AIAA Electric Propulsion Technical Committee Dr. Lyon (Brad) King (Committee Chair) Ron and Elaine Starr Professor of Space Systems Michigan Technological.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Nuclear and Future Flight Propulsion Technical Committee T.C. Overview as of 12/07/2011 TC Liaisons EP – Mike Patterson, TBD P&C - TBD External Austria.

Advertisements

2/13/ Engineering & Technology Management Group Educating the workforce of 2025 Dr. Merri Sanchez, Precollege Outreach Chair Engineering Technology.

1 AIAA Delta Forum AIAA Public Policy A CRISIS IN AERONAUTICS The NASA Landscape Aerospace Sciences Meeting January 8, 2001 Carol A. Cash, Chair Aeronautics.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company Automated Demand Response June 9, 2009 Connectivity Week, Santa Clara.

A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.

1 Inherently Linked!!!! RequirementsResourcesAcquisitionSustainment Requirements Resources Acquisition and Sustainment Changing the Acquisition Paradigm.

EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 11 Electric Propulsion.

Lunar Lander / Orbiter CubeSats Dr. Carl Vermont Technical College (Voice) Randolph Center, VT USA

Lyle N. Long, Panel: “Improving SWE Content in Aerospace Engineering Curriculum” Chair: Ronald Kohl President, R. J.

Emerging Technologies Committee Space Subcommittee Report Inside Aerospace, Washington D.C., May 10, 2011 May 10, 2011 Anthony R. Gross, Chair, ETC – Space.

EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems

October 1, 2013 John Brophy Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA.

List of investigators PPU’s for Next Generation EP Brian Gilchrist, UM Steve Battel, Battel Engineering (consultant) Alec Gallimore, UM Ken Arnett, UM-Space.

List of investigators Next Generation EP PPUs Brian Gilchrist, UM Steve Battel, Battel Engineering (consultant) Alec Gallimore, UM Ken Arnett, UM-Space.

Iain D. Boyd University of Michigan Modeling of Ion Sputtering and Product Transport.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Future of Space Exploration Orion, Ares and Beyond.... AIAA / NSC / JPL Town Hall Meeting 26 April 2007.

ENG 450: Potential Projects Nilton O. Renno, Professor Manish Mehta, Graduate Student University of Michigan.

Improved Hall thruster performance via tailored external magnetic field Lyon B. King Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan Technological University.

JSC Systems Engineering Development Initiatives Jason Nelson JSC Human Resources Development.

Systems Engineering for Space Vehicles Bryan Palaszewski with the Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH.

Federal Aviation Administration CLEEN (Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise) Program Technologies Development AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Jim.

Tech Transfer on the Ground. Manufacturing in Colorado.

In-Space Propulsion Systems Low Thrust Micropropulsion Michael M. Micci The Pennsylvania State University Presented at the NASA Technology Roadmaps: Propulsion.

Course Summary Session: Trajectories, Chemical Rockets, Plasma Propulsion, Fusion Propulsion John F Santarius Lecture 43 Resources from Space NEEP 533/

EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 12 Electric Propulsion Continued.

A Perspective on the NASA Space Power and Energy Storage Roadmap National Research Council Panel Power Workshop March 21, 2011 H. Sterling Bailey, Ph.

Electric Propulsion.

1 Integrity  Service  Excellence 19 June 2014 Jaime A. Stearns, Russell Cooper, a David Sporleder, a Alexander Zolot b Space Vehicles Directorate Air.

Iain D. Boyd and Brandon Smith Department of Aerospace Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Sputtering.

AIAA Corporate Membership Advisory Committee Space & Astronautics CMAC Report June 7, 2013.

Preliminary Design of NEA Detection Array Contractor 2 Kim Ellsworth Brigid Flood Nick Gawloski James Kim Lisa Malone Clay Matcek Brian Musslewhite Randall.

AIAA New Event Model January Why the New Event Model? Our profession is evolving and AIAA must change with it  More emphasis in the industry.

Electrostatics – the study of electrical charges that can be collected and held in one place. Also referred to as Static Electricity.

1 COMSTAC RLV Working Group Meeting Report Presentation to the COMSTAC Michael S. Kelly Chairman 20 May 2004.

VASIMR: The Future of Space Travel (?) Kevin Blondino 8 October 2012.

ELECTRIC PROPULSION Introduction Classification of Electric Thrusters Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy Chairman.

Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.

Electric Propulsion for Future Space Missions Part I Bryan Palaszewski Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field.

THE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING Joseph Picone, PhD Professor and Chair, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering College.

FUZZy TimE-critical Spatio-Temporal (FUZZ-TEST): Project #3 Brandon Cook – 3 rd Year Aerospace Engineering ACCEND Student Dr. Kelly Cohen – Faculty Mentor.

Space Grant Board of Directors Briefing NASA Academy – Space Grant Advisory Committee March 3, 2007.

Update about Forums and Other Events Briefing to Technical Activities Committee 1 September 2015.

AIAA Corporate Membership Advisory Committees Propulsion & Energy (P&E) Conference CMAC 7 June 2013 CMC Meeting.

Ion Energetics of the Modes of the CubeSat Ambipolar Thruster Timothy A. Collard 1, J. P. Sheehan 1, and Alec D. Gallimore 1 1 Aerospace Engineering, University.

Octoberfest! October 2014 Peter Tudor John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Laser Wakefield Acceleration.

Section Meeting Presenter’s name: Thomas mirowski Meeting: AIAA Michigan Section Date: 10 November 2015.

2010 Planetary Science Technology Review Interim Report; Assessment Phase National Aeronautics and Space Administration Prepared by the PSTR panel, advisors,

ENERGETIC COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS TC. Energetic Components and Systems Focus : Energetic materials, components, and systems with Military, NASA, Commercial,

1 Ukraine Higher Education Final conference Kiev 12 November 2015 European Investment Bank 03/02/2016.

Study of the Plasma-Wall Interface – Measurement and Simulation of Sheath Potential Profiles Samuel J. Langendorf, Mitchell L.R. Walker High-Power Electric.

NASA Academy Advisory Committee October 29, 2006 Douglas O’Handley (Chair)

NASA ARMD COUNCIL OF DEANS Tucson, AZ April 13-14, 2005 Progress report from: The Strategic Task Force Joseph L. Cecchi The University of New Mexico.

July 2003 At A Glance The GMSEC provides efficient and enabling GSFC mission services and products for the next decade. Benefits Establishes a Single Strategic.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration July 28, 2009.

Test and Development of the High Powered Helicon Thruster.

NASA Johnson Space Center, Advanced Space Propulsion Laboratory Point Design for 2.5 Megawatt VASIMR Engine For Mission to Callisto in 2045 Developed with.

Phase I STTR Principal Investigator: Christopher Davis, PhD ElectroDynamic Applications, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan University Principal Investigator: Professor.

PIT – What it is PIT - Pulsed Inductive Thruster NuPIT – Nuclear Pulsed Inductive Plasma Step after the grided ion thruster Advantage: No Electrode –No.

Plasma/Electrode Interactions in High Current Density Environments

Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing

Ion Thrusters Michael Fountain.

Hypervelocity Impact Measurements and Simulations

Richard Blott, Space Enterprise Partnerships Limited

Systems Engineering Management

Mathematical Problems in

System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure

Non-Invasive Characterization of the Hall Thruster Breathing Mode

Aerospace Systems Integration Engineering Panel

Presentation transcript:

AIAA Electric Propulsion Technical Committee Dr. Lyon (Brad) King (Committee Chair) Ron and Elaine Starr Professor of Space Systems Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI

Electric Propulsion – The Technology of The Future Electric Propulsion Ion Thrusters Hall-effect Thrusters Magnetoplasmadynamic Thruster Field-reversed Configuration Lorentz-force Accelerator Pulsed Plasma Thruster Resistojet Arcjet Helicon Microcavity Discharge Thruster VASIMR Pulsed Inductive Thruster Electrospray

Physics from

Electric Propulsion – The Technology of Today Deep Space 1 Comet Borrelly SMART 1 AEHF Hayabusa Asteroid Itokawa

Tipping Point (noun) The critical point in an evolving situation that leads to a new and irreversible development An addition or increment that, in itself, might not seem extraordinary but that unexpectedly is just the amount of additional change that will lead to a big effect

2008

2010

Tipping Point (noun) The critical point in an evolving situation that leads to a new and irreversible development An addition or increment that, in itself, might not seem extraordinary but that unexpectedly is just the amount of additional change that will lead to a big effect There are many Level-4 Electric Propulsion Technologies that are at a tipping point. Electric Propulsion as a whole is in the process of tipping. Small input will yield disproportionately large displacement.

TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL kW4.5 kW 7.2 kW 100 kW 200 kW Ion ThrustersHall ThrustersElectrospray Pulsed Inductive MPD VASIMR TRL VALLEY OF DEATH 50 kW 500 kW 1,000 kW 500 kW 1,000 kW 10 W 100 W1,000 kW < 100 W State-of-the Art in Electric Propulsion 2010

TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL kW 100 kW 200 kW Ion ThrustersHall ThrustersElectrospray Pulsed Inductive MPD VASIMR TRL VALLEY OF DEATH 50 kW 500 kW 1,000 kW 500 kW 1,000 kW 10 W 100 W1,000 kW < 100 W State-of-the Art in Electric Propulsion kW4.5 kW

The EP Roadmap: Scaling Straightforward (adj): admitting no doubt or misunderstanding; having only one meaning and leading to only one conclusion. Easy (adj): capable of being accomplished with ease; posing no difficulty vs.

Gaps Provide technology gaps that the roadmap did not cover Potential Gap: Ground testing and development In order to thrive EP technology programs must be active at prime contractors, small businesses, and multiple academic institutions At present high-power EP will be ‘choked’ at 1, 2, or 3 available ground facilities Some roadmap technologies will severely strain national xenon production capabilities, not to mention cost of raw material NASA must consider alternatives to all-xenon architectures – what are they and what are the trades?

Academia Industry Jet Propulsion Laboratory Glenn Research Center Marshall Spaceflight Center Government Current Membership of AIAA Electric Propulsion Technical Committee Air Force Research Laboratory