GENETICALLY MODIFIED CORN ON Spodoptera frugiperda AND Helicoverpa zea CONTROL IN SINALOA, MEXICO Luis. A. Aguirre-Uribe*, Agustín Hernández-Juárez, Gustavo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genetically Modified Corn Proudly present by : Khesia Kalistyatika (H ) M. Fatchurohman (H ) Mita Nurul Azkia (H ) Muhammad Luqman A.H.
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Genetic modification allows us to manipulate the characteristics of a plant by altering its genome.
Results showed in Figure 1 indicated that WE mean for grain pearl millet was higher 84% than corn and 22% than sorghum for the highland location. WE mean.
Bailee Slack Camdenton High School. Background Information: Helicoverpa zea - most costly agricultural pest in country -can damage up to 50 % of sweet.
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum Christian Krupke Assistant Professor Field Crops Entomology.
Bt corn Saturnina C Halos, Ph.D. Chair, Biotechnology Advisory Team Department of Agriculture.
William A. Donahue, Jr., Ph.D. Sumiko De La Vega Sierra Research Laboratories, Modesto, CA Nebraska Urban Pest Management Conference February 12-13, 2013.
Unit 3: Corn Insect Diseases.  European Corn Borer & Southwestern Corn Borer  Can cause 3% yield loss/corn borer/plant  Sweet corn 8%  Bore  Stalks.
Insecticide Resistance: Genes For Pest? Donnie Day.
Insect Resistance Management for Corn Rootworm Alan Reynolds, Sharlene Matten, and Tessa Milofsky U.S. EPA/Office of Pesticide Programs, Biopesticides.
GMO PowerPoint By Sharlah Reynolds. Vocabulary.
Biotechnology - traditional Modification by microorganisms of materials for human use Modification by microorganisms of materials for human use Use of.
rDNA Technology & Food Uses
Genetically Modified Foods
INTRODUCTION Organic acreage, to meet the feed and food industry demand is increasing. Between 1997 and 2003, certified organic acres grew by 10% per year.
Roundup Ready ® corn: A case study Presentation by: Harlan Svoboda 25 November 2014 PBIO 5500.
NDSU Agriculture TRENDS IN THE USE OF CROPS DEVELOPED THROUGH BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE USA AND THE WORLD BY: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Plant Science.
Genetically Modified Foods
Abstract: In recent years, advances in genetic engineering and techniques of molecular biology have enabled the creation and commercial release of “Genetically.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM PRESENTATION 13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry.
CHAPTER 38 PLANT REPRODUCTION AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section C: Plant Biotechnology.
Genetically Modified Organisms in Agricultural Production.
© ENDURE, February 2007 FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY © ENDURE, February 2007 FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY Integrated Pest Management for WESTERN CORN ROOTWORM -WCR.
Chapter 13 - Biotechnology
Risk assessment: Bt corn MON810 Risk assessment: identifying and evaluating possible dangers predicting the chances the danger will occur assessing the.
Lecture 13 Chapter 8 Genes and traits of interest II Neal Stewart.
Key Area 3: Crop protection Unit 3: Sustainability and Interdependence.
CONVENTIONAL VS. TRANSGENIC: THE SHOWDOWN Robert Hogan, Texas AgriLife Extension; Jason L. Johnson, Texas AgriLife Extension; Jeanne Reeves, Cotton, Incorporated;
KEY POINT(S) To note the following : Positive and Negative effects of GM food crops Assess the effectiveness of food development to overcome problems.
Workshop on modern biology & its social impacts 2-5 Dec 2007, Xishuanbanna, Yunnan, China Environmental Impacts of GM Crops for Insect-Resistance Yufa.
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) Any microorganism, plant or animal that has purposely had its genome altered using genetic engineering technology.
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) Any microorganism, plant or animal that has purposely had its genome altered using genetic engineering technology.
Genetically Engineered Foods are here!!! What are they? What do they accomplish?
Do Now 3.26 (Week 30) Objective: Describe and evaluate the impact of transgenic organisms on food production. Tasks: 1.Pass forward last week’s Do Nows.
PRECISION FARMING IN MEXICO Cesar Galaviz By Soil 4213.
{ Bt cotton Bethany Zumwalde.  What is Bt cotton?  How is it produced?  Advantages & limitations  Bt cotton study  Inheritance of an insecticidal.
Population of the Country is expected to exceed 169 cr by 2050
Biosecurity in agricultural field within neoliberal policies Schaper and Parada, 2001; Melgarejo et al., 2002; Russell, 2008; Azadi and Ho, 2009; Qaim,
LAKYN CLINE & AMBER OSBORNE Genetically Modified Foods.
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Millions of Hectares Texas = 70 ha Global area planted with GM crops
Transgenic Plants Dr. Sanjay Singh C.M.P. College Allahabad
Field Performance of WideStrike Insect Protection Against Key Lepidopteran Pests in the Mid-South And Southeastern U.S. M. Willrich Siebert, L. B. Braxton,
Genetically Modified Foods
Development of an Action Threshold for Spodoptera exigua in Tomatoes James E. Taylor and David G. Riley. University of Georgia, Department of Entomology,
13-4: Genetic Engineering. GMOs Genetically Modified Organisms.
Grower’s Name:AgWorx Corn PlotIrrigation: City, State:Mountain, NDPlanting Date:4/25/2015 County:Harvest Date:10/20/2015 Hybrid/Brand 1 CRMYield (Bu/A)MoistureTest.
Efficacy of Optimum® Intrasect™ Maize Hybrids Against Southern Lepidopteran Pests Matthew W. McKinnon, Jarrod T. Hardke, Robert L. Rorie Pioneer Hi-Bred.
Controversies Surrounding the Introduction of Bt Brinjal in India Monika Leininger-Casper, Wyoming; Social Work Mariah Strike-Pinedale, Wyoming; International.
Ch. 13 Genetic Engineering
DNA Technology. Please pick up notes on the front desk.
DNA: THE SECRET OF LIFE By: James Watson Chapter 4: Playing God: Customizing DNA Molecules.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM (GMO) TECHNOHOLICS.
Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111 GM corn hybrid and its respective isoline provided by Syngenta Agro S.A. de C.V.- Mexico were used. Research was carried out.
1 CfE Higher Biology 3.2(f) Gene Technology. 2 Key areas: 3.2f Gene Technology (f) Genetic technology As a result of genome sequencing, organisms with.
Susceptibility of Cry1F-susceptible and -resistant fall armyworm to transgenic corn plants containing single or pyramided Bt genes Y. Niu1, R. Meagher2,
Evaluation of early drought tolerant maize genotypes under low nitrogen conditions Nyasha E. Goredema1, Ms Nakai Goredema2, Ezekia Svotwa1, Gabriel Soropa1,
Agrisure Corn Trait Purity Testing Standards
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s)
and Pheromone Trap Data
Evolution and Environmental Science
Technical Aspects of Recombinant DNA and Gene Cloning
DIFFERENT CONCENTRATION-RESPONSE ESTIMATES FOR ASSESSING HELIOTHINE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BT INSECTICIDAL PROTEINS M. I. Ali and R. G. Luttrell, University.
Research Scientists Advocating the Use of Bt Corn
By Eileen, Daniel and Andrew
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum
Multiple Pest Resistance in Elite Corn Inbreds and Hybrids
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
Non Bt Corn Variety Testing
Presentation transcript:

GENETICALLY MODIFIED CORN ON Spodoptera frugiperda AND Helicoverpa zea CONTROL IN SINALOA, MEXICO Luis. A. Aguirre-Uribe*, Agustín Hernández-Juárez, Gustavo A. Frías-Treviño, Mariano Flores-Dávila, Ernesto Cerna-Chávez, Jerónimo Landeros-Flores. Departamento de Parasitología. Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro # 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo; Coahuila, México. INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Two GM corn hybrids were used for this research; Agrisure Viptera 3111 and Agrisure 3000 GT, both effective to control Spodoptera frugiperda and Helicoverpa zea and their respective isolines provided by Syngenta Agro S.A. Research was carried out at El Dorado and Navolato, Sinaloa; Mex., using an experimental design with 8 treatments that included insecticide control(CP) and 4 replicates. Davis scale (Davis et al. 1992); (1=no damage to 9= severe damage) was used to evaluate fall armyworm and length (cm) of damaged corncobs for corn earworm evaluation. A proc ANOVA and a Tukey (P< 0.05) multiple range tests was conducted using the SAS statistic software (SAS, 2002) for variables analyzed. Different corn hybrids have been genetically modified (GM) with the insertion of genes that express the ∂-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (Bruck et al. 2006), in which the plant expresses the protein with insecticidal activity primarily against Lepidoptera and some Coleoptera insects (Silva, 2005). In Mexico, GM corn planting is not authorized for commercial purposes; however, Bt maize planting was permitted under biosafety conditions to test their pest control effectiveness. The objective of this research was to evaluate Agrisure Viptera 3111 and Agrisure 3000 GT corn hybrids expressing B. thuringiensis toxins on S. frugiperda and H. zea control in Sinaloa, Mexico. RESULTS Fig. 1. Foliar damage and plants with damage by fall armyworm and corncob damage and ears with damage by corn earworm in Agrisure Viptera 3111 and isoline corn at El Dorado, Culiacán; Sinaloa. CP= Crop Protection. Fig. 2. Foliar damage and plants with damage by fall armyworm and corncob damage and ears with damage by corn earworm in Agrisure 3000 GT and isoline corn at Navolato, Sinaloa. CP= Crop Protection.  Agrisure 3000 GT and Agrisure Viptera 3111 hybrids significantly reduced foliar damage (Davis scale) and % plants damaged by fall armyworm S. frugiperda. and corncob lesion size and % cobs damaged by corn earworm, H zea, while the isolines were highly susceptible, with a greater number of plants with injuries and higher foliar and corncob damage at Culiacan and Navolato (Figs. 1 and 2).  This evaluation shows that the GM corn with B. thuringiensis toxin provides permanent protection and not seriously affected by fall armyworm and corn earworm, while insecticidal control to prevent ear damage in field corn is difficult and generally not cost effective and does not significantly reduce fall armyworm damage.  Bt Agrisure Viptera 3111 and Agrisure 3000 GT, probe to be resistant to both pests, increasing the chances to obtain a better grain quality and higher yield. DISCUSSION Bruck, J. D., Lopez, M. D., Lewis L. C., Prasifka J. R. and R. D. Gunnarson Effects of Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis Corn and Permethrin on Nontarget Arthropods. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 23(3): Davis, F. M.; S. S. NG. and W. P. Williams Visual rating scales for screening whorl-stage corn for resistance to fall armyworm. Miss. Agric. Agric. For. Exp. Sta. Technical Bull Pag. S.A.S. Institute The SAS System for Windows, Release 9.0. SAS, Institute, Cary N. C. U.S.A. Silva, C. C. A Maíz Genéticamente Modificado. AGRO-BIO. Bogotá, Colombia. Pág. 60. LITERATURE CITED