Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex 2010 using the CMAQ-VBS Matthew Woody 1, Kirk Baker 1, Patrick Hayes 2, Jose Jimenez 3, and Havala.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intercomparison of secondary organic aerosol models based on SOA/O x ratio Yu Morino, Kiyoshi Tanabe, Kei Sato, and Toshimasa Ohara National Institute.
Advertisements

Template Implementing APT Plume-in-Grid and Volatility Basis Set (VBS) Algorithms in CMAQ 5.0 Bonyoung Koo, Prakash Karamchandani, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah.
Nos Commanditaires : IRIC 18 mars, h00 Salle S1-151 Pavillon Jean-Coutu Université de Montréal.
Aerosol Composition in Los Angeles During the 2010 CalNex Campaign Studied by High Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry CalNex Data Analysis Workshop,
Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
Template Assessment of the Sources of Organic Carbon at Monitoring Sites in the Southeastern United States using Receptor and Deterministic Models Ralph.
R. Ahmadov 1,2, S. McKeen 1,2, R. Bahreini 1,2, A. Middlebrook 2, J.A. deGouw 1,2, J.L. Jimenez 1,3, P.L. Hayes 1,3, A.L. Robinson 4, M. Trainer 2 1 Cooperative.
Havala O. T. Pye 1, Rob Pinder 1, Ying Xie 1, Deborah Luecken 1, Bill Hutzell 1, Golam Sarwar 1, Jason Surratt 2 1 US Environmental Protection Agency 2.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Prakash V. Bhave, Ph.D. Physical Scientist EMEP Workshop – PM Measurement & Modeling April 22, 2004 Measurement Needs for Evaluating Model Calculations.
Source apportionment of the carbonaceous aerosol – Quantitative estimates based on 14 C- and organic tracer analysis 1.Norwegian Institute for Air Research.
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
The Framework of Modeling SOA Formation from Toluene Oxidation Di Hu and Richard Kamens Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University.
2008 Field measurements 1 Field Measurements of organic aerosols Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry LAC : Head: Urs Baltensperger 15 Scientists/Postdocs.
Organic Carbon Aerosol: An Overview (and Insight from Recent Field Campaigns) Colette L. Heald NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellow
Comprehensive model evaluation of PM2.5 species over Japan:
Implementing Online Marine Organic Aerosol Emissions into GEOS-Chem Implementing Online Marine Organic Aerosol Emissions into GEOS-Chem NASA Ames Research.
Diurnal cycle of fossil and non-fossil total carbon using 14 C analyses during CalNex P. Zotter 1, A.S.H. Prévôt 1, Y. Zhang 2, S. Szidat 2, X. Zhang 3,
Southeast Nexus (SENEX) Studying the Interactions Between Natural and Anthropogenic Emissions at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change A NOAA Field.
Modeling Elemental Composition of Organic Aerosol: Exploiting Laboratory and Ambient Measurement and the Implications of the Gap Between Them Qi Chen*
Operational Air Quality and Source Contribution Forecasting in Georgia Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
Chemical composition of submicron particles with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor at the JRC-Ispra site M. Bressi, F. Cavalli, C. Belis, J-P. Putaud,
Source Signatures of Organic Compounds and Particle Growth in Bakersfield, CA Lars Ahlm 1, Shang Liu 1, Lynn M. Russell 1, Douglas A. Day 1,2, Robin Weber.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie.
Characterization of Organic Aerosol Formation and Processing in California from Airborne Measurements R. Bahreini, A.M. Middlebrook, C. Warneke, J. de.
X. Zhang, J. Liu, E. T. Parker and R. J. Weber
1 Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ PM2.5 Source Apportionment Estimates Kirk Baker and Brian Timin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
Molecular Characterization of Organic Aerosols from the Los Angeles Ground Site during the CalNex 2010 Campaign Using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.
Simulating Fire Event Impacts on Regional O 3 and PM2.5 and Looking Forward Toward Evaluation October 5, 2015 Kirk Baker U.S. Environmental Protection.
Parameterization of Global Monoterpene SOA formation and Water Uptake, Based on a Near-explicit Mechanism Karl Ceulemans – Jean-François Müller – Steven.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development, Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division Columbus Day 2010 Prakash Bhave U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Aerosol from Organic Nitrogen in the Southeast United States Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental.
Application of the CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to a Coastal Urban Site Chris Nolte NOAA Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC 6.
2012 CMAS meeting Yunsoo Choi, Assistant Professor Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston NOAA Air quality forecasting and.
Classificatory performance evaluation of air quality forecasting in Georgia Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang 2 and Armistead G. Russell.
Prakash V. Bhave, Ph.D. Physical Scientist PM Model Performance Workshop February 10, 2004 Postprocessing Model Output for Comparison to Ambient Data.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Simulating the Oxygen Content of Organic Aerosol in a Global Model
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 16 October 2012 Integrating source.
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence Matthew Woody and Saravanan Arunachalam Institute.
Yunseok Im and Myoseon Jang
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
2/5/2016 Anthropogenic Impacts on Organic Aerosol during the 2007 BAQS-Met Field Study Craig Stroud, Michael Moran, Paul Makar, Junhua Zhang, Wanmin Gong,
Organic aerosol composition and aging in the atmosphere: How to fit laboratory experiments, field data, and modeling together American Chemical Society.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
2. Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA
Observational Constraints on Global Organic Aerosol Telluride Science Research Center Workshop on Organic Aerosol July 30, 2014 Colette L. Heald Xuan Wang,
Global Simulation of Secondary Organic Carbon Aerosols Hong Liao California Institute of Technology GEOS-CHEM meeting, April 2005.
2016 TFEIP meeting, Zagreb, 16-18th May 2016 Cross-cutting WG TFMM-TFEIP on SVOC emissions Working document for the workshop on condensables & Semi-Volatiles.
Source apportionment of submicron organic aerosols at an urban site by linear unmixing of aerosol mass spectra V. A. Lanz 1, M. R. Alfarra 2, U. Baltensperger.
Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Photo image area measures.
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
58 A modeling perspective of the ChArMEx intensive campaign: origin of photo-oxidant and organic aerosol formation Arineh Cholakian, Matthias Beekmann,
Introduction Method Results Conclusions
CHIMERE - Volatility Basis Set approach
Assessment of Air Quality Impacts from the 2013 Rim Fire
Havala O. T. Pye1 With contributions from:
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, M. Talat Odman and Armistead G. Russell
On-going developments of SinG: particles
Potential Anthropogenic Controls on Biogenic Organic Aerosol
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex 2010 using the CMAQ-VBS Matthew Woody 1, Kirk Baker 1, Patrick Hayes 2, Jose Jimenez 3, and Havala Pye 1 1 U.S. EPA 2 Université de Montréal 3 University of Colorado 13 th Annual CMAS Conference October 27-29,

Motivation 41% of the measured submicron aerosol mass at Pasadena was organic during CalNex > 70% of midday OA is estimated to be secondary in Pasadena, CA (Hayes et al., JGR, 2013) CMAQ traditionally underpredicts SOA (Foley et al., GMD, 2010; de Gouw et al., JGR, 2008; Volkamer et al., GRL, 2006) OA measurements collected during CalNex (AMS, 14 C) provide unique opportunity to evaluate CMAQ with the volatility basis set (CMAQ-VBS) (Koo et al., AE, 2014) 2

CMAQ-VBS Organic aerosols lumped based on volatility – 4 basis sets in CMAQ-VBS Primary anthropogenic and biogenic [biomass burning (BBOA)]; secondary anthropogenic and biogenic 5 bins for each basis set (C* values of 10 0 to 10 3 µg m -3 plus 1 non- volatile bin) Primary organic aerosols (POA) treated as semi-volatile (SVOCs) and aged Anthropogenic secondary organic aerosols (SOA) aged Includes SOA formation pathway from intermediate volatility organic compounds (IVOCs) – IVOC emissions = 1.5 x SVOC emissions 3

SV_POA1 SV_POA2 SV_POA3 SV_POA4 POA0 POA1 POA2 POA3 POA4 Alkanes Aromatics VOC Emissions POA Emissions SV_ASOA1 SV_ASOA2 SV_ASOA3 SV_ASOA4 Oxidation ASOA0 ASOA1 ASOA2 ASOA3 ASOA4 BSOA0 BSOA1 BSOA2 BSOA3 BSOA4 SV_BSOA1 SV_BSOA2 SV_BSOA3 SV_BSOA4 IsopreneTerpenes Oxidation Schematic of CMAQ-VBS OA Module 4 SV_BBOA1 SV_BBOA2 SV_BBOA3 SV_BBOA4 Biomass Burning POA Emissions BBOA0 BBOA1 BBOA2 BBOA3 BBOA4 Oxidation Aging IVOCs

CMAQ-AE6 vs. CMAQ-VBS AE6VBS POANon-volatile Aged Semi-volatile Aged Distinct volatility splits for POA emissions from gas, diesel, non-volatile, and “other” SOAPrecursor specific products (e.g. ATRP1, ATRP2) Oligomerized (biogenic and anthropogenic) Products (biogenic and anthropogenic) lumped based on volatility (e.g. A_AVB0 – A_AVB4, A_BVB0 – BVB4) Aged (anthropogenic only) IVOC formation pathway BBOALumped with POATracked separately from POA Aged 5

Model Setup Pasadena Bakersfield CMAQ v5.0.2 – CB05 – AERO6 + VBS 4 km grid resolution May and June, NEI v1 POA + SVOC emissions = NEI POA (no scaling), IVOC = 1.5 x POA Added basis set for meat cooking + ability to track POA from gas, diesel, meat cooking, and “other” sources separately 6

NMdnB (%)NMdnE (%) CSN AE VBS IMPROVE AE VBS CMAQ-AE6 and CMAQ-VBS OC Model Performance CMAQ-AE6 OC performance better at CSN and IMPROVE sites 7

Organic Matter (OM) Lower OM concentrations with CMAQ-VBS 8

POA (VBS POA + BBOA) CMAQ-VBS semi-volatile POA treatment lowers POA concentrations considerably 9

Biogenic SOA Biogenic SOA comparable between two OA schemes 10

Anthropogenic SOA CMAQ-VBS produces considerably more anthropogenic SOA (~10x) 11

Anthropogenic SOA CMAQ-VBS produces considerably more anthropogenic SOA (~10x) x10 12

CMAQ-AE6 overpredicts POA (AMS HOA) and underpredicts SOA CMAQ-VBS better represents SOA diurnal profile [but peak still 4.6x lower than measured peak SOA (LV-OOA + SV-OOA)] 13 CMAQ-AE6CMAQ-VBS Comparison with AMS Measurements (Pasadena)

CMAQ-VBS SOA/ΔCO vs. Photochemical Age (log NOx/NOy) (Pasadena) CMAQ-VBS SOA/ΔCO vs. photochemical age (fairest comparison of model vs. observations) ~1.7x lower than observations (108 μg m -3 ppm -1 ); CMAQ-AE6 ~13.5x lower 14

Anthropogenic Aging Biogenic Aging CMAQ-VBS SOA Contributions (Pasadena) Pasadena Bakersfield Daily Average Diurnal Profile CMAQ-VBS SOA formed from VOCs (A_VOC and B_VOC) comparable to CMAQ-AE6. Most CMAQ-VBS SOA formed from aging [A_AGE and B_AGE (sensitivity test)] Biogenic Aging Biogenic Aging Anthropogenic Aging 15

CMAQ-VBS POA Source Apportionment Diesel x 10 Gas Meat Cooking Other Majority of POA in LA attributed to meat cooking (at Pasadena: ~55% meat cooking, 21% gas, 15% other, and 9% diesel) μg m μg m μg m μg m

Non-Fossil vs. Fossil Carbon Pasadena Bakersfield CMAQ-VBS overpredicts (underpredicts) fossil (non-fossil) fraction (obs ~50/50 split); however likely positive bias in non-fossil measurements Non-FossilFossil 17

CMAQ-VBSObs. (Zotter et al., JGR, 2014) Non-Fossil Fraction (OC) Non-Fossil Fraction (TC) Non-Fossil Fraction (Pasadena) CMAQ-VBS captures diurnal profile of non- fossil fraction well but biased low 18

Conclusions CMAQ-AE6 OC performance better at routine networks (CSN, IMPROVE) – CMAQ-VBS underpredicts OC due to semi-volatile treatment of POA CMAQ-VBS better represents SOA/POA split at Pasadena – CMAQ-VBS semi-volatile POA compares favorably to AMS HOA – Majority of SOA mass formed from aging – SOA still underpredicted (~4.6x compared to AMS peak) VOCs generally well represented (Baker et al., ACP, in prep.) Photochemical age ~1.7x too low Yields ~2.7x too low, within 4x uncertainty reported by Zhang et al. (PNAS, 2014) Majority of POA at Pasadena attributed to meat cooking CMAQ-VBS overpredicts fossil C and underpredicts non- fossil C 19

Acknowledgements John Offenberg, U.S. EPA This project was supported in part by an appointment to the Internship/Research Participation Program at the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and EPA. 20

CMAQ-VBS Volatility Distribution Wider range of volatilities represented in CMAQ-VBS. Majority of CMAQ-AE6 OA mass (not shown) in 2-3 bins (NV, 10 1, 10 2 ) (Baker et al., ACP, in prep.) 21