LHC Beam Dumping system

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K. Potter RADWG & RADMON Workshop 1 Dec WELCOME TO THE 4th RADWG & RADMON WORKSHOP 1 December 2004.
Advertisements

Plot Approval Yat Long Chan (CUHK) Igor Mandic (Ljubljana) Charlie Young (SLAC)
LHC UPS Systems and Configurations: Changes during the LS1 V. Chareyre / EN-EL LHC Beam Operation Committee 11 February 2014 EDMS No /02/2014.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
1 MKBH Erratic Jan Uythoven On behalf of the ABT team (Viliam, Nicolas M., Etienne, Laurent, Francesco etc…..) MPP meeting 8/5/2015.
FHCT SEB cross-section measurements at H4IRRAD and with cosmic rays and its influence to LHC abort system reliability Viliam Senaj RadWG meeting 04/10/2011.
B.Goddard 08/11/04 HHH 2004 Workshop, CERN Beam Dump Brennan GODDARD CERN AB/BT The existing LHC beam dump is described, together with the relevant design.
Radiation Environment at AWAKE Silvia Cipiccia, Eduard Feldbaumer, Helmut Vincke.
R2E Weekly Report status AT/MB/MC – 4 th R2E Project Meeting – 7 th April 2011.
MKD stack upgrade MKD generator meeting Viliam Senaj 23/06/2015.
J. MEKKI (1/14) 05/12/12 – RadWG meeting Summary of the radiation levels of the equipments at CNRAD RF MosFETs Cryogenics TE/EPC LED warning system BPM.
Studies of radiation hardness of ECAL modules 1Yu. Guz 2013/05/28.
LBDS commissioning – MKD tests Viliam Senaj, 11/12/2013.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Proposed LHC beam dumping kicker generator modifications for LS2 TE-TM Meeting Viliam Senaj 07/07/2015.
LHC Beam Dumping System Status and Readiness for LHC Run II Evian Workshop 2-4 June 2014 Nicolas Magnin – TE/ABT/EC On behalf of TE/ABT team. Thanks to.
LIBD on LBDSmeeting Viliam Senaj 04/02/2014. MKB test MKB vacuum level satisfactory for beginning of HV test: – B1: between 3.1x10 -7 and 5.7x10 -7 (new.
1 LBDS Testing Before Operation Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Based on the work of many people in the KSL, EC and TL sections.
LBDS overview on system analysis and design upgrades during LS1 Roberto Filippini, Etienne Carlier, Nicolas Magnin, Jan Uythoven CERN Workshop Machine.
REQUIREMENTS FOR FCC DILUTION KICKERS AND BEAM DUMP LINE GEOMETRY F. Burkart, W. Bartmann, M. Fraser, B. Goddard, T. Kramer FCC dump meeting 18 th June.
LBDS KICKERS MPP workshop - Annecy Nicolas Magnin TE-ABT-EC.
Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 LBDS Environmental Aspects EMC, radiation, UPS… Etienne CARLIER AB/BT/EC.
Pawel Krakowski TE-VSC-ICM LHC R2E for vacuum control systems Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department Automation Forum-electronics session,
Kicker generator and controls installation in ECA5? Etienne CARLIER
1 Beam Dumping System MPP review 12/06/2015 Jan Uythoven for the ABT team.
MKD Reliability run Viliam Senaj TCM meeting 18/11/2014.
MKD dust related actions Viliam Senaj Technical Coordination Meeting 27/01/2015.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
1 Yu. Guz HCAL status 22/06/ Yu. Guz HCAL 137 Cs calibration The 3 rd run in 2011 was performed at the technical stop, May-09. Two source passages,
CERN IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t HP ProCurve 2910 Ethernet switch in CNRAD April-June 2012 RadWG Meeting Gyorgy.
LMC 27 November 2013 Status of LBDS LS1 activities and plans for 2014 reliability run Jan Uythoven for the many, many people working on the mentioned equipment.
LHC Beam Dumping System Experience from reliability run and Re-commissioning procedures MPP Nicolas Magnin – TE/ABT/EC.
1 ABTEF - 16/05/2014 Maintenance of safety-critical systems : LBDS - MKD / MKB on LHC.
CERN Converter Control Electronics Setting the Scene
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
R2E Availability October 15 th 2014 Experience from Past LHC and Injector Operation and scaling to the future G. Spiezia.
SBDS – MKDV/H: The new MKDV Generator and additional Magnet for BA5 installation V. Senaj, L. Ducimetière November 20 th 2015.
LHC beam dump, injection system and other kickers B.Goddard, with input from L.Ducimetière, W.Bartmann, V.Mertens, J.Borburgh, M.Barnes, C.Bracco, V.Senaj,
AWAKE: D2E for Alexey beam properties Silvia Cipiccia, Eduard Feldbaumer, Helmut Vincke DGS/RP.
FHCT SEB cross-section measurements at H4IRRAD and consequences for MKD reliability Viliam Senaj LIBD meeting 24/01/2012.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
1 Single event upset test of the voltage limiter for the ATLAS Semiconductor tracker TSL Experiment Number: F151 distance between power supplies and modules.
EXPERIMENTAL AREAS CONSOLIDATION EACONS part – early draft from comments.
R2E/Availability Workshop Report - RadWG October 22 nd 2014 R2E/Availability Workshop 2014 October th 2014 R2E/Availability Workshop RadWG - Brief.
LBDS YETS activity report Viliam Senaj MKD meeting, 19/01/2016.
MKDV upgrade LIU-SPS ABT meeting V. Senaj, L. Ducimetiere, P. Faure November 4 th 2014.
Leakage current test & switched HV stress test of ALICE TRD / TPC capacitors TRD status meeting,
R2E-MD preliminary report – 3rd/4th July th July LSWG meeting
CONS and HL-LHC day Analysis of needs from TE-EPC
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Dependability Requirements of the LBDS and their Design Implications
The High Voltage problem
Fast retrigger path What threshold level we need for the fast trigger path?
Proposition of MKD & MKBH modification with the goal to reduce maximum voltage (and risk of erratic) Viliam Senaj, 05/05/2017.
LHC beam dump 7.56 TeV operation
Fast High Current Thyristor SEB test
LHC Beam Dumping System Reliability Run Summary
MKD/MKB Review Meeting Scope and Definition
R2E – Experience and Outlook for LS1
LHC Risk Review: Kicker Magnet Reliability
Overview of LBDS related tasks
TI8/WIC Incident & UJ87/UA87 Radiation Levels & Analysis
FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam
Review of the MQW and MBW lifetime taking into account results from the reading of the dosimeters collecting data in the 2016 RUN Dosimeter (installation,
FCC Kicker Systems M.J. Barnes, T. Kramer CERN TE-ABT
Attempt to non-destructive SEB testing of 1.2 kV SiC MOS
Collimator Control (SEUs & R2E Outlook)
BLM internal review M.Hodgson
Status of the retriggering boxes and measurements
Presentation transcript:

LHC Beam Dumping system R2E/Availability workshop Viliam Senaj 15/10/2014

LHC beam dumping system 15 deflection generators (MKD) and 10 dilution generators (MKB) per beam Altogether 800 HV GTO like Thyristors (GTO) and 480 HV triggering IGBTs Main concern – Single Event Burnout (SEB) of HV semiconductor switches due to High Energy Hadron (HEH) flux leaking from tunnel to the gallery through cable ducts SEB on MKD HV semiconductors = asynchronous beam dump (AD) and beam losses with risk of damage to downstream instruments and machine down-time (reparation) SEB on MKB = synchronous beam dump (SD) = machine down time

MKB generators: 10 per beam

MKD generators: 15 per beam

Stack of 10 GTO-like thyristors ABB - 5STH20H4502 DYNEX - DG648BH45-185 Similar specifications for both: Umax: 4.5 kV Udc: 2.8 kV (100 FIT) Imax: 80 kA dI/dt: 20 kA/µs Load integral ~ 106 A2s wafer diameter ~ 60 mm

Run1 and actions taken during LS1: extraction generators - MKD Run1: E < 4 TeV = reduced voltage on HV switches; no SEB observed LHC safety request: < 1 AD/y Internal request < 0.2 AD/y due to SEB on GTO SEB = destruction of GTO/IGBT = need to replace it: intervention + re-testing procedure = 6 – 12 h of machine down time Measurement of SEB cross-section (c-s) of 2 GTO families used (Dynex & ABB) and of triggering IGBT done in H4IRRAD showed significant difference in GTO SEB c-s at nominal voltage (2.9 kV per GTO at 7 TeV): ABB SEBc-s: ~ 8e-9 cm2 Dynex SEBc-s: ~ 5e-7 cm2 – factor of 60 higher! IXDN75N120 (triggering IGBT @ 1 kV) SEBc-s: ~ 1e-7 cm2 Replacement of 300 GTO make Dynex by ABB ones in MKD generators: Total of 600 GTO in MKD generators; SEB = AD Replacement of 360 triggering HV IGBT 1.2 kV rated by 1.7 kV ones and increase of triggering voltage to 1.17 kV per IGBT; SEB = AD

Run1 and actions taken during LS1: extraction generators - MKD Simplified estimation that HEH flux exists only at full beam energy (full GTO voltage) Request of 0.2 SEB/y on GTO leads to HEH fluence target value of ~ 5e4 HEH/cm2.y ~ 1/4 of cosmic rays at sea level SEB rate of HV IGBT at 5e4 HEH/cm2.y ~ 0.1 SEB/y Total of 0.3 SEB/y (AD) Simulations predict maximum fluence in UA area in front of cable duct of up to 1e6 HEH/cm2.y Shielding of the most exposed duct (the one close to TCDQ) during Run1 confirmed shielding factor of ~ 10 HEH flux during Run1 is estimated to < 1e5 HEH/cm2.y (measurement with insufficient accuracy) Filling of the remaining 2 big cable ducts will be completed in LS1 (UA side) In case of need – shielding can be added from RA (tunnel) side as well

Run1 and actions taken during LS1: dilution generators - MKB Run1: E < 4 TeV = reduced voltage on HV switches; no SEB observed. Replacement of 120 triggering HV IGBT 1.2 kV rated by 1.7 kV ones (SEB = SD) GTO exposed to max voltage of 2.9 kV only in MKBH generators = 80 GTO; (SEB = SD) GTO in MKBV (120 x) operates at voltage up to 1.6 kV only; SEB probability can be neglected MKBH and MKBV generators remains with Dynex GTO Filling of 3 big cable ducts will be completed in LS1 (UA side only)

R2E related failure rate estimation 6.5 TeV 7 TeV (without LS1 modifications) 2.7 kV/GTO (MKD + MKBH); 1.5 kV/GTO (MKBV) 2.9 kV/GTO (MKD + MKBH); 1.6 kV/GTO (MKBV) ABB SEBc-s [cm2] 2e-10 8e-9 Dynex SEBc-s [cm2] 7e-8 5e-7 IXGN100N170 SEBc-s [cm2] 5e-9 1e-7 IXDN75N120 HEH fluence estimation [HEH.cm-2.y] 5e4 4e5 Failure probability MKD (GTO) [y-1] 6e-3 0.2 61 (60 due to Dynex GTO) MKD (IGBT) [y-1] 9e-2 15 MKBH (GTO) [y-1] 0.3 2 16 MKB (IGBT) [y-1] 3e-2 5 Total AD (MKD GTO + IGBT) [y-1] 0.1 76 Total SD (MKB GTO + IGBT) [y-1] 0.35 2.2 21

Prevision of actions for Run3 and HL LHC MKD: based on more precise measurements of radiation in UA63/67 during Run2: Shielding of cable ducts from RA side Population of the most exposed positions in front of ducts by the generators with the old production of GTO (GV.xxx series ~ order of magnitude less sensitive to HEH; ~ 6 generators still have them) Installing of new trigger transformers (under development) to ensure improved triggering conditions with reduced voltage on triggering IGBTs MKB: Replacement of Dynex GTO by ABB ones Shielding of ducts from RA side IGBT SEB rate can be reduced by a factor of 5 by reducing the trigger supply voltage from 3.5 kV to 3.4 kV

Cumulative effects on LBDS Dose observed in UA63/67 during Run1 < 0.5mGy/y HV semiconductors: GTO/IGBT tested at H4IRAD with dose up to 10 Gy and cumulated HEH fluencies up to 1e10 HEH/cm2 showed only slight increase of leakage current Further tests of the influence of irradiation to switching properties of GTO/IGBTs to be done Control electronics: With all cable ducts shielded the total dose should be low enough to not expect particular problems Influence on commercial electronics (HV power supplies): To be determined. Multiple failures observed in the past but without clear correlation with beam presence

GTO SEB c-s measurement: ABB (5STH20H4502) vs. DYNEX (DG648BH45-185) Graphics representation of the measurement results: cosmic rays measurement at 4 kV and 3.4 kV with low statistics and hence low accuracy. Results at nominal voltage shows significant difference in SEB sensitivity of both GTO families – ABB being better and Dynex worse than claimed

Triggering IGBT SEB c-s measurement: IXYS IXDN75N120 vs. IXGN100N170