State aid evaluation Rodrigo PEDUZZI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introducing Multi-Level Government in the EUs Better Regulation Agenda Werner Stengg European Commission; DG Internal Market and Services; Impact Assessment,
Advertisements

1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
1 JESSICA: STATE AID PRINCIPLES Eglé Striungyté, DG Competition European Commission* JEREMIE and JESSICA Conference Brussels, 30 November 2010 * DISCLAIMER:
Regional Policy The future of EU funding - proposals from the Commission Guy Flament European Commission, DG REGIO Cardiff, 19 April 2013.
State aid control Wouter Pieké* Head of Unit COMP.C.4
Carles ESTEVA MOSSO Director, Policy and Strategy DG Competition Brussels, 6 March 2012 Session 1: Challenges for State aid control in the present context.
Jose Braz, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3rd Package 11th December 2008 The Agency for the Cooperation of European Energy Regulators.
State aid Modernisation Changing the balance of State aid control
Brussels, 12 July 2006 Klaus-Otto JUNGINGER-DITTEL State aid rules and programming of Structural Fund’s programs for
Legal Aspects of the Broadcasting Communication EE&MC - European Economic & Marketing Consultants GmbH Bonn * Brussels * Vienna Adenauerallee 87, D
State aid and regional policy Paul Hadley Department for Trade and Industry United Kingdom.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Workshop 3 Audit of State Aids Ljubljana,
1 EFCA - 21th March 2002 Raul Mateus Paula. 2 This presentation underlines: The key objectives of the Relex Reform The division of the responsibilities.
The State Aid Action Plan Thibaut KLEINER DG COMP Global Competition Law Centre 19 September 2005 – Brussels.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
European Commission DG Competition 1 Competition Policy and Corporate Governance Humbert Drabbe Stockholm 3 December, 2009.
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
Financial Instruments in the rural development area – delivering as they should? by Peeter LÄTTI Head of cabinet European Court of Auditors 18 June 2015.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
The revision of the State aid rules for R&D&I Prague, 18 July 2013
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Humbert DRABBE Director Directorate H DG Competition State Aid Modernisation Compatibility assessment and revision of State aid guidelines.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)
Evaluation workshop on the Economic Development OP Budapest, 24 April 2013 Jack Engwegen Head of Unit, Hungary DG Regional and Urban Policy European Commission.
DG Competition 1 Prague April 2006 Regional State aid Regional aid guidelines
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 EC rules on state aid Ljubljana,
Humbert DRABBE Director, Cohesion, R&D&I and enforcement DG Competition Brussels, 6 March 2012 Session 2: Possible main elements of the modernisation package.
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 9 June 2009 “ Cohesion policy: response to the economic crisis” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying.
2004 Aviation Guidelines EUROPEAN COMMISSION Jean-Louis COLSON, Brussels, 08 September 2009.
European Commission IDEAS - New Delhi 14 April 2005 European Commission DG Budget – Evaluation Unit.
Workshop III: Energy and Environmental aid Diana BARGLAZAN DG Competition, European Commission 1.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Communication Temporary framework for State aid measures European Commission DG Competition 21 January 2009.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
“How Can Competition reforms be an Opportunity for Policy Makers in Developing Countries” William E. Kovacic George Washington University Law School Dhaka.
Regional Policy European Semester / 2013 CSRs and Period John WALSH DG Regional and Urban Policy Brussels, 11 March Cohesion Policy.
Belgrade, 14 th December Aid Coordination Meeting Gender Equality Synergy Group Belgrade, 14 th of March 2012.
Dace Berkolde Director State Aid Control Department Ministry of Finance Latvia 1.
Commission européenne EU Employment Strategy for people with Disabilities Final Conference Conversion Strasbourg, 21 Sept Egbert Holthuis European.
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
Annual Interreg meeting 06 June 2016 #EUBudget4Results 1.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
State Aid Modernisation after 3 years
Session 9 – Data exploitation and publication
EU’s CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme – Benchmarks for Free Allocation from 2013 Onwards 9 September 2010 Hans Bergman DG Climate Action European Commission.
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
State aid in the fishery and aquaculture sector
GRI-S : Infrastructures The Union list of projects of common interest
4.4 Procurement by grant beneficiaries
Investment Plan for Europe & ESIF Financial Instruments
Simplification in ESI funds for
Awareness and enforcement of compliance with State aid rules
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Upskilling Pathways New Opportunities for Adults Detlef Eckert, Director: Skills, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Incentives and Cross-border Cost Allocation in the Energy Infrastructure Package Benoît Esnault (CRE) Chair of the ACER Gas Infrastructure Task Force.
“State aid and EU funding – Are they compatible?”
Anna Nykiel-Mateo Nuria Mariñas Rojo DG COMP
State aid in the field of Energy: challenges
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
Pedro Cruz Yábar Brussels, 21st June 2016
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
ProZorro : Innovations in Digital Ex-Ante Monitoring Tools for Public Procurement in Ukraine Eliza Niewiadomska
Presentation transcript:

State aid evaluation Rodrigo PEDUZZI Unit A.3 State aid Strategy, DG Competition Evaluation Network meeting Brussels, 15 January 2015

State aid modernisation Launched in 2012, now essentially completed Comprehensive reform of State aid rules 3 objectives: Enhance effectiveness of aid, in line with Europe 2020 objectives, and limit distortions of trade and competition Prioritise enforcement on cases/schemes that have a significant impact on the internal market Simplification of rules

Most State aid is granted through schemes 87% of aid (in 2013) provided through schemes, either block-exempted or approved ex ante Very limited ex post assessment of impact Mostly formal rather than substantial assessment of incentive effect

Evaluation: 'Closing' the State aid cycle Objectives of State aid evaluation : Assessing whether the scheme was effective in achieving the direct objective for which it was introduced, (i.e. did it change the behaviour of the beneficiary, and to which extent?) Detecting possible indirect effects of the scheme (e.g. spill-over effects on the activity of other firms, general effects on regional growth, etc.); Addressing the issues of proportionality and appropriateness of the chosen aid instrument. Assessment and approval Design Evaluation Monitoring Implemen-tation did the public intervention work?”, “why and how did it work?”, “did the positive impacts outweigh the negative ones?”.

Opportunities and challenges Collect evidence on actual impact of State aid Contribute to a better informed decision-making, by the Member States and by the Commission Help allocate scarce resources more efficiently Need to facilitate ownership from Member States Ensure equal treatment and the necessary flexibility Implement evaluation for block-exempted schemes

Scope of evaluation In the GBER: Only for selected aid categories (e.g. regional aid). Only for large aid schemes, with an average annual budget exceeding €150 million (a handful each year). For such schemes, the exemption is limited to an initial period of six months following their entry into force. The Commission, under certain conditions, may extend this period upon approval of an evaluation plan. In the guidelines (Broadband, Regional, Risk finance, Aviation, R&D&I, Environment and Energy): Large aid schemes, novel schemes, schemes affected by significant markets, technology or regulatory changes

Evaluation plan - Content For schemes subject to evaluation, Member States have to notify to the Commission an evaluation plan, which should contain at least the following elements: Objectives of the aid scheme to be evaluated Evaluation questions Result indicators Envisaged methods Data collection Timeline The body conducting the evaluation (or the selection principles) Publicity of evaluation  Methodological guidance in Commission Staff Working Document: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/modernisation/state_aid_evaluation_m ethodology_en.pdf

Implementation since July 2014 - Template for notification of evaluation plans - FAQ available on DG COMP website - First two decisions under GBER adopted in December (large regional aid schemes, UK and CZ) - Two other regional aid cases in the pipeline - New cases in other areas (R&D, energy, broadband) - Ongoing discussions with Member States - Exploring synergies (e.g. with ESIF experts) - Advocacy - Eventually, policy recommendations on future schemes and State aid rules