Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 WP29: Speed Variation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
Advertisements

Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 8, 2012 SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Operations.
SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Benefits Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA
Federal Aviation Administration Performance Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS) Data Link Operational Authorization Process Date:13-14 May 2013.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues 30 Nautical Mile (NM) Lateral / Longitudinal Distance-based.
SC227 – SC214 ISRA – Datalink Interface. PBN Manual, Part A, Chapter On-board performance monitoring and alerting On-board performance.
IP-20 Review of the Effectiveness of Branching UPRs from PACOTS Track 2 Electronic Navigation Research Institute The IPACG meeting 40, Sep. 2014, Washington.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group (CFCG) Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 – 06 February.
FAA Presentation to CAR/SAM ATN/GNSS Seminar, Varadero, Cuba, May 2002 ATM DATA LINK APPLICATIONS M J A Asbury ATSDL_001_4 01 Presentation ATN 2.3.
Part 4. ATC clearances and instructions
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 WP02: Timing Errors in Oakland OCA.
Instrument Ground Training Module 4 & 5
Protection Values for VOR-Defined ATS Routes
Analysis of ATC Communication messages Relevant to Altitude Change Requests Electronic Navigation Research Institute IPACG/39, 5-6 February 2014, Fukuoka,
Standard Terminal Arrival Routes STARs
DARP.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP09: LOST FUEL SAVINGS DUE TO LACK OF.
JCAB and FAA Joint Paper IP/12 UPR and PACOTS Update.
Presented to: Teterboro User Group By: Vincent Gerry Date: 18 January 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Operations in the New York Center CTA/FIR.
Normal and Emergency Communication Procedures
ICAO SARPS and Guidance Material
ATS Route and Waypoint Implementation:
Federal Aviation Administration Deepwater Horizon NOTAM Overview Air Traffic Organization System Operations Security Date: July 25, 2010.
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
Cirrus Transition Course
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Presented by Jim Gardner, AFS-200 Proposed Amendment To Annex 6, Part I International Commercial Transport – Aeroplanes.
Presented to: Instructors and Pilot Examiners By: The FAASTeam Date: July 1 to September 30, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from
Rob Eagles Director ASIA PACIFIC Safety, Operations & Infrastructure.
“Yes, but is there any air in space?”
CPDLC / ADS Operations 4/22/2017 2:35 PM
Property of Lear Siegler
Data Link Communications
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Minimum Safe Altitude Warning November 19, 2008 Glenn W. Michael Air Traffic Manager, Boston ARTCC.
Structural Design Considerations and Airspeeds
By: FAASTeam Federal Aviation Administration Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO)
IFR Lost Communications I Can’t Hear You Procedures.
SVDM ConOps 18 May 2010 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Space Vehicle Debris Threat Management ConOps Presentation to COMSTAC Space Transportation.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2011 Boeing. All rights reserved. OMWG and All Working Groups DCIT-39 report out 11 March.
Air Traffic Management Chapter 5 – Flight Plan By Captain Ab Manan Mansor.
CY Segment 1 Phase 1 Tower Services Initial En Route Services Departure Clearances (DCL) Transfer of Communications Initial Check-In.
Federal Aviation Administration APEC Seminar on Practical Measures to Manage Aviation Emissions Collaboration on Aviation Emissions Reduction Partnerships.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CFCG ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group IPACG/40 Keith Dutch, AJV September.
USE OF INTENT INFORMATION IN AIRCRAFT CONFORMANCE MONITORING
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP06: ADS-B In-trail- Procedure (ITP)
1 Air Tour Operating Authority (ATOA) Reporting System What It Is:  A web based system that enables its users to report, track, and manage air tour operating.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2014 IP8: Lost Fuel Savings due to lack of RNP4/FANS Equipage.
REGULATIONS FOR ARMY AIRCRAFT CW2 ROBERT GOEBEL. Administrative Please turn off all: –Cell phones –Beepers –Palm Pilots –Gameboys –Stereos –Watch alarms.
99-11 UH-60 IPC IFR PUBLICATIONS & REGULATIONS WOPA.
Page 1 July 28, 2003 Richmond Facility ATN 2003 IEE London Raytheon Integrated Data Link–RIDL
Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety For Corporate Pilot’s Corporate Seminar August 8, 2009 Back to Basics For Runway Safety.
1 International Flight Operations Efficiency Enhancements: Oceanic Navigation and the North Atlantic Track System (NATS) Presented by Frank Ketcham.
Vertical, lateral separations based on time / distance
ATS Route and Waypoint Implementation:
Performance Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)
AIR TRAFFIC ONTROL.
Допълнение 7 на PANS-ATM (ICAO Doc 4444)
CLARIFICATIONS FROM ICAO - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop
VARIOUS KINDS OF SEPARATION
longitudinal separations based on time / distance
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
SEPARATION Module 1, Topic 1.
Oceanic and International Operations
Sdgsdg.
Oceanic and International Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
DOES THE ATC HAVE A ROLE IN THE WILDLIFE STRIKE PREVENTION ?
Presentation transcript:

Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 WP29: Speed Variation

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Mach Speed Variation The FAA has presented papers at IPACG and ISPACG which outline the dangers of unannounced speed changes. This issue needs attention by ICAO and a Global or Regional Procedure developed. The ISPACG Working Group has been working on this issue to try and develop a unified regional procedure. 2

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 ICAO Annex change Inadvertent changes. In the event that a controlled flight inadvertently deviates from its current flight plan, the following action shall be taken: a) Deviation from track: if the aircraft is off track, action shall be taken forthwith to adjust the heading of the aircraft to regain track as soon as practicable. b) Variation in true airspeed: if the average true airspeed at cruising level between reporting points varies or is expected to vary by plus or minus 5 per cent of the true airspeed, from that given in the flight plan, the appropriate air traffic services unit shall be so informed. c) Change in time estimate: if the time estimate for the next applicable reporting point, flight information region boundary or destination aerodrome, whichever comes first, is found to be in error in excess of 2 minutes from that notified to air traffic services, or such other period of time as is prescribed by the appropriate ATS authority or on the basis of air navigation regional agreements, a revised estimated time shall be notified as soon as possible to the appropriate air traffic services unit Additionally, when an ADS agreement is in place, the air traffic services unit shall be informed automatically via data link whenever changes occur beyond the threshold values stipulated by the ADS event contract. 3

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Mach Speed Variation Annex 2 change fails to fully address the issue. An en route aircraft at 500 knots only has to inform ATC when its true airspeed changes by 25 knots or more from the speed given in the flight plan. This allows for speed changes of 48 knots without informing ATC. 4

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Mach Speed Variation 5

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Flight Planned Speed Changes (FPL-XXXX-IS -B744/H-SDE3FGHIJ3J5M1RWXY/LB2D1 -RJAA1025 -M073F290 DCT CUPID Y808 ALLEN/M072F290 Y812 SCORE OTR11 LEPKI DCT 37N160E/M071F290 DCT 35N170E/M084F390 DCT 32N180E DCT 27N170W DCT CANON V15 LILIA/M083F390 DCT KLANI KLANI2 -PHNL0633 PHJR -PBN/A1L1B1C1D1O1S2 DOF/ REG/XXXXX EET/KZAK0227 PHZH0542 SEL/FGJP CODE/XXXX RVR/75 OPR/XXX PER/D RALT/RJCK PMDY RMK/TCAS) 6

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Mach Speed Variation In the Pacific, FIRs are applying 30nm longitudinal separation standard using an ADS-C reporting rate of 10 minutes. A 48 knot speed change by one aircraft could result in an 8nm closure between two aircraft between ADS-C reports. 7 30nm

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Australia AIP Amendment AIP ENR 1.1 para 21: A pilot must inform ATS if the average cruising speed, either TAS or Mach whichever is applicable, between reporting points, varies or is expected to vary, by a value equal to or greater than: a. 5% TAS b Mach from that given in the flight plan. 8

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Speed Change NOTAM Proposal IN ORDER TO PREVENT UNANNOUNCED SPEED CHANGES AIRCREWS ARE REQUIRED TO USE THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES IN THE KZAK FIR. UPON CROSSING THE KZAK FIR BOUNDARY AIRCRAFT ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT THEIR SPEED IN THE FIR POSITION REPORT VIA CPDLC OR HF VOICE. TURBOJET AIRCRAFT ARE TO REPORT THEIR MACH NUMBER AND NON-TURBOJET AIRCRAFT ARE TO REPORT A TRUE AIRSPEED. A PILOT MUST INFORM ATS EACH TIME THE CRUISING SPEED, EITHER TAS OR MACH WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE VARIES OR IS EXPECTED TO VARY BY A VALUE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN: A. 10 KNOTS TAS FROM THE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED SPEED - Non-Turbojet B MACH FROM THE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED SPEED - Turbojet. 9

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Speed Change Proposal Procedurally when an aircraft wanted to change by.02 Mach number, they could downlink DM18 with the requested speed (Mach number). If ATC required a speed assignment for separation, an appropriate speed assignment would be assigned ie UM106 MAINTAIN Speed. If ATC did not require a speed assignment, the following could be Uplinked: UM ROGER? UM169 Speed change to M0.84 approved This advises the aircraft that the requested speed change is approved but no speed restriction has been assigned. 10

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 ATMC Speed Change Proposal IN ORDER TO PREVENT UNANNOUNCED SPEED CHANGES AIRCREWS ARE REQUIRED TO USE THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES IN THE RJJJ FIR. AIRCRAFT SHOULD REPORT THEIR PRESENT MACH NUMBER WHEN DIFFERS 0.02 MACH NUMBER OR MORE FROM THE FLIGHT PLANNED SPEED. 11

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Mach Speed Variation Aircrews predominantly do not monitor their flown speed versus the flight planned speed. It does not matter whether an ATC system uses the first speed in field 15 of the FPL or accounts for the speed changes imbedded in the route of flight. 12

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Flight Planned Speed Changes (FPL-XXXX-IS -B753/M-SDE2E3FGHIRWXYZ/S -KSEA0035 -N0396F300 HAROB4 HQM C1418 SEDAR A331 ZINNO/N0463F340 A331 ZIGIE MAGGI3 -PHNL0541 -PBN/A1B1C1D1O1S1T1 NAV/RNVD1E2A1 REG/XXXXX EET/KZAK0039 SEL/XXXX RMK/TCAS AGCS EQUIPPED NRP USA) 13

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Flight Planned Speed Changes ANA1078 IS B788 SADE2FGHIJ2J4J5J6M1M2RWXYZ LB1D1SH RJAAKSEAP270270N0446JA806A TR 1 N0446F270 CUPID Y808 ONION OTR5 KALNA/M069F270 DCT 44N160E/M084F390 47N170E 49N180E/M085F410 50N170W 51N160W 52N150W 51N140W DCT ORNAI/N0488F410 DCT SIMLU DCT KEPKO DCT TOU MARNR3 14

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Mach Speed Variation By requiring a speed report upon entering the FIR/CTA, a pilot is made aware of their speed and the need to notify ATC if the speed will change by.02 Mach or more. The speed report also allows ATC to check the speed the ATC system is using to calculate separation for the aircraft. 15

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 Mach Speed Variation The ODP system does not highlight the reported TAS nor Mach Number when the position report is processed at the FIR boundary nor at any other waypoints, regardless of HF report, CPDLC, ADS. The ODP system does not inform ATMC controllers of the differences between the reported speed and the flight planned speed. When aircraft report present Mach Number and the ODP system and FPL indicates its flight planned TAS, ATMC Controllers have to convert and compare its differences manually. Even if ATMC could find the reported Mach Number, they could not compare the differences between TAS and MACH. ATMC would have no other choice but to input the aircraft’s reported speed into ODP without exception. And if ATMC needed to keep Mach Number Assignment, we have to add Mach Number with every climb clearance. 16

Federal Aviation Administration IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015