DOK as: A Mindset -and- Within the Context of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Advertisements

Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Round Table Discussion- Evaluating Arts Teachers William Kohut, Principal- Denver School of the Arts Dr. Mark Hudson- Director of Arts- Denver Public Schools.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Assessment Review and Design for Student Learning Outcomes.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Assessment Literacy Series
Student Learning Objectives A Guiding Framework for Selecting Student Assessments to Inform Educator Evaluation Student Learning Objectives Training Series.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
 Student Learning Objectives February 26, 2015 Work and Creation Session.
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
An Introduction and Results of a Field Test.  Julie Oxenford O’Brian  Director, Center for Transforming Learning and Teaching  Catalyzing and co-creating.
Student Learning Objectives Assessment Guidance for LEAs Student Learning Objectives Training Series.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
 Student Growth Goals & Plan KASA Conference July 17, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.
Student Learning Objectives Introduction Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 1 of 3.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
OTES AND TESTING AND BEARS… OH MY!!! WHAT IS HAPPENI NG?
The Professional Development Plan for License Renewal in Wisconsin Goal Writing Workshop.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
1 WI Educator Effectiveness System Understanding Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
EdTPA: Elementary Literacy
Write on sticky note, how you implemented the exit slip strategy. What does this tell you about your students?
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Colorado’s District Sample Curriculum Project History Colorado & TPS August 8, 2013.
Assessment Literacy and the Common Core Shifts. Why Be Assessment Literate? ED Test and Measurement 101 was a long time ago Assure students are being.
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS. Keys of Appraisal Student growth is a part of the appraisal process: Formative Ongoing and Timely Formalize what.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
ELA VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Common Core Transition Training SY May 6, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC)
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Student Learning Objectives Briana Timmerman, Ph.D. for Rinice Sauls.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
How Assessment Supports RTI2 and Closing the Achievement Gap
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
Common Core Standards Building Curriculum Units
Creating Common Assessments Part I: Item Development
Benchmark Assessment Update
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

DOK as: A Mindset -and- Within the Context of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

 All Licensed Educators; Variety of grade and content areas  Terminology Considerations  Content area/Grade level Tally and Grouping  Parking Lot  Depth of Knowledge (DOK)  DOK within the context of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)  Intended Outcomes: Participants will gain a basic understanding of DOK and its purpose as it applies to instructional practice, particularly within the framework of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Participants will have engaged in practice with rating academic goals with a DOK level Participants will gain a basic understanding of the purpose, structure, and benefits of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Participants will grasp the process of writing a Statement of Intended Learning for their own content area/grade level

 Overview  DOK within the context of the Colorado Academic Standards (CAS)  Item Examples and DOK

 PARCC / CMAS samples: m-task-prototypes m-task-prototypes “increased rigor; deeper understanding” High DOK in MC items is difficult but possible. See Scientific Literacy Handout.

 Handout: Samples of Goals for a Term  Please collaborate at your table/with your group (if applicable) and determine the DOK level of two goals (refer to DOK handouts if necessary)..and why Note: Consensus ideal but not required  Share out/Discussion of ratings

 Explanation of this type of goal (Statement of Intended Learning)  [5 min break?]

 Background/Purpose SB ; 50% Student Growth Pre-post concept; Assessment Collaboratives Aligned with the Teaching and Learning Cycle Provide flexibility and autonomy to their creators  Definition: Measurable instructional goals that are based on the academic standards and established for a specific group of students (usually a class) over a set period of time (usually a term)

 SLOs are NOT: a simple computation of pre-post assessment score differences; results based on only ONE measure or assessment instrument; an “add-on” for teachers engaged in effective teaching practices  Pilot  Components/Form

 Striving for Higher DOK levels should be a mindset that applies to the Teaching/Learning Cycle in general.  The DOK level of the Statement of Intended Learning in your SLO should be matched by the same level DOK for: Assessment (items; rubrics) Learning Targets (by default) Progress Monitoring (looking for evidence)

 Individually or with colleagues, write a first draft of a Statement of Intended Learning while referring to the CO Academic Standards. Keep in mind your intended level of DOK.  Following this session: You can submit for feedback but MUST include complete Standards reference and content/grade level information:

 We are developing PD for teachers in collaboration with Div. of Equity in Learning and Div. of Human Resources Linking QS 1-5 to QS 6 Linking Pacing Guides to Educator Effectiveness Implementation planning In-person trainings Screencasts SLO Bank  pte.aurorak12.org (our website)  thinking/ thinking/ (webinar on DOK)  (CDE Assessment Bank) Questions?