RESIDENTIAL UTILITY CONSUMER OFFICE (RUCO) PAT QUINN DIRECTOR 602 364-4838

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulation of Rates for Water Utilities Oregon Public Utility Commission.
Advertisements

1 Reassessment City of Olean Public Information June, 2007 John Brearley, JDBrearley Consultants Joseph Emminger, Emminger, Hyatt, Newton & Pigeon Nancy.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Monday, August 20,
Monterey Wastewater Rate Application
EIM DISALLOWANCE CASE: PROGRESS IN THE SOUTHWEST Aka: Continued Assault.
Supporting CLIFF Users Presentation for EAs January 2013.
Efficiencies West Hills Community College District November, 2004.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Accounting Cycle Reporting Financial Results Chapter 5.
SCWCEA One Day Seminar May 6, 2011 Commission Update Gary M. Cannon Amanda Underhill Executive Director Applications Analyst.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
1 Investing in your water … investing in your future California American Water General Rate & Conservation Case Applications.
Drafting Rate Case Orders Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
File & Suspend Rate Cases Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
1 THE RATE CASE PROCESS A Blend of Science and Superstition Presentation to the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Board By Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota.
Distributing Dividends and Preparing a Worksheet for a Merchandising Business.
Cuff Account Dashboard
Overview of 2011 proposed budget.  Defunded Five Positions  Maintained Service Levels  Continued Infrastructure Improvements  Cut spending early to.
Monterey Rate Application Satellite Systems May 13, 2008.
Determining and Setting Public Utility Rates Bill Wilks, Senior Project Manager November 19, 2014 AGFOA Fall Conference.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 CCS Exhibit 1.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
2014 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 25, 2015.
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 5-1 THE ACCOUNTING CYCLE: REPORTING FINANCIAL RESULTS Chapter 5.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) UPDATE ON PROPOSED SMUD ANNEXATION Presented to Yolo LAFCo September 19, 2005.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project April 23, 2012.
NextGen Budgeting Presented by: Julie Carroll Local Government Corporation Resource 2015.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK MARCH 24, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING THE PASADENA.
1 Westar Energy’s 2013 Annual Transmission Revenue Requirement Meeting October 30, 2012.
Overview of a Water Action Plan: California Public Utilities Commission Paul G. Townsley, President Arizona American Water January 18, 2011.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 5-1 The Accounting Cycle Reporting Financial Results Chapter 5.
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 5-1 Chapter Five: The Accounting Cycle: Reporting Financial.
© McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Chapter 6 Reporting and Interpreting Sales Revenue, Receivables, and Cash.
Equipment Management Series (To perform rental of equipment and fixed asset management)
NARUC SUMMER COMMITTEE MEETINGS Committee on Water Agenda California Regulatory Initiatives Case History – California American Water B. Kent Turner – President.
GEtServices Purchasing Units & Materials Training For Suppliers Request.
SC Workers’ Compensation Commission SC Workers’ Compensation Educational Association Medical Seminar Commission Update March 1, 2011.
Steps for posting a training (single event or series) to the regional calendar R&C Regional Calendar.
CPUC Public Agenda 3261 Thursday, September 23, 2010, 10:00 a.m. 505 Van Ness Ave, San Francisco Commissioners: Michael R. Peevey Dian M. Grueneich John.
PALERANG COUNCIL Proposed Special Rate Variation 2016/ /21 Public Exhibition : Draft Long Term Financial Plan and Draft Delivery Program (as amended)
Arizona Water Issues Arizona Water Issues Setting Rates for Regulated Water Utilities Nancy Scott Utilities Division ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION June.
Staff Assistance In Alternate Rate Setting Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting January 11, 2016 Item #12.
PROCEDURE FOR CONSOLIDATION A Discussion STATE BOUNDARY COMMISSION Office of Land Survey & Remonumentation Bureau of Construction Codes Department of Licensing.
1 Westar Energy’s 2012 Annual Transmission Revenue Requirement Meeting October 25, 2011.
Alternative Rate Structure Paul Smith Vice President, Rates Duke Energy Ohio June 20, 2006.
Sewer Rate Evaluation Wareham, Massachusetts January 14, 2014 Michael J. Schrader, P.E.
DECEMBER 2013 ASYLUM ACCESS Budget vs. Actual Briefing.
HORSE CREEK WATER SERVICES INC GENERAL RATE APPLICATION.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
2013 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 13, 2014.
NextGen Budgeting Resource 2016 Local Government Corporation.
Finance Department Environmental Services City of Superior Superior Water Light & Power Wastewater Billing.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Partnership between: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO (PUCO)
Rochester Public Utilities Presentation on Formula Development of Transmission Revenue Requirements for 2016 October 23, 2015.
Finance Department Environmental Services
2016 Annual True-Up Meeting for South Central MCN LLC
Springfield Utility Board Proposed 5.0%
The Accounting Cycle: Reporting Financial Results
May 2018 Proposed Electric Rate Increase - First Public Hearing
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
TRWA/TWCA Water Law Seminar Waves of Change January 11–12, 2017
RPPP Policy and Procedures Update
Fulfillment Channel Services
Monterey Wastewater Rate Application
The Accounting Cycle Reporting Financial Results
OKLAHOMA INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS (OIEC)
Presentation transcript:

RESIDENTIAL UTILITY CONSUMER OFFICE (RUCO) PAT QUINN DIRECTOR

Water/Wastewater What You Need to Know September 17, 2014 Agenda 1. EPCOR Agua Fria Wastewater Consolidation Docket No. SW-01303A EPCOR’s Pending Sun City Rate Case Docket No. WS-01303A Arizona Corporation Commission’s Docket on Changing the Way APS Files Rate Cases

AGUA FRIA WASTEWATER CONSOLIDATION EPCOR CASE Cost of Service -Rate Base X Return + Expenses -Cost of service varies by community -Consolidation does not use cost of service by community but by total company costs RUCO Position -Represents all residential customers -Any change in rates requires full cost of service rate case -Stale test years -Commission and Company want to open up the rate cases from 2008, 2010 and a just filed Cost savings of consolidation -Current revenue requirement considering all factors and parties -Current rate design

EPCOR – CONSOLIDATED WASTEWATER RATE PROPOSAL CURRENT RATES RECOMMENDED SYSTEM TOTAL Note (3) RATEINC (DEC) PERCENT Agua Fria Note (1) $ $ ($ 87.61) ( %) Anthem Note (2) $ $ ($ 21.95) ( %) Mohave WWater $ $ ($ 48.49) ( %) Sun City $ $ $ % Sun City West $ $ $ % Note: (1) Agua Fria and Anthem – Current rates reflect rates scheduled to go into effect on January 1, Note: (2) Mohave Wastewater -- Current rates reflect pending increase in rates as filed in Docket No. WS-01303A Note: (3) All rates based on average usage of 7,000 gallons per month

AGUA FRIA CONSOLIDATED What can you do? -Contact the Corporation Commissioners -Let them know your position through s, calls or voic s, letters, petitions Timeline -It appears the commission wants to hear this quickly, before end of the year -Cost of service rate case would take minimum of a year -It was on the open meeting for September 9th but was pulled -It will probably show up in some form on the October open meeting

EPCOR 2014 RATE CASE FILING Recent Commission decision in EPCOR's Chaparral rate case (Fountain Hills) -Majority of Commissioners sided with the company on rate of return and depreciation. -against recommendations of the ALJ, Staff and RUCO -two adjustments alone increased the rates over 26% -Approved a System Improvement Benefit (SIB) ◦-doubles rates over the next 5 years -Approved several other increases tank maintenance and declining usage -All this added up to a 43% increase for the residential customer, Order approved by Commission says a 20.3 % -Fountain Hills reviewing options

BUT IT’S GOING TO GET WORSE CURRENT INITIAL SIB INCREASE INCREASE ADJUSTED YEAR RATE PER MONTH PERCENTAGE RATES 2014 $ $ $ $ $ %$ $ $ %$ $ $ %$ $ $ %$ $ $ %$ The Order as approved by the Commission states that the rate increase on the average residential ratepayer is $7.68 per month or 20.3%. In reality, the rates increase each year and at the end of year five the rate has increased to $54.11, a percentage increase of 43.0%.

WE’RE NOT FINISHED YET COMMISSIONERS APPROVAL vs. ALJ Additional Depreciation Expense through the use of the Group Depreciation Method as opposed to the modified Vintage method, and the continuation of over- depreciating Utility Plant Assets. Changing the Rate of Return on Rate Base from 8.06 percent to 8.95 percent. ADDITIONAL APPROVALS Declining Usage$ 22,174 Tank Maintenance Expense (18years)$ 202,184 Additional Post Test Year Plant over what RUCO recommended $ 2,278,882 System Improvement Benefit $ 1,502,514

EPCOR 2014 SUN CITY RATE CASE What is in the Sun City rate case -Filing includes all the issues that were approved in Chaparral case ◦-Tank maintenance, declining usage, SIB, depreciation, post test year plant -Adds new issues: Obama Care (insurance cost increases) -Actual rate increase over next 5 years is double because of SIB ◦- $3.82 vs $ % vs 44% -All numbers come from the EPCOR filing

REVENUE PROPOSED BY EPCOR Current Revenues $ 10,265,553 Total Revenues Requested (this filing) $ 11,912,007 Company Increase Requested $ 1,646,454 Percent Increase - Overall % Percent Increase – Residential (Note 1) % SIB Revenue Increases (over 5 years) $ 1,233,692 Percent Increase - Overall With SIB % Percent Increase - Residential With SIB % (Note 1 – 5/8’ X ¾” and ¾” = 90% of residential ratepayers)

SIB RATE INCREASE TO RESIDENTIAL RATEPAYERS INITIAL SIB CURRENT INCREASE ADJUSTED YEAR RATE PER MONTH RATES 2014 $ $ 3.82 $ $ $.79 $ $ $.76 $ $ $.84 $ $ $.70 $ $ $.72$ Overall increase from current rates 44.03%

EPCOR 2014 SUN CITY RATE CASE Current Status -Original schedule ◦-Filed case found sufficient 4/4/14, interveners' testimony due 10/3, hearing 12/2 -Schedule suspended 9/12 -Staff and RUCO been working with company since April -Company can't defend the accuracy of their beginning numbers -Numbers constantly changing -Not ready to file case -They will have to file new accurate data and schedules -Numbers we have shown you today will change but we don't know degree or direction -Schedule is now on a month to month process where the company, staff and RUCO meet with ALJ to discuss where we are and how to proceed -Watch docket and we will try to keep you advised

APS REQUEST TO CHANGE RATE CASE PROCESS Requested change -Normally in a rate case the revenue requirement and the rate design are looked at simultaneously -APS wants to bifurcate the rate design from the revenue requirement determination -Based on discussion at the September 9th open meeting it appears that the majority of the Commissioners support this idea -There was no written document describing this new process -Everyone at the meeting besides the Commission, the Staff and APS spoke against the proposal -The Commission didn't vote on the item but instead directed the Staff to draft a proposal -All parties will get a chance to make comments on the proposal -We will keep you informed to the schedule since this could move pretty fast