WORKSHOP: MEPA SIMULATION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Advertisements

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Victory begins with right perspective.. Objectives: At the end of the session, the participants should be able to:  define technical assistance (TA);
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
CUES The purposes for school community councils are:  To build consistent and effective communication among parents, employees and administrators. 
MANAGERIAL PLANNING. STRENGHTS ANNUAL PLANNING (DEFINED IN SCHOOL CURICULUM)  Organisational and pedagogical tasks (staffing,coordinating teachers and.
The Venice Tide Barrier Project The Bailong Elevator.
ACT Data… Friend or Foe? OSCA ALL OHIO CONFERENCE November 5, 2009 Laura Beach, ACT Ann Bruce, Solon High School Wendy Dingman, Solon High School.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Title I Parental Involvement
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
TEAM-Math Project Update June 12, TEAM-Math Mission Statement To enable all students to understand, utilize, communicate, and appreciate mathematics.
THE MEPA TECHNOLOGY Background Overview & Processes.
REGIONAL ROLL-OUT OF INTEGRATED MEPA
MEPA PROCESSES & TERM OF REFERENCE (TOR).
“Taking advantage of numbers for effective decision-making”
MEPA Facilitation & Synthesizing Skills.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: CNA Toolkit August 21, 2012.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Learn How to Complete the ACE & Get a College Credit Too.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Preparing for the CCR Regional Sessions. Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education College and career readiness means an individual.
SAISD Office for Professional Learning Advisory Board March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy 623 S. Pecos.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Pillar I: Teacher Teams and Small Learning Communities (Part 2) Creating shared expectations for students Tony Gerdes and Jacqui Thomas.
A Fairmont High School (NC) experience …. Can achieve a high school diploma and our belief starts before they walk into our doors.
JICA LGREP As of November 16, 2008Organization Developmen and Management1/16.
ENHANCING PARENT INVOLVEMENT IN NC-CCSS FOR K-2 MATHEMATICS AT P.W. MOORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
Predicting Patterns: Lenawee County's Use of EXPLORE and PLAN DataDirector 2011 User Conference Dearborn, Michigan.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Standard I: Leadership, Advocacy & Collaboration NCDPI Webinar Series 10/2/13.
Dr. Nelia V. Benito, CESO IV Director III DepED-NETRC
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Union Hill School Worcester, MA VideoVideo. Turnaround Practices Research: Strategies that Contribute to Successful School Turnaround CCSSO Conference.
National Center on Response to Intervention NCRTI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Tessie Rose, PhD NCRTI Co-coordinator of TA and.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
E -Maturity And Development of Public Secondary Schools with CLIC Project in South Central Mindanao. RAMELYN VELARDE-USMAN, Ph.D. DENNIS B. RUBIN Presenter.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
Purpose Goals Objectives Needs Focusing Curriculum Alignment Delivery to Student.
Administrators Academy August 9, Closing the Achievement Gap.
MEPA Preparation: The Completed Staff Work REGION XII - SOCCSKSARGEN.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND Update on Secondary Learning Center Transition March 23, 2010.
Slide 1 1. Profile Summary Report: Presentation Packet 2. Item Response Summary Report 3. Profile Summary Report Three reports to analyze student performance.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
English Department Chairs October 14, 2014 Sara Overby, Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy
Sayreville Public Schools Curriculum & Instruction Budget Presentation Dr. Marilyn Shediack Assistant Superintendent Curriculum & Instruction.
BLW: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITES BARANGAY LITERACY WORKER PROGRAM.
Policy Guidelines on Awards and Recognition for the K to 12 Basic Education Program DepEd Order No. 36 , s
ALABEL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
DIVISION OF CEBU PROVINCE Monitoring, Evaluation, & Adjustment
EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICE DIVISION Resource Management & Mobilization
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Group 6 Salido, May Viajedor, Jenny Fajarda, Dearrijen Mayor, Jillian
Total No. of Learners Enrolled
Training for New District Test Coordinators
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
English II Benchmarks September 24, 2014
Parent Informational Meeting
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
MARIA ṠOCORRO N. RELACION ṠEPṠ- Monitoring and Evaluation
New Prospect Elementary School
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
21st Century After School Program Sharonville, Ohio
Presentation transcript:

WORKSHOP: MEPA SIMULATION The 10-20-70 or the Principle of Learning Continuum upholds ‘Learning by doing principle.’

WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES At the end of the WORKSHOP, the participants are expected to: Make a Completed Staff Work (CSW) for the 1st Quarterly SMEPA using both the qualitative and quantitative tools (School Heads); Prepare a presentation based on the given dashboard; Simulate the conduct of SMEPA by observing the essential processes, Term of Reference (TOR) of the persons involved, and facilitation and synthesizing skills; and Develop deeper understanding on the importance of SMEPA in enhancing efficiency and effectiveness of governance of basic education delivery.

WORKSHOP TASK: BY GROUP Focus on Quality Quarter 1: NAT Group 2 Focus on Access Quarter 2: Enrolment Group 3 Quarter 3: Drop-out

TASK TO DO Make a Completed Staff Work (CSW) for the Quarterly SMEPA using both the qualitative and quantitative tools. Prepare a presentation based on the given dashboard. Simulate the conduct of SMEPA by observing the essential processes, Term of Reference (TOR) of the persons involved, and facilitation and synthesizing skills.

TASK TO DO I. Information Requirements on KPIs for Quality A. Dashboard Presents a three year data on achievement (2011-2014) broken-down per level & subject (Grade 3 & Grade 6 /Year IV). Shows comparative graphs and tables to provide MPS by subject: Aral. Pan. Filipino, English, Math and Science. Performance of school will be presented using the achievement quartile ratio (how many students belong to the following Quartile: 0-25; 26-50; 51-75; 76-100).

TASK TO DO Information Requirements on KPIs for Quality B. Segmentation Make Data map showing the performance and mean percent score (MPS) (ex. by Gender & Tribe) C. Analyses Describes the programs and/or practices implemented leading to improve performance or achievement. Explains the context (environmental factors) contributing to poor pupils/students performance/achievement. Explains why the school is unable to improve achievements despite programs on related to quality education.

TASK TO DO Information Requirements on KPIs for Quality D. Proposed Actions Describes measures to undertake to sustain DepED programs on quality. Provides suggestions on how to improve programs on quality to minimize effects of environmental factors contributing to MPS. Suggests actions or measures that will address the limitations or weaknesses of DepED programs on quality. Suggests new policies and/or enhancements in DepED policies and systems related to quality.

TASK TO DO II. Implementation status of the AIP; 15 Programs, Projects, Activities (PPAs) and Foreign Assisted Projects (FAP) including NGO Projects, if any: Using S-Curve, the school will report the implementation of the following in term of its Physical and Financial accomplishment (Actual vs Target – just make assumption only for the first month of 2015): AIP Implementation, Implementation Status of the 15 PPAs (SPED, MG, Madrasah, etc.) and Any Foreign-Assisted Projects (FAP) including NGO Projects: Save the Children, UNICEF, Pasali, Plan International, etc.

TASK TO DO III. Agenda affecting program design, policy, standard, system and technical assistance needed. Provides suggestions on how to improve programs on quality to minimize effects of environmental factors contributing to KPI on Quality. Suggests actions or measures that will address the limitations or weaknesses of DepED programs. Suggests new policies and/or enhancements in DepED policies and systems related to KPI on Quality.

PRESENTER BY BATCH Batch II-A: Elementary Cluster A: North Cotabato, Sarangani, Cotabato City Cluster B: North Cotabato: Group 1, 2 & 3 Batch II-B: Elementary Cluster A: GSC, South Cotabato, Kidapawan Cluster B: Sultan Kudarat, Koronadal, Tacurong Batch III: Secondary Cluster A: North Cot., GSC, Kidapawan City Cluster B: Sultan Kudarat, Cotabato City, Koronadal, Sarangani, Tacurong, South Cotabato

ROLE OF THE SCHOOL PLANNING TEAM (SPT) & SCHOOL HEAD IN THE SMEPA AS CONVENOR SMEPA DESIGN ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION PERSONS IN-CHARGE 1. Opening Presentation of Objectives, Activity flow and Roll call of attendance EMCEE & Opening Speaker 2. Presentation by Grade Level / Department Heads Each of the Grade Level / Department Heads presents their findings on the KPI , Physical & Financial Accomplishments of (AIP) Curriculum Level / Department Heads 3. Discussion of Presentation Discussion leader pose questions to the presenter to clarify essential points every after presentation. School Discussion Leaders 4. Synthesis of Discussion A synthesizer listens to all presentations and discussions and gives the summary of the main points. The synthesizer list down all the issues and concerns on which decisions need to be made. School Synthesizer & Documenter 5. Agreement The SH discusses the issues listed and leads the group in coming up with agreements on program adjustments, Policy Directions to be flagged to SDO as well as TA needs SH/PSDS

SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: QUALITY (1st Quarter) SGC Eng. Coord. SGC Math Coord. Legend: PSDS – Public Schools District Supervisor SCH – Secondary Cluster Head BLGU – Barangay LGU SH – School Head SGC – School Governing Council PTA – Parents-Teachers Association GC – Guidance Counselor (Designate) SGC Sci Coord. SGC Fil. Coord. PTA Pres. AP Coord. Special Program Coord. GC SH PSDS/SCH BLGU

SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: ACCESS ELEMENTARY (Big SCHOOL) Kin-der SGC Grade 1 Level Chair SGC Legend: PSDS – Public Schools District Supervisor SCH – Secondary Cluster Head AP – Assistant Principal AH – Academic Head BLGU – Barangay LGU SGC – School Governing Council PTA – Parents-Teachers Association GC – Guidance Counselor (Designate) Grade 2 Level Chair SGC Grade 3 Level Chair SGC Grade 4 Level Chair PTA Pres. Grade 5 Level Chair Grade 6 Level Chair GC AP/ AH Prin-cipal PSDS/SCH BLGU

SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: ACCESS SECONDARY Grade 7 Chair SGC Grade 8 Level Chair SGC Legend: SCH – Secondary Cluster Head AP – Assistant Principal AH – Academic Head BLGU – Barangay LGU SGC – School Governing Council PTA – Parents-Teachers Association GC – Guidance Counselor (Designate) Grade 9 Level Chair SGC Grade 10 Level Chair SGC GC PTA Pres. AP/ AH Prin-cipal SCH BLGU

SIMULATION TIME ALLOTMENT: Opening Program ……………………………. 5 minutes Presentation …………………………………… 20 Minutes Part I: Group 1: Quality: NAT MPS by Subject (Subject Coordinator) Group 2: Access: Enrolment Pattern (Grade Level Chairman) Group 3: Access: Drop-out - PARDOs/SARDOs (Grade Level Chairman) Part II: (Only if applicable) * AIP Implementation (School Head) * 15 nationally-funded PPAs: SPED/SPA/SPS (Coordinator) * Other PPAs from FAP or NGOs (School Head) Part III: Agenda affecting program design, policy, standard, system and technical assistance needed (School Head) 3. Interpellation/Discussion…………………………. 7 minutes 4. Synthesis ……………………………………………… 2 minutes 5. Agreement …………………………………………….. 3 minutes

ANALYSIS How did you find the activity? What went well in the simulation activity? What did not go well? What needs to be improved? Why? What learning insights have you gained from the activity?

TIME TO REFLECT

In DepEd XII we uphold the Principle: One Message, One Character, One Direction!