How to get that first NIH grant

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
How to write a Research Grant? or How to get a grant rejected? Spencer Gibson Provincial Director, Research CancerCare Manitoba.
Specific Aims or Selling your Science in One Page Pedro Fernandez-Funez Assistant Professor of Neurology and Neuroscience
NIH Writing Your Specifics Aims CHIP Grant Workshop 2014 Amy Gorin, Ph.D. Listen Up! This is a critical section of your application.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Grant Writing: Specific Aims and Study Design Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD EPIDEMIOLOGY
Writing for Publication
CRTP Coursework Assignment Accounting for Leases Exposure Draft (ED/2013/6) Submission date: 20 January 2014 by 2:00 pm 1.
Tips on NIH grant writing
The material was supported by an educational grant from Ferring How to Write a Scientific Article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Writing a Research Paper
Writing a Grant: Focus on Mentored Awards J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine University of Washington, Seattle,
RGC Grant Applications in Biology & Medicine Formulating and Writing winning proposals Kathy Cheah, 2003.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 3 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Basic Scientific Writing in English Lecture 3 Professor Ralph Kirby Faculty of Life Sciences Extension 7323 Room B322.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
Grant Writing/Comprehensive Workshop Paul R. Albert, Ph. D
Publishing your paper. Learning About You What journals do you have access to? Which do you read regularly? Which journals do you aspire to publish in.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Section 2: Science as a Process
Grant Writing: A Primer for the Initial Application
Grants Factory GRANTS FACTORY WRITING GROUPS Essential Elements of a Good Grant Application Mick Tuite School of Biosciences
Self-evaluation of project concepts for application in Horizon 2020
Course Timeline October 7 th : Project description October 14 th : Paperwork and Budget October 21 st : Successful Grant Writers (Project description due)
RESEARCH PROPOSAL: THEORY, RESEARCH QUESTION & HYPOTHESIS
“Knowing Revisited” And that’s how we can move toward really knowing something: Richard Feynman on the Scientific Method.
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method
WEEK 3 THE TERM PAPER. WHAT IS A TERM PAPER? An academic essay that is rather lengthy, prepared by an academic writer Written in a concise and well documented.
ABSTRACT Function: An abstract is a summary of the entire work that helps readers to decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper. (HINT…write.
Grantsmanship – Hypothesis Generation and Testing H. F. Gilbert.
Basic Science Grants Vision, outline and « big picture » of a research proposal Grantsmanship workshop – June 2014 Marc Prentki CRCHUM.
4) It is a measure of semi-independence and your PI may treat you differently since your fellowship will be providing salary support. 2) Fellowship support.
Developing IFS Research Proposals AuthorAID Proposal Writing Workshop June 2011.
The Science of Biology. Key Concept Key Concept What is the goal of science? What is the goal of science? Vocabulary Vocabulary Science Science Observation.
Science Fair How To Get Started… (
You Had Me at “Hello” Specific Aims Workshop Michael R. Blackburn, PhD Dean, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston John P. McGovern Distinguished.
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
“Under Construction” Building the Best Possible (Team) Grant Proposal.
Grant Writing Strategies All About Grants! Research & Innovation Week April 20, 2015 Cynthia Jobe, Lead Grant Writer
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
Grant writing 101 The Art of Flawless Packaging Scott K. Powers Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Scott K. Powers Department of Applied.
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
National Institutes of Health AREA PROGRAM (R15) Thomas J. Wenzel Bates College, Lewiston, Maine.
 An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience  When writing an article review,
Writing a research application Ewa Ehrenborg 1. 2 Research application Write a grant application 3-4 students/group Send in title by Friday November 23.
Written Presentations of Technical Subject Writing Guide vs. Term paper Writing style: specifics Editing Refereeing.
 Ensure the title is in line with the requirements of the proposed funding agency if they have any specification for the titled page (some do have.
1 National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research How to Write a Successful Grant Proposal: Problems and Solutions Guo H. Zhang, PhD, MPH Program.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How Research Gets Funded A report by Wayne Wakeland from a workshop given at PSU in late Sept. ’06 by The Grant Institute.
Hypothesis, Question, Specific Aims Ed Puzas, Ph.D. University of Rochester School of Medicine Rochester, NY.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
How to Read a Journal Article. Basics Always question: – Does this apply to my clinical practice? – Will this change how I treat patients? – How could.
DISCUSS WORKSHOPS AND PEER EDITING How to get the most out of your Peer Review.
Short and Sweet: Selling Your Science in 12 Pages ASBMR Grant Writing Workshop Friday, 15 October 2010 Toronto, ON Jane E. Aubin, Ph.D. Dept of Molecular.
Unit 1 The Science of Biology Part 1- What is Science?
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
Reviewers Expectations Peter Donkor. Outline Definitions The review process Common mistakes to avoid Conclusion.
Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses in Your Proposal
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
Section 2: Science as a Process
CRC Grant writing basics
Biology Writing a Lab Report
Tips for Writing Proposals
Introduction to Scientific Writing
Presentation transcript:

COBRE Grant Writing Workshop Hypothesis and Specific Aims Randall Duncan Biological Sciences COBRE Grant Writing Workshop January 21, 2015

How to get that first NIH grant New Investigator No specific aims Weak scientific background No experimental description or concept No Preliminary data Poorly defined methods No Grant!!!

General comments A good idea is critical, but not enough. Roughly 80% of proposals submitted to NIH are reasonably good ideas that will yield important knowledge. Excellent grant writers often claim they can get any reasonable idea funded. A poorly written grant will never be funded, even if it’s the best idea in the world.

There’s lots of excellent science out there There’s lots of excellent science out there. What makes for an excellent grant? A compelling question Clarity of thought and expression A strong, testable hypothesis Logical steps (aims) to answer the question Rigorous experiments to answer the question

General Comments There is a simple secret to writing successful grants that all the best grant writers follow, . . . but the vast majority of applicants do not. Abstract Hypothesis / Specific Aims Significance / Innovation Research Design This is the key

The Essential Parts of the Grant: Abstract Hypothesis / Specific Aims Significance / Innovation Research Design This is the key

Specific Aims Page: The first “make or break” point Defines the question to be answered The reviewer’s first major encounter with your ideas and thought processes – Experienced reviewers can assign a 85% accurate score just by reading this page Only page most panel member read (remember they all get a vote)

The 1st page should contain the essence of the entire proposal Must address the following: • What is the problem? • Which aspect of this problem will you solve? • How will you solve it? • When you are done, what will we know and why is it important to solving the problem?

What is the problem? - Definition of the problem and rationale 1-2 paragraphs Osteoporosis and low bone mineral density impacts over 32 million Americans and is responsible for over 1.7 million fractures per year. It is well known that exercise can significantly reduce bone loss and increase bone strength in osteoporotic patients, however the benefit of loading on the skeleton is limited due to the desensi-tization of bone to long-term loads. Robling et al. have shown that inserting rest periods between loading bouts increases bone formation rates in rodents (32), yet the cellular mechanisms for the desensitization of bone cells to extended load remains unclear. Which aspect of this problem will you solve? Clear, unambiguous, testable hypotheses How will you solve it? - Specific Aims to include general methods When you’re done, what will we know and why is it important to solving the problem - Close the loop

Specific Aims Page: The first “make or break” point First impressions count Failure here can “lose the reviewer”, regardless of the quality of your experiments! Good hypotheses and aims lead to good experiments Write your aims and hypotheses first!!!

Hypothesis and specific aims: The first “make or break” point Where do you start? - with a good idea. (chalk talks, colleagues) How do you know if your idea is good? Why do we need to know this? (Scientifically important?) Is it clinically relevant? – This is the NIH

Hypothesis and specific aims: The first “make or break” point Be brutally honest with yourself. “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you’re the easiest person to fool.” Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate Get other opinions. Chalk talks/colleagues input

What is a good hypothesis? Logical - based on solid observations or experimental data Testable Focused (no fishing) Informative – interesting and new, not trivial or predictable Simple – “The number of entities used to explain phenomena should not be increased unnecessarily” (Occam’s Razor) Translation: Offer the simplest explanation consistent with the data

Is a hypothesis always needed? No – Bioengineering/other technology Developmental type grants Clinical Trials But, all grants need well defined objectives

Specific Aims Describe the general research steps by which you will test your hypotheses. Each aim should logically follow the major hypotheses Follow each aim with a brief description of the experimental design (2-3 sentences).

Do’s and Don’t’s Limit Specific Aims to one page – required. Formulate no more than four specific aims. Too many aims makes the grant overly ambitious. Draft and complete the SA page as the first task!!! Common mistake! Start early (6 months before deadline)

Do’s and Don’t’s Avoid “serial” or “contingent” aims. The aims shouldn’t be dependent on one another. If the first one fails, why give the grant. Too many aims. First words are important. Be active. “Determine, Define, Ascertain” good “Examine, describe, measure” not so good Vague goals/objectives