Engagement is purposeful --Students know roles --Structures evident –i.e. pacing --Purposeful/Intentional --Teachers know why, how and when to deploy the teaching behavior to get the desired results. --Majority of Students Participate --Evidence of student learning for almost all Distinguished --Student directed --Full student responsibility --Student to Student --Student ownership --Atypically outstanding --Student ownership for learning (responsibility) --Teacher is a true facilitator --Student to student interaction --Challenging --Inquiry --Students do apply learning beyond the classroom --Relevant to students --Student centered and led based on what the teacher wants learned --Student community of learners Handout 4

Best Practices in Scripting  Time  Abbreviations  Verbatim  Paraphrase  Questions and Feedback  The Line  Questions and Wonderings  Label  Lesson Analysis (next slide)  Circulate Handout 5

Video #1 Observation Process  View Video and Script the Lesson  Categorize Evidence Individually  Todd will model his thinking for each indicator.  Compare your thinking to his.  Be ready to point out where you disagree or where you would strengthen what he says.

Lesson Analysis Process  What is/was the learning target?  How will/did the teacher know the students learned it?  How will/did the students know they learned it?  How will/did the teacher get them there?  How is it related to standards/district curriculum/eligible content?  How will/did learning this benefit the student? Handout 6

Evidence vs. Opinion/Non- Evidence Evidence  Observable and Specific  Not Influenced by Perspective  Objective  Unambiguous  Regularity of Occurrence Opinion/Non-Evidence  Restatement of “Bullets” from rubric  Draws Conclusions  Influenced by Perspective  Subjective  May be Subject to Debate

 Evidence: - facts (Desks were arranged in a circle.) - directly observable (Teacher said/did. Student said/did.) - documents, artifacts  Opinion: - interpretations (Students were interested.) - judgments - conclusions  Complete Handout 4 with a Partner Evidence vs. Opinion/Non- Evidence Handout 7

Collecting Evidence vs. Opinion Evidence for an Indicator Judgment Data (Quantitative) Data Data (Qualitative) Data (Output) ERROR! Data (Input)

Best Practices for Scoring  Between Levels?  Between Scores?  Holistic vs. Individual Score?  Weights?  General Characteristics?  Primary and Secondary Sources?  Match Evidence to Indicator  Eliminate Opinions  Be Aware of Personal Bias  “The Way I Would Do It”  Consistency of Evidence  Impact on Learning Handout 8

Video #2 Observation Process  View Video and Script the Lesson  Categorize Evidence and Score Individually  Compare Evidence and Ratings in Groups 3 or 4  Reach a Consensus Score for Each Indicator

Video #3 Observation Process  View Video and Script the Lesson  Categorize Evidence and Score Individually  Compare Evidence by Rating  Craft “Why it is not a _____?” Arguments by Indicator  Reach Consensus Score

Video #4 Observation Process  View Video and Script the Lesson  Categorize Evidence and Score Individually  Compare Evidence for Each Indicator  Reach Consensus Score

Mini Observations  Plenty of Evidence Can Be Gathered During a Mini Observation.  Let’s watch a couple of clips from lessons.  Identify what you have evidence of and how it aligns to the rubric.  What are the implications for your practice in your building?

Reflection  Which parts of this process do you feel will be challenging for you?  What do you need to do to address those parts?  Which parts of this process will be difficult for teachers?  What might you need to do to address those issues?