Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Continuing and Expanding Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools February, 2005 Dr. Susan Leddick.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
A NEW MODEL OF TIERED INTERVENTION REQUIRED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT AS OF JULY 1, PRESENTED BY JESS GRAYUM Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
Network for College Success The School of Social Service Administration at The University of Chicago A community of Chicago public high school leaders.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Managing Change Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
Examining Monitoring Data
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Research Teams within Grade Levels: Principles of Effective Vocabulary Instruction November 2012 Common Core Ambassadors.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Timberlane Regional School District
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
21 st Century Assessment Examples of Practice Clinic Session 9:45 – 11:15.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Rethinking Pre-College Math: A Brief Reminder about Why We’re Here and What We’re Trying to Do Overall context/purpose of project Defining characteristics.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Michigan Coalition of Essential Schools Welcome to the Critical Friends Groups November 1, 2013.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
Introduction to the Process of Formative Assessment.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Data Driven Instruction It’s not….. What did the Teacher Teach? It’s ………. What did the Student Learn? Prepared by Robin Hecht.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Chicago Public Schools
Presentation transcript:

Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014

Session Objectives Participants will:① Reflect on the benefits of shared leadership ② Understand the purpose, responsibilities, and tasks of an Instructional Leadership Team ③ Use a self-assessment tool to plan actionsteps

Connections to Our Current Work Aspen Implementation Guide: Indicator 1 -a leadership team that guides and monitors the improvement of instruction 3 of Noguera’s 5 Ingredients: 1) a coherent instructional guidance system 3) development of the professional capacity of faculty 5) leadership that drives change

Leading the Learning of Common Core

Read Article and Discuss “A Framework for Shared Leadership” by Linda Lambert Process: 1)Read the article independently (10 mins.) 1)Note your reflections using the Circle, Square, Triangle protocol as you read 1)Turn and Talk to share your responses (3 mins.) 1)Table Talk to share your reflections on shared leadership at your school (4 mins.)

The Team’s Purpose According to the Aspen Guide:  Formation of this team is the critical first step toward successful implementation of the CCSS  Exists to lead improvement efforts  Guide the school community in learning the Common Core Standards in order to eventually fully implement

The Team’s Responsibilities  Keep a steady focus on student achievement for all.  Know how students learn.  Know the grade level progressions deeply and understand the key shifts in teaching they require  Guide the school in identifying an instructional focus rooted in Common Core  The ILT (with input from colleagues) makes decisions about the school’s instructional program

The Team’s Tasks  Plan the school’s journey towards Common Core implementation  Meet regularly and frequently (at least twice a month) to plan professional development and other structures for collaboration  Guide the staff in data analysis including analysis of student work and periodic assessments results

IS OUR SCHOOL ON THE RIGHT TRACK? Teams will use the self-assessment to : 1.Take an honest look at where the school is in implementation 2.Use responses to guide actions 3.Be reminded of a core set of practices and processes that are critical to improving outcomes for students. 4.Support the work over multiple years

IS OUR SCHOOL ON THE RIGHT TRACK? The tool is NOT: For accountability or evaluation A compliance exercise Separate from your school’s ongoing improvement efforts

LET’S TRY IT OUT…. Self-Assessment for Indicator 1 1) With your school teammates, read and respond to the first 6 questions of the assessment (Indicator 1) 2) If you are here alone, partner with another lone principal 3) Use the Gap Analysis Handout to begin to plan action steps

Session Objectives Participants: ① Read an article and reflected on the benefits of shared leadership ① Understand the purpose and responsibilities and tasks of an Instructional Leadership Team ② Used the first 6 questions of the Aspen self- assessment tool to plan action steps