US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JSC CPARS Overview for Contractors
Advertisements

Electronic Research Administration The National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) Notification.
1 eAYSO: Referee Scheduling Presented by: Rand Potter eAYSO Commission.
CIM Student Employment - TimesheetX
EvalS Application User Guide version September 17, 2011.
Please be sure to call in:
Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) Overview
Federal Awardee Performance & Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Overview J. Lisa Romney Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy.
Naval Sea Logistics Center Welcome to ACASS/CCASS/CPARS Focal Point Training ACASS/CCASS/CPARS Focal Point Training.
BUILDING STRONG ® Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System Changes to Contractor Performance Evaluations 1 Ian Mitchell, PE, LEED AP BD+C Chief,
RFP PROCESSES Contracts for Professional Services.
June 24, When is End of Year? Two dates are important: September 1: This is when the rollover occurs. After this date, data in cannot.
ACASS BUILDING STRONG Rosemary Gilbertson
Office of Business Development Training
Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System
LMS Gap Analysis 6/15/2011 Department of Personnel.
Chapter 3 Automating Business Processes with Workflow.
Advance and the Electronic Packet Advance and the Electronic Packet April 5,
0 Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) Department of Defense Government Training.
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reporting Requirements Presented by: Darryl Grant Procurement Analyst Division of Acquisition Policy &
SERVICE MANAGER 9.2 CHANGE PRESENTATION JUNE 2011.
6 th Annual Focus Users’ Conference 6 th Annual Focus Users’ Conference Discipline Referrals Presented by: Christine Lee Presented by: Christine Lee.
TimeTrex Electronic Signature Process. Welcome to the new totally electronic TimeTrex System The purpose of this presentation is to explain how the electronic.
MyFloridaMarketPlace MyFloridaMarketPlace User Meeting April 13, 2004.
FQHC Look-Alike Registration for Implementation of Electronic Information Systems June 16, 2010 Twyla Adams, MHS, Branch Chief Anil Bommakanti, Consultant.
Don Mansfield Professor of Contract Management Defense Acquisition University.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Finding Opportunities in Northwestern Division (NWD) Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division.
CPARS Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System Suzanne Sierra Procurement Analyst, 210.M NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
How to Use Advance Reviewing Packets How to Use Advance Reviewing Packets 1.
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS ( Guidelines for using the PPDB in NAIS ) Carol Hill July 2004 (revised 9/12/07)
Welcome To INSPIR Training Please be sure Please be sure to sign- in to sign- in Please be sure you try to log – on to INSPIR before you leave Please be.
This session is sponsored by the Federal Acquisition Institute The primary organization providing knowledge and support to the federal civilian acquisition.
08/20/ Welcome to Overview.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration User Group Presentation – Release 2.15 (No meeting)
08/20/ Welcome to Quality and Narrative Writing.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mr. Daniel Carrasco Chief, Contracting Division USACE – LA District 13 OCT 2015.
08/20/ Welcome to Overview.
10/20/ Welcome to Overview for Grants.
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REVIEWS – CPARS, PPIRS, and FAPIIS
0 Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) Department of Defense Government Training Submitting a SSR – Commercial Plan.
0 Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) Department of Defense Government Training Submitting a SSR – Individual Plan.
April 23, 2008 Electronic Certified Payroll Sandia National Laboratories.
LEO: LSHTM Ethics Online Patricia Henley Quality & Governance Manager Research Governance & Integrity Office London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Donna M. Jenkins, Director National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Use Of Past Performance Information June 10, 2014 William P.
1 Overview of the NF 1680 Evaluation of Performance Process Overview/Training Charts April 7, 2008.
NEW GRANTS MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE (GME) Common Issues and Processes.
01/19/ Welcome to Reports Training.
CPARS & Quality Writing Training
1 Welcome to PPIRS-RC Overview Training Past Performance Information Retrieval System – Report Card.
04/17/ Welcome to Contractor Overview.
Closeout Project Update & Phase 1 Tech Launch April 28, 2016 ORS Quarterly Meeting Valerie Abbott RACI.
Federal Awardee Integrity Information System Jerry Gabig Huntsville Attorney (256) © Jerome Gabig 2012.
410th CSB 410 th COR Training CPARS Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System.
GSA Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer SIZE OF BUSINESS RE-REPRESENTATION.
Don’t Forget to Phone In! Pass Code: Past Performance Information Retrieval System – Statistical Reporting.
DLA AVIATION REVERSE AUCTION PROGRAM
Contractor Evaluations
PearsonAccess EOC Training
Administrivia Settings Controls Attendees Record
ICOTS Offender Violation Report:
Research Administrators Open Forum E-Verify Requirements in Federal Contracts SPA/Human Resources Harvard Medical School December 8, 2017.
Welcome to Overview.
Receiving Transmittals from Contractors
What’s New in Small Business
Contractor Performance Assessment Retrieval System
Focal Point Access Process
OFFICIAL MASS CANCELLATION
Focal Point & Agency POC Auto Register Function
Diversity management system (DMS)
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office June 2015

BUILDING STRONG ® Regional Contracting Office Julie Anderson – Regional Contracting Chief (RCC) Cheryl Anderson – Deputy RCC Mike Pearson – Procurement Analyst

BUILDING STRONG ® What is CPARS C - Contractor P - Performance A - Assessment R - Reporting S - System 3

BUILDING STRONG ® Why Evaluate Past Performance? -FAR (c)(3)(i) - past performance shall be evaluated in all source selections for negotiated competitive acquisitions expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. -Performance records on similar contract efforts provides insight into the probability the offeror will successfully perform under your contract 4

BUILDING STRONG ® Reporting Thresholds? -FAR Annually and when work is complete - Contract/Orders > SAT ($150,000) - Construction > $650,000 - Architect-Engineer > $30,000 - Terminations for Default 5

BUILDING STRONG ® Pre-Merge State  Contractor Performance Assessing Reporting System (CPARS) Module – Systems, Services, Operations Support, Information Technology Contracts  Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) Module – Architect-Engineer Contracts  Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) Module – Construction Contracts  Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Module 6

BUILDING STRONG ® Post-Merge State  Single CPARS Application to Evaluate All Types of Contracts ► Systems ► Non-Systems (Services, Operations Support, IT) ► Architect-Engineer ► Construction  Single Evaluation Form  Single Set of Evaluation Areas  Single Workflow Process  FAPIIS Module Remains Part of CPARS Application 7 MODULES

BUILDING STRONG ® Grading Scale 8 Rating Contract Requirements Problems Corrective Actions Exceptional Exceeds Many - Gov’t Benefit Few MinorHighly Effective Very Good Exceeds Some - Gov’t Benefit Some MinorEffective SatisfactoryMeets AllSome MinorSatisfactory Marginal Does Not Meet Some - Gov’t Impact Serious: Recovery Still Possible Marginally Effective; Not Fully Implemented Unsatisfactory Does Not Meet Most - Gov’t Impact Serious: Recovery Not Likely Ineffective No changes

BUILDING STRONG ® CPARS Roles 9 Focal Point/Alternate Focal Point (FP/AFP): Registers Contracts, Assigns Users, Provides Support Contractor Rep (CR): Provides Comments Assessing Official Rep (AOR): Assists Assessing Official in Preparing Evaluation Assessing Official (AO): Sends Evaluation to Contractor Rep; Reviews Contractor Comments Reviewing Official (RO): Resolves Disputes

BUILDING STRONG ® CPARS Timelines 10 Within 30 Days of Contract Award FP/AFP, AOR, or AO Registers Basic Contract Information Days After Contract Award Evaluation Appears on AOR/AO To Do List Days After Contract Award AOR/AO Enters Evaluation Ratings & Narratives – 485 Days After Contract Award AO Sends Evaluation to CR 4 4

BUILDING STRONG ® CPARS Timelines (Continued) 11 Days 1 – 14 After Eval Sent to CR CR May Send Comments If CR Sends Comments and AO/RO Closes, Eval Sent to PPIRS 5 5 Day 15 After Eval Sent to CR Eval Available in PPIRS: - With or Without CR Comments - Whether or Not It Has Been Closed by AO/RO Eval Available in PPIRS: - With or Without CR Comments - Whether or Not It Has Been Closed by AO/RO Note: Eval Marked as “Pending” if Not Closed 6 6

BUILDING STRONG ® CPARS Timelines (Continued) 12 Days 15 – 60 After Eval Sent to CR CR May Send Comments if None Previously Provided If CR Sends Comments, PPIRS Updated to Reflect CR Comments; “Pending” Marking Removed When AO/RO Closes Eval 7 7 Day 61 After Eval Sent to CR Eval Returned to AO; CR Locked Out of Eval & May No Longer Send Comments 8 8

BUILDING STRONG ® CPARS Timelines (Continued) 13 Day 61 After Eval Sent to CR – Day 120 After End of Period of Performance 9 9 AO Must Either: -Close Eval (Eval Updated in PPIRS) - Modify & Close Eval (Eval Updated in PPIRS) - Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”) - Modify & Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”) AO Must Either: -Close Eval (Eval Updated in PPIRS) - Modify & Close Eval (Eval Updated in PPIRS) - Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”) - Modify & Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”) Note: “Pending” Marking Removed When Eval Closed CR CONCURRED AO Must Either: - Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”) - Modify & Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”) AO Must Either: - Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”) - Modify & Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”) CR DID NOT CONCUR

BUILDING STRONG ® CPARS Timelines (Continued) 14 Prior to Day 121 After End of Period of Performance RO Provides Comments & Closes Eval; Eval Updated in PPIRS with “Pending” Marking Removed 10 The entire CPARS evaluation process must be completed within 120 days of the end of the period of performance!

BUILDING STRONG ® Notifications  to CR if has not Provided Comments on Evaluation within 14 Days ► Sent Daily  to CR if has not Provided Comments on Evaluation between 15 and 60 Days ► Sent Weekly  to AO if CR has not Provided Comments on Evaluation Within 61 Days ► Sent Weekly 15

BUILDING STRONG ® FAQs  What happens to the evaluation if the Contractor does not provide comments within the 60 calendar day timeframe?  The evaluation will no longer be available to the CR and will be available for the AO to close. An will be sent to the AO indicating that the evaluation is ready for closure. 16

BUILDING STRONG ® FAQs for Contractor Reps  Will I receive automatic notifications telling me when I have actions due in CPARS?  Yes. An will be sent to the CR when the AO sends the evaluation to you for comment, and will be sent daily for the first 14 calendar days after indicating action is due. An notification to the CR will be sent weekly 15 calendar days after the AO submitted the evaluation indicating that Contractor comments are overdue. The weekly overdue reminder will continue until 60 calendar days after the AO’s evaluation signature date. 17

BUILDING STRONG ® How to Reach Us  Julie Anderson ► Regional Contracting Chief ► ►  Cheryl Anderson ► Deputy Regional Contracting Chief ► ►  Mike Pearson ► Procurement Analyst ► ►

BUILDING STRONG ® Additional Resources  CPARS Training  CPARS User Manual 19

BUILDING STRONG ® Questions? 20