MTSS Maryland: Shift Happens Creating Positive Conditions for Learning through Coordinated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Maryland State Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mentoring Across Tiers Christina Jordan, M.Ed Wayne Hickman, Ed. D Rebecca Piermattei, M.S.
Advertisements

Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDRESSING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS January 11, 2012.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
District-level Adoption: The Engine to Drive Sustainable Change Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org Missouri SW-PBS Summer Institute June.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
F LORIDA ’ S I MPLEMENTATION OF M ULTI - TIERED S YSTEM OF S TUDENT S UPPORTS (MTSSS) Bambi J. Lockman, LL.D. Bureau Chief, Exceptional Education and Student.
A District Model for Integrated RtI Systems Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Shawnee Mission, KS Steve Goodman Michigan’s.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
SYSTEMS COACHING AND BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports SPDG, 2014.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
Oregon RTI The Who, What & How of Participation in
Barbara J. Smith, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver OSEP, July, 2014 Promoting Social Emotional Competence in All Young Children Through Collaboration.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
NAZ as a Promise Neighborhood….. Where opportunities rise to meet their promising future! NAZ Family Academy Graduates.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.
Starting/Sustaining Universal Team Milt McKenna, Co-Coordinator, PBIS MD Maryland State Department of Education
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs that Promote the Social and Emotional Development of Young Children Part II Roxane Kaufmann, Karen Blase,
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
RESEARCH Among developed countries the US ranks: – 17 th in high school graduation – 14 th in college graduation – Each year 1/3 of public school students.
: The National Center at EDC
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL CLIMATE TRANSFORMATION GRANT.
Mission The Kentucky Department of Education’s mission is to prepare all Kentucky students for next-generation learning, work and citizenship by engaging.
Maryland’s School Mental Health Initiatives and Progress.
MDE Office of Special Education Teri L. Chapman, Ed.S., Director February 17, 2016 MAASE.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
1 Stakeholder Engagement State Personnel Development Grantees Directors’ Webinar Beth Moore, Ed.D. June 11, 2015.
From Preschool to Post-School Outcomes Preparing Florida’s Youngest Students to Become College and Career Ready Monica Verra-Tirado, Chief Florida Department.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: EXPLORATION
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
Application to Participate Webinar February 2012
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Aligning Efforts to Improve Capacity
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Interconnected Systems Framework PA PBS Network Professional Learning Community Webinar #2 April 11, 2017.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Full Committee The purpose of the SSEAC is to promote the education of children with disabilities by providing advice and policy guidance based on input.
Presentation transcript:

MTSS Maryland: Shift Happens Creating Positive Conditions for Learning through Coordinated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Maryland State Department of Education Title I Administrative Meeting Spring 2015 Sheppard Pratt Health System Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health University of Maryland, Center for School Mental Health Division of Student, Family, and School Support, Division of Special Education/ Early Intervention Services Division of Early Childhood Development

PRESENTATION OF MTSS MARYLAND Kristina Kyles, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Student, Family and School Support Maryland State Department of Education 200 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore MD 21201 Phone:410-767-0274  Fax: 410-333-8148 Kristina.kyles@maryland.gov Greetings Acknowledge response forms I have had the pleasure of meeting most of you all. However, in case I have not, let me say hello and thank you all for joining. As I have been saying at all of our convenings, my team and I have been tasked by the BOE to work on a plan to scale up PBIS and by this increase your access to tools and resources that will aid you in increasing the effectiveness of your school’s culture and climates. I want to thank you all particularly because I know that you all have in the midst of annual state testing…

Purpose of the Discussion Update on the strategic shift of the Division of Student, Family, and School Support (DOSFSS) for PBIS Maryland. Give stakeholders the opportunity to provide feedback to the MTSS Maryland Report to the State Board of Education

Why? WHY? ACHIEVEMENT GAP SUPPORT SYSTEM GAP Career and College Readiness All Students Birth to 21 ACHIEVEMENT GAP SUPPORT SYSTEM GAP PURPOSE WHY MTSS? There are two gaps schools need to close in order to better ensure students can be successful. The first is an achievement gap. This is notable in all our data and shows that different subgroups perform better or worse on tasks. This is often a measure of students performing with varied skills and abilities. Secondly, there is a resource gap. That some students are not able to get all that they need to develop their academic or social skills and this hinders their performance or the acquisition of necessary skills and abilities. We believe that if we better structure an intentional system of support, we will be able to better align resources that will impact a student ability to achieve. Therefore, we would like to be a change agent, ensuring that we can provide students a more streamlined access to resources within our reach and better neutralize the ability to develop or acquire the necessary skills to succeed in school. Maryland has been leaders in implementing programs that aim to support students, provide targeted resources to schools and close the achievement gap. Many efforts around academic achievement fall into buckets that are “silo-ed” resulting in a support system gap. DOSFSS will lead the way in aligning the support system that will impact by collaborating and integrating our work. We expect that a coordinated multi-tiered system of support is crucial to the work of others in closing the achievement gap. Standards for Learning Academic Social Emotional Varied Skills & Abilities Academic Social Emotional

ALIGNING POLICIES IDEA ESEA DISPRO BTE CSS THE GUIDELINES Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ESEA Elementary and Secondary Education Act: DISPRO DISPROPORTIONALITY BTE BRIDGE TO EXCELLENCE CSS COORDINATED STUDENT SERVICES THE GUIDELINES CODE OF CONDUCT ACCESS & EQUITY PBIS MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

Student Reality & Being On Track to Graduation On Track Behaviors Academic Achievement Grades, Scores, and Graduation Positive Educational Engagement Attendance, behavior, and completion Cognitive Skills & Attitudes Concentration, memory, mood & Motivation Off Track Behaviors Disengaged Lack of Self-Control Drop Out Poor Attendance Lack of Skills Capacity and skills tip the scales for today’s students to be either in favor of on track or off track behaviors. All behavior have a function and serves a purpose, our goal is to make sure that more often than not, the behaviors displayed in schools serve the function of propelling students towards being college and career ready. Today’s youth have complex needs and live in an increasingly complex world. Sometimes, our students live in worlds that we nor our teachers could ever imagine. Students today need supports more than ever to connect to each other, to school, and to their full potential. These connections make all the difference in igniting those on track behaviors and those behaviors that help students unlock their full potential. In creating this report, let me run through some our fundamental beliefs and assumptions

Whole School Whole Community Whole Child ASCD: Collaborative Approach to Learning and Health For the purposes of this presentation, academic achievement is defined as… Academic Performance (grades, scores and graduation) Education Behavior (Attendance, Retention, Behavior and positive engagement w/o exclusion) Responds to the call for greater alignment, integration, and collaboration between health and education to improve each child’s cognitive, physical, social and emotional development. MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

MTSS: Coordinated 3-Tiered Practices This is an example of what a menu of Multi-Tiered Systems of Support might look like. It is not all inclusive, one of our Divisions first tasks may be to create a comprehensive menu of supports. For example, include physical health and family involvement practices that we are committed to in policy and through professional development, and TA. This table also demonstrates a way to align our divisions efforts to support positive conditions for learning across the tiers of intervention; for all, some, and few. Similar tables could be developed within other divisions, partner agencies, and ultimately model coordination of effort for the LSS level. Sharing multiple practices within the three-tiered system allows coordination systems; a multi-tiered system of support.

Defining the What… MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

MTSS MARYLAND: GOALS Goal 1: Expand and Enhance the State and District Level Infrastructure Objective 1: Prioritize Full Integration and Effective Coordination. Objective 2: Examine current capacity of trainers and coaches and build expertise at the state, district and school team level. MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

MTSS MARYLAND: GOALS Goal 2: Develop an MTSS Evaluation Plan that includes a Data Collection System for Implementation, Evaluation and Promotion of MTSS Goal 3: Collect, Use, and Report Disaggregated Student Discipline Data Goal 4: Provide Training and Supports for Administrators in MTSS MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

MTSS MARYLAND: GOALS Goal 5: MSDE Staff will serve as MTSS Technical Assistance Experts Goal 6: Use a multi-tiered approach to deliver intensive and differentiated training and technical assistance Goal 7: Use the Coordinated Student Services Model to maximize effectiveness of Tier II, III supports. MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

MTSS MARYLAND: GOALS Goal 8: Conduct annual reviews of state and local policies to ensure alignment to evidence based practices with emphasis on a proactive, preventative approach. Goal 9: Improve access and delivery of school based mental health Goal 10: Increase Student, Family and Community Support through MTSS MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

2018 Goal 75% of all schools in Maryland trained and implementing Tier I with fidelity; 50% of those implementing Tier II with fidelity; and 25% of those implementing Tier III with fidelity. MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

GAPS Leadership Overarching Governance Structure to Drive MSDE Goals State Level Data System and Evaluation Competency Driver Assessing Fidelity of Implementation at Tier I Implementing Tiers II and III with fidelity Capacity Driver Regionalized Technical Support Leadership: Executive and Management leadership teams within MSDE and partner agencies cooperate to support individual grants; however, there is a lack of an overarching governance structure to ensure collaborative efforts and sustainability objectives across grant initiatives. Most importantly, MSDE needs to plan, conduct and produce inter-related, sustainable approaches for conducting Coordinated Student Services. There are routine reports regarding the number of training sessions conducted and certain participating schools share fidelity and outcome measures, depending on their interest in applying for special recognition or to comply with grant requirements. However, there is a need for a State level evaluation plan to collect a universal set of data in order to assess fidelity, outcomes and the relationship between implementation fidelity and outcomes.   The plan addresses the gaps in leadership by creating a hierarchy of collaborative leadership teams to provide overarching governance for setting goals guiding the work of the competency and capacity drivers. Competency: The primary focus on previous training is on schools implementing Tier I supports. Training is delivered through a regionalized process in a whole group format and follow-up coaching is not conducted in a formal way. As a result, fidelity of implementation has been a challenge for many trained schools. Tiers II and III of the Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Framework for Maryland are still evolving in their development and implementation. Few schools are implementing Tier II, but there is no way to ascertain the fidelity of implementation. Tier III training has not been systematically developed for distribution. The plan addresses the gaps in selection of practices, training and coaching by building state-level capacity through a Trainer-of-Trainer’s process that will develop the skills needed to support local systems and school staff. A structured coaching model will be implemented to aid local systems in achieving the standard for fidelity of implementation. Capacity: Currently, technical support is delivered primarily to those school teams implementing PBIS and that technical support is not always coordinated or aligned with state other state initiatives and programs. This results in multiple messages being provided to schools about the delivery of supports to student struggling with academic and behavioral concerns and does not address the needs of schools implementing programs other than PBIS. There are too few technical support providers in the state to adequately meet the needs and challenges of school teams implementing behavioral and academic programming for students. This contributes to the challenges with fidelity of implementation and consistent outcomes. The plan addresses the gaps in technical support through the development of regionalized technical support “collaboratives” that are designed to strategically target and identify the needs of school teams and staff. A secondary role of these regionalized technical support “collaboratives” will be to align state-level efforts in order to deliver coordinated support.

HOW? Sustain Align Scale Up MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015 DOSFSS will support and strengthen Tier I DOSFSS will expand and develop Tier II and III DOSFSS will engage other Divisions and Partner Agencies HOW? Sustain Align What will DOSFSS do to coordinate multi-tiered systems of support? Align DOSFSS initiatives with other Divisions and Partner school support initiatives through a three-tiered framework Sustain current universal school support efforts to fidelity (Tier I) Scale Up menu of targeted (Tier II) and intensive (Tier III) school support efforts Scale Up

Career and College Readiness Standards for Learning WHY? MSDE EFFORTS: Vision Coordinating the vision of MSDE Divisions Management Coordination Integrated Systems of Support Facilitative Administration Leveraging Department Expertise Career and College Readiness What divisions at MSDE care about school and student supports and why? DOSFSS DSE/EIS DECD What work is currently underway separately? What shared work is currently underway? Standards for Learning Academic Social Emotional MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

Varied Skills & Abilities PARTNER EFFORTS: Coaching Organizational Structure Selection Integrated Systems of Support Training Leveraging Agency Expertise All Students Birth to 21 What other organizations care about school and student supports and why? SPHS JHU DHMH U of MD What work is currently underway separately? What shared work is currently underway? Varied Skills & Abilities Academic Social Emotional

Varied Skills & Abilities LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEM EFFORTS: Decision Supports & Data Systems Information & Resources Incentives All Students Birth to 21 Varied Skills & Abilities Academic Social Emotional MTSS Maryland Webinar March 19, 2015

NEXT Description of 4-year Implementation Plan Installation 2015-16 Management level set up infrastructure to support successful implementation of coordinated multi-tiered systems of support. Establish team and data systems, conduct audit of separate and shared work. Identify gaps in coordination and develop plan. Initial Implementation 2016-17 Try out plan with current partners, work out the details, learn and improve before expanding to other contexts. Elaboration 2017-18 Expand program/practices to other contexts, and apply lessons learned. Continuous Improvement/ Regeneration Ongoing evaluation for efficiency of coordinated systems, effectiveness of multi-tiered practices, and excellence in improving student outcomes. This is a STATE level plan to INTEGRATE service to the local school systems by coordinating our work at the state level to carry out the policies of the BOE, provide professional development and technical assistance to LSS.

“Town Hall Meeting” Response from Title I Coordinators How does this plan align with your current work? Are there gaps in your systems of support that can be met by this plan? What professional development and technical assistance would you like to see MSDE provide? Order of business for today 15 minute presentation 45 minute Response; 15 minutes per section