STRAGEGY FOR ENHANCING SHARE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY – Ensuring Safety & viability S.S. Bajaj Chairman, AERB 6 th Nuclear Energy Conclave, New Delhi 14 Oct 2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Introductions; Objectives and Scope of the Course Tr aining course on Authorization and Inspection of Uranium Mining.

Advertisements

1 Technical Meeting on Managing the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power SECURITY STATUS IN CHILE Mauricio Lichtemberg Chilean Nuclear.

Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority

Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.

A brief history of nuclear energy technologies Barbara Rauter Daniela Wachter.

MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.

Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan

School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.

INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)

Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate Integrated Oversight An Approach to Systematic Supervision of NPP Safety Dr Peter Flury 31 May 2006.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.

Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.

1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.

Nuclear program of Lithuania Dr. Vidas Paulikas, Radiation Protection Department VATESI Visaginas, 29 June 2009.

MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Human Resources Development for Nuclear Safety J. Bastos NSNI/RAS.

Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.

International Atomic Energy Agency Achieving human performance excellence in the nuclear industry through leadership, education, and training C. R. Clark.

NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.

Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.

RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kazakhstan.

Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.

MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” RADIATION PROTECTION SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.

Transportation of Radioactive Material in the United States Earl P. Easton.

IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.

School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Experience and Future Activities for Introduction of Nuclear Power Masaomi KOYAMA Deputy Director Nuclear Energy.

International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.4. Pre-disposal waste management Safety Standards.

1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “National legislation and licensing” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.10 Documents to be Submitted to the Regulatory Body.

Fukushima Lessons Learnt and Follow-up Activities of Rostechnadzor Alexey Ferapontov, Acting Chairman Second European Nuclear Safety Conference

LEGAL and REGULATORY FRAMEWORK for NUCLEAR and RADIATION SAFETY in BULGARIA General overview Dr. M. Mateeva – Chief Inspector R. Markova-Mihaylova – Chief.

Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.

0 Safety Infrastructure Development for Introduction of Nuclear Power S.K. Sharma Chairman, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, India IAEA Workshop on Evaluation.

SAFETY EVALUATION OF INDIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS POST FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.

International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.

4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.

International Atomic Energy Agency School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096 Vienna, 3 May, 2010 Adriana Nicic, Regulatory Activities.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.

International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.2. Principles of radioactive waste management Basic technical management solutions: concentrate and contain, storage.

REGULATORY OVERSIGHT OF HUMAN AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS (HOF) DURING DIFFERENT STAGES OF INDIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS REGULATORY OVERSIGHT OF HUMAN AND.

Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body Objectives of regulatory functions Organizational.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.

Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)

MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME

By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.

Jussi helske1 Workshop on the learning of EC approaches and experience in Licensing of New NPP’s Existing in European Union countries procedures.

1.9. Safety assessment “School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety, IAEA - Module 1 Regulatory framework for safety, authorization and inspection.

Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.

DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE BASE NECESSARY FOR TSO.

Nuclear decommissioning: Turning waste into Wealth

Why is Licensing Process important?

THE ROLE OF TSOs IN THE NATIONAL SAFETY ORGANIZATION

IAEA Safety Guidance on Licensing and Oversight Activities

Offerings for design safety from harmonization

Regulatory Control Training Workshop

Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB

Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop

Nuclear Emergency Planning and Preparedness

Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN

REGULATORY ASPECTS OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN TURKEY Dr

Current Radiation Protection Legislation in Slovakia

India Energy Congress 2013 Sustainable Sources of Energy February 2013.

Presentation transcript:

STRAGEGY FOR ENHANCING SHARE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY – Ensuring Safety & viability S.S. Bajaj Chairman, AERB 6 th Nuclear Energy Conclave, New Delhi 14 Oct

2 Requirements for Successful Deployment of Nuclear Energy -Acceptable Safety : Real & Perceived -Competitive unit energy cost (Construction period: Plant life, capacity factor, financing) -Simplification : Design, Operation, Construction -Fuel supplies / fuel resources -Environment friendliness – Minimum waste generation -Amenability to Decommissioning -Security -Infrastructure : Human Resources; Regulatory System; Manufacturing / Service industries

Acceptable Safety : Safety Management  Implementation of Technical Safety Requirements in Design, siting, Construction, Operation (Hard / Tangible aspects)  Organization, Processes & Systems of Working and Values which are conductive to Safety (Soft / Intangible aspects) o Safety Management in Design o Safety Management in Construction / Manufacture o Safety Management in Operation o Safety Analysis & Assessment : DSA, PSA o Safety Review and Verification (By Plant / HQ / Intl./ Regulator) 36 th Nuclear Energy Conclave, New Delhi 14 Oct 2014

4 Safety Record of Indian NPP Programme Normal Operation : Public Discharges / Estimated Doses Occupation Worker Doses Prevention & Mitigation of Accidents : Fukushima Related Reviews : Enhanced Safety Small fraction of limits

INES levels > Total INES Rating of Significant Events in NPPs during the last five years INES Rating The INES system of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rates events at seven levels (1 to 7) depending on their safety significance. The accidents at Chernobyl NPP in former USSR (now in Ukraine) in April 1986 and Fukushima NPPs in Japan in March 2011 were rated at level 7 on INES. These accidents involved core meltdown with the consequences of off-site radioactivity release to environment. Out of 33 significant events in 2013, 32 significant events were rated at level 0 on INES while one significant event of contamination of storm water drain at NAPS was rated at level 1 on INES respectively. At NAPS, the tritiated water leaked out from the dyke floor area of downgraded heavy water storage tanks, and found way to a nearby storm drain. The tritium activity was conservatively estimated as 10 Ci, which was much below the authorized daily limit for discharge. The event was reviewed in detail in AERB. After this event, necessary measures were taken by the station to ensure appropriate configuration / condition of the isolation provisions in dyke floor drain. Statistics : Significant Events AERB requires NPPs to submit detailed report for every significant event that takes place. The reporting criteria is provided in the Technical specification for operations. These reports are reviewed and categorized based on International Nuclear & Radiological Event Scale

6 th Nuclear Energy Conclave, New Delhi 14 Oct Regulatory Control & Oversight  Prime responsibility for Safety : Operator / Utility  Regulator’s Role : To set requirements & see that operator is performing his responsibility  Prescribe safety & regulatory requirements – Codes/guides  Review proposals for setting up / operation of nuclear facilities against requirements; grant consents (Siting / construction / commissioning / operation)  Continual oversight over operating facilities  How do we review - Multi-tiered review process - Inspection / Periodic Review  Good Safety Record : But must guard against complacency

AEC Meeting - 217, August 2,